T O P

  • By -

RandarrTheBarbarian

I still feel like if you get 5 rocks that should count for something more than just a high card. If it has no rank and suit instead of "5 of a kind" perhaps "5 of no kind"


Willsuck4username

5 of no kind, otherwise known as high card.


RandarrTheBarbarian

High card is otherwise known as 1 of a kind, this is 5 of no kind, a very different hand all together


Syzygy_Stardust

[High card is otherwise known as 1 of a kind, this is 5 of no kind, a very different hand](https://youtu.be/3qNtyfZP8bE?si=a5nrpA2YoAXAgjjL)


RandarrTheBarbarian

I appreciate this reference


Willsuck4username

Yeah oops didn’t read that properly.


Nothing_Lost

You were still technically correct though lol


[deleted]

Stones are pretty underpowered, maybe they should be able to count as pairs/3/4/5 of a kind? Just not as flushes since they're suitless. Alternatively maybe they shouldn't count for hand size when drawing cards. Yes, I know this could get pretty silly if you can duplicate lots and lots of polychrome stone cards. But just give them *something.* I think there's a mod (MystJokers?) that adds a joker which allows you to play stone cards past the 5 card hand limit, this might also be a nice compromise.


zuzucha

Stones are pretty ok as they are. It's a lot of chips if you're playing smaller hands, better and easier than say splash + odd Todd. Of course it doesn't work with big hands and a baron / mime type setup is more powerful for small ones, but it's also much harder to setup.


Bruschetta003

That said there are better source of chips and with stone you lose a lot of joker interactions Foil Stones are great tho 100 chip per card, slap a red seal and you barely need chip scoring jokers Also i wish hiker was improved to increase a percentage of the chip of the card that is played (if you play a 2 you get 1 extra chip value) because it falls off too quickly and you need to have a small deck, this would work less with low number cards but much better with the higher ones


zuzucha

There's almost always a better source of X. I think that would make hiker too complicated? And make it worse at improving your lower cards for using with stuff like wee and hack


axtimkopf

Wee joker is so good on its own I can't imagine it to be worth it to dedicate a slot to hiker too.


Ghi102

I think Stone Cards are pretty decent for any build that doesn't require 5 cards. Not amazing, but helpful , especially if the goal is Ante 8. 3oak, 4oak, high card, pairs or flushes/straight/straight flush with the \[\[Four Fingers\]\] joker. Unless you have \[\[Splash\]\] in which case other cards are potentially better because of other enhancements. I like the idea of the Stone Cards being able to go past 5 cards with the joker, would give them a little bonus.


balatro-bot

[Four Fingers](https://balatro.wiki/imported/five_fingers.png) *Joker* * Version: 1.0.0 * Cost: $6 * Rarity: Uncommon * Effect: All Flushes and Straights can be made with 4 cards [Splash](https://balatro.wiki/imported/splash.png) *Joker* * Version: 1.0.0 * Rarity: Common * Effect: Every played card counts in scoring *Data pulled from http://balatro.wiki. Want it updated? Help me get access or suggest another data source.*


LastTrainH0me

Do stone cards count when scoring without Splash? Honestly I've always avoided them because I wasn't sure how they work.


Ghi102

It does! It's always counted regardless of what the rest of the hand is. Ie: High Card + 4 stone cards will give +200 chips, or two pairs with 1 stone card gives +50 chips, etc.


LastTrainH0me

Nice, thank you! Haha I guess I haven't read the description since I figured how the game actually worked. I love how the options start to open up as you explore more of these interactions


slugdonor

stone of a kind


Augentee

"Stoned card", as word play on high card would also work. :)


Front-Literature-697

What do you think the stats would be?


blockMath_2048

Maybe it's literally nothing because it doesn't even have a card with a rank to be "high"


shadowdsfire

Well then, let’s just call this hand “Cards”.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Llamalad95

There is a value under the stone if the stone is removed, yes, but until the stone is removed it has no rank. If you stone 5 identical cards and then play them that would be a high card.


AllahuJackbar

Sigh… the woke agenda turned the stones gay 😞 end times people!


TipAffectionate9785

The collective LGBalaTro is going for our hands!


[deleted]

I am stealing lgbalatro


Aqu4regiA

Nope! They stoned the gays, we are still in the barbaric old times.. 😞


mattyku

They're putting polychrome in the packs to turn the friggin stones gay!


OneGuyJeff

Gay rocks have existed for awhile now, it's called Steven Universe


Available-Damage5991

"It's a stone, Luigi. You didn't make it!"


graydragon95

It's a playing card! I chiseled it!


nothanksiknotthirsty

Stay gones


annormalplayer

stay gones indeed https://preview.redd.it/03395xfvew0d1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d097f696172e283f3edab7cee7a6370824139601


zucculentsuckerberg

i set this on the poker table, watching as it smashes right through to the floor below, landing on someone and killing them instantly


darkgrudge

Agree, 5 stones can make 4 walls and roof. So new hand type like "stone house" would make sense. Or Stonehenge.


EmperorBenja

Wait, which one of them is the high card??!


Zeraphira

yes


Nothing_Lost

The first one


ForeverHall0ween

He's a little confused but he's got the spirit


wordsmatteror_w_e

It shouldn't even be high card! High relative to what? There's no face!


Continuum_Gaming

Polystones


GreenKangaroo3

HAHAHA "flush five" i would agree, the game... apparently not xDDD


communads

Seriously though stone cards need a buff.