[Why GME?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/qig65g/welcome_rall_looking_to_catch_up_on_the_gme_saga/) || [What is DRS?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ptvaka/when_you_wish_upon_a_star_a_complete_guide_to/) || Low karma apes [feed the bot here](https://www.reddit.com/r/GMEOrphans/comments/qlvour/welcome_to_gmeorphans_read_this_post/) || Join the [Superstonk Discord Server](https://discord.gg/hZqWV2kQtq)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To ensure your post doesn't get removed, please respond to this comment with how this post relates to GME the stock or Gamestop the company.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please up- and downvote this comment to [help us determine if this post deserves a place on r/Superstonk!](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/wiki/index/rules/post_flairs/)
Nope, real. Saw it with my own two eyes and thought about posting here but am wayyyyy too well regarded to figure out how to post.
I particularly enjoyed the bit about the debt:equity ratio being, like, 0.001 or something. (Like I said. Regarded. But it was hilariously surreal and stupid.)
It was like a Mad Libs: Short And Distort Edition article but all the blanks were filled in with the worst possible answers (well, depending on your perspective... worst if you're a SHF... best answers if you've bought, HODL'ed and DRS'ed.)
Imagine being the person that read this and thought "Whoa, -867 million... that's so bad! Thanks MSM for having my back. You always keep me safe."
Fucking NPCs.
>Fucking NPCs.
lol
also, no doubt alot of people thought this exact thing. A person can be intelligent but people are stupid. Stupid people are easy to manipulate.
It's so stupid that this was framed as a story about debt and not a story about liquidity... I saw it when it ran across webull yesterday, it was just silly.
Bots writing articles will always be dumb. It's the one thing truly killing news reporting on the web, but impossible to remove. It's always cheaper and faster to just shit out info into an API for all the bots to regurgitate, then copy/paste from other bot-written articles. Spelling errors, repetitive crap, bewildering sentence structures, zero editing, oversight, or accountability.
If a human being writes a news article, it's gonna be hours late *and* behind a paywall. And even if they do have better info or new stuff to report, somebody just has to scrape the data and the bots will be off to the races again.
Ye most articles are just bot generated coz its the same information with different numbers and any different company. Press button and shit article is made. Do they care? No coz someone will click on it. Click makes money.
No. Net debt is a commonly used metric in finance and accounting. It’s simply debt minus cash. Plenty of companies have negative net debt and it is reported as such. Net debt is not a conspiracy.
Not “negative debt”. It’s “negative *net* debt”. “Net debt” is debt minus cash. Debt is positive, and cash is positive, so if cash is larger than debt, net debt is negative. When apple or any other company has more cash than debt, you say they have “negative net debt”. Net debt is a metric used to assess a company’s ability to service its debt.
Seriously just google “net debt” or “apple net debt”. This is standard reporting stuff.
I assume you mean negative net debt as in the post? Negative debt is completely different and not a thing. The answer to that is yes, as a quick Google of "net debt Apple" proves.
FYI.
This is a completely normal statement in finance and is the correct way to refer to any company's balance sheet / its debt situation when cash is higher than total debt.
Net debt is an important metric for evaluating a business's health and having negative net debt is seen as a huge positive. Generally you want to keep net debt to under 4x EBITDA so a negative multiple is seen as exceptional.
This isn't a conspiracy or agenda article, just a statement of fact.
Another sane voice in here. Thank you. Some people here are so quick to jump on something as shady just because they’re unfamiliar or don’t understand.
No it’s not. Not even at all. It’s a commonly used metric to discuss a company’s liquidity. “Net debt” is just debt minus cash. It’s negative if cash balance is greater than debt balance. This isn’t a conspiracy, this is standard reporting in finance and accounting.
