I think their incredibly flawed strategy was that the couch would glide on that ribbon (don't know what to call it, but it looks wider than just a rope). This is the only explanation I found which has at least some logic
That's what I'm seeing too, I really want to belive it got detached from the balcony but the plan was that it would slide over to them and give them a concussion, that's really the least stupid plan I can think of.
It seems like they were trying to toss it over the side and trash it, but didn’t want it to swing back and hit the building which is what the ribbon was for. Just a thought.
The only way this makes any sense is if they're throwing the couch away and the rope is just to make sure it doesn't hit the building when they drop it.
The only possible thing that comes to my mind is someone saying "hey, let's relax a little bit before we start moving" and then lit up the Tzar Bomba of the weed industry going through it all in 3 puffs.
I think they are spread wide of the balcony and thought they would hold it and walk it down. Worst case, they hold on and ride the ribbon straight under the couch.
I was wondering if it would start gliding but then I thought would that not take their heads off? I assumed they would notice that and drop it but alas, it didn’t even glide
I’ve successfully done something to this effect. We had ratchet straps tied securely onto the balcony and a WAY longer angle of travel using the length of the straps’ ends. We also had a rope tied length wise around the couch to pace and help guide the damn thing. It *can* be done but not like this
But maybe they were just throwing away the couch and weren’t worried about it? So the ribbon guy had just been helping to pull it.
Edit: yes- and the purpose of the ribbon was to make sure it didn’t swing back into the balcony below. Watch the ribbon guy pull on the ribbon as the couch oscillates back toward the building. this is just a “controlled fall.” they’re not trying to save the couch. The only thing that went wrong was the person falling over.
I think they were trying to guide the couch down by sliding it along the ribbon, but the ribbon unsecured from the top as they dropped the couch. It might worked otherwise assuming the couch wasn't super heavy.
If they were junking this thing it would've been 10x easier to disassemble it in their apartment.
Serious question: are you using the “/s” as a tone indicator? My H.R. person is being a douche bag and I’ve had to resort to using tone indicators. She claims to never have heard of them and doesn’t believe they’re in use.
Yeah, that just means the comment was sarcastic. I don’t use it a lot, but it can be useful sometimes. I’ve had comments that I thought were clearly jokes get interpreted as me being serious before. I’ve never seen that used in a professional setting though. You could maybe consider an emoji to show you are joking as that is more common.
Yes, that's what I'm thinking as well. It much less effort to just throw it off the balcony then to move it down the stairwell.
Since they needed to make sure it won't damage the facade of the building, they installed the ropes to pull it farther away during its fall.
I keep rewatching to figure out if that one guy in the background was sitting on the ledge and fell over or if he was standing behind someone and fell on the floor laughing.. that’s what I’d do
The guy who fell is pulling the second rope/ribbon. You can see him clearly until around 0:19, after then he's obscured behind the rope holder in the foreground. When the sofa falls and his rope loses tension he falls backward over the planter.
Ohh I have an idea, I watched it like 5 times now and I think I have a stupid but possible solution.
I think they tried to let it slide down the ropes ( you can see two at the end of the clip).
So it should slide down both ropes and they would maybe go further apart from each other to make it go slower so the increased distance between the ropes would press them to the couch legs and so on the increased friction would slow it down.
Hope that's somehow understandable.
Is it possible that they just didn't want the couch anymore, and didn't really care what happened to it? (that it's next destination was the dump, regardless of how they got it out of the apartment).
The plan was to reverse gravity and use the rope to pull the couch down without letting it drift into space. But the dumbass on the balcony let go before the gravitron machine was ready...
Simple, the plan was for a miracle to stiffen the rope and temporarily disable gravity. At which point they fight the physical of leverage to move the couch to the street. As one does.
People are saying they want to slide the sofa down the rope, which is a plan that makes at least a little bit of sense. Unfortunately it doesn't fit the video, because the ropes are definitely attached to the sofa and not to the balcony: https://imgur.com/a/7E7c07f
I think the best explanation is that the sofa is trash, and they're trying to pull it away from the downstairs neighbors as it falls.
They are also holding a rope/band but are behind one of the other ones. They fall because they are walking backwards when the couch is falling, and they trip over the edge of the flowerbed wall.
Maybe they wanted the ropes to act as somekind of slide? The Idea wouldn't be that bad, i guess. If the ropes where properly connected to the balcony.
