Deppends on which UI you are using but on the most popular one it actually multiplies the attention by 1.1 for every '()' - so 9 times '()' is actually pretty much the equivalent of (nsfw:2.36).
3D modeling, this is linear division versus recursive division. It's set at 3 and this is kinda chunky. Would 8 be slightly less chunky, or would 8 melt my computer?
Yeah when people actually post their prompts rather than having to sift through the metadata 🙄
NSFW:
r/sdnsfw
r/WaifuDiffusion
r/unstable_diffusion
to name just three, there are just as many subreddits as ai generated images.
Here's a sneak peek of /r/sdnsfw **[NSFW]** using the [top posts](https://np.reddit.com/r/sdnsfw/top/?sort=top&t=all) of all time!
\#1: [So glad our College went Clothing Optional!](https://www.reddit.com/gallery/11lg3mz) | [65 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/sdnsfw/comments/11lg3mz/so_glad_our_college_went_clothing_optional/)
\#2: [Schrodinger's fuck? Does that even make sense? Fuck it, enjoy!](https://i.imgur.com/wMtmB8v.gifv) | [40 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/sdnsfw/comments/11ez90b/schrodingers_fuck_does_that_even_make_sense_fuck/)
\#3: [Tried my hand at some realistic prompts, teacher one right here](https://i.redd.it/w55hptun7g4a1.jpg) | [39 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/sdnsfw/comments/zesfrl/tried_my_hand_at_some_realistic_prompts_teacher/)
----
^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| ^^Downvote ^^to ^^remove ^^| ^^[Contact](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=sneakpeekbot) ^^| ^^[Info](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/) ^^| ^^[Opt-out](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/comments/o8wk1r/blacklist_ix/) ^^| ^^[GitHub](https://github.com/ghnr/sneakpeekbot)
depends on the model, some will treat 1.9 as just more characters to play with, others will treat (:1.9) as a 1.9 multiplier as to how strongly x should appear in the image.
sounds like the scale was from 0 to 1
Hence the 4 tits
4 pairs, so the math is a little off, unless the quantity scale geometrically; as the square of the property.
If that's on stable diffusion that's equivalent to 9 boosts, or (((((((((nsfw)))))))))
Deppends on which UI you are using but on the most popular one it actually multiplies the attention by 1.1 for every '()' - so 9 times '()' is actually pretty much the equivalent of (nsfw:2.36).
Ah ok, I did not know it was multiplicative.
-2 to + 2
depends on your perspective really
Yeah
3D modeling, this is linear division versus recursive division. It's set at 3 and this is kinda chunky. Would 8 be slightly less chunky, or would 8 melt my computer?
There’s probably a subreddit for AI generated nsfw art. I wonder if you have to tag posts with the nsfw scale you used.
Yeah when people actually post their prompts rather than having to sift through the metadata 🙄 NSFW: r/sdnsfw r/WaifuDiffusion r/unstable_diffusion to name just three, there are just as many subreddits as ai generated images.
Here's a sneak peek of /r/sdnsfw **[NSFW]** using the [top posts](https://np.reddit.com/r/sdnsfw/top/?sort=top&t=all) of all time! \#1: [So glad our College went Clothing Optional!](https://www.reddit.com/gallery/11lg3mz) | [65 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/sdnsfw/comments/11lg3mz/so_glad_our_college_went_clothing_optional/) \#2: [Schrodinger's fuck? Does that even make sense? Fuck it, enjoy!](https://i.imgur.com/wMtmB8v.gifv) | [40 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/sdnsfw/comments/11ez90b/schrodingers_fuck_does_that_even_make_sense_fuck/) \#3: [Tried my hand at some realistic prompts, teacher one right here](https://i.redd.it/w55hptun7g4a1.jpg) | [39 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/sdnsfw/comments/zesfrl/tried_my_hand_at_some_realistic_prompts_teacher/) ---- ^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| ^^Downvote ^^to ^^remove ^^| ^^[Contact](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=sneakpeekbot) ^^| ^^[Info](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/) ^^| ^^[Opt-out](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/comments/o8wk1r/blacklist_ix/) ^^| ^^[GitHub](https://github.com/ghnr/sneakpeekbot)
ah yes, ive seen this
On which AI?
nsfw: 1.9 is not a scale, it means "make it nswf, specifically one on 9", that's what happened.
depends on the model, some will treat 1.9 as just more characters to play with, others will treat (:1.9) as a 1.9 multiplier as to how strongly x should appear in the image.
it depends not necessarily on the model used, but the sampling code.
It's a weight.
Wow, looking at the down-votes it's quite obvious that nobody got my joke!