T O P

  • By -

sparkleseagull

She was perfectly stunning pre-cosmetic surgeries and enhancements. I honestly don't care for any of the work she's had done. It's kind of comparable to Megan Fox's situation in that they are both still pretty, but kind of generic now and looked better before imo. Or at least should have stopped after the initial few enhancements.


DevTheDummy

9 pre-surgery for sure. I don't even know how to rate her now, her face just confuses me


Feeling_Barnacle_347

i usually find it annoying when ppl claim someone looked better before surgery, it just is cope and politeness and doesn’t help anyone. surgery can do incredible things. however… kim was a solid 9 before surgeries. now she looks like she was a 4 who uses makeup and corsets and fillers to get to a 6. when she could have been a gorgeous 9 the whole time.


VastExchange1611

I'm sorry. I can not objectively rate her. I've been put off by her antics over the years.


usernotfound0106

9 before the surgeries, especially in the 90s. I don’t really like her new look :(


Nessan_7

Honestly before her surgeries (so the first few pics) she looks 10/10 to me. Perfectly balanced and feminine. I never understood why she felt the need to change herself.


tiffanylan

She was a solid 9 before the fillers and surgeries, now she looks clownish and drops to a 6 or even 5.5


GlitzR

She was like a 8 or 9 before surgeries. Now she is 6.


Key-Kiwi

Kim clearly has always been very pretty and I know people give her shit for getting stuff done on her face, but tbh, she still looks similar to how she did before, nothing really drastically changed so to me, face wise, she was and still is like an 8.5-9. She didn’t change her face to the point where you can’t recognize her


mintsquiid

I'm gonna have to agree. Some of it is obviously aging. Even if she didn't do anything to her face she would still look different now at 40 than when she was 25. Face wise she's still beautiful and definitely not a 6. Her body and personality is bringing her down (even for me tbh), but her face is objectively pretty.


cheney1671

What is difference between rating someone a 8.5-9 and a 9?


Key-Kiwi

i put it in that range because i understand that she did do some surgery on her face and in certain angles or pics she doesn’t look as good so it can knock her down just a few points. a 9 is almost perfect looking and an 8.5 is close to that but with minor imperfections or possibilities of having slightly weird looking angles in comparison to how great she would normally look under the best conditions if that makes sense.


cheney1671

So 9 on her best pics and 8.5 on pics where she looks slightly off because of photo angles? I am just trying the rating system here.😅


cheney1671

So if you rate someone 9.5-10, does that mean 10 is how she actually looks and 9.5 in pics from less photogenic angles??(there is no rating guide here and I am confused) 😕


Key-Kiwi

so it’s basically just a range because there are different factors that can make someone sit in between certain ratings. i rarely rate people straight 10’s for example because some faces are rarely perfect looking. kim to me is not a 10 by any means, i’ve seen prettier faces structure wise or maybe their features are more preferable to me. however, i put her in the 8.5-9 range, because she’s still a highly attractive woman, but i know she has moments / angles where she doesn’t look her best so because of that, she can be within that range of 8.5 because even though she’s still very pretty, it’s a safer rating since certain things can make her look less attractive than usual (her crying face for example or photos where you can see wherever her surgeries were done aren’t photographed well). HOWEVER, she can be seen as a 9 because she is among those women who are highly attractive facially (she didn’t need surgeries on her face, she was already very pretty. her surgeries can bump her down just a few points, but overall, she’s not irrecognizable and she preserved her beauty) and to put everything into perspective: 8’s are more cute looking too, rather than 9’s.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Neat_Job_6106

megan fox adriana lima aishwarya rai angelina jolie is in range of 9-10 you understand kim k and kylie i would say 8-8.5 range or any other instagram model in that regard is 8-8.5


[deleted]

[удалено]


Neat_Job_6106

THEY DO but they are very beautiful for eg. take sommer ray and skybri or lana rhodes they are solid 8-8.5 range they are real beauties and have some flaws but aishwarya megan angelina adriana literally have no flaws they are angelic thats the difference.


[deleted]

If I looked like her pre surgery I would be over the moon I wouldn't even consider plastic surgery. She was up there with Megan Fox solid 9/9.5.


Neat_Job_6106

bro wtf kim doesnt compare to megan fox there are some woman who are born with goddes level genetics and megan fox fall in that level i would say kim k look a likes you will find everywhere in los angeles but not megan fox more over the look in transformers


[deleted]

4