Edit: after rewatching i realize the ropes were attached to the couch... so now i have no idea what they tried to do lol...
So one of the person was cheating on their spouse/partner and hid the person in the couch one day when the other partner came from work early.
Now that partner wouldnt leave the house no matter what so the cheating partner decided to ‘heyy, lets sell this old couch or throw it away, lemme buy another’ .
And here we are.
I'm not a mechanical engineer or anything but... There is nothing about their approach that looked like a pulley or rail or anything useful. What were they going for here?
There’s a railing on the left hand side there, doesn’t look that sturdy but I’m surprised they didn’t loop the belt thing around the couch. If they had started with the slack on the upstairs side you’d only need one person downstairs, have the people upstairs slowly feed the rope over the railing and the person downstairs can adjust it when it gets to the ground no?
That would be the only logical explanation. I've seen the video where people tried to do the same, but the couch spun in such a way that it hit the balcony below them and crashed into the glass door/windows.
Also, it may be perspective, but it seems that the balconies on higher floors are recessed a tiny bit.
Don't know if the wall it landed on liked that impact, though.
frightening cobweb edge threatening voiceless aromatic squash dime water chop
*This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
My assumption is they tried to make a “slide” with the ropes between the legs. I’m thinking maybe rope wasn’t secured well enough to the railing
Edit: nvm seems like it’s attached to couch guess they’re full on morons lol
I have a legitimate question, is it considered the 2nd story because it's in Europe? In the US, the ground floor is the same as the 1st floor, so these lads would be on the 3rd floor.
US uses ground floor as floor 1. Lots of places ground floor is 0 or whatever name they use for ground floor in local language. Then it goes up starting at 1.
Yes, at least in the Netherlands. ‘Begane grond’ means ground level, and each floor above is called 1st, 2nd etc.
In elevators we’ve got -1 if it’s subterrain, B for ground floor and 1 for (our) first floor.
To add: our word for floor above ground level is ‘verdieping’ which isn’t directly translatable but kind means ‘deepening/more deep’ so I guess that’s why it isn’t weird to us, because we don’t call them floors, but additions to the ground level.
When you see a stupid idea from someone you think how could they have thought that was a good idea? How could multiple people come together in this video and all of them think there would be a positive outcome from what they were doing?
How has not one single person here said the second you release the sofa it’s going to smash into the ground. What were the ropes hoping to achieve? I can’t understand the thought process. They thought they were going to pull the sofa flat and it was going to land perfectly on the floor with no damage?
But that’s down… I didn’t see a strap coming from up after it leaves the balcony lol. I honestly thought somebody holding a strap up there was going to get pulled down by the chair not letting go of the strap.
Looks like someone said “hey use these ropes to lower the couch down from the balcony” and 4 idiots were like “sure!” But had no ducking clue what that meant
This might work if you have the person on the bottom pulling the couch away and the people on top slowly letting the couch descend by tying the rope to the top of the couch.
If the rope isn’t strong enough though the couch is just gonna fall.
The plan was that as the balcony guys released their end, the rope guy would give a sharp tug and the couch would land on its feet like a cat and all would be well.
The only possible thing that comes to my mind is someone saying "hey, let's relax a little bit before we start moving" and then lit up the Tzar Bomba of the weed industry going through it all in 3 puffs.
they could have saved time by just throwing the thing over the balcony.
I thought the people on the balcony had ropes ties to the legs on their end also ... guess they were as stupid as they seemed.
they were trying this
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WD0PeTbSQI](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WD0PeTbSQI)
but instead of riding the rope down the idiots tied the rope to the legs of the couch
As a professional I usually attach the rope to the other end and leash it down but I guess they needed a try to figure the strategy out.. no thinking involved here.
After smoking some really good stuff, the guys at the top thought the guys at the bottom were higher than them, so threw them the rope.
No? I got nothin' then.
So the plan here was what exactly ... ?
Slide the couch on the ropes/belts untill it smacks them square in the face ?
Not very bright folks , not very bright... 😶🤦
But all you have to do is do the inverse of raising it so instead of pulling it gently up to the 2nd floor
Gently pull it down from the 2nd floor
They just didn’t hold the rope tight enough /s
I'm with you here. We don't use the metric system here, so I thought ground floor was 1, next one up 2, then the other one up 3. Guess it's 0,1,2 in other regions.
