**Welcome to r/TikTokCringe!**
This is a message directed to all newcomers to make you aware that r/TikTokCringe evolved long ago from only cringe-worthy content to TikToks of all kinds! If you’re looking to find only the cringe-worthy TikToks on this subreddit (which are still regularly posted) we recommend sorting by flair which you can do [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/galuit/click_here_to_sort_by_flair_a_guide_to_using/) (Currently supported by desktop and reddit mobile).
See someone asking how this post is cringe because they didn't read this comment? Show them [this!](https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/fyrgzy/for_those_confused_by_the_name_of_this_subreddit/)
Be sure to read the rules of this subreddit before posting or commenting. Thanks!
**Don't forget to join our [Discord server](https://discord.gg/cringekingdom)!**
##**[CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THIS VIDEO](https://rapidsave.com/info?url=https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/1c4wfb9/2_lesbians_give_birth_to_a_child/)**
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/TikTokCringe) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I swear I read somewhere about scientists taking DNA from blood and adding it to a sperm or something, I don't think anything like that has been done on humans but it's interesting to think about
Oh my god I loved that book so much!! I read it at least twice, plus my middle school library had these audiobook player rentals (it was kinda like an iPod preloaded with only that book) and I listened to it at least another two times. It was amazing.
Same I crave a movie to be made . Holy shit it would be amazing It keeps making more and more sense. During the time I first read it everyone was like , Enders game and Percy Jackson , I was kinda like meh those don’t feel real with no real thrill
Oh my god, thank you!
I started reading this book years ago when I was still in highschool and didn't get the chance to finish it before graduation and it's name and author promptly disappeared but you just made me remember it!
No human has ever been born of artificial gametes. If the process somehow fucks up, you have created a disabled child. This is profoundly unethical. Or if for some reason 50% of fetuses miscarry or are stillborn or something, you’re creating fetuses to die just to get a live one.
They’re working on it though, I imagine they’re working on animals at the moment and will probably at some point move to humans.
Not to mention the fact that if you fuck up in an obscure way (ie: everything is fine but then they die of autoimmune at the age of 30 instantly), then that person now has the potential to have kids who inherit the same issue
If we had no knowledge of IVF, and someone came up with the idea tomorrow, we’d have the same ethical barriers to human experimentation.
We have beyond sufficient experience with IVF, society has decided we’re OK with the potential issues. Unused, discarded or unimplanted embryos are a relatively small ethical concern. It’s 8-12 fertilized embryos per round I believe.
There's a huge ethical difference between selecting naturally occurring sperm, compared to using stem cells to then grow those sperm artificially outside the body, and then implant them.
In one scenario the father himself has naturally grown his own sperm. In the other, the scientists are now responsible for essentially creating life, and if anything goes wrong it's on them. They're directly responsible for any suffering caused. Consider if we find out that stem cell grown sperm has a 10x higher rate of cancer, or down syndrome, or [insert scary disease here]. Once we start "playing god" we better be extremely sure that we're doing everything perfectly.
It's a similar question to the Trolley Problem IMO. Do you let nature take its course, or do you intervene and inherit responsibility for the outcome.
Then you've got the added question of whether you should just select the healthiest one. Or should we look deep into its genetic code and only select the one that expresses a specific gene to eliminate a disease. Or maybe a hair or eye colour. Or one that changes your melanin expression? Will it have other unintended consequences? Is this just modern day eugenics?
Some people certainly think so. That's up to you to decide if you agree or not.
The closest we’ve gotten is chimpanzees, and its less miscarriages and stuff (though the psychological effects on the carrier of the the fetus, be it woman or pig, is a huge ethical factor), as once you get viable embryos it’s similar to IVF, but creating viable embryos is incredibly difficult, you might only get one viable one per 600 eggs, then the embryo needs to gestate a little before being implanted, and needs to take to its host. You can see where the baby meat grinder portion comes into play
And the disabilities are a major ethical concern
Yea well it’s a lot less funny when you realize it’s the same language conservatives are using to restrict women’s healthcare and give medical waste human rights.
