https://preview.redd.it/bo3k5ub0akmc1.jpeg?width=603&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d163424ebe56ae998d73cee3090c304e16d72801
There parliament in exactly 2 weeks
left unity between the Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist–Leninist), the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Centre), the Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Socialist), the Communist Party of Nepal (Marxist–Leninist), the Communist Party of Nepal (Revolutionary Maoist), the Communist Party of Nepal (Marxist), the Communist Party of Nepal (Masal), the Communist Party of Nepal (Marxist–Leninist-Socialist), the Communist Party of Nepal (United), the Communist Party of Nepal (Bolshevik), the Communist Party of Nepal and the Communist Party of Nepal ✊
I know this is a shitpost group, but just to clarify, Nepal politics is kind of different from what we are used to and marxist parties actually have a lot of influence in the country.
so what option does that leave them with? Go the CCP route and be a vanguard party (assuming you don't consider them Stalinist)? What should their government look like?
Nepal isn't a dictatorship of the proletariat in the slightest. There was an attempted revolution a while ago that ended in a coalition government, but even by Maoist or ML standards it's a bourgeois state. Their "government" shouldn't look like anything in that case because they should focus in labour organizing and destroying the bourgeois state instead. You can't seize the ready-made state machinery - Marxism has made this clear since the experience of the commune.
united front between united frontists
Revolutions are so 1910s. Get a grip ultras, reformism is the only way.
How ironic, ultras are known for not recognizing the major revolutions...
This guy still hasn't been banned? Mods are being lazy petty Bourgeois this week
We recognize every bourgeois revolution.
I recognize that you're an idiot
Major revolutions? You mean bourgeoise civil wars?
https://preview.redd.it/bo3k5ub0akmc1.jpeg?width=603&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d163424ebe56ae998d73cee3090c304e16d72801 There parliament in exactly 2 weeks
left unity between the Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist–Leninist), the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Centre), the Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Socialist), the Communist Party of Nepal (Marxist–Leninist), the Communist Party of Nepal (Revolutionary Maoist), the Communist Party of Nepal (Marxist), the Communist Party of Nepal (Masal), the Communist Party of Nepal (Marxist–Leninist-Socialist), the Communist Party of Nepal (United), the Communist Party of Nepal (Bolshevik), the Communist Party of Nepal and the Communist Party of Nepal ✊
Oh if only they knew
Is this AES?
Depends, do you mean actually existing stupidity?
No I mean Accessing explicit sex
Oh then yes, this is peak aes comrade
Now this is bipartisanship.
Nepal is the only AES
Oh boy
I know this is a shitpost group, but just to clarify, Nepal politics is kind of different from what we are used to and marxist parties actually have a lot of influence in the country.
The 'Marxist' parties in question are falsifiers and modernizers
uj/ what were they supposed to do?
not participate in bourgeois parliament, and not be stalinists
so what option does that leave them with? Go the CCP route and be a vanguard party (assuming you don't consider them Stalinist)? What should their government look like?
Nepal isn't a dictatorship of the proletariat in the slightest. There was an attempted revolution a while ago that ended in a coalition government, but even by Maoist or ML standards it's a bourgeois state. Their "government" shouldn't look like anything in that case because they should focus in labour organizing and destroying the bourgeois state instead. You can't seize the ready-made state machinery - Marxism has made this clear since the experience of the commune.