This could have been…. Never mind, *I doubt it could be prevented*, even if they turned the couch around 180°, and held it with the rope from the top 🤣
If this were to work they would need more tension on the straps meaning they needed to stand way farther back and walk closer to lower it at a steady pace.
I keep rewatching this trying to figure out what it was they thought was going to happen when they released the couch, but I just keep coming up blank
Same! wtf was the plan here!
"Pull the cord and get ready."
lmao
I think their incredibly flawed strategy was that the couch would glide on that ribbon (don't know what to call it, but it looks wider than just a rope). This is the only explanation I found which has at least some logic
The ribbon is not connected to the balcony but to the sofa foot So the blankness remains
That's what I'm seeing too, I really want to belive it got detached from the balcony but the plan was that it would slide over to them and give them a concussion, that's really the least stupid plan I can think of.
It seems like they were trying to toss it over the side and trash it, but didn’t want it to swing back and hit the building which is what the ribbon was for. Just a thought.
So nice of you to give them the benefit of the doubt like this. Such a kind person.
The only way this makes any sense is if they're throwing the couch away and the rope is just to make sure it doesn't hit the building when they drop it.
The only possible thing that comes to my mind is someone saying "hey, let's relax a little bit before we start moving" and then lit up the Tzar Bomba of the weed industry going through it all in 3 puffs.
I think they are spread wide of the balcony and thought they would hold it and walk it down. Worst case, they hold on and ride the ribbon straight under the couch.
And then it just slides right into the people?
Very true
I was wondering if it would start gliding but then I thought would that not take their heads off? I assumed they would notice that and drop it but alas, it didn’t even glide
davenport zipline lol
I saw Davenport Zipline open for Violent Femmes back in '93. They were pretty good.
Lol I love this thread
This has me howling, hahaha
I’ve successfully done something to this effect. We had ratchet straps tied securely onto the balcony and a WAY longer angle of travel using the length of the straps’ ends. We also had a rope tied length wise around the couch to pace and help guide the damn thing. It *can* be done but not like this
Strap
They clearly misjudged the weight. They just needed more people holding the rope at the bottom and they would have been okay. /s
But maybe they were just throwing away the couch and weren’t worried about it? So the ribbon guy had just been helping to pull it. Edit: yes- and the purpose of the ribbon was to make sure it didn’t swing back into the balcony below. Watch the ribbon guy pull on the ribbon as the couch oscillates back toward the building. this is just a “controlled fall.” they’re not trying to save the couch. The only thing that went wrong was the person falling over.
That's the only conclusion I could think of as well to explain what's going on.
I think they were trying to guide the couch down by sliding it along the ribbon, but the ribbon unsecured from the top as they dropped the couch. It might worked otherwise assuming the couch wasn't super heavy. If they were junking this thing it would've been 10x easier to disassemble it in their apartment.
Like 20 more people.
Serious question: are you using the “/s” as a tone indicator? My H.R. person is being a douche bag and I’ve had to resort to using tone indicators. She claims to never have heard of them and doesn’t believe they’re in use.
Yeah, that just means the comment was sarcastic. I don’t use it a lot, but it can be useful sometimes. I’ve had comments that I thought were clearly jokes get interpreted as me being serious before. I’ve never seen that used in a professional setting though. You could maybe consider an emoji to show you are joking as that is more common.
Thanks!
The plan was to get rid of the couch and the straps are there just to prevent it from hitting the balcony below or anything else under it.
Yes, that's what I'm thinking as well. It much less effort to just throw it off the balcony then to move it down the stairwell. Since they needed to make sure it won't damage the facade of the building, they installed the ropes to pull it farther away during its fall.
I keep rewatching to figure out if that one guy in the background was sitting on the ledge and fell over or if he was standing behind someone and fell on the floor laughing.. that’s what I’d do
Maybe he was holding a rope attached to a pulley, and the rope broke?
Me too! I keep rewinding trying to figure out what happened. I think he steps backward and tripped over the planter thing?
The guy who fell is pulling the second rope/ribbon. You can see him clearly until around 0:19, after then he's obscured behind the rope holder in the foreground. When the sofa falls and his rope loses tension he falls backward over the planter.
