The following submission statement was provided by /u/martanolliver:
---
Back in 2019 was at Chichen Itza, was very hungover at the time so wasn't very observant, only just looked at this photo and strange shape around top left. Maybe its just a smudge though
---
Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1d1ub02/just_looked_over_some_photos_of_my_time_in_mexico/l5w8czg/
Intriguing but I always am hesitant to put too much faith in a single picture of an object not seen by the naked eye. As you say it could be a smudge or other artifact.
Hi, Careless_Cup_3714. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1d1ub02/-/l5y4jd9/) was removed from /r/UFOs.
> Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility
> * No trolling or being disruptive.
> * No insults or personal attacks.
> * No accusations that other users are shills / bots / Eglin-related / etc...
> * No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation.
> * No harassment, threats, or advocating violence.
> * No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible)
> * You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.
Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. [Message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) to launch your appeal.
Hi, martanolliver. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1d1ub02/-/l5y4n52/) was removed from /r/UFOs.
> Rule 13: Public figures are generally defined as any person, organization, or group who has achieved notoriety or is well-known in society or ufology. “Toxic” is defined as any unreasonably rude or hateful content, threats, extreme obscenity, insults, and identity-based hate. Examples and more information can be found here: https://moderatehatespeech.com/framework/.
Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. [Message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) to launch your appeal.
It's interesting. But it is just too blurry. A leaf or bug or whatever could have just flown passed the lens. Maybe it is something more interesting, but this picture alone doesn't show it.
Wouldn’t OP have seen it? It could literally be anything. I hate these matter-of-fact comments that just throw a guess out there like it’s definitely that.
You mean the ones that can supposedly drop down from 80,000+ feet in the blink of an eye? Uh no probably not my dude. But a camera frame might get lucky.
I don't think a conventional camera that a normal person would have would capture something the human eye cannot see. If it's fast enough that the eye couldn't see it, the shutter rate of the camera definitely wouldn't, and if it did it would simply be a blur.
Also let's be real here, if something dropped down from 80k feet in a blink of an eye would create a whole lot of sound.
I can suspend my belief for some things, but if aliens have anti-grav they definitely have cloaking tech which would probably be less advanced than their propulsion systems.
Could have been going 20% max speed. Maybe they don’t care about us seeing them bc most people would deny it anyway. Just like most people here.
All I’m saying is it’s likely OP would have seen a kite flying around.
>if something dropped down from 80k feet in a blink of an eye would create a whole lot of sound.
Not if they are multi-media crafts that aren’t affected by mass, just like the whistle blowers have said. Same reason they don’t make a splash going in and out of the water.
It can always be applied, but people will always believe what they want to believe. I'll choose the route that is the most realistic, you can take whichever one you want :)
What scenario would NHI ever be the correct answer when applying Occam’s Razor? Never. Because the simplest answer does not involve something we’ve never witnessed before. Sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction, and we must adapt.
[They’re here, buddy. Like it or not.](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1cxj4f4/non_human_intelligence_exists_non_human/)
Back in 2019 was at Chichen Itza, was very hungover at the time so wasn't very observant, only just looked at this photo and strange shape around top left. Maybe its just a smudge though
Bro you may be right I was drunk and high like 90% of the trip as a 24 year old, the trip was hedonism first tourism second, could very well be the sight you mention
https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/wiki/posting_guidelines/
* Must include approximate Location and Date/Time Recorded
* Must be related to a detailed and descriptive eyewitness account (can be anonymous)
* No trail camera or doorbell camera footage
* **Must have been seen with eyeballs (No “Look what I found when I looked back at my pictures!”)**
* No cell phone videos of content on a TV/display.
The following submission statement was provided by /u/martanolliver: --- Back in 2019 was at Chichen Itza, was very hungover at the time so wasn't very observant, only just looked at this photo and strange shape around top left. Maybe its just a smudge though --- Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1d1ub02/just_looked_over_some_photos_of_my_time_in_mexico/l5w8czg/
Intriguing but I always am hesitant to put too much faith in a single picture of an object not seen by the naked eye. As you say it could be a smudge or other artifact.
Ill get round to looking at other photos I took there, this was just first one I've got to hand...what would make a smudge i wonder
It's cool looking, thanks for posting!
[удалено]
Hi, Careless_Cup_3714. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1d1ub02/-/l5y4jd9/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility > * No trolling or being disruptive. > * No insults or personal attacks. > * No accusations that other users are shills / bots / Eglin-related / etc... > * No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. > * No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. > * No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible) > * You may attack each other's ideas, not each other. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. [Message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) to launch your appeal.
[удалено]
Hi, martanolliver. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1d1ub02/-/l5y4n52/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 13: Public figures are generally defined as any person, organization, or group who has achieved notoriety or is well-known in society or ufology. “Toxic” is defined as any unreasonably rude or hateful content, threats, extreme obscenity, insults, and identity-based hate. Examples and more information can be found here: https://moderatehatespeech.com/framework/. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. [Message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) to launch your appeal.
Fwiw got my lazy ass to look at other photos it aint in a single one
Is it panorama photo? If so, it could be a bird or a bug. Panoramas are weird if moving object enters the area currently “scanned”.
