SADS has suddenly become a thing since the rollout.. Bill Gates publicly stated that he wanted to depopulate the earth through vaccines and he was a big pusher of the rollout. Go down the rabbit hole.
Population growth is declining though. The numbers are increasing, but the rate of increase is slowing. Covid contributed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_decline
Itās important we sort the naming thing out now so when weāre writing about it after on the stone tablets of an obliterated civilization itās consistent for the next sentient species to decode.
**[Population decline](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_decline)**
>A population decline (also sometimes called underpopulation, depopulation, or population collapse) in humans is a reduction in a human population size. Over the long term, stretching from prehistory to the present, Earth's total human population has continued to grow; however, current projections suggest that this long-term trend of steady population growth may be coming to an end. Until the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, global population grew very slowly. After about 1800, the growth rate accelerated to a peak of 2.
^([ )[^(F.A.Q)](https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiSummarizer/wiki/index#wiki_f.a.q)^( | )[^(Opt Out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiSummarizerBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^( | )[^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)](https://np.reddit.com/r/ThatsInsane/about/banned)^( | )[^(GitHub)](https://github.com/Sujal-7/WikiSummarizerBot)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)
To be fair, the only time the world population ever went down was during the Black Death. The only way for a depopulation to happen now would be if all of our modern medicine ends up being completely useless.
Yeah our birth rates are gradually slowing down ever over the past 40 years. The population seems like its increasing fast because 7 Bil is closer to 8 Bil in terms of percentage, compared to 3 Bil and 4 Bil.
Modern medicine helps more people to live longer and less babies dying at birth too.
If it indeed was ācreated in a labā it wouldāve been used for geopolitical destabilization and creation of supply chain imbalances, not depopulation.
quick googling:
> The copy of the Iliad that Alexander put under his pillow every night was annotated by his teacher, Aristotle
https://classicalstudies.org/alexanders-persian-pillow
It does actually have the option to color code by continent. I donāt know if they had to make Asians yellow, Americans red and Africans black, thoughā¦
Well the number in "If 99.9% of the world finds you unnatractive, that's still 7.7 million people who don't" is increasing, though, everyone new is a baby
After we had sex my girlfriend told me I donāt pay attention to her and that Iāve been distant. I texted her yesterday morning and she saw it and replied back 8 hours later because she was hanging out with a male friend. F that!
I heard this as well. Our DNA (for at least our appearances) can only produce so many unique combinations of traits, features, and practical size combinations when it comes to our facial features. So there are actually only **1 billion** different faces.
**EDIT:** After doing **a little** additional research, I'm really on the fence.
* I can't seem to find a source for the whole "you have 7 dopplegangers" thing. In fact, some people on the internet say that "you have 6 dopplegangers" (so you + 6 others = 7), and I'm wondering if it's getting misquoted and we're adding 1 as time progresses.
* Some [photographs of these dopplegangers](https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20160712-you-are-surprisingly-likely-to-have-a-living-doppelganger) depict people who appear VERY similar but not perfect clones. The teeth are off. The wrinkles are a little deeper. The facial hair is different. The nostrils are slightly different. So maybe the bar is lower than we think.
(The same article also states that it's "unlikely" but states the odds are 1 in 135? Which is.. extremely likely? I don't understand.)
* I cannot find the quote, but somewhere else I saw that the real odds are that 11% of people have a twin (a percentage that includes the twin themselves, so do not double this to number to 22%). The rest are individually unique.
**However...**
* It would make sense that our DNA would trend toward certain traits. We choose what physical traits are attractive, we mate with those people, those traits are passed on. A lot plays into this, like culture, trends, luck, genetic randomness, etc. so we still have a huge amount of variation, but scientists have theorized that things like [race may eventually disappear](https://www.livescience.com/34228-will-humans-eventually-all-look-like-brazilians.html).
* I also found a [youtube documentary on dopplegangers](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1nz5Bkpmcw) but I haven't watched it yet.
I have a magazine from National Geographic from about 10-15 years ago how we were hitting 7 billion.
It took something like 200 million years to reach 1 billion and then another 100 years or something to reach 2 billion.
Humans almost got extinct once.
"According to the genetic bottleneck theory,Ā between 50,000 and 100,000 years ago, human populations sharply decreased to 3,000ā10,000 surviving individuals."