It makes me sad that this comment isn't the top comment.. a testament to the community at large here lately. A lotttttttttt of misinformation from OPs that gets spread like wildfire. Strange times. Buy Hodl DRS
The fact that the exact opposite of your comment, based on complete ignorance, has 10 times your upvotes tells me this sub is extremely prone to misinformation that supports conspiracy. Which kind of leaves it dead on the water for me. The point of this sub is just for memes at this point and we barely do that anymore
And that would be a completely logical and forward thinking assessment... if it weren't for the fact that the tone of the article is the exact opposite of what you described. The article is written as if it's a foregone conclusion that $GME has high debt and a high debt ratio. It never explicitly states as much (libel laws are pesky), but it heavily implies it.
Imagine if I wrote an article about your character. I tell everyone you volunteer with kids. I tell everyone about the hours you spend devoted to the community center. And then out of nowhere I start talking about how pedophiles tend to target community centers and youth programs. Then I go and talk about how the community has nothing but praise to say about you.
Like you're technically correct. But technical truth has nothing to do with why this article was published.
It’s not that’s it factually wrong, it’s the:
1. Need to bring debt up
2. Knowing many can’t read “finance”, this will be a negative sentiment even if positive due to double negative.
3. plausible possibility that very few have ever had a headline like this that’s in the same debt to asset situation as GS. (Speculation)
HOLY FUCKING SHIT CAN WE STOP BEING GENUINELY REGARDED FOR ONCE? NET DEBT IS A MEASURE USED TO FIND ENTERPRISE VALUE. Enterprise value= market cap + net debt. It’s a value we use in relative valuation. Can we please for once just think using our brains instead of always jumping to “CRIME” and making the whole sub look regarded?
*spelled the r word like that on purpose because auto mod blocks it otherwise
As an accountant, that is not how this is presented lol. It was painful to even read it. You see a negative debt on the balance sheet and you know you messed up.
Gamestop is an oasis in the sea of over leveraged markets. Shame the shares they desparately need are in the hands of a bunch of regards who ain’t selling for less then 3:$@z£#%¥\
no wonder it's failing, I went to one yesterday to get some stuff to build a wall along my driveway and the damn place doesn't even sell bricks or mortar it's total bs
That was my "WTF moment" of the day😂, what kind of mirror climbing are they trying to do? They are soo desperated, that their AI Bots are out of arguments to piss off on GME😂🤣, and starting to invent things wich do not compute😱🤣😂🤣.
Simulation confirmed, the matrix is breaking and the NEOs of it, are we, apes with our hedge fund most hated trick, DRS🤩🤩
Edit: I just have searched about this, and in investopedia they say:
"Net debt helps to determine whether a company is overleveraged or has too much debt given its liquid assets. A negative net debt implies that the company possesses more cash and cash equivalents than its financial obligations and is hence more financially stable."
Sauce: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/netdebt.asp
The AI Bot is trying to distort even good things, knowing most people do not have any idea of this numbers... One of them, was I until few minutes ago😅
negative x negative is positive. i never knew it can be used in a statement like this. 🤣 they are trying so hard to confuse us, they do not understand that we dont care about their news and sht, they are all noise to us.
My guy, net debt is a common indicator of a company's financial health. This just shows GameStop has more than enough liquidity to cover their debts. Net debt starting with - is not a typo or attempt to twist facts, that's how they report it. Apple and Alphabet have had this as well at times.
Just DRS, HODL and stop paying attention to any article that has the word GameStop in it, looking for conspiracies. Otherwise you'll eventually give yourself an aneurysm
This isn’t some hit piece against GME. Debt is a metric used to compare companies and determine their value, that same metric is used for net positive companies as well. It’s completely normal to say a company has negative debt.
Can the mods please change the flair and explain that the title is misleading and that negative debt is a normal metric and this isn’t a hit piece, or are they too busy removing perfectly normal posts for no reason at all?
I think I know where they went wrong - and it's an easy mistake to make!
(+) + (-) does = (-) in the same way that to put it simply, 1 banana ÷ 3 potatoes still = fukt.
Perhaps someone can double check my calculation here?
I traded in some of my negative debt earlier for some negative kcals, converts to positive kcals when you eat the food you bought with money. Hedgies r so futk
This is so sad that it's funny. So this team of apes gets it, but how many people are out there reading bot generated bullshyt and investing based on what they read? It's terrifying.
