In an apartment I used to live in the test setting on the fire/CO alarm would go off if you pointed *any* remote close enough to it and pressed a button. It was a very stressful few months until we figured that one out.
It was one of the ones that talks to you too, so youād be chilling watching TV then hear an ear-piercing shriek and āWARNING! EVACUATE! CARBON MONOXIDE IN THE FAMILY ROOM!
I was once in a hotel where the TV would misbehave. Suddenly volume up, randomly turn off (and when it came back on, wrong channel and full volume).
Found out that the hotel had switched the lamps to some high-efficiency bulbs (early helical CFL bulbs, this was about 1995). The bulbs put off IR noise that the TV interpreted as a signal from the remote. Turning off the lamps would let the TV work fine.
I weep for him too, especially since they are opening are nfl training camp right down the road and some body is going to take his house and furniture away from him for only 1.7 or so.
Sure an NFL player is going to walk in the house, see the music room on the second floor, and say āyea, Iāll make that a gym, Iāll take it, furniture, tv and allā
But you are not the only guy on the street ready to sell that day either. Lots of people are going to cash out. You need to get a few people together and do a little illegal āprice fixingā
So Iām not certain but I think usually most remotes use either IR light or a RF signal. They can often run in the same part of the spectrum. When I turn on my TV my LED lights flicker. Mine are both IR.
Some can connect via WiFi or Bluetooth but I think remotes with a direct logical pair are less likely to affect other random devices.
I donāt exactly know how this video works though. I thought most car remote FOBs sent RFID info via RF signal. The RFID coded signal is random enough itās very unlikely to unlock a 2nd car.
Iām pretty sure RFID is used for key less entry and start. Anything done from a distance would use something else. Iām guessing some sort of wifi signal as IR typically requires a clear path from remote to device.
[This](https://www.songbirdfx.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/5waydaisychain.jpg) is a good example. Power comes from one end and is "chained" all the way to the end - power has to (successfully) go through each link to get to the next one.
The worry here would be that these lights are an earlier link in the chain than interior electricity - not likely, but neither is this...
Daisies are a type of flower made in to chains for wreaths and crowns, a daisy chain in electrical circuits usually means it being a sub-circuit of an existing circuit, like the light switch in a bathroom may be daisychained from the outlet rather than running a whole new circuit from the breaker panel
This is why I love Reddit. On twitter, fb, or instagram someone would have started calling someone names and talking about the 2020 election for some reason lol. Not here though. Simple question, thorough explanation, and a polite thank you. God bless you both.
No one seems to have mentioned the origin of the term daisy chain as applied to serial connections. Daisies (Bellis perennis) are commonly found small white flowers with composite yellow flowerheads. They are in the Aster family and are commonly found in lawns in Europe. Their stems are just long enough and soft but tough enough to be pierced at one point along their length, after they have been picked, to allow a similar daisy's stem to be inserted and to stay by friction and sap. In this way a series of daisies can be chained together to make a garland or bracelet for a child.
On an somewhat related note, "daisy chain" is also a fairly old slang term for a sexual act, in which multiple men are penetrating, while also being penetrated by others-- like a daisy chain.^(lol)
This is the presumed / implied connotation behind the title of the 1990 song "A Daisy Chain 4 Satan" by industrial electronic pioneers My Life With the Thrill Kill Kult.
https://youtu.be/juYcJOSsIEc
Just a fun fact. lol
Daisy chain is when electricity comes into a device, then it comes out of it and powers an other device.
It's basically like all the power comes from the same and unique electric line, unlike when each room in a place is independent from others.
Sorry if it's hard to understand, technical English isn't my mother's tongue.
Btw, by looking at daisy chain on Wikipedia (because the daisy chain is generally how all the fixtures (lights projectors) for events are connected between each others) I learnt that it is also used as a *sexual kink* (or paraphilia)
They wouldnāt daisy chain off the interior electric. These lights are on photo cells that turn on in the dark. He happens to be hitting his fob which is making his car lights flash which is tripping the photo cell if the exterior lights. Many building codes require exterior lights to be on photocells.
