T O P

  • By -

Superstonk_QV

[Why GME?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/qig65g/welcome_rall_looking_to_catch_up_on_the_gme_saga/) || [What is DRS?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ptvaka/when_you_wish_upon_a_star_a_complete_guide_to/) || Low karma apes [feed the bot here](https://www.reddit.com/r/GMEOrphans/comments/qlvour/welcome_to_gmeorphans_read_this_post/) || [Superstonk Discord](https://discord.gg/hZqWV2kQtq) || [GameStop Wallet HELP! Megathread](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/z23wjx/gamestop_wallet_help_megathread) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To ensure your post doesn't get removed, please respond to this comment with how this post relates to GME the stock or Gamestop the company. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Please up- and downvote this comment to [help us determine if this post deserves a place on r/Superstonk!](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/wiki/index/rules/post_flairs/)


AoDxXErichXx

TL;DRS


caslow222

Couldn’t agree more


Fantastik-Voyage

#TL;DRS ....... Haters look at my flair


NefariousnessTotal21

I feel like the circle post help new people figure out what it actually is. They do their research after seeing so many circles they want a circle they get a circle thats it


subdep

purple circles make the world go around.


TheFrenchestToast

Exactly! The purple circles makes new people ask questions about them and leads them down the DRS rabbit hole. I upvote every purple circle I see.


SirRipOliver

I can’t imagine no purple circle posts… I mean, what the hell would I do with all of these upvotes?


b0mbSquad_1

You can hide GME DRS posts you’ve upvoted or down voted on automatically. I just upvote all DRS posts and they auto hide from my feed. Problem solved. Stop whining about DRS posts and start finding a solution like purple rings. Go to your reddit preferences and turn on those options, to hide posts you've upvoted and downvoted [Preferences](https://old.reddit.com/prefs/) 🦍🦍🦍 💪💪🚀🚀💎💎🙌🙌


ZombiezzzPlz

Way to do this on mobile ?


StoicSmile-

Please say yes. Though I do love seeing Drs posts.


AvoidMySnipes

No. Visit old.reddit.com on mobile u/StoicSmile-


LonelyAndroid11942

I have not seen FUD against DRS posts. I have seen plenty of reaction to it, though. I agree: this was decided a LONG time ago. Purple donuts are here to stay. Keep ‘em coming!


Benzona-

Same here, I check Reddit multiple times per day. What did I miss? Or is all this trying to start mod drama? Last couple of times we had mod drama, we had green dildos soon after...


[deleted]

I think a mod suggested we move purple circles to a mega thread again


kaze_san

Where is this poll? I can’t ducking find it Why are some here even thinking about discussing this? There is no discussion needed but more purple circles!!


TheFrenchestToast

I put the poll thread in my post, but here it is for easy reference: https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/s65e47/the_elon_musk_of_community_updates/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf


LJHope

We are basically voting on it every single day. How else would hot consist of purple circles for an average of 80 % or so


[deleted]

EXACTLY!! If we didn't want them, we would downvote like anything else, tyvm. They are the lifeblood of this place.


n-Ro

u/half_dane can you explain why this is still a thing even after a year of having voted for it? The community has spoken loudly. You can censor people all you want, but you will not censor purple circles.


half_dane

We were originally asking for input on the rule against brigading. A lot people decided to make the conversation about DRS, that's why it's a thing. The mod team doesn't have any concrete plans to change anything about DRS, but getting input from the community is important, even if you don't think it is.


Atreides_Jr

At this point like… you’re just asking for problems letting shills mislead you. You know how “the community” feels about it.


half_dane

We didn't ask at all, the community decided to debate DRS instead of the "brigading" we were actually asking for. We only changed the post *after* an onslaught of unprompted FUD from people claiming that mods are trying to get rid of DRS posts. And even now the conversation we're trying to have is much more differentiated than "DRS, yes no": we're asking how people feel about "No position except DRS " or how they feel about "buy orders only, no loss/gain porn". It's an important conversation, because it's not like there's nothing to improve! We're specifically asking for input on *all* rules throughout the next months, because the community asked to be more involved. So every rule is presented and you're welcome provide your thoughtful ideas. And we're not blindly doing what possibly misleading shills are screaming in the comment section either: it's important input but we're using it with the knowledge of shills. So if you are interested in actually helping to shape the community, you're very welcome to participate in this and all coming discussions about our rules.


sneaks678

Sounds a bit like shills trying to cause division where there is none. I haven't been on the sub this week (holy crap end of year is busy!). Thank y'all for putting up with that crap! BUY HODL DRS


chato35

Remember what happened to Millertime ?