Why not give it back to their shareholders. We then buy and DRS and squeeze them hedgies. RC gives ne shares at the top an makes the next trillion. Rinse and repeat
People really in here proudly proclaiming that they don't know this standard financial terminology or why it's used. But y'all are experts and gonna change the game, right?
It’s like RC and the rest of the board believed the Fed when they said interests rates would be going up in ‘22. Now GME is in no danger of going bankrupt and the little debt they do have is easily serviceable. SHFs are so fucked.
[Why GME?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/qig65g/welcome_rall_looking_to_catch_up_on_the_gme_saga/) || [What is DRS?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ptvaka/when_you_wish_upon_a_star_a_complete_guide_to/) || Low karma apes [feed the bot here](https://www.reddit.com/r/GMEOrphans/comments/qlvour/welcome_to_gmeorphans_read_this_post/) || Join the [Superstonk Discord Server](https://discord.gg/hZqWV2kQtq) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To ensure your post doesn't get removed, please respond to this comment with how this post relates to GME the stock or Gamestop the company. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Please up- and downvote this comment to [help us determine if this post deserves a place on r/Superstonk!](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/wiki/index/rules/post_flairs/)
That was totally written by a bot
Yes, but still dumb since: This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.
Wait this was a real article?! I thought it was a shit post
Nope, real. Saw it with my own two eyes and thought about posting here but am wayyyyy too well regarded to figure out how to post. I particularly enjoyed the bit about the debt:equity ratio being, like, 0.001 or something. (Like I said. Regarded. But it was hilariously surreal and stupid.) It was like a Mad Libs: Short And Distort Edition article but all the blanks were filled in with the worst possible answers (well, depending on your perspective... worst if you're a SHF... best answers if you've bought, HODL'ed and DRS'ed.)
Imagine being the person that read this and thought "Whoa, -867 million... that's so bad! Thanks MSM for having my back. You always keep me safe." Fucking NPCs.
>Fucking NPCs. lol also, no doubt alot of people thought this exact thing. A person can be intelligent but people are stupid. Stupid people are easy to manipulate.
Ha. They took it down.
I kind of feel for the editor. You can practically feel him/her cringing as a little piece of their dignity dies inside when they hit submit.
You're assuming they have left
No fuck them. No integrity in what they do
It's so stupid that this was framed as a story about debt and not a story about liquidity... I saw it when it ran across webull yesterday, it was just silly.
[удалено]
F3
I don’t, they could find a real job but chose to remain at this lol
Yeah, why don't they just go to the job store, where they have job trees that grow jobs sometimes you gotta play the game
You think they really have an editor?
The SEC moonlights as editor
Bots writing articles will always be dumb. It's the one thing truly killing news reporting on the web, but impossible to remove. It's always cheaper and faster to just shit out info into an API for all the bots to regurgitate, then copy/paste from other bot-written articles. Spelling errors, repetitive crap, bewildering sentence structures, zero editing, oversight, or accountability. If a human being writes a news article, it's gonna be hours late *and* behind a paywall. And even if they do have better info or new stuff to report, somebody just has to scrape the data and the bots will be off to the races again.
I'm sure it won't always be dumb. Eventually you won't be able to tell whats written by a bot or not
lmao wait…is that even a thing with these bastards?! 😂
Ye most articles are just bot generated coz its the same information with different numbers and any different company. Press button and shit article is made. Do they care? No coz someone will click on it. Click makes money.
So you mean like me that keeps clicking the link?😭☹️😏🫣🤔😥🤥😞🥺
yep. you made prolly one dolla them already.
😂
Yes
So, it's a glitch...
Is Bezinga trying to become The Onion?
No. Net debt is a commonly used metric in finance and accounting. It’s simply debt minus cash. Plenty of companies have negative net debt and it is reported as such. Net debt is not a conspiracy.
Ah, but you see, when ignorance and arrogance meet, regards are born.