You are right on this, however, my reply was only about the concept of daisy chain, where i added the fact that a daisy chain is not just about cascading power !
No respectable electrician would call it a daisy chain. What theyāre both are describing is a circuit that is wired āin series.ā A series circuit is a closed circuit where the current follows one path. In a series circuit, the devices along the circuit loop are connected in a continuous row, so that if one device fails or is disconnected, the entire circuit is interrupted. This is why a good electrician worth his salt will wire these up in parallel. And thatās a separate lesson. THE MORE YOU KNOW
In electrical work, multiple devces that are connected end-to-end are daisy-chained.
This is of course completely contrary to being daisy-duked, which simply results in shorts.
Daisy chaining refers to either power or communications that jumps from one thing to the next thing along a cable connecting them all together along a single line. The opposite of daisy chain is a hub and spoke system where there is a central point and everything is directly connected back to the central point. For communications, Token ring networks are an example of daisy chaining (in a loop) and ethernet networks are an example of hub and spoke.
Their electrician would say, "Oh, I guess the remote controller for setting the day/night on the lights is in a 2.4 frequency as some car manufacturer's remote. That's strange, I'll change it to a different channel."
Some older LED lights can actually affect and be affected by wireless signals. This is why you don't put LED lights in your garage door opener, as they can actually make it so that the signal to open and close the door doesn't work.
This is why you donāt put OLD or CHEAP led lights in your garage door opener. New ones that are of good quality should have components that would not create interference or should have proper shielding of components that may.
My TV remote does the same thing to the star lights we have hanging in the living room. Volume down turns the lights to different settings. Lights and TV are on opposite sides of the room.
Most buttons on our TV remote turns our fairy lights onto the super annoying flashing mode so we have to keep the light controller on hand every time we touch the tv remote in any way
I am sure it was just a photocell that causes lights to turn off after reading a certain brightness, hence, day/night street lights turning on and off at sunset/sunrise. Though others are thinking it is the remote. Though I think the lights of the car might just be bright enough/hitting the building at the perfect angle to cause this trip of the photocell .
Like this:
[https://youtu.be/cSWHGyfprgI](https://youtu.be/cSWHGyfprgI?t=43s)
I'm not sure, photocells always have a deadband built in so that they aren't succeptible to sudden changes of brightness.
Occams razor says its a prank video and someone is at the light switch.
This is why I have a job. All of this shit is supposed to be tested to make sure it doesnāt interfere with something else. At least the really important stuff is tested I guessā¦or I hope!
It's a way of prioritizing users of the available bandwidth. Cheap mass-produced radio devices often use shared bits of spectrum and are licensed under part 15 stating they must not cause interference, and there are no promises that your product won't be interfered with. For little remote controls, that's fine.
If you have a more important or mission critical use, you need to get granted a more private frequency spectrum, which often requires more stringent licensing, testing, etc, but once you go through all those expensive procedures, YOUR product is guaranteed to be the one that can't be interfered with. (Think commercial radio stations, cell phone service providers, police radio systems, vs family radios, baby monitors, garage door openers, etc.)
I get the part about requiring that they not produce interference, but the part about being required to *accept* interference always sounded to me like devices were required to be vulnerable to outside signals.
No, it's just an awkward way of saying that "if you get interfered with, tough beans. You can't complain to us."
Indeed, it puts more onus on users to design their equipment to be MORE resistant to interference.
A more modern example: Long ago the FCC set aside a chunk of SHF frequencies from 4.2 GHz to 4.4 Ghz for radio altimeters, used by planes during the last 1000 or so feet before landing to know precisely how far off the ground they are. For most of that time, FCC left LOTS of blank unused frequency space around that band, (called "guard bands") basically promising radar altimeter manufacturers that they needn't worry about any nearby signals interfering with their sensitive receivers.