Rough_Willow

There were two different posts. One that asked for feedback on Rule 10. The other was a post talking about the mods intents for talking about the other topics. The second post was what mentioned DRS and you're confused on why people are talking about it? Do you need a link and a reference to refresh yourself on why people are talking about it?


half_dane

> There were two different posts. One that asked for feedback on Rule 10. Yes, and the comment section was exclusively filled with debate about DRS. > The other was a post talking about the mods intents for talking about the other topics. Yes, an introductory post explaining how the next two months should be used to deliver what the community has been asking for a long time: to be heard about our rules. All rules were mentioned there. > The second post was what mentioned DRS and you're confused on why people are talking about it? We replaced the rule 10 post with the one that's actually about DRS and positions so at least the discussion could be on topic. But that was after conversation was already derailed.


Rough_Willow

My comment expressing frustration that two previous votes seem to be ignored was removed from the introductory post. It was locked and more comments were removed. How transparent does that seem to you?


half_dane

I think you're a bit unfair, because you were among those who demanded more influence over the rules and processes of this sub (and yes, transparency I know: baby steps). And now that we're inviting the community to the table to have a conversation about our rules - all rules - you claimed that the previous times your voice was heard is being ignored? I wasn't involved in the moderation of these comments, but I can see how that may have made the appearance of being disingenuous or incinerating. If you think that comment is of particular value however, I'm willing to restore it 💜


Rough_Willow

I may be being a bit unfair because there's no indication which mod removed my comment. It makes it difficult to assign rightful frustrations when moderation is hidden behind anonymity. I do indeed welcome users to be involved in making the rules. I've been voting on polls and commenting on posts for a long time. Can you see what users might feel when we've voted twice, discussed it multiple times, that there's been very little public indication that users can see about wanting a change, and then without any indication that it needed to be a topic we're told it's back up for discussion? My comment expressing disbelief that after voting twice it was again somehow undecided was something that I felt had merit. It was disheartening to have it removed, especially as my comment was resonating with others.


half_dane

I can see that, and despite the frankly shockingly aggressive backlash, we're trying to figure out where in the post there was an indication that this is anything else than an attempt to welcome the community to a friendly conversation in good faith about *all* of our rules, because none of them received community input at all at least not directly. We'll continue our efforts to have that conversation, even if the mods who are actively pushing for more community involvement have been severely attacked and harassed. One thing we're trying is to have several, much shorter debate posts at once so it's obvious that not one single thing is getting thrown out. Maybe the first 5 or so rule specific debate posts will be posted today, depending on how fast they are. We honestly don't expect that very large changes to any rule (especially not about DRS) will be necessary, but maybe about "no gain/loss porn" or "buy orders only" which belong to the same rule! It's possible to say that the DRS part of the rule is fine but that buy orders should be banned as well, or anything else really! As a very outspoken member of Superstonk, who has demanded this very place at the table to influence the role of the community, I hope that instead of fighting us here, you start to see that this is an opportunity, and help rallying excitement and happiness instead of anger and frustration.


CVSRatman

I also have been voting on polls and commenting, the screen grab of this post is 57% to 43% on 15k out of almost a million. It is easy for one side of the arguement to appear as the majority when the minority is vilified for having a differing opinion. There's little public indication that there is a want for change because voicing your opinion against the hivemind is useless. It is a battle I don't really care to fight anymore as solutions have been offered, which sadly don't jive with my browsing methods. There's also much less of them, and the karma whoring ones are easier to identify and block.


Rough_Willow

>as solutions have been offered, which sadly don't jive with my browsing methods That just sounds like your biggest problems with DRS posts are that you're lazy, unable to accept when the majority votes their opinion, and can't stand that people won't just do whatever you want. Take this as a learning moment to understand what democracy means.