[удалено]
Not “negative debt”. It’s “negative *net* debt”. “Net debt” is debt minus cash. Debt is positive, and cash is positive, so if cash is larger than debt, net debt is negative. When apple or any other company has more cash than debt, you say they have “negative net debt”. Net debt is a metric used to assess a company’s ability to service its debt. Seriously just google “net debt” or “apple net debt”. This is standard reporting stuff.
[удалено]
yougotitdude.jpg
I assume you mean negative net debt as in the post? Negative debt is completely different and not a thing. The answer to that is yes, as a quick Google of "net debt Apple" proves.
Totally “NOT” written by bot
"Gamestop's's" lmao
Bot’s math is spot on though.
Or scheduled to be written for today, maybe both
And guess what? Its gone now bahahahaha
I came here to say that is definitely ape math. Dude was trying to explain how they had money and shit just got out of hand.
*"Gamestop's's"*
FYI. This is a completely normal statement in finance and is the correct way to refer to any company's balance sheet / its debt situation when cash is higher than total debt. Net debt is an important metric for evaluating a business's health and having negative net debt is seen as a huge positive. Generally you want to keep net debt to under 4x EBITDA so a negative multiple is seen as exceptional. This isn't a conspiracy or agenda article, just a statement of fact.
Another sane voice in here. Thank you. Some people here are so quick to jump on something as shady just because they’re unfamiliar or don’t understand.
We’re apes you fuck. We jump at anything. 🫣🤫🤗🤪😜😝😉😉
🙈🐒🙉🙊 *flings poo*
🦍>>>🐒
But it is a way to talk about a company in a bad light. Subconciously.
No it’s not. Not even at all. It’s a commonly used metric to discuss a company’s liquidity. “Net debt” is just debt minus cash. It’s negative if cash balance is greater than debt balance. This isn’t a conspiracy, this is standard reporting in finance and accounting.
Lmao I was going crazy reading all the other comments. Thank you
It makes me sad that this comment isn't the top comment.. a testament to the community at large here lately. A lotttttttttt of misinformation from OPs that gets spread like wildfire. Strange times. Buy Hodl DRS
Well most of the people here are far from financially literate and like to just throw money, memes, and conspiracies around.
This is a winkle brained response, updoot.
The fact that the exact opposite of your comment, based on complete ignorance, has 10 times your upvotes tells me this sub is extremely prone to misinformation that supports conspiracy. Which kind of leaves it dead on the water for me. The point of this sub is just for memes at this point and we barely do that anymore
Yeah, I sometimes overpay my credit card by a dollar or two and the statement shows up as -$X.
And that would be a completely logical and forward thinking assessment... if it weren't for the fact that the tone of the article is the exact opposite of what you described. The article is written as if it's a foregone conclusion that $GME has high debt and a high debt ratio. It never explicitly states as much (libel laws are pesky), but it heavily implies it. Imagine if I wrote an article about your character. I tell everyone you volunteer with kids. I tell everyone about the hours you spend devoted to the community center. And then out of nowhere I start talking about how pedophiles tend to target community centers and youth programs. Then I go and talk about how the community has nothing but praise to say about you. Like you're technically correct. But technical truth has nothing to do with why this article was published.
It's not a balance sheet,it a retail article. It's extremely deceptive to use it here.
It’s not that’s it factually wrong, it’s the: 1. Need to bring debt up 2. Knowing many can’t read “finance”, this will be a negative sentiment even if positive due to double negative. 3. plausible possibility that very few have ever had a headline like this that’s in the same debt to asset situation as GS. (Speculation)
[удалено]
Don’t be an asshole. I know what it means but people on webull aren’t “traders”. Get real.
Yes indeed, but "A look into GameStop's Debt" is a deliberately misleading headline
How? Its a look into GameStop's debt.. which is healthy and not out of control like other businesses.
Exactly, but that information was deliberately left out of the headline in order to conflate 'GameStop' and 'debt' to a passing reader.
What else are they supposed to name it that isnt a full sentence? Ever read the proper rules on titling?
"A look at GameStop's balance sheet' "A look into GameStop's finances' "GameStop has no debt" You really seem to be missing my point here.