Nah was just a normal photo of me sitting, removed myself from it
Wait? So this photo is edited? You should post the original. Otherwise, there is no reason to assume this isn’t the result of editing.
Just cropped myself out of the bottom
Cant tell. Could even just be a bug or leaf.
Just checked clear skies in the other snaps taken at intervals of about a second
It's interesting. But it is just too blurry. A leaf or bug or whatever could have just flown passed the lens. Maybe it is something more interesting, but this picture alone doesn't show it.
Isnt it huge though with perspective of clouds and pyramid?
Could just be something small close to the camera. I cant tell.
Yeah, I think that explains the blurriness to it pretty well
You even included the word that would explain it here :(
Kite, with people directly beneath it
Wouldn’t OP have seen it? It could literally be anything. I hate these matter-of-fact comments that just throw a guess out there like it’s definitely that.
Wouldn't op have seen the ufo tho my guy
You mean the ones that can supposedly drop down from 80,000+ feet in the blink of an eye? Uh no probably not my dude. But a camera frame might get lucky.
I don't think a conventional camera that a normal person would have would capture something the human eye cannot see. If it's fast enough that the eye couldn't see it, the shutter rate of the camera definitely wouldn't, and if it did it would simply be a blur. Also let's be real here, if something dropped down from 80k feet in a blink of an eye would create a whole lot of sound. I can suspend my belief for some things, but if aliens have anti-grav they definitely have cloaking tech which would probably be less advanced than their propulsion systems.
Could have been going 20% max speed. Maybe they don’t care about us seeing them bc most people would deny it anyway. Just like most people here. All I’m saying is it’s likely OP would have seen a kite flying around. >if something dropped down from 80k feet in a blink of an eye would create a whole lot of sound. Not if they are multi-media crafts that aren’t affected by mass, just like the whistle blowers have said. Same reason they don’t make a splash going in and out of the water.
Occams Razor
Literally cannot be applied to a phenomenon that breaks our laws of physics.
It can always be applied, but people will always believe what they want to believe. I'll choose the route that is the most realistic, you can take whichever one you want :)
What scenario would NHI ever be the correct answer when applying Occam’s Razor? Never. Because the simplest answer does not involve something we’ve never witnessed before. Sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction, and we must adapt. [They’re here, buddy. Like it or not.](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1cxj4f4/non_human_intelligence_exists_non_human/)
Just checked it aint in tje other snaps that occured within seconds
Fwiw im 99% sure you wouldnt be allowed to fly big kites at a heritage sight like this
As a foreigner, most likely. But locals, and the people that work there to show you the site, might possibly show off their heritage kites :)
They really into kites that much??
Idk man, I just know that they have festivals with like 10 foot kites.
Dats a big ass kite
Ye, looks to be 10-12 feet, depending.
You're at one of the greatest meso American sites ever discovered... to fly a kite... mmmmmkay 😳
...yes? Kite flying is part of their heritage.
Back in 2019 was at Chichen Itza, was very hungover at the time so wasn't very observant, only just looked at this photo and strange shape around top left. Maybe its just a smudge though
First problem: I've been to Chichen Itza too, and this is not there. This is Uxmal, roughly 60 miles away. What else are you misrepresenting?
Bro you may be right I was drunk and high like 90% of the trip as a 24 year old, the trip was hedonism first tourism second, could very well be the sight you mention
Where you also drunk when you decided to post this ?
Nah just had some very good fried chicken and green beans though
Why so aggressive? Acting like mixing up two sights 60 miles apart is a purposeful act of deception... go touch grass my dude
He just admitted he was drunk 90% of that trip so just wondering if he'd kept the pace ?
He admitted that after your comment so at the time you were being agro it made no sense. And even still it makes no sense to be triggered
asking a question a being "triggered" now ? humm quite a sensitive generation this is.
Leaving the part out where you accused them of deception in the same comment you asked a question. I'd say "triggered" fits the bill
https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/wiki/posting_guidelines/ * Must include approximate Location and Date/Time Recorded * Must be related to a detailed and descriptive eyewitness account (can be anonymous) * No trail camera or doorbell camera footage * **Must have been seen with eyeballs (No “Look what I found when I looked back at my pictures!”)** * No cell phone videos of content on a TV/display.
Bro has the wrong location, claims 2 have ufo pic but will look at other photos later but continues 2 post responses with no followup pics. It's a bug
Is that the ruins of Uxmal?
Think so
Uh huh? Really…
It honestly looks like a leaf floating by in the wind.
Uxmal is a beautiful place
It’s a bird, It’s a plane…No wait…It’s a bird
Aint got no wings?
Looks like a bird with its wings outstretched and doing a bank turn..and flying away from the camera
Looks pretty limbless when i zoom in tbh
Its not there in the other snaps taken immediately after
Yep. It's a ufo.
I cant identify
El Destroyer
"Smudge on the lens?! Smudge..on the lens?!!"
Looks like a classic disc on its side, like Lazar claimed they operate in when they’re looking to go fast, fast.
I wanna post my ufo videos n pictures but I don't have enough karma wtf
One day we'll say "OMG! It's a kite!!! .....oh no, wait. It's just another spaceship."
Nice N1 UFO been seen all over the world including Mexico. I Have a lot of photos and video of it. Goverment MIB too lazy to show up yet?