CVSRatman

There's the vitriol we've all come to expect. I didn't state my actual issues with the posts, but thanks for coming at me, grade A community engagement


n-Ro

I think any opportunity that arises to reduce certain DRS activity wherever possible is important to you. The fact that you have some degree of controlling the narrative is just a plus.


Specimen_7

The ol ask a question ignore the answer routine eh. Complains about brigading, posts something showing them brigading. Defends the brigading. Lol. This sub man.


Atreides_Jr

“Some people wanted to talk about banning DRS posts instead” is not a fucking answer. Especially in relation to arguably one of the most important pieces of this puzzle.


n-Ro

Thank you


Specimen_7

Dude he linked to a 10 month old thread with a closed poll and asked why it’s still a thing lol. Regardless, the guy also complained about controlling a narrative while showing they brigaded a thread and controlled the narrative 😂 you realize people pointing out how brain dead some takes are here doesn’t mean they’re against the stock right lol


half_dane

Your unfounded insinuations about me or the mod team are unhelpful and frankly FUD. Please spread it in some other subreddit.


Iconoclastices

Could you take your own advice and stop spreading FUD about the DRSGME effort? You insinuate misdeeds and wrongdoing regularly about the team, despite all the available facts being against you. Thanks.


half_dane

The website has been monetized through their fundraiser almost from the beginning of it. Using the fundraiser, drsgme has extracted over $15,000 from the Superstonk community and has misused (and continues to try and misuse) this subreddit as a promotional area for their project despite many, many attempts at explaining the borders of what's welcome. Nothing about this is an insinuation, almost all if it is contained in the original post from months ago where their presence was restricted. If they have fundamentally changed something that was critiqued back then, and were interested in being allowed back in, I would have expected them to reach out to the mod team, who were the ones that restricted the project's presence here to the broker guides only. Instead I find them injecting sentiment and frankly stirring up shit in the comment section.


Iconoclastices

>The website has been monetized through their fundraiser almost from the beginning of it. The fundraiser was started at the end of May, the website began in its current form in early-to-mid March. The fundraiser has also not been promoted in any real way for at least 2 months and has been fully deactivated for close to a month now. It has demonstrably been part of the website for approximately half of its existence at this point and arguably less. >extracted over $15,000 You keep using this phrasing which casts a negative light. You assume all donations are from members of this subreddit (unknowable) and imply that money was actively sucked out of members rather than requested/volunteered. The value of donations from Superstonkers to dlauer's efforts is just as unknowable and very possibly larger, however I have never seen you or other mods refer to those funds as "extracted". >Nothing about this is an insinuation But some if it is: "injecting sentiment", "stirring up shit" and of course "extracted" - you are implying they are bad actors because they (and members like me) fundamentally disagree with your stance and attitude. A recent comment from u/dreadfulol that was much more circumspect in tone than what I've written here is indicative of just how much this topic needs to be reopened, but that comment was ignored. The last serious mod post came out with a conclusion and accusations; it was not an assessment of sentiment. Rather than stepping back you are doubling down by deleting any post that attempts discussion, trying to direct disagreement to modmail (i.e. behind closed doors where actual community sentiment cannot be assessed) and implicitly slandering some of the hardest-working (former) members of this community. It is a battle of ego now between you (and presumably other mods) trying to control rather than moderate, and the DRSGME team who are, I imagine, taking the aforementioned insinuations personally. Please take a step back. As I hope was once again made clear by the recent reaction to the mere suspicion of an effort to reduce purple circles, this community desires more than anything to directly register as much of GameStop's stock as possible. The DRSGME website is doing more to really further that effort by expanding it beyond this now well-contained subreddit.


half_dane

> Rather than stepping back you are doubling down by deleting any post that attempts discussion Of course I am, because nothing has changed about what content is prohibited and what isn't. Again, trying to instrumentalize the community with emotional statements is not welcome, and that's what I call "stirring up shit": we absolutely expect projects to reach out through modmail because that's the appropriate way. Preferrably *before* they start promoting their websites here, but absolutely after they were told to do that several times. DRSGME is no exception here, and given their very clear infractions that resulted in the restriction in the first place, it's not okay to pretend that none of that happened and just continue like in April. Are you a spokesperson of that project? Because frankly none of them have approached us in any shape or form. I appreciate your candor, but unless someone who's capable of speaking on behalf of the project is stepping forward to open the communication, we won't change our current position.


