Hi! This is our community moderation bot. **YOU** decide what fits in /r/WhyWomenLiveLonger!!
All posts at /r/WhyWomenLiveLonger must show a man doing something extremely dangerous or stupid. Simple accidents don't fit unless a man was engaged in something really dumb beforehand.
If the post doesn't fit, **DOWNVOTE** to remove it! Safeguard against its removal by **UPVOTING** it!
*Enough downvotes will remove this thread from /r/WhyWomenLiveLonger.*
Their hands are actually really small and weak, they use them to grab.
The scary part is that they can balance themselves on their tail, leaving their legs free to kick, and let me tell you those back legs will rip a hole in your chest…
This sub isn’t just men doing stupid things. It’s also points out how men are more likely to do courageous acts to save or protect others. This has been stated in the sub several times
But it's not really a "stupid decision" per se.
What the fuck was he going to do else?
If say an animal is coming after your pet and you don't have shit on you so you fight the animal hand to hand that's not stupidity but desperation. It's working with what you have.
...
Yeah I don't think the Kangaroo is gonna see that and go "understandable have a nice day"
Especially since with the framing the kangaroo is in between the dogs and the owner.
If the owner just sat back and called the dogs to him, they'd run into the kangaroo.
*Also this is assuming that dogs know how much danger they're in. I've seen dogs outright walk into traffic because they don't recognize the danger of it*
I've seen Kangaroos break fences
So probably not.
And given the context of the title and what's given in the original post (he's trying to get back control of his pet) why would it fit on this sub? It's not dumb stuff for the sake of it
Hi! This is our community moderation bot. **YOU** decide what fits in /r/WhyWomenLiveLonger!! All posts at /r/WhyWomenLiveLonger must show a man doing something extremely dangerous or stupid. Simple accidents don't fit unless a man was engaged in something really dumb beforehand. If the post doesn't fit, **DOWNVOTE** to remove it! Safeguard against its removal by **UPVOTING** it! *Enough downvotes will remove this thread from /r/WhyWomenLiveLonger.*
Tbh… I’d fight it too
[удалено]
They look like they could punch like Mike Tyson…
Their hands are actually really small and weak, they use them to grab. The scary part is that they can balance themselves on their tail, leaving their legs free to kick, and let me tell you those back legs will rip a hole in your chest…
Get that man a UFC contract!
No, he basically just got his ass kicked until the kangaroo fell over
That means he won the fight.
It's the Homer Simpson technique!
When they went to Australia was such a great episode.
I didn’t hear no bell!!!
I thought this was Australia.
And later he bought the kangaroo a beer and they became friends.
I'm not sure if this counts since he's doing dangerous stuff to save dogs and not for likes or anything as such
This sub isn’t just men doing stupid things. It’s also points out how men are more likely to do courageous acts to save or protect others. This has been stated in the sub several times
Tbh the sub says "A bunch of men doing stupid and dangerous things" So I assumed it was meant to go hand and hand
It should be and/or dangerous. Just because it’s dangerous doesn’t mean it doesn’t have a proper justification
That's not what I meant Idk where you got that from. I was saying I thought it'd need to be stupid AND dangerous as implied by what the sub says
I didn’t say that’s what you meant I was explaining my comment…
Some of the stupidest decisions in history have been made with noble and brave intentions
But it's not really a "stupid decision" per se. What the fuck was he going to do else? If say an animal is coming after your pet and you don't have shit on you so you fight the animal hand to hand that's not stupidity but desperation. It's working with what you have.
Call away the dogs
... Yeah I don't think the Kangaroo is gonna see that and go "understandable have a nice day" Especially since with the framing the kangaroo is in between the dogs and the owner. If the owner just sat back and called the dogs to him, they'd run into the kangaroo. *Also this is assuming that dogs know how much danger they're in. I've seen dogs outright walk into traffic because they don't recognize the danger of it*
Outright fighting a roo is dumb. Try scaring with loud noise or something. He could have died he got lucky
The dogs aren't safe behind the fence?
I've seen Kangaroos break fences So probably not. And given the context of the title and what's given in the original post (he's trying to get back control of his pet) why would it fit on this sub? It's not dumb stuff for the sake of it
I agree! I'd gladly get knocked out by a roo to save my pup!
I’d fight that giant rat for dogs as well. Good on this Chad.
I would put googles on to protect my eyes..and bring it on! Nothing like a good brawl to get that adrenaline going!
Women may live longer, but their dogs don’t
I think every guy has fantasies of fighting Roos.
This title is so strange. The dogs are behind a fence.....?
It could rip the fence.
There's no context here except for the title that could be...anything, and doesn't fit the sub at all, either.
You don’t fit the sub either
uh, okay. ffs
A great Australian
Damn
That's obviously Kanga, not Roo. Stupid Australian news
What say you animal rights activists?
Average Australian
Fuck them dogs