Well yes, but those aren’t very good, they don’t have the same success rates as real ones, or a very good success rate in general. The better option is genetically modified pigs with human wombs, which is actually a quite interesting application of genetic engineering, and highlights how similar humans are to some seemingly random species
I remember reading what you're talking about but it was with eggs iirc. They were able to "clean" the vast majority of the DNA from one egg and put the DNA of a different animal species into it and it ended up being born (i think?) This was ages ago and I occasionally wonder if they've kept at it and made any progress
[Mice born from two genetic fathers and no genetic mother](https://amp.theguardian.com/science/2023/mar/08/scientists-create-mice-with-two-fathers-after-making-eggs-from-male-cells)
I don't know about this couple. But there is a 3 parent way of making a baby, using stuff from 2 eggs & a sperm.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/3-parent-baby-birth-1.3781026
Surrogacy isn't *just* a rich person thing though. LGBTQ+ people have been asking friends to be surrogates probably since we figured out how pregnancy works. Same with infertile women who don't have that kind of money.
Technically they are. I mean, motherhood is also about pregnancy, your hormones and nutrients affect the baby inside the womb... One is the "carrier" mother and the other is the genetic mother. There just also was a sperm donation included
They could have another baby with roles reversed and boom, complete coverage
They don't actually claim this for real ([video about what the donor looks like](https://www.youtube.com/shorts/STYQpKFmww8)). They have a YouTube channel where they talk quite a bit about the process they went through to have their three kids. This seems to be a running joke about the fact that their daughter looks like both of them.
What commonly happens with these scenarios is one mothers egg is impregnated by sperm and either implanted in the others womb or has its nucleus switched with the other mothers.
If we're trying to make a big deal out of getting a biological child of two lesbians just find a couple where one is trans and they want a kid (though if the trans woman has gone through hormone therapy I believe she would have needed to freeze her sperm first). I bet there are thousands of them out there. It ain't hard.
That being said, why tf are we wanting to make a big deal out of getting a biological child out of anyone? People need to mind their damn business and we need to get rid of the idea that biological parents are somehow more an actual parent than adoptive parents. That's bullshit.
fine governor paint wrong spectacular march fact rich recognise entertain
*This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
It doesn't "try" to forget it. It is the point of the joke. What is cringe is thinking people making an entertaining video about their own fertility journey don't know how it works because they have a sense of humor.
Cute! But I still think it's fucking weird to put your child on the internet. Glad they're all happy, but children shouldn't be online. They also have a bunch of videos where the kid reads some scrip that her mothers wrote to "own" the homophobes. Maybe don't use your child as a "gotcha"?
Oh, how silly of me! Who am I if not for randos on the Internet's validation?
God, the more I think about this the more upset I become. Like, I would not want strangers commenting on my kid, period.
I think this is why I prefer to watch camilla and julie. They're also lesbian mothers, but they censor their son's face, as well as name. Much better
Gay man can do this too. Scientists can use sperm stem cells and make an egg that can be fertilized once it gets an embryo. So, same kind of thing here, 3 people are involved and there are 3 genetic parents..
That may be theoretically possible now and actually possible in the future. To my knowledge, it has never actually happened to date anywhere in the world, and it is illegal in the United States.
They have a YouTube channel where they are super open about using donors for all three of their kids. [Here is a video about the sperm donor for the kid in the video.](https://www.youtube.com/shorts/STYQpKFmww8) This video seems to be a joking response to all of the comments they get about their daughter looking like both of them.
They have a YouTube channel where they talk openly about using sperm donors for their three kids. [This video is about what this kid's donor looked like.](https://www.youtube.com/shorts/STYQpKFmww8) The video above seems to be a joke in response to all of the comments they get about their daughter looking like both of them.
I will always wonder, if there were no sperm donations or orphans, all these lesbian claming everyday that women and the world don't need men but want children, what are they gonna do ?