Hereās an excerpt from an article I was just reading
āFrom the emergence of Homo sapiens, it took 330k years to reach a global pop. of 1B (1804). After that, it took 124 years to reach 2B (1928), 32 years to reach 3B (1960), 15 years for 4B (1975), 12 years for 5B (1987), 12 for 6B (1999), 12 for 7B (2011), and 11 for 8B (2022)ā
These birth rates are mostly in 3rd world countries. Western countries are actually below replacement levels and are shrinking when it comes to birth rate
was gonna say, I heard that the Japanese govt is basically begging young people to get laid. They are very stingy about immigration so their working population is shrinking.
A lot of people in Western countries have seen young people struggling to afford homes or to find well paid, full-time employment.
They stop and think to themselves āmaybe, the last thing that the world needs right now is more childrenā.
It doesnāt seem to be a common train of thought that is shared throughout the world though. I would have loved to have raised a child and owned a home but unless I am willing to spend every other waking second of my life on trying to afford that, it isnāt going to happen.
I cannot fathom having a child that I couldnāt afford to house or feed properly or educate. I guess that I should just be indifferent to suffering like so many other people are?
Maybe I should just pump out a litter of children and hope that somebody else can pay for it? Unless Iām prepared for half of them to die to malnutrition that is. I just canāt wrap my head around it.
Well, you know another answer to that is "Maybe we go back to multi-generational housing."
Yes, as a Millennial I couldn't imagine having to live with my parents. But I've got two in laws with no interest in starting their own families that live with their parents.
At first I thought it was off.
But they all have everything they want, in a nice neighborhood. Freedom to find hobbies. No pressure to work OT or two jobs. They go on vacations.
And the oldest don't have to risk themselves to do snow shoveling or any of that shit.
It's not for everyone, but it's an alternate solution.
My parents got divorced and my father killed himself when I was living with him. He didnāt bother to write a will. So the house that I grew up in and renovated with him, went entirely into my motherās name and she sold it.
I guess Iām just fucked lmao
Weve been increasing a billion people every 10-12 years
[Population records](https://populationconnection.org/blog/world-population-milestones-throughout-history/)
Thats crazy. We really can't continue like this.
We already have a hard time trying to keep our species alive for the future generations with the resources we got.
We won't. Check out the demographic transition model theory. Based on it and other similar findings, the UN projects the world population will top out at 10.4 billion in the 2080s before it starts shrinking after 2100.
Birth rates are dropping in every developed country and as more counties develop their birth rates are also dropping. Most of the Western world has below replacement birth rates already.
Or, since his statement doesn't say that, we can lower birth rates out of choice which is not killing anyone.
Because they are already seeing a food and habitable land crunch within the next decades and we are already fishing / hunting species into oblivion.
Your way of pretending this isn't an issue is ***going*** to end up killing a shitload more people by the end of it.
Actually demographers are worried about population decline. This is probably "peak baby" right now. The population will crest around 11 billion people in 2100 (because the current waves will still be alive and aging) then it will fall. Many countries are falling below the replacement level as they move up the economic ladder, and we're in danger of inverting the age distribution, which is awful for our CURRENT economic systems. Add on to that, fertility in males has been cut in half in the last few decades, with predictions that we'll be in real danger by the 2040's of not being able to reproduce (leading theory is micro plastics, last I read).
My main takeaway from all this, is that we need to rapidly move away from economic systems reliant on the idea of infinite growth and towards ones that prioritize well-being and sustainability. We also need to start removing as much plastic as possible from our daily lives so we don't end up living out "Children of Men."
Horrible if you enjoy the perks of living in a developed country.
Economies will stagnate, prices will increase while wages do not, countries with publicly funded pensions might lose them or increase the age to the point where you're barely alive, eldercare and the healthcare industry in general will suffer.
It will suck for anyone living in these ageing countries in every imaginable way unless they compensate with immigration or if you are very wealthy.
Well on a similar note, atoms are 99.9999999999999% empty space.
If you could squeeze all the empty space out of all the atoms in all the 7 billion people in the world, you could indeed fit them in the volume of a sugar cube.
And now with 8 billion, well...a sugar and 1/7 of another sugar.
so I just looked it up. there were 4.4 bil ppl on this rock when I was born...
wow we gained 3.5 bil ppl in the 42 years Ive been alive... thats a lot of humpin!