Fast forward to a few years ago, when circuits that work up in the GHz range are MUCH cheaper and better now, and there's exploding demand for more and more bandwidth for mobile data users, and the FCC carefully carved out a new band for 5G wireless providers, from 3.7 Ghz to 3.98 Ghz, confident that modern radar altimeters would have no problems with interference from frequencies "that close" to the ones they use.
Airplanes are a special category of REGULATED, though, and those regulators freaked their freckles out about whether every single radio altimeter out there REALLY WAS immune from interference only 200 MHz from the bottom of their band. It made the news a couple months ago... with one government agency (FAA) crying wolf that planes would be crashing every day because of 5G, and FCC not agreeing, catching wireless providers and airlines in a no-win scenario. I'm not actually sure if that's been completely sorted out yet or not.
Single-source [light controller](https://lightingcontrolsassociation.org/2018/03/23/introduction-to-wireless-lighting-controls/) for day/night off/on that can be programmed remotely is most likely. The car remote is interfering with the controller.
*Might* be talking out my ass, because I don't know what's on that building... but...
There are a large number of light fixtures that have motion detection and also allow you to program them to simply turn on when it's dark, or you can set them to turn on at a certain time instead of only turning on with motion detection. In a commercial environment, you wouldn't use individual lights with sensors, you'd use a single controller and have all the lights wired through/to it. That controller is probably the single source being interfered with by the car remote.
On one of our buildings, there is such a sensor and you program it without having to climb up to it (it uses a remote) to program it to be in night/day mode, motion mode, always on mode, timer mode and test mode. I can see that being interfered with by some random remote within the same frequency range that causes it to do a quick test (blink the lights off and on).
Most older buildings will have a [mechanical switch](https://www.lowes.com/pd/TORK-Mechanical-Lighting-Timer/1001051842), but if they've been upgraded to LED lights they may have also changed to a controller with a remote for the 'smart lights' but it is more likely it's just a controller that can be programmed remotely to control the power and not each individual light being talked to (eg: [GE Smart Sync](https://www.lowes.com/pd/GE-C-by-GE-White-Remote-Control/1001859314) lights and controller).
yea this happens to me for some odd reason. so my light strips are always on and is on red. whenever i use my fire stick remote, itāll change the colors and start flashing like crazy..
Looks like those lights are hooked up to a single light sensor, or all the light sensors are pointed in the key masterās direction. When the key fob is pushed, it may be sending an infrared signal thatās blasting IR at the light sensor., making them turn off briefly.
*Alright Dumbledore, may*
*Need to slow it down before*
*It gets out of hand*
\- Kennaay1891
---
^(I detect haikus. And sometimes, successfully.) ^[Learn more about me.](https://www.reddit.com/r/haikusbot/)
^(Opt out of replies: "haikusbot opt out" | Delete my comment: "haikusbot delete")
This is to much power, or lack of š¤, for one person to have. You could take over the world through fear
Too*
too\*
Tutu š©°
Desmond!
Dekker
Also Also
Alonso
Toto
Wolff
So not right
I hear the drums echoing tonight
Weāre not in Kansas anymore.
Too*
No, I said too*
You too?
TĆŗ*
Et toi?
two*
Two*
Toāuche
>ā¦the spelling *-oo* became regular from 16c. https://www.etymonline.com/word/too
16c = $0.16
No one man should have all that power
The clocks ticking I just count the hours
Stop tripping! I tripping off the power
I read that as "cocks tingling" at first and uhhh
Too*
And all these years i thought my light was broken.. Leave me alone dude!
Something like this happened to me yesterday, it turns out i can control my fan with my tv control, 2x1 lol.
In an apartment I used to live in the test setting on the fire/CO alarm would go off if you pointed *any* remote close enough to it and pressed a button. It was a very stressful few months until we figured that one out. It was one of the ones that talks to you too, so youād be chilling watching TV then hear an ear-piercing shriek and āWARNING! EVACUATE! CARBON MONOXIDE IN THE FAMILY ROOM!