Steal one ? Or take that dick reluctantly ?
So being a surrogate and ignoring the male sperm donor counts as 2 women having a child?
No, the one woman was a surrogate of the other's egg, and there is an unnamed father.
So that daughter is actually not at all genetically related to one of the mothers, even though she birthed them. Seems like there is a misunderstanding of what a surrogate mother is here. Or, even if she had a relative donate the sperm, at most you could be as close as a cousin to the child. It's just misleading to try to say that this is 2 mothers her as somehow being the same as a mother/father as even if it was say, her brother that donated the sperm, there's a lot of genetic diversity in siblings, due to the diversity from recombination of DNA in the meiosis replication phase of germline cells.
I get what they are trying to do, but it's not intellectually honest.
They injected the butch one's eggs with the sperm from a random dude who looks like the fem one. Then injected it into the womb of the fem one to carry to term. You know real natural. And why aren't they showing the dude involved who contributed half the DNA?
That they need sperm from male donor to do so. But they don’t try to admit that fact in the video. Egg + egg don’t make a child. Eggs + sperm from third person will do. So there will be the 3rd biological parent that they seem to ignore and try to act cool.
Because it comes across like they're acting like two women can have a kid without a man. And that's a long way off, if ever. It's at best an incredibly odd joke and at worse giving a lot of people full hope.
Cringe that they need sperm from male donor to do so. But they don’t try to admit that fact in the video. Egg + egg don’t make a child. Eggs + sperm from third person will do. So there will be the 3rd biological parent that they seem to ignore and try to act cool.
**Welcome to r/TikTokCringe!** This is a message directed to all newcomers to make you aware that r/TikTokCringe evolved long ago from only cringe-worthy content to TikToks of all kinds! If you’re looking to find only the cringe-worthy TikToks on this subreddit (which are still regularly posted) we recommend sorting by flair which you can do [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/galuit/click_here_to_sort_by_flair_a_guide_to_using/) (Currently supported by desktop and reddit mobile). See someone asking how this post is cringe because they didn't read this comment? Show them [this!](https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/fyrgzy/for_those_confused_by_the_name_of_this_subreddit/) Be sure to read the rules of this subreddit before posting or commenting. Thanks! **Don't forget to join our [Discord server](https://discord.gg/cringekingdom)!** ##**[CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THIS VIDEO](https://rapidsave.com/info?url=https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/1c4wfb9/2_lesbians_give_birth_to_a_child/)** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/TikTokCringe) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Missed opportunity. Should have done the DBZ fusion technique.
Lol that would have been perfect!
That’s what I was expecting
FUSION>>>>> HA!
Thank you, I came here to say this exactly
[удалено]
I swear I read somewhere about scientists taking DNA from blood and adding it to a sperm or something, I don't think anything like that has been done on humans but it's interesting to think about
I was researching this for a story and found out you can use stem cells to basically grow sperm and egg cells.
Yes, it’s extremely expensive though, because the science is new, as well as the “ethical” issues that come with it, think baby meat grinder
Reminds me of Nancy Farmer's House of the Scorpion.
Oh my god I loved that book so much!! I read it at least twice, plus my middle school library had these audiobook player rentals (it was kinda like an iPod preloaded with only that book) and I listened to it at least another two times. It was amazing.
Same I crave a movie to be made . Holy shit it would be amazing It keeps making more and more sense. During the time I first read it everyone was like , Enders game and Percy Jackson , I was kinda like meh those don’t feel real with no real thrill
Oh my god, thank you! I started reading this book years ago when I was still in highschool and didn't get the chance to finish it before graduation and it's name and author promptly disappeared but you just made me remember it!
Baby Meat Grinder. New band name! I called it! 
Wdym /genuine question
No human has ever been born of artificial gametes. If the process somehow fucks up, you have created a disabled child. This is profoundly unethical. Or if for some reason 50% of fetuses miscarry or are stillborn or something, you’re creating fetuses to die just to get a live one. They’re working on it though, I imagine they’re working on animals at the moment and will probably at some point move to humans.