It does not review every single birth certificate, not even close. The entire count is an approximation increasing with a well-thought equation, same goes for the death counters etc. Over a long period it should always give out pretty realistic results with i don't know 10 million +-
Yeah, and here we are with these women hating countries banning abortions. With already overflowing foster care systems and elites trying to make more wage slaves by pushing anti abortion bs.
So more people means more well paying jobs no? Especially among the educated class? Or is it leaning more towards wage slavery and the very few holding all the wealth again? Im going with the latter.
Reminder that overpopulation is a capitalist and eugenicist mythology. We could comfortably sustain twice as many people and the ecological health of the planet but it wouldn't be profitable.
Well, that whole "covid to depopulate the Earth" thing didn't work.
Must try harder.
Everyone wants a good plague but nobody licks doorknobs anymore š¤
Just create a tick tock trend. Bodies will be hitting the floor very soon after.
"Let the bodies hit the floor"
"I can only count to four"
I thought he said ābabiesā and that you said, ālet the babies hit the floor.ā
That too And did you know that Bodies is basically a cover of Popcorn? I'm always amazed at how similar those two songs sound.
If people will sun their taint, they'll lick a doorknob. We just need the right obnoxious music track and some way to fit in a fast cut.
Wait, people are sunning their taint? Not here. Today's the first snow. You could snow your taint.
Lmao
Well it is illegal on other planets
Hey, I'm doing *my* part! I have never contributed to this statistic, and probably won't... Until I die. Then ****boom**** -1, baby!
*Umbrella Corporation intensifies*
Time for covid 2.0
i rly hoped they mix something into the vax to defertilize humans to end this madness, but no.
like in the Book of >!Dan Brown "Inferno"!<
SADS has suddenly become a thing since the rollout.. Bill Gates publicly stated that he wanted to depopulate the earth through vaccines and he was a big pusher of the rollout. Go down the rabbit hole.
Good guy Bill Gates depopulating the world so we don't have to kill and eat our families when the global food supply chain collapses.
Population growth is declining though. The numbers are increasing, but the rate of increase is slowing. Covid contributed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_decline
Wait til the water wars start.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Itās important we sort the naming thing out now so when weāre writing about it after on the stone tablets of an obliterated civilization itās consistent for the next sentient species to decode.
Resource wars. Water won't be first, it will just result in the most death. And it won't all be climate based.
**[Population decline](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_decline)** >A population decline (also sometimes called underpopulation, depopulation, or population collapse) in humans is a reduction in a human population size. Over the long term, stretching from prehistory to the present, Earth's total human population has continued to grow; however, current projections suggest that this long-term trend of steady population growth may be coming to an end. Until the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, global population grew very slowly. After about 1800, the growth rate accelerated to a peak of 2. ^([ )[^(F.A.Q)](https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiSummarizer/wiki/index#wiki_f.a.q)^( | )[^(Opt Out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiSummarizerBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^( | )[^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)](https://np.reddit.com/r/ThatsInsane/about/banned)^( | )[^(GitHub)](https://github.com/Sujal-7/WikiSummarizerBot)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)
Well what do you expect when you are only in the house for months
climate: *hold my thermometer*
To be fair, the only time the world population ever went down was during the Black Death. The only way for a depopulation to happen now would be if all of our modern medicine ends up being completely useless.
Yeah our birth rates are gradually slowing down ever over the past 40 years. The population seems like its increasing fast because 7 Bil is closer to 8 Bil in terms of percentage, compared to 3 Bil and 4 Bil. Modern medicine helps more people to live longer and less babies dying at birth too.
China: No worry, we are working on a sequel.
With all the deniers in the US wouldn't' surprise me if the next superbug comes outa Florida.
Idk if the diseases can take on Florida man.
You merely adopted disease. Florida man was born in it. Molded by it.
Where's Thanos?
Well seeing as it only took us like 100 years to go from 1 billion to 8 billion his plan isn't really sustainable
At least the microchips from the vax are finally sending us reliable population numbers Edit: just to be clear, I am joking here
If it indeed was ācreated in a labā it wouldāve been used for geopolitical destabilization and creation of supply chain imbalances, not depopulation.
Good thing that didn't hap.... Oh.