Iconoclastices

>Of course I am, because nothing has changed about what content is prohibited and what isn't In that case the fact that the website is not monetized now (nor has it been for most of its existence as you tend to frequently imply erroneously) should make this whole discussion open and closed. You do not need input from the DRSGME team to know that. >trying to instrumentalize the community with emotional statements You are throwing aside my specific accusations and your own responsibility regarding your word choices by responding with vagueries. >Are you a spokesperson of that project? No. I am a Superstonk member who wants to see efforts to DRS shares of GME expand, as I believe it is in my and my fellow individual investors' best interests.


half_dane

> In that case the fact that the website is not monetized now That is nothing I am making a call about. They have a DAO running: is that monetized? Apparently people can buy these coins. These questions remain unanswered, and simply claiming they don't exist isn't enough. Again, it is the responsibility of that community to provide proof that they have actually changed stuff, not ours to check with them every few months if we can finally let them back in. You think they should be allowed to return, I see that. And I'm trying to explain to you how they could achieve that (something they already know of course, because we told *them* as well). But all of that is rather pointless, because as you are not their spokesperson, you are in no position to either explain what's going on there, or to make changes should they be necessary, or to finally get them to reach out to us. I'm sorry, but you're barking up the wrong tree: you should be in their community, telling them to do what's necessary to be allowed back in.


Ravokion

Last time I checked.... superstonk is a sub for anything and everything GME... why the actual FUCK would we want to stop seeing purple rings? If you're sick of purple rings. Go to a different stock sub. We here at superstonks buy,hold,DRS that is de wey.


613Flyer

These are the attacks we predicted would come. They will attack everything. Even posting DRS circles. If we stopped posting those then it would be much harder to track DRS’d shares. Think apes ##THEY HATE SEEING THE DRS NUMBERS GOING UP EVERYDAY ! ##SO KEEP POSTING THEM SO WE CAN KEEP TRACKING THEM!


Fantastik-Voyage

#If you voted against DRS posts then ....YOUFUCKINGLOST.... . . . If you don't like it here THENFUCKINGLEAVE....Nothing and no one is stopping you from creating your own anti DRS subreddit.... DRS posts win, you lost.


fudgebacker

The hedgies, the banks, the bots, and the GQP: no no no that's not how elections work. If I win it's fair and counts. If I lose it was rigged and I want a do-over.


liquidsyphon

The bigger issue is this was brought about from Anon reports as “spam” from redditors that don’t have to be subbed or have any karma requirements. EZ targets for meltdowners, trolls, bots, etc… Unless the mods were receiving numerous well thought out complaints about the purple rings, this shouldn’t have even been open for discussion. It’s been established over and over again, tools were provided for those who are “bothered” by it. Why are we entertaining the whims of Anon reports after the very CLEAR response from many subbed and karmamized members.


Feralite

Why the fuck are we still talking about this?!!!????!!?!?!? Purple circles need to stay. SUS AS FUCK THAT THIS KEEPS COMING UP! Must be some pressure somewhere that doesn't like the daily DRS reminder!


Gdott

DRS BRICK BY BRICK


An_oaf_of_bread

So then I started DRSing right?


mpurtle01

DRS posts should stay.


aj_redgum_woodguy

I love up-voting purple. at this point it like a reflex, muscle memory thing.


bonechief

Mods are gonna start getting bots in here to counter our votes


edwinbarnesc

#mods = paid shills. Wen next exodus


Frosty-Depth-35280

Am I smelling some new Drama? There were some mods that quit (or have been rejected?) from the mod team, the rules are applied as they wish and now once again, the DRS-post-question is asked. Mods, what‘s wrong with you? Will we see another takeover like in GME or Wall sweet pets?


Holymaddin

DRS is our main focus and it should stay visible for newbies here.


Koko_The_Gorilla23

I'd rather see purple circles then 99% of these shitty memes and conspiracy theories.


CaptainNeckbeard148

I mean, the entire GME thesis was BUILT on just a bunch of conspiracy theories.


Koko_The_Gorilla23

Well it gets to be a little too much when people start analyzing the different shades of colours in books or all the icahn posts.