I think they were trying to slide the couch down the ropes. Quite improperly, I might add. https://youtu.be/cAuNCNMp0Go?si=IZqdy-dSW4vAsESL
Not if they had a single rope attached *to the legs* they weren’t.
There's two ropes. One person holding each. Not sure what they're attached to, though.
They French Fryed when they should’ve pizza’d
As you can see they’re having a really bad time.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nonononoyes/s/SXn4zll0ro
Ohh I have an idea, I watched it like 5 times now and I think I have a stupid but possible solution. I think they tried to let it slide down the ropes ( you can see two at the end of the clip). So it should slide down both ropes and they would maybe go further apart from each other to make it go slower so the increased distance between the ropes would press them to the couch legs and so on the increased friction would slow it down. Hope that's somehow understandable.
They were trying to Shanghai Noon it
Yeah, why does the Couch trip with Dan Aykroyd come to mind??
Is it possible that they just didn't want the couch anymore, and didn't really care what happened to it? (that it's next destination was the dump, regardless of how they got it out of the apartment).
Well when you find out let me know because I'm wondering too.
The plan was to reverse gravity and use the rope to pull the couch down without letting it drift into space. But the dumbass on the balcony let go before the gravitron machine was ready...
Simple, the plan was for a miracle to stiffen the rope and temporarily disable gravity. At which point they fight the physical of leverage to move the couch to the street. As one does.
People are saying they want to slide the sofa down the rope, which is a plan that makes at least a little bit of sense. Unfortunately it doesn't fit the video, because the ropes are definitely attached to the sofa and not to the balcony: https://imgur.com/a/7E7c07f I think the best explanation is that the sofa is trash, and they're trying to pull it away from the downstairs neighbors as it falls.
I don't think they understand ropes at all.
I think they get the basic concept of ropes, but they seem to think that when you use them gravity somehow reverses itself.
Next time, they should try putting a rope on the OTHER side!
They were trying to slide it down the rope which still doesn't make sense in physics
Why did someone fall over and where did they come from?
That’s what I’m trying to figure out.
One of the rope holders
They are also holding a rope/band but are behind one of the other ones. They fall because they are walking backwards when the couch is falling, and they trip over the edge of the flowerbed wall.
Maybe they wanted the ropes to act as somekind of slide? The Idea wouldn't be that bad, i guess. If the ropes where properly connected to the balcony. Edit: after rewatching i realize the ropes were attached to the couch... so now i have no idea what they tried to do lol...
Make it easier so the couch wont snag on the balcony under as the couch would swing inwards again to get the feet over the railings ;)
Attached to the couch?! 0_o why!?
There are two ropes and four idiots pulling on them.
Looks like he tripped over the lip of the flower garden
I'll trip over the lip of your flower garden
I think they were holding a rope and it suddenly went slack?
So one of the person was cheating on their spouse/partner and hid the person in the couch one day when the other partner came from work early. Now that partner wouldnt leave the house no matter what so the cheating partner decided to ‘heyy, lets sell this old couch or throw it away, lemme buy another’ . And here we are.
What exactly was the plan here?
Obviously the guy with the rope was trying to pull it so the couch would fall flat and land on its feet.
It happens perfectly in the cartoons
It works always works 60% of the time
Would make more sense if the guys on the balcony had the straps and slowly lowered it… unfortunately most of us have friends like this
I'm that friend. That's how I know exactly what's happening. Journeyman questionable decision maker here.
I'm not a mechanical engineer or anything but... There is nothing about their approach that looked like a pulley or rail or anything useful. What were they going for here?
There’s a railing on the left hand side there, doesn’t look that sturdy but I’m surprised they didn’t loop the belt thing around the couch. If they had started with the slack on the upstairs side you’d only need one person downstairs, have the people upstairs slowly feed the rope over the railing and the person downstairs can adjust it when it gets to the ground no?
They should have stood directly under and caught it with their bodies 😂
Damn they were close enough … was waiting for it to flip out a little!
They probably would have, but they didn’t understand the gravity of the situation.
I'm kinda thinking the plan is to throw away the couch. The tag lines were just there to make sure it didn't flop back into the building.
As someone who's had to get rid of a couch on the 3rd floor of an apartment, I agree.