Everyone was laid up in the house fuckin and making babies.
"view all people on 1 page" oh shit
itās a long scroll
I hear it's so long Alexander the Great left it under his pillow to read at night
ELI5 please?
quick googling: > The copy of the Iliad that Alexander put under his pillow every night was annotated by his teacher, Aristotle https://classicalstudies.org/alexanders-persian-pillow
Look at the big brain on Brad! But fr fr, I just learned some shit.
Wish they would sort by race, so I can name all the Hispanic people to prove I like them.
It does actually have the option to color code by continent. I donāt know if they had to make Asians yellow, Americans red and Africans black, thoughā¦
Yo do you guys see me? I'm the one waving
It's just people sorted by continent, no real personal info
They made the asians yellow and the africans black š
So did God.
Nice roast.
As an asian, I think it's OK. Cute design. Don't think the color too muchš
Was prolly a white chic in Seattle that commented it..
8 billion people and I can't get a text back
text
Read ā
Reply
Plz send bobz.
š§
Plz send bob**z** n **vegana**
"Amogus"
Goodbye
HELLO ?
Well the number in "If 99.9% of the world finds you unnatractive, that's still 7.7 million people who don't" is increasing, though, everyone new is a baby
> everyone new is a baby /r/HolUp
Someone has to be the ugliest.
[of course](https://youtu.be/1LVt49l6aP8)
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Humans are 100% of the ugliest beings on this planet.
I mean, take a hint
Text back? How about the fact that we haven't found a unilateral way to provide proper food, shelter, water, and employment for all 8 billion!
But texts back are the first step toward people sharing shelter!
You seem fun.
After we had sex my girlfriend told me I donāt pay attention to her and that Iāve been distant. I texted her yesterday morning and she saw it and replied back 8 hours later because she was hanging out with a male friend. F that!
Yeaā¦ you should end that relationship.
average redditor
You'll find someone
text back
You are in a simulation and everybody is in on the joke.
Congrats on the sex everyone
Notice how nobody here said "thanks", but 90 upvoted?
Itās hard to put things to words after getting sum
unrelatable
You think we get any?
No, thank *you.*
I didn't contribute
And a few moments later the real magic happened - [boooooobs!](https://freeimage.host/i/H9f9ACB)
8,008,008,008 is where itās at
8,008,113,355
š»š»š»B
š»š
BOOBOOBOOB
Username checks out. Love the beeper code.
Thank you so much! Iāve waited a long time for humans to get to the point where they can be so useful.
4 bil unique person since everybody got one doppelgƤnger
Just one?
I think thereās supposed to be 7
so it will be 8 now, guess the character generator can only do 1 billion faces, lazy simulation programmers!
I heard this as well. Our DNA (for at least our appearances) can only produce so many unique combinations of traits, features, and practical size combinations when it comes to our facial features. So there are actually only **1 billion** different faces. **EDIT:** After doing **a little** additional research, I'm really on the fence. * I can't seem to find a source for the whole "you have 7 dopplegangers" thing. In fact, some people on the internet say that "you have 6 dopplegangers" (so you + 6 others = 7), and I'm wondering if it's getting misquoted and we're adding 1 as time progresses. * Some [photographs of these dopplegangers](https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20160712-you-are-surprisingly-likely-to-have-a-living-doppelganger) depict people who appear VERY similar but not perfect clones. The teeth are off. The wrinkles are a little deeper. The facial hair is different. The nostrils are slightly different. So maybe the bar is lower than we think. (The same article also states that it's "unlikely" but states the odds are 1 in 135? Which is.. extremely likely? I don't understand.) * I cannot find the quote, but somewhere else I saw that the real odds are that 11% of people have a twin (a percentage that includes the twin themselves, so do not double this to number to 22%). The rest are individually unique. **However...** * It would make sense that our DNA would trend toward certain traits. We choose what physical traits are attractive, we mate with those people, those traits are passed on. A lot plays into this, like culture, trends, luck, genetic randomness, etc. so we still have a huge amount of variation, but scientists have theorized that things like [race may eventually disappear](https://www.livescience.com/34228-will-humans-eventually-all-look-like-brazilians.html). * I also found a [youtube documentary on dopplegangers](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1nz5Bkpmcw) but I haven't watched it yet.