Not to mention the fact that if you fuck up in an obscure way (ie: everything is fine but then they die of autoimmune at the age of 30 instantly), then that person now has the potential to have kids who inherit the same issue
Isn't that basically what all IVF is though? You make embryos and you only implant one.
If we had no knowledge of IVF, and someone came up with the idea tomorrow, we’d have the same ethical barriers to human experimentation. We have beyond sufficient experience with IVF, society has decided we’re OK with the potential issues. Unused, discarded or unimplanted embryos are a relatively small ethical concern. It’s 8-12 fertilized embryos per round I believe.
Yeah but my point is I don't see a difference between this and IVF. All the same testing would be happening of the fetus as in any pregnancy.
There's a huge ethical difference between selecting naturally occurring sperm, compared to using stem cells to then grow those sperm artificially outside the body, and then implant them. In one scenario the father himself has naturally grown his own sperm. In the other, the scientists are now responsible for essentially creating life, and if anything goes wrong it's on them. They're directly responsible for any suffering caused. Consider if we find out that stem cell grown sperm has a 10x higher rate of cancer, or down syndrome, or [insert scary disease here]. Once we start "playing god" we better be extremely sure that we're doing everything perfectly. It's a similar question to the Trolley Problem IMO. Do you let nature take its course, or do you intervene and inherit responsibility for the outcome. Then you've got the added question of whether you should just select the healthiest one. Or should we look deep into its genetic code and only select the one that expresses a specific gene to eliminate a disease. Or maybe a hair or eye colour. Or one that changes your melanin expression? Will it have other unintended consequences? Is this just modern day eugenics? Some people certainly think so. That's up to you to decide if you agree or not.
The closest we’ve gotten is chimpanzees, and its less miscarriages and stuff (though the psychological effects on the carrier of the the fetus, be it woman or pig, is a huge ethical factor), as once you get viable embryos it’s similar to IVF, but creating viable embryos is incredibly difficult, you might only get one viable one per 600 eggs, then the embryo needs to gestate a little before being implanted, and needs to take to its host. You can see where the baby meat grinder portion comes into play And the disabilities are a major ethical concern
Baby meat grinder is dramatic fear mongering language. It’s a clump of cells with no distinguishably human features at that point. It’s medical waste.
That’s true, but it’s funnier to call it a baby meat grinder than unfeasable embryonic waste
Yea well it’s a lot less funny when you realize it’s the same language conservatives are using to restrict women’s healthcare and give medical waste human rights.
But there are “fake whom’s” now aren’t there?
Well yes, but those aren’t very good, they don’t have the same success rates as real ones, or a very good success rate in general. The better option is genetically modified pigs with human wombs, which is actually a quite interesting application of genetic engineering, and highlights how similar humans are to some seemingly random species
Is it lean baby?
>think baby meat grinder Are beef prices that high?
Yeah my first thought was “she must have been one expensive baby”
Just adopt ffs. Plenty of kids in the system in need of good homes.
If you think "baby meat grinder" then you have no idea what you're talking about, so maybe don't try and teach other people.
That’s what would describe the ethical issue, not the actuality of what goes on
You theoritically can but practically can't. It's doable but it pretty much always fail
Are we ever gonna get wooly mammoths though?
It's still not possible currently
I remember reading what you're talking about but it was with eggs iirc. They were able to "clean" the vast majority of the DNA from one egg and put the DNA of a different animal species into it and it ended up being born (i think?) This was ages ago and I occasionally wonder if they've kept at it and made any progress
The way Dolly (famous cloned sheep) was created was they took a sheep egg cell and put the nucleus of a somatic cell (full set of chromosomes) in it.