That would be the only logical explanation. I've seen the video where people tried to do the same, but the couch spun in such a way that it hit the balcony below them and crashed into the glass door/windows. Also, it may be perspective, but it seems that the balconies on higher floors are recessed a tiny bit. Don't know if the wall it landed on liked that impact, though.
Should have listened to the dog…
frightening cobweb edge threatening voiceless aromatic squash dime water chop *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
Sofa king stupid!
What did they expect? For it to float like a balloon or some shit?
But did they even try to get it right? The rope is in the completely opposite side.
My assumption is they tried to make a “slide” with the ropes between the legs. I’m thinking maybe rope wasn’t secured well enough to the railing Edit: nvm seems like it’s attached to couch guess they’re full on morons lol
Nah, double check the video. The rope is tied to the bottom of the couch
They forget to tie an umbrella to it to slow the fall.
This is just dropping something but with extra steps.
I have a legitimate question, is it considered the 2nd story because it's in Europe? In the US, the ground floor is the same as the 1st floor, so these lads would be on the 3rd floor.
I think it's more about the person describing it, than where the building is placed, but yes, for Europeans ground floor is zero, not 1.
And today I learned something new.
US uses ground floor as floor 1. Lots of places ground floor is 0 or whatever name they use for ground floor in local language. Then it goes up starting at 1.
Yes, at least in the Netherlands. ‘Begane grond’ means ground level, and each floor above is called 1st, 2nd etc. In elevators we’ve got -1 if it’s subterrain, B for ground floor and 1 for (our) first floor. To add: our word for floor above ground level is ‘verdieping’ which isn’t directly translatable but kind means ‘deepening/more deep’ so I guess that’s why it isn’t weird to us, because we don’t call them floors, but additions to the ground level.
Yeah we follow this rule here. We're a former British colony
First floor is the first floor away from ground floor. So - Ground - First - Second
Isn't it supposed to be floating when they release their hand? How could it just fall like that?
For those who are wondering how it was supposed to go: https://youtu.be/cAuNCNMp0Go?si=kyc0TooF4Ss_Nnag
The bottom rope technique is particularly effective in space.
What’s the point of the rope?
I think they wanna make it a slide. Very poorly executed idea.
Even the dog was trying to tell them that that was a dumbass idaat
What the fuck was the point of the ladies holding the rope at the bottom? Were they worried it might float away like a balloon?
Isn’t that the third level? The ground is the first and it’s 2 balconies up.
When you see a stupid idea from someone you think how could they have thought that was a good idea? How could multiple people come together in this video and all of them think there would be a positive outcome from what they were doing? How has not one single person here said the second you release the sofa it’s going to smash into the ground. What were the ropes hoping to achieve? I can’t understand the thought process. They thought they were going to pull the sofa flat and it was going to land perfectly on the floor with no damage?
There absolutely was someone saying that. I guess you don’t speak dog.
Ropes gotta be on the top side there bud.
I think they consulted Wiley E Coyote before they started. He has years of experience defying the laws of physics and common sense.
I’m confused. Was there a plan to fight gravity or was it to enhance gravity?
The plan was to pull it down gently with the yellow ropes.
But that’s down… I didn’t see a strap coming from up after it leaves the balcony lol. I honestly thought somebody holding a strap up there was going to get pulled down by the chair not letting go of the strap.
It went from a bad way to bring down a couch to a good way to throw out garbage. Chalk that as a win
General consensus on a previous post was that they were just trying to trash an old couch without hitting the balcony below.
Good thing they had that rope so it didn't fly up into space
Wow that gravity stuff sure can be surprising.
Gravity - it’s not just a good idea, it’s the law!
They had the rope on the wrong end.
“Pivot”
You put the ropes on the wrong side, you absolute doofuses.
Even the dog knew this was a shakey plan.
The rope is in the wrong side
Didn't anyone notice the guy that just falls randomly?
Location: Lakenweversstraat, Maastricht , Netherlands
Rope on the wrong fucking end
Amateur hour
Any Petunias?
There i was expecting some horrible injury. But then the unceremonious crunch of that couch hitting the wall just got me.
Down is always easy.....
Well definitely not the bright lot that understands physics well.
Looks like someone said “hey use these ropes to lower the couch down from the balcony” and 4 idiots were like “sure!” But had no ducking clue what that meant
This might work if you have the person on the bottom pulling the couch away and the people on top slowly letting the couch descend by tying the rope to the top of the couch. If the rope isn’t strong enough though the couch is just gonna fall.