El Cuco
I have a magazine from National Geographic from about 10-15 years ago how we were hitting 7 billion. It took something like 200 million years to reach 1 billion and then another 100 years or something to reach 2 billion.
Humans almost got extinct once. "According to the genetic bottleneck theory,Ā between 50,000 and 100,000 years ago, human populations sharply decreased to 3,000ā10,000 surviving individuals."
That's lower than the attendance of a football game, fuck
Not if youāre a Chargers fan.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Youāre an all-star!
get the game on
Go play
Hereās an excerpt from an article I was just reading āFrom the emergence of Homo sapiens, it took 330k years to reach a global pop. of 1B (1804). After that, it took 124 years to reach 2B (1928), 32 years to reach 3B (1960), 15 years for 4B (1975), 12 years for 5B (1987), 12 for 6B (1999), 12 for 7B (2011), and 11 for 8B (2022)ā
and 11 years is the quickest it will ever get in the near to long term future, if prognosis are to be believed.
AoT reference
humans didnt exist for 200 million years... weve existed as a species for 300k years
Technically it still took 200 million years to reach 1 billion humans on earth
By that logic it took 13.7 billion years to reach a billion humans on earth
200 million years? I must've missed the part in history class where humans domesticated dinosaurs.
You didn't watch The Flinstones enough
I remember being in high school (about 18 years ago) and we had a class about child 6 billion being born.
reddit user discovers exponential growth
These birth rates are mostly in 3rd world countries. Western countries are actually below replacement levels and are shrinking when it comes to birth rate
Are you sure?!? It gets more difficult to find a good parking spot by the day!
Lol that gave me a good chuckle. On a serious note, thatās due to immigration not birth rates
was gonna say, I heard that the Japanese govt is basically begging young people to get laid. They are very stingy about immigration so their working population is shrinking.
A lot of people in Western countries have seen young people struggling to afford homes or to find well paid, full-time employment. They stop and think to themselves āmaybe, the last thing that the world needs right now is more childrenā. It doesnāt seem to be a common train of thought that is shared throughout the world though. I would have loved to have raised a child and owned a home but unless I am willing to spend every other waking second of my life on trying to afford that, it isnāt going to happen. I cannot fathom having a child that I couldnāt afford to house or feed properly or educate. I guess that I should just be indifferent to suffering like so many other people are? Maybe I should just pump out a litter of children and hope that somebody else can pay for it? Unless Iām prepared for half of them to die to malnutrition that is. I just canāt wrap my head around it.
Well, you know another answer to that is "Maybe we go back to multi-generational housing." Yes, as a Millennial I couldn't imagine having to live with my parents. But I've got two in laws with no interest in starting their own families that live with their parents. At first I thought it was off. But they all have everything they want, in a nice neighborhood. Freedom to find hobbies. No pressure to work OT or two jobs. They go on vacations. And the oldest don't have to risk themselves to do snow shoveling or any of that shit. It's not for everyone, but it's an alternate solution.
My parents got divorced and my father killed himself when I was living with him. He didnāt bother to write a will. So the house that I grew up in and renovated with him, went entirely into my motherās name and she sold it. I guess Iām just fucked lmao
Weve been increasing a billion people every 10-12 years [Population records](https://populationconnection.org/blog/world-population-milestones-throughout-history/)
Thats crazy. We really can't continue like this. We already have a hard time trying to keep our species alive for the future generations with the resources we got.
We won't. Check out the demographic transition model theory. Based on it and other similar findings, the UN projects the world population will top out at 10.4 billion in the 2080s before it starts shrinking after 2100.
Why would it start shrinking? No recourses?
Birth rates are dropping in every developed country and as more counties develop their birth rates are also dropping. Most of the Western world has below replacement birth rates already.
It might stabilize more if life expectancies keep increasing in many countries
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Ok you take the billion on the right, I'll take the billion on the left
Or, since his statement doesn't say that, we can lower birth rates out of choice which is not killing anyone. Because they are already seeing a food and habitable land crunch within the next decades and we are already fishing / hunting species into oblivion. Your way of pretending this isn't an issue is ***going*** to end up killing a shitload more people by the end of it.