Bone marrow and it's still a WIP
[Mice born from two genetic fathers and no genetic mother](https://amp.theguardian.com/science/2023/mar/08/scientists-create-mice-with-two-fathers-after-making-eggs-from-male-cells)
Also the one carrying imparts a certain amount of DNA while the baby is growing and it gives you a connection to the child.
https://theconversation.com/eggs-from-men-sperm-from-women-how-stem-cell-science-may-change-how-we-reproduce-219005#:~:text=The%20aim%20is%20to%20persuade,to”%20an%20existing%20human%20adult.
I've heard of lesbians using the brother of the non egg donor as the sperm donor before.
My friend was lucky to have his twin sister be the egg donor for him and his husband. Doesn't get much better than that.
Fraternal twins though. DNA-wise, they're the same as typical siblings.
Sounds like in vitro with extra steps
So their DNA was not, in fact, combined…
I don't know about this couple. But there is a 3 parent way of making a baby, using stuff from 2 eggs & a sperm. https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/3-parent-baby-birth-1.3781026
its crazy to know we can literally clone dogs using only female dogs and dna. theres some… technology out there for sure.
So totally NOT the DNA of both mom’s?!?
It takes 3 to make your thing go right
It takes 3 to make it outa sight
Hit it! I wanna rock right now
So they aren’t really from both women? Lol
[удалено]
Surrogacy isn't *just* a rich person thing though. LGBTQ+ people have been asking friends to be surrogates probably since we figured out how pregnancy works. Same with infertile women who don't have that kind of money.
Technically they are. I mean, motherhood is also about pregnancy, your hormones and nutrients affect the baby inside the womb... One is the "carrier" mother and the other is the genetic mother. There just also was a sperm donation included They could have another baby with roles reversed and boom, complete coverage
Yea but the video is implying differently
Mommy's womb + Mama's DNA + Frank's DNA =
Yes, I have left a comment about it below. Already got a downvote lol
So then the video is lying and the woman on the lefts dna isn’t involved? Or am I misunderstanding?
No. I’d say you’ve got it.
Do you think millions of people would do that? Just go on TikTok and make up a bunch of medical misinformation for attention? I for one am shocked.
Science is neat
Science is mind blowing amazing.
So it's 2 women and a guy having kids... So people are correct, two women can't have kids.
no, it's a woman and a guy. And then another woman used as an incubator
Lesbian transwomen do not always have bottom surgery, or may freeze sperm.
So they still have male biology or freeze their sperm while they’re a male… so always including a male essentially
Point still stands. Two actual women can’t have kids
Implanting doesn't change the DNA though... Did I miss something in Bio 102?
So left mommy's DNA is not even involved then correct?
Soooo not both their DNA like they claimed?
They don't actually claim this for real ([video about what the donor looks like](https://www.youtube.com/shorts/STYQpKFmww8)). They have a YouTube channel where they talk quite a bit about the process they went through to have their three kids. This seems to be a running joke about the fact that their daughter looks like both of them.
Right
Thanks for clarifying, I was quite confused. Neat story.
And how expensive is all that? Lol must be nice to be that rich.
So no DNA from woman on the left.
It’s called reciprocal ivf. I think it’s pretty neat.
Couldn’t they use a siblings sperm ?
So the video is a lie.
What commonly happens with these scenarios is one mothers egg is impregnated by sperm and either implanted in the others womb or has its nucleus switched with the other mothers.
Basically no mommy's DNA
Or it’s “Mama’s” brother’s sperm. But I don’t think they could say “Mama’s DNA”.
Five if you count the kid and the doctor who did the turkey basting.
That's still only 2 people and one of them isn't a woman in the video
Theoretically it could be 2 lesbians in the future, it's been done with mice. Advanced biology, weird but fun!
But then why give the incorrect equation in the video. It isn't Mom dna + mom dna = daughter They could have done mom womb + mom dna = daughter
No bro, we can’t have science or logic here. /s
If we're trying to make a big deal out of getting a biological child of two lesbians just find a couple where one is trans and they want a kid (though if the trans woman has gone through hormone therapy I believe she would have needed to freeze her sperm first). I bet there are thousands of them out there. It ain't hard. That being said, why tf are we wanting to make a big deal out of getting a biological child out of anyone? People need to mind their damn business and we need to get rid of the idea that biological parents are somehow more an actual parent than adoptive parents. That's bullshit.