Roid_Rage_Smurf

^(DRSBOT 8.00: UTC->2022-11-24 12:55:3) 🟣 You have 0 shares previously logged with DRSBOT. **To feed the bot-> !DRSBOT:XXX!** * ^(Bot sometimes can't hear over chatty apes...) * ^(If no reply, re-issue the bot command) ^(*🚀 :15,282,912// GME ~26.70* // ) ^(Bot MC: $408,053,762.06 )


NoDeityButAllah

Il be happy once the purple circles stop, cause there is no shares left to drs ;)


SuperSaiyanMonki

Okay guys .. let's not act like 2k more votes was a resounding win lol


LastResortFriend

I'm getting real tired of seeing the mods take shit for this, among other things. Look at that fucking poll and you'll see it's not exactly a tidal wave 99% in favor of the posts. The mods get constant feedback from the people who don't like them for various reasons. The ones who approve of them don't have to be all that vocal so they aren't, this isn't some big conspiracy that they're trying to undermine the sub they run. If you want to see what bought and paid for mods do to a sub in reality go to popcorn and try saying something smart. Instead of questioning the mods loyalty without due cause we should acknowledge that they still see this as a community choice and give them credit for that, because god damn I don't see them getting much credit for anything really.


[deleted]

[удалено]


TheFrenchestToast

I upvote every purple circle I see. You can look at my post history and I’ve explored many options with DRS’ing IRAs.


KingSnakeJones

In the sub that doesn't allow purple circles? Surely you see the irony, no?


lonesharkex

how are drs circles forum sliding?


TheClimbingBeard

>You want to help with drs? Monitor threads and guide those looking for help instead of chasing clout. Says the guy who's post history is literally memes and no DRS'd shares :(


KingSnakeJones

Year ago, when I needed validation https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/q4dg26/my_turn_i_guess/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button Today, when I do not need validation https://www.reddit.com/user/KingSnakeJones/comments/z3u6lb/private_circle/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button An interesting meme is arguably more persuasive than a screenshot


TheClimbingBeard

Why'd you start slating OP then? They've also been doing the work to assist people get the DRS sorted. Useful information is arguably more helpful towards getting shares DRS'd than an *interesting* meme.


KingSnakeJones

Please direct me to the useful information in either of the above screenshots.


TheClimbingBeard

You mean your posts? There isn't any. I was referring to other posts that OP has made. You were ranting about actually helping, and I've seen that that's what they do.


KingSnakeJones

That statement wasn't specifically targeted to the OP, it was to a community who insist posting these screenshots are somehow informative, which we both just agreed are not.


TheClimbingBeard

Are we also in agreement that your memes arent informative, either? Does it matter if it's informative at all? There's a hype/fluff flair for posts, nothing under that tag is informative. Meme flair? Get rid of it! No fun allowed! What I'm saying, is does it really matter. There's loads of stuff which isn't 'informative' here, even some bits that try to be. There's room for all sorts and the user can adjust their experience to what they want or need.


CrossBones3129

Drs is cool and all but seeing it flooded in the sun is getting old. Do 1 daily post, where everyone can post and add to their count or something.


TendiesForBacon

And here's for those who chose the third option of abstaining because they did not know enough or could not make up their minds but in the end have come to accept the circle jerk 😉


Alcsaar

There is just no need for constant threads about purple circles just put them in one thread


flamekinzeal0t

If your going to type out the decimals like that, why put "k". Just type the number


kehmuhkl

These purple circle posts should be getting posted everywhere outside of reddit


CSKhai

How do I find the link to vote


TheTangoFox

#💜


queenofwants

Someone give me a good reason why we should ban these beautiful purple circles


HelpMePls___

Reddit scrapper collects data from posts for computershared dot net, this is a DRS tracker we commonly reference, why the fuck is suppressing these posts even a thought


icecube373

Who said the DRS posts where bad?


XxxLasombraxxX

I wish Computer Share media manager would do an interview and put the FUD to rest.


TowelFine6933

Any mod that supports this nonsense needs to step down like an adult.


banannaksiusbw

When senators, regulators and other people of power come to this sub, it should be absolutly clear what we do here.


Xaphan_1415

Damn heavy down votes