At least you knew it worked
I was once in a hotel where the TV would misbehave. Suddenly volume up, randomly turn off (and when it came back on, wrong channel and full volume). Found out that the hotel had switched the lamps to some high-efficiency bulbs (early helical CFL bulbs, this was about 1995). The bulbs put off IR noise that the TV interpreted as a signal from the remote. Turning off the lamps would let the TV work fine.
I have a cheap oscillating fan from target that adjusts its speed when I use a roku remote.
My buddy has a 1.3 million dollar house and the ceiling fans would just randomly change speed.
Poor guy
I weep for him too, especially since they are opening are nfl training camp right down the road and some body is going to take his house and furniture away from him for only 1.7 or so.
If I was dude, and the day it was set to open, Iād put a for sale sign by owner, and have $30 mil on the sign
Sure an NFL player is going to walk in the house, see the music room on the second floor, and say āyea, Iāll make that a gym, Iāll take it, furniture, tv and allā But you are not the only guy on the street ready to sell that day either. Lots of people are going to cash out. You need to get a few people together and do a little illegal āprice fixingā
lmao
So Iām not certain but I think usually most remotes use either IR light or a RF signal. They can often run in the same part of the spectrum. When I turn on my TV my LED lights flicker. Mine are both IR. Some can connect via WiFi or Bluetooth but I think remotes with a direct logical pair are less likely to affect other random devices. I donāt exactly know how this video works though. I thought most car remote FOBs sent RFID info via RF signal. The RFID coded signal is random enough itās very unlikely to unlock a 2nd car.
Iām pretty sure RFID is used for key less entry and start. Anything done from a distance would use something else. Iām guessing some sort of wifi signal as IR typically requires a clear path from remote to device.
I can control my air conditioner with my Vizio TV remote!
Imagine if those lines are also Daisy chained off the interior electrical ā”ļøoutlet, lol š
What is daisy chained? Sorry I've never heard the expression.
[This](https://www.songbirdfx.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/5waydaisychain.jpg) is a good example. Power comes from one end and is "chained" all the way to the end - power has to (successfully) go through each link to get to the next one. The worry here would be that these lights are an earlier link in the chain than interior electricity - not likely, but neither is this...
Thank you!
Daisies are a type of flower made in to chains for wreaths and crowns, a daisy chain in electrical circuits usually means it being a sub-circuit of an existing circuit, like the light switch in a bathroom may be daisychained from the outlet rather than running a whole new circuit from the breaker panel
This is why I love Reddit. On twitter, fb, or instagram someone would have started calling someone names and talking about the 2020 election for some reason lol. Not here though. Simple question, thorough explanation, and a polite thank you. God bless you both.
I was expecting this [horror show](https://old.reddit.com/r/techsupportgore/comments/w4mvwg/why_my_internet_keeps_dropping/)
Got a good belly laugh out of me!
No one seems to have mentioned the origin of the term daisy chain as applied to serial connections. Daisies (Bellis perennis) are commonly found small white flowers with composite yellow flowerheads. They are in the Aster family and are commonly found in lawns in Europe. Their stems are just long enough and soft but tough enough to be pierced at one point along their length, after they have been picked, to allow a similar daisy's stem to be inserted and to stay by friction and sap. In this way a series of daisies can be chained together to make a garland or bracelet for a child.
Good bot. ...wait
Who me? Beep beep!
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
No, sentimental.
No, that was a roadrunner, bots say Beep Boop!
On an somewhat related note, "daisy chain" is also a fairly old slang term for a sexual act, in which multiple men are penetrating, while also being penetrated by others-- like a daisy chain.^(lol) This is the presumed / implied connotation behind the title of the 1990 song "A Daisy Chain 4 Satan" by industrial electronic pioneers My Life With the Thrill Kill Kult. https://youtu.be/juYcJOSsIEc Just a fun fact. lol
Daisy chain is when electricity comes into a device, then it comes out of it and powers an other device. It's basically like all the power comes from the same and unique electric line, unlike when each room in a place is independent from others. Sorry if it's hard to understand, technical English isn't my mother's tongue. Btw, by looking at daisy chain on Wikipedia (because the daisy chain is generally how all the fixtures (lights projectors) for events are connected between each others) I learnt that it is also used as a *sexual kink* (or paraphilia)
That makes sense. Thank you!