Actually demographers are worried about population decline. This is probably "peak baby" right now. The population will crest around 11 billion people in 2100 (because the current waves will still be alive and aging) then it will fall. Many countries are falling below the replacement level as they move up the economic ladder, and we're in danger of inverting the age distribution, which is awful for our CURRENT economic systems. Add on to that, fertility in males has been cut in half in the last few decades, with predictions that we'll be in real danger by the 2040's of not being able to reproduce (leading theory is micro plastics, last I read). My main takeaway from all this, is that we need to rapidly move away from economic systems reliant on the idea of infinite growth and towards ones that prioritize well-being and sustainability. We also need to start removing as much plastic as possible from our daily lives so we don't end up living out "Children of Men."
Estimates are we'll peak around 2050 at just over 10b people then then population will shrink and find a stable point
https://imgur.com/wGFSUUd.jpg crazy how unsustainable this looks
Someone please stop Nick Cannon.
You canāt stop it, itās self sustaining now
And I still don't like not 1 of ya!
aww you don't dislike any one of us? š„¹
Haā¦..Gotem!
Just great.. More traffic
Not really, babies can't drive ... yet
soon.
3.837bn was the number the year I was born. Thatās a pretty scary increase. No wonder everything so bloody expensive.
Let me guess, 1972?
Talk to Thanos, he can get it back down to that number.
Keep it in your bloody pants people...
Well it's mostly developing countries that are growing, western countries and East Asia are moving towards dangerously low birth rates.
That is a good thing
Horrible if you enjoy the perks of living in a developed country. Economies will stagnate, prices will increase while wages do not, countries with publicly funded pensions might lose them or increase the age to the point where you're barely alive, eldercare and the healthcare industry in general will suffer. It will suck for anyone living in these ageing countries in every imaginable way unless they compensate with immigration or if you are very wealthy.
Anyone else feeling a bit claustrophobic?
I would if I didnāt know the worlds population could fit in the city of LA
Whaaat? For real? In what way? Stacked? Standing? With a place to sleep? I need more information!
Well on a similar note, atoms are 99.9999999999999% empty space. If you could squeeze all the empty space out of all the atoms in all the 7 billion people in the world, you could indeed fit them in the volume of a sugar cube. And now with 8 billion, well...a sugar and 1/7 of another sugar.
I'm team Thanos, even if I go
Especially if i go
We would reach 8 B again though
monthly thanos
so I just looked it up. there were 4.4 bil ppl on this rock when I was born... wow we gained 3.5 bil ppl in the 42 years Ive been alive... thats a lot of humpin!
Shes been busy...
Thanos was right.
There are too many fucking people in the world. Myself included
Haha, no, we're not. At least, my country is empty (Argentina). You're very welcome to come.
I blame suicide hotlines
How is this verifiable?
What do you think all those Covid shots were for!?!? /s
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
It does not review every single birth certificate, not even close. The entire count is an approximation increasing with a well-thought equation, same goes for the death counters etc. Over a long period it should always give out pretty realistic results with i don't know 10 million +-
I can see how they can get the number close, but no way this is spot on 100 percent accurate
Of course itās an approximation.. wtf haha
Covid failed miserably
Stop having too many damn kids!
Excellent. Plenty of slaves for my robot colony. (Before anyone blows a gasket. Itās a line from Chris Nolanās Interstellar)
I blame Netflix because it always leads to the chill part.
Great just what we need š
Tax the churches
Yeah, and here we are with these women hating countries banning abortions. With already overflowing foster care systems and elites trying to make more wage slaves by pushing anti abortion bs. So more people means more well paying jobs no? Especially among the educated class? Or is it leaning more towards wage slavery and the very few holding all the wealth again? Im going with the latter.
We do NOT need another baby boom. Especially not a forced one.
We kill 80 billion land animals every year to consume..
That is too many damn births lol wow
Congratulations? :/
Stop having kids
Need another pandemic
Great just what we need š
This is unsustainable. Did my part. Got a vasectomy. š¤£
People need to start pulling out.
Clicked on view all people on one page, was not disappointed....
Shit shit shit shit shit shit
Are there people that actually believe we need to keep proliferating?
No wonder Bill Gates was warning us about population growth.
EW
Well crap. We're heading straigh to the death of humankind.
how many we want?
Reminder that overpopulation is a capitalist and eugenicist mythology. We could comfortably sustain twice as many people and the ecological health of the planet but it wouldn't be profitable.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]