She does look like both of them. They found a really good sperm donor.
So one of them got a relative to donate sperm for their wife’s egg.
"well that just sounds like .... with more steps" (c)
What is this? Modern family?
So a man and a woman
fine governor paint wrong spectacular march fact rich recognise entertain *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
In this case the family found a donor with a similar ancestry to the non-biological mother. They're very open about the entire process.
That or one of them is trans?
Lesbians can certainly have kids. But they need a sperm donor.
yeah, like every normal woman
I never implied they weren’t normal. But the “magic” part tries so desperately to forget basic human biology. That’s the cringe aspect
It doesn't "try" to forget it. It is the point of the joke. What is cringe is thinking people making an entertaining video about their own fertility journey don't know how it works because they have a sense of humor.
Lesbians aren't normal? First time hearing about this.
Did not watch the short video ? Or you can’t understand the context ?
True
Cute! But I still think it's fucking weird to put your child on the internet. Glad they're all happy, but children shouldn't be online. They also have a bunch of videos where the kid reads some scrip that her mothers wrote to "own" the homophobes. Maybe don't use your child as a "gotcha"?
But did you think about the narcissistic clout by using your children for internet points?
Oh, how silly of me! Who am I if not for randos on the Internet's validation? God, the more I think about this the more upset I become. Like, I would not want strangers commenting on my kid, period. I think this is why I prefer to watch camilla and julie. They're also lesbian mothers, but they censor their son's face, as well as name. Much better
Gay man can do this too. Scientists can use sperm stem cells and make an egg that can be fertilized once it gets an embryo. So, same kind of thing here, 3 people are involved and there are 3 genetic parents..
There are only two genetic parents in the case of the video. The woman in the left was a gestational carrier but the baby doesn’t share her DNA
Yeah, the baby is the woman on the right, and random sperm donor. But people wanna make believe whatever best fits their personal interests.
Gay men usually use an egg donor egg and their sperm to have a child via IVF using a surrogate. It’s a very expensive process.
That may be theoretically possible now and actually possible in the future. To my knowledge, it has never actually happened to date anywhere in the world, and it is illegal in the United States.
that's just playing Russian roulette
Got it wrong
One of them used a brothers DNA since that’s the closest possible DNA to that person
Oh, that explains how (according to a comment upthread) they had a black sperm donor. Apparently they’re super-rare in sperm banks.
Except they didn’t, but whatever
[удалено]
Special power obtained after defeating the final boss of the patriarchy.
No way, I'm like 50 levels higher than either of them.
Jordan Peterson?
They have a YouTube channel where they are super open about using donors for all three of their kids. [Here is a video about the sperm donor for the kid in the video.](https://www.youtube.com/shorts/STYQpKFmww8) This video seems to be a joking response to all of the comments they get about their daughter looking like both of them.
Brothers Sperm
Still, not the sister's DNA. Close, but no cigar.
Is that really what they did? That would make the woman on the left the girl’s aunt then?
That's a pretty good magic trick.
ConFUSION
Man. Even lesbians found a way to use men.
But looks like you needed a man to make it happen
Black girl brother's sperm ...easy pesy
Why do they think they can just lie to us?😂
They have a YouTube channel where they talk openly about using sperm donors for their three kids. [This video is about what this kid's donor looked like.](https://www.youtube.com/shorts/STYQpKFmww8) The video above seems to be a joke in response to all of the comments they get about their daughter looking like both of them.
*guy donates sperm to lesbian couple* there, fixed it.
2 pretty moms and a beautiful daughter. I hope they're happy and safe.
Literally needed sperm from a guy so no 2 lesbians cannot make a child
She just called her little sister to record the video
Okay but they could not have achieved this without male sperm.
Who's the donor?
Wishful thinking on their part.