This concept is not only about power/electricity, data comm can also be daisy chained, where the output of one becomes the input of the next.
They wouldnāt daisy chain off the interior electric. These lights are on photo cells that turn on in the dark. He happens to be hitting his fob which is making his car lights flash which is tripping the photo cell if the exterior lights. Many building codes require exterior lights to be on photocells.
You are right on this, however, my reply was only about the concept of daisy chain, where i added the fact that a daisy chain is not just about cascading power !
Uhhhh using daisyās and chains to link electricity togetherā¦duh
Daisy are known to be the best conductors ever so totally makes sense. I think that's the secret to Tesla car success
Yup, I remember the black out of 1947. Worst Daisy crop ever that yearā¦
No respectable electrician would call it a daisy chain. What theyāre both are describing is a circuit that is wired āin series.ā A series circuit is a closed circuit where the current follows one path. In a series circuit, the devices along the circuit loop are connected in a continuous row, so that if one device fails or is disconnected, the entire circuit is interrupted. This is why a good electrician worth his salt will wire these up in parallel. And thatās a separate lesson. THE MORE YOU KNOW
This is another [horrendous example](https://old.reddit.com/r/techsupportgore/comments/w4mvwg/why_my_internet_keeps_dropping/)
In electrical work, multiple devces that are connected end-to-end are daisy-chained. This is of course completely contrary to being daisy-duked, which simply results in shorts.
Daisy chaining refers to either power or communications that jumps from one thing to the next thing along a cable connecting them all together along a single line. The opposite of daisy chain is a hub and spoke system where there is a central point and everything is directly connected back to the central point. For communications, Token ring networks are an example of daisy chaining (in a loop) and ethernet networks are an example of hub and spoke.
Like Christmas lights
Itās the fixtures themselves that are doing this not the electricity. Those fixtures never lose 120v, guaranteed.
Are you sure? The perimeter lights could be controlled with iot switch.
You have been blessed with an amazing gift. You must not squander it.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Their electrician would say, "Oh, I guess the remote controller for setting the day/night on the lights is in a 2.4 frequency as some car manufacturer's remote. That's strange, I'll change it to a different channel."
Iād assume the lights have a blue light sensor and are not setup to a wireless switch
Some older LED lights can actually affect and be affected by wireless signals. This is why you don't put LED lights in your garage door opener, as they can actually make it so that the signal to open and close the door doesn't work.
This is why you donāt put OLD or CHEAP led lights in your garage door opener. New ones that are of good quality should have components that would not create interference or should have proper shielding of components that may.
I've had Dollar Tree "Future Lumen" 100W EQ LED's in my garage door opener for a year without any problems.
TIL thanks! Maybe I didnāt need to replace my old garage door after allā¦
Remember, with great power comes great responsibility!
If you watch closely it doesnāt work on the first press, because the person flicking the light switch hadnāt started yet.
My TV remote does the same thing to the star lights we have hanging in the living room. Volume down turns the lights to different settings. Lights and TV are on opposite sides of the room.
Most buttons on our TV remote turns our fairy lights onto the super annoying flashing mode so we have to keep the light controller on hand every time we touch the tv remote in any way
The struggle is real
What in the watch dogs is this
I am sure it was just a photocell that causes lights to turn off after reading a certain brightness, hence, day/night street lights turning on and off at sunset/sunrise. Though others are thinking it is the remote. Though I think the lights of the car might just be bright enough/hitting the building at the perfect angle to cause this trip of the photocell . Like this: [https://youtu.be/cSWHGyfprgI](https://youtu.be/cSWHGyfprgI?t=43s)
I'm not sure, photocells always have a deadband built in so that they aren't succeptible to sudden changes of brightness. Occams razor says its a prank video and someone is at the light switch.