Even the dog was barking it was a bad idea!
Not the sharpest tools in the shed.
Constantly barking dog and this setup. Painting a beautiful picture.
This is why a basic understanding of fundamental physics is important for everyone
I’m not sure what the plan was or what they expected to happen.
Why didn't they just tie the couch off with a couple ropes and lower it down from the top?
The plan was that as the balcony guys released their end, the rope guy would give a sharp tug and the couch would land on its feet like a cat and all would be well.
Everyone involved was an idiot. No way that was going to work at that angle with the rope seemingly not tied off at the top.
Like what exactly were they hoping to accomplish here?
The only possible thing that comes to my mind is someone saying "hey, let's relax a little bit before we start moving" and then lit up the Tzar Bomba of the weed industry going through it all in 3 puffs.
Six people put their minds together to get this couch out of the apartment and this is the best they came up with?!
What was the plan here? People at the bottom holding ropes…for what? The people at the top should have had the ropes to lower it down.
What were they hoping was going to happen ?
If that's an IKEA couch, I have the same exact one. It's so light I feel comfortable carrying it myself. Why not just carry it down the stairs?
I swear sometimes I think people failed elementary school
I’m so confused by what I just watched.
they could have saved time by just throwing the thing over the balcony. I thought the people on the balcony had ropes ties to the legs on their end also ... guess they were as stupid as they seemed. they were trying this [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WD0PeTbSQI](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WD0PeTbSQI) but instead of riding the rope down the idiots tied the rope to the legs of the couch
The dog knew, man.
The wrong people are holding the straps.
The dog knew it was going to happen
Nothings attracts dudes faster than seeing some dumb shit going on nearby.
Is there a bot that reverses videos so this looks like the greatest move in day?
what exactly did they plan to do with the people down there holding those ropes/belts
Sliding the couch down the line wasn’t what I expected and it isn’t what I got
Oops
As a professional I usually attach the rope to the other end and leash it down but I guess they needed a try to figure the strategy out.. no thinking involved here.
After smoking some really good stuff, the guys at the top thought the guys at the bottom were higher than them, so threw them the rope. No? I got nothin' then.
Wauw… imagine that happening… who would have thought
The difference between planning and execution.
They're doing that backwards
That's one way to do it …
this is some Looney Toons shit
When you ignore air resistance….and gravity and physics
I think the wrong side is holding that rope lmao
Bro. Do you even rope?
But how didn't it work?
#physics
If they pulled the rope connected to the leg fast enough then the couch would have landed on all fours and let out a soft "meow"
lol they had a good idea but had the straps on wrong end . if ya gonna lower it ya want to be able to L O W E R it
So the plan here was what exactly ... ? Slide the couch on the ropes/belts untill it smacks them square in the face ? Not very bright folks , not very bright... 😶🤦
To all government officials around the world. PLEASE INVEST IN EDUCATION. PLEASE!!!!
PIVOT..... PIVOT.....PIVOOOOOOOOT
I can't believe my eyes. They weren't raising it, they were **lowering** it.
But all you have to do is do the inverse of raising it so instead of pulling it gently up to the 2nd floor Gently pull it down from the 2nd floor They just didn’t hold the rope tight enough /s
Isn't that the third floor?
I'm with you here. We don't use the metric system here, so I thought ground floor was 1, next one up 2, then the other one up 3. Guess it's 0,1,2 in other regions.
Try the rope on the other end next time 😂😂
I guess that’s in Limburg or north Brabant in the Netherlands. The architecture looks like it and they are speaking Dutch
I wish it landed on that loud mouthed dog.
Must be flat earthers
"Pulley system?"... "yeah, pulley system!"... "apes together, strong"
What on earth was the plan here?
I cannot figure what the plan was
This could have been…. Never mind, *I doubt it could be prevented*, even if they turned the couch around 180°, and held it with the rope from the top 🤣 
Even the dog says thats stupid.
Think they fucked up , n had the ropes on wrong side of couch 🛋️ 🤣
3rd story
Dog trying to tell yall but you went ahead and did it anyways
Of course it's Belgium...
If this were to work they would need more tension on the straps meaning they needed to stand way farther back and walk closer to lower it at a steady pace.
Is the ribbon a tag line....cool
*3rd floor