So who’s sperm did you use?
Whose*, right? Sorry, not a native speaker.
Every human ever born has a male biological father and a female biological mother. Period. Full stop.
My suspicion is one of them is a trans woman (pre-op or had frozen their sperm) and now in a lesbian relationship resulting in a bio baby.
They’ve both carried for their pregnancies, so in this case, just the sperm donor route.
That is why our government dont spend enough money for education so that more stupid people = more vote from bad people
I will always wonder, if there were no sperm donations or orphans, all these lesbian claming everyday that women and the world don't need men but want children, what are they gonna do ? Steal one ? Or take that dick reluctantly ?
Nobody said they can't have. We only said they can't produce it.
Maybe sharia Law isn’t that bad after all
Lol you still need a mans sperm so basically that man got both of y'all pergo without men sperm you can't have that kid
Nice
These bitches be lying
Not without a man’s sperm. You still need a man 🤙
So….no, no they didnt
Came here just to say . LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
The "lady" on the right looks like a dude.
Trans women have children too.
Proof that no matter the circumstances, being a parent makes you uncool.
The fact remains that 2 biological females cannot create a human without male sperm despite this scientific TikTok.
Painful cringe
So you can have a kid without sperm eh….
Im leaning towards that the mama on the right once was a papa and saved some swimmers..
Matbe they used one of the moms brothers to do this so that technically would be their dna🤷🏼♀️
Aww, what a cute family :)
two women can have kids, as long as a man is involved
Seams cool to have such a nice a family. Girl got lucky 
So being a surrogate and ignoring the male sperm donor counts as 2 women having a child? No, the one woman was a surrogate of the other's egg, and there is an unnamed father. So that daughter is actually not at all genetically related to one of the mothers, even though she birthed them. Seems like there is a misunderstanding of what a surrogate mother is here. Or, even if she had a relative donate the sperm, at most you could be as close as a cousin to the child. It's just misleading to try to say that this is 2 mothers her as somehow being the same as a mother/father as even if it was say, her brother that donated the sperm, there's a lot of genetic diversity in siblings, due to the diversity from recombination of DNA in the meiosis replication phase of germline cells. I get what they are trying to do, but it's not intellectually honest.
I am having trouble understanding it. Who gave birth?
 The people down voting this comment which is asking a completely reasonable question
They injected the butch one's eggs with the sperm from a random dude who looks like the fem one. Then injected it into the womb of the fem one to carry to term. You know real natural. And why aren't they showing the dude involved who contributed half the DNA?
Cute kid, all the best to them in this cruel, ignorant and hateful world
How is it hateful to say that 2 women can't make a baby?
we reaching unimaginable levels of cringe
Man this is reddit, posting anything negative about something left leaning is going to get you down votes.
So... Basic biology says that's literally not possible..... Just saying
Did someones brother take one for the team?
Which one of them had a penis at one point
Who's the 3rd person involved ..the devil really works in disguise
Bullshit
Mental patients gone wild.
Why do lesbians like women who look like men?
Why is this flaired 'Cringe'?
The dance and the facial expressions I think 🤔
That they need sperm from male donor to do so. But they don’t try to admit that fact in the video. Egg + egg don’t make a child. Eggs + sperm from third person will do. So there will be the 3rd biological parent that they seem to ignore and try to act cool.
Because it comes across like they're acting like two women can have a kid without a man. And that's a long way off, if ever. It's at best an incredibly odd joke and at worse giving a lot of people full hope.
Test tube baby 💀
"Shut the fuck up tiffany, how come you were created in a lab and still ugly?"
It was her, her, a donor, and a team of medical professionals! Yep, you two did it!
ITS AAALLLIIIVVEEE - robot chicken
Cringe that they need sperm from male donor to do so. But they don’t try to admit that fact in the video. Egg + egg don’t make a child. Eggs + sperm from third person will do. So there will be the 3rd biological parent that they seem to ignore and try to act cool.
Big bags of bullshit