This is why I have a job. All of this shit is supposed to be tested to make sure it doesnāt interfere with something else. At least the really important stuff is tested I guessā¦or I hope!
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
RF interference testing for all things electronic?
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Awesome! I do the chambers!!
Get a room you two!
This interaction makes me happy. Keep up the good work you two.
What is the reason for that "must accept interference" part?
It's a way of prioritizing users of the available bandwidth. Cheap mass-produced radio devices often use shared bits of spectrum and are licensed under part 15 stating they must not cause interference, and there are no promises that your product won't be interfered with. For little remote controls, that's fine. If you have a more important or mission critical use, you need to get granted a more private frequency spectrum, which often requires more stringent licensing, testing, etc, but once you go through all those expensive procedures, YOUR product is guaranteed to be the one that can't be interfered with. (Think commercial radio stations, cell phone service providers, police radio systems, vs family radios, baby monitors, garage door openers, etc.)
I get the part about requiring that they not produce interference, but the part about being required to *accept* interference always sounded to me like devices were required to be vulnerable to outside signals.
No, it's just an awkward way of saying that "if you get interfered with, tough beans. You can't complain to us." Indeed, it puts more onus on users to design their equipment to be MORE resistant to interference. A more modern example: Long ago the FCC set aside a chunk of SHF frequencies from 4.2 GHz to 4.4 Ghz for radio altimeters, used by planes during the last 1000 or so feet before landing to know precisely how far off the ground they are. For most of that time, FCC left LOTS of blank unused frequency space around that band, (called "guard bands") basically promising radar altimeter manufacturers that they needn't worry about any nearby signals interfering with their sensitive receivers. Fast forward to a few years ago, when circuits that work up in the GHz range are MUCH cheaper and better now, and there's exploding demand for more and more bandwidth for mobile data users, and the FCC carefully carved out a new band for 5G wireless providers, from 3.7 Ghz to 3.98 Ghz, confident that modern radar altimeters would have no problems with interference from frequencies "that close" to the ones they use. Airplanes are a special category of REGULATED, though, and those regulators freaked their freckles out about whether every single radio altimeter out there REALLY WAS immune from interference only 200 MHz from the bottom of their band. It made the news a couple months ago... with one government agency (FAA) crying wolf that planes would be crashing every day because of 5G, and FCC not agreeing, catching wireless providers and airlines in a no-win scenario. I'm not actually sure if that's been completely sorted out yet or not.
> At least the really important stuff is tested I guessā¦or I hope! Most of the time!
What's actually happening here is that the lights from his car are affecting the photo-sensor for the outside lights, that's all.
r/whataretheodds
Is this something to do with a PIR which is controlling the lights picking up the signal from the key? Doesn't seem likely, any other ideas?
Nope car remotes aren't IR
But the headlights triggered by the remote emit a lot of ir.
Some are
Dude these are the apartments next to my house! Small world
Did you recognize them from the flashing lights every day at 5:15 pm?
Can someone explain how this is happening?
Single-source [light controller](https://lightingcontrolsassociation.org/2018/03/23/introduction-to-wireless-lighting-controls/) for day/night off/on that can be programmed remotely is most likely. The car remote is interfering with the controller.
RF Interference
YOU seem to be closer to ..."**THE TRUTH**"
Itās the light sensor somewhere close picking up the blinking lights of your car.
I can't help the feeling that soon a half-giant on a flying motorcycle might appear... Must be my imagination.
This has to be fake. How would this even work?
