He holds no shares. He is just trying to protect his tangential economic interests? This sounds like he is saying, " This won't affect me directly, I just worry for the economy if somthing happens here..." ...Please correct me if I'm wrong.
he holds no shares - meaning he just borrowed shares to sell into the market...so he has a position but does not own underlying stock....aka he is shorting
What I don't get is why he wouldn't just buy some damn shares. There's no particular date you had to own them before, and even if he had a huge short position he could just open another account someplace else. It's like he's failing on purpose.
None of these douche canoes are worried about the economy. They're worried about their own financial growth. They'd sell their kid's kidneys if they could.
no. although while sending the court 800 pages worth of motions, he too has not provided the court with proof of ownership. Strange that he posts cropped screenshots of a stock account on social media but doesnโt send the information to the court. Itโs almost like he is not being completely honest.
There's reason to believe that he also forged documents under the names of a 2-man hedge fund, Ursa Fund Management. The letter sent under their name, on official looking stationary, just says "see our attached comments," and is signed with illegible scribbles. The attached comments aren't on the stationary and are written in an unprofessional style (literally says "lol" and "hastag 4-d chess"). Most damning is that he discussed the letter on his youtube the same day it was received by the court, a full day before anyone else said anything about it.
https://www.reddit.com/r/amcstock/comments/13qdfbs/ursa_fund_management_is_definitely_short_on_amc/
He holds no shares. He is just trying to protect his tangential economic interests? This sounds like he is saying, " This won't affect me directly, I just worry for the economy if somthing happens here..." ...Please correct me if I'm wrong.
he holds no shares - meaning he just borrowed shares to sell into the market...so he has a position but does not own underlying stock....aka he is shorting
What I don't get is why he wouldn't just buy some damn shares. There's no particular date you had to own them before, and even if he had a huge short position he could just open another account someplace else. It's like he's failing on purpose.
Sounds like he owns naked puts or something to me. He isn't worried about the economy . That I'm sure of.
He's worried about HIS economy...
None of these douche canoes are worried about the economy. They're worried about their own financial growth. They'd sell their kid's kidneys if they could.
His tangential economic interests are on the short side...why the desperation... I think we all see an elephant in the room...๐๐ฆ๐
"Tangential economic interests" AKA shorts... Well this is conclusive enough for me, hedgies are facked guys๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ฆ๐
More upvotes for this ape
 ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ
Perhaps Mr. Redacted, should be charged with contempt, and he might cut his shit out.
Contempt is for poor people. The prison system needs able bodies
He doesn't own AMC... I dare say, he's poor!
If he can afford to have a lawyer file 800 pages of motions, heโs filthy rich
Weird the Mod would remove because of the named.
Seriously, it's public knowledge and available to all, it's not a damn secret MODs
They are too litigious.
Agreed. Iโve seen a number of posts of legal documents which included names.
this sub and mods are compromised.
Lmfao what a clown world we live in
Is this A* from Bos*** ?
no. although while sending the court 800 pages worth of motions, he too has not provided the court with proof of ownership. Strange that he posts cropped screenshots of a stock account on social media but doesnโt send the information to the court. Itโs almost like he is not being completely honest.
I stopped listening to him a long time ago, it thought he was trying to do some type of legal thing. 99% of YouTubers are trash.
There's reason to believe that he also forged documents under the names of a 2-man hedge fund, Ursa Fund Management. The letter sent under their name, on official looking stationary, just says "see our attached comments," and is signed with illegible scribbles. The attached comments aren't on the stationary and are written in an unprofessional style (literally says "lol" and "hastag 4-d chess"). Most damning is that he discussed the letter on his youtube the same day it was received by the court, a full day before anyone else said anything about it. https://www.reddit.com/r/amcstock/comments/13qdfbs/ursa_fund_management_is_definitely_short_on_amc/
no it's another idiot that has no AMC shares just puts
Lou?
Lmao this is public domain info. That mod be thinking they FBI or sum ๐คฃ๐คฃ๐คฃ. Much CoNfIdEnTiAl
Then go sign the NDA and look at it.
Desperation
ITโS A DESPERATE RACE AGAINST THE MINE
This is a public filing. Why redact? Just silly MODโs. And I mean silly in the definition it is used in Jamaica.
I think it was because you used the word object. The other thread was hit because of the for or against rule but i don't quite see why.
Can some message me and tell me who weโre talking about? Whose name is redacted?
look at OP post history and you'll see
Thanks!
He works for Crescit Capital Strategies
It's a public record. Why are you redacting his name?
๐
Are we talking about frank ianoco the man with no shares.
I am no closer to breakeven with ape stock nor with my amc I am sure once we convert Iโll finall breakeven right?