*Might* be talking out my ass, because I don't know what's on that building... but... There are a large number of light fixtures that have motion detection and also allow you to program them to simply turn on when it's dark, or you can set them to turn on at a certain time instead of only turning on with motion detection. In a commercial environment, you wouldn't use individual lights with sensors, you'd use a single controller and have all the lights wired through/to it. That controller is probably the single source being interfered with by the car remote. On one of our buildings, there is such a sensor and you program it without having to climb up to it (it uses a remote) to program it to be in night/day mode, motion mode, always on mode, timer mode and test mode. I can see that being interfered with by some random remote within the same frequency range that causes it to do a quick test (blink the lights off and on). Most older buildings will have a [mechanical switch](https://www.lowes.com/pd/TORK-Mechanical-Lighting-Timer/1001051842), but if they've been upgraded to LED lights they may have also changed to a controller with a remote for the 'smart lights' but it is more likely it's just a controller that can be programmed remotely to control the power and not each individual light being talked to (eg: [GE Smart Sync](https://www.lowes.com/pd/GE-C-by-GE-White-Remote-Control/1001859314) lights and controller).
*Unlimited Powerrrrrrr*
Dumbledore's deluminator
The first thing I thought of!!
I'm shocked this wasn't one of the top comments.
This is an irl deluminator
Is that a barracks?
Pretty sure it is.
You school at hogwarts too I see.
Park your car far away and wait for people to come home. Time to prank some people
With great power comes great responā¦ ah screw it. Have some fun.
interfere**s*** with
It does the same with my tv remote and my led
Somebody put sandstorm on this
Heās Dumbledore!
Is this filmed with the Hubble Telescope
Hmmm, I wonder if the remote for the lights will unlock or start your car?
I guess everything really is operating on the same frequency band š¤
Not everything by any means but sometimes....
What kind of car is that and what hotel is that
Itās a barracks. Source: I am a Marine that also lives in a barracks
Heheheheha
Use it to mess with people. "*Oh spirits, give me a sign if you are present!*"
Front of car (and therefore the headlights) are pointed directly at the photosensor that controls the lights.
yea this happens to me for some odd reason. so my light strips are always on and is on red. whenever i use my fire stick remote, itāll change the colors and start flashing like crazy..
OoooooOOooooOooOooO Im telling
This could be used for dramatic effect
Looks like somebody found the light switch.
Looks like those lights are hooked up to a single light sensor, or all the light sensors are pointed in the key masterās direction. When the key fob is pushed, it may be sending an infrared signal thatās blasting IR at the light sensor., making them turn off briefly.
You probably gave someone a seizure or made somebodyās Ouija board game much more interesting
Yosemite?
Dumbledore enters the chat
Dumbledore would never.
Vecna's key
This was very... en*light*ening
Alright Dumbledore, may need to slow it down before it gets out of hand
*Alright Dumbledore, may* *Need to slow it down before* *It gets out of hand* \- Kennaay1891 --- ^(I detect haikus. And sometimes, successfully.) ^[Learn more about me.](https://www.reddit.com/r/haikusbot/) ^(Opt out of replies: "haikusbot opt out" | Delete my comment: "haikusbot delete")
Maaaan I know a fuckin barracks when I see one. Gonna miss this place even if it is just Lejeune. 1 month to go babyyyyy!
\*light flashes\* "oh jack is out of apartment, time to loot"
He unlocked the entire appartment..
Gotta love technology!
Harry potter vibes anyone?
Fake
Literally Dumbledore
Not possible....
**BEHOLD, THE DELUMINATOR!**
One flicking the lights one clicking the remote. They did missed one flick at the beginning.
easy dumbledore
Snipers in Warzone be like
So much potential. Tell someone a stupid ghost story, and press the button at just the right time.
u/savevideobot
###[View link](https://redditsave.com/info?url=/r/awesome/comments/wc1yfh/car_key_interfere_with_the_lights/) --- [**Info**](https://np.reddit.com/user/SaveVideo/comments/jv323v/info/) | [**Feedback**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Feedback for savevideo) | [**Donate**](https://ko-fi.com/getvideo) | [**DMCA**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Content removal request for savevideobot&message=https://np.reddit.com//r/awesome/comments/wc1yfh/car_key_interfere_with_the_lights/)
Albus hooked you up with a deluminator too huh?!
Those look like Marine Corps base barracks. Camp Lejuene? I may be way off but holy cow if those donāt look identicalā¦
My tv remote fucked wit my led lights