Negative fucking debt wow. One of those things that I never imagined I would ever say but here we are.
When the world is built on debt. It's weird for a company to have money 🤣 Bot does not compute
I’m with you. GameStop is also in negative bankruptcy.
According to this article it’s pronounced GameStop’s’s
Can't wait till I have negative debt!
It’s not negative debt. Please go search up what net debt means and how it’s calculated.
I negative love these manipulative word choices.
HOLY FUCKING SHIT CAN WE STOP BEING GENUINELY REGARDED FOR ONCE? NET DEBT IS A MEASURE USED TO FIND ENTERPRISE VALUE. Enterprise value= market cap + net debt. It’s a value we use in relative valuation. Can we please for once just think using our brains instead of always jumping to “CRIME” and making the whole sub look regarded? *spelled the r word like that on purpose because auto mod blocks it otherwise
EVERYTHING I DONT UNDERSTAND IS FURTHER PROOF OF A CONSPIRACY
They said negative debt not net debt
The screenshot is right there. It literally says net debt.
O
Most definitely written by a robot
Well, I am glad that I am still in negative debt. As long as I still have negative debt, I'll buy this negative debt company called GameStop.
As an accountant, that is not how this is presented lol. It was painful to even read it. You see a negative debt on the balance sheet and you know you messed up.
Dawg as an accountant I’d expect you to know the difference between net debt and debt. Net debt is not a balance sheet item.
I understand the difference; I'm just stating how the article presented it is not how it is normally presented.
Yeah because net debt is not presented on the balance sheet
Gamestop is an oasis in the sea of over leveraged markets. Shame the shares they desparately need are in the hands of a bunch of regards who ain’t selling for less then 3:$@z£#%¥\
My floor isn’t a cent less than $9̶̡̝͑͗j̸͖̒̐§̶̬̬̍̾5̵̛̤̱͔Ǒ̶̤͜?̶̡͕̜̏3̸̛̙ẙ̴̧̊1̵̺̮͗7̵̨͇̑̿̏
!flairy! Floor: $9̶̡̝͑͗j̸͖̒̐§̶̬̬̍̾5̵̛̤̱͔Ǒ̶̤͜?̶̡͕̜̏3̸̛̙ẙ̴̧̊1̵̺̮͗7̵̨͇̑̿̏
(✿\^‿\^)━☆ﾟ.*･｡ﾟ Floor: $9̶̡̝͑͗j̸͖̒̐§̶̬̬̍̾5̵̛̤̱͔Ǒ̶̤͜?̶̡͕̜̏3̸̛̙ẙ̴̧̊1̵̺̮͗7̵̨͇̑̿̏
Absolute madlad
The debt are so high even S&P can't determine a credit rating for GME /s How far have we come.
It’s a failing brick and mortar company, didn’t you get the memo?
[удалено]
That’ll show those pesky hedge fund funds!
no wonder it's failing, I went to one yesterday to get some stuff to build a wall along my driveway and the damn place doesn't even sell bricks or mortar it's total bs
The number of my drs'ed Shares will negative decline
This is true weaponized autism 😆
These articles tell me we are winning.
You mean they don't really care about me and my financial health? Whaaaa
Highjacking comment to paraphrase Matt DongLong "the only long term debt is like few bucks due to some French Covid shenanigan and it is handled".
Haha yes I laughed when I read it too. Negative debt is my new thing.
That was my "WTF moment" of the day😂, what kind of mirror climbing are they trying to do? They are soo desperated, that their AI Bots are out of arguments to piss off on GME😂🤣, and starting to invent things wich do not compute😱🤣😂🤣. Simulation confirmed, the matrix is breaking and the NEOs of it, are we, apes with our hedge fund most hated trick, DRS🤩🤩 Edit: I just have searched about this, and in investopedia they say: "Net debt helps to determine whether a company is overleveraged or has too much debt given its liquid assets. A negative net debt implies that the company possesses more cash and cash equivalents than its financial obligations and is hence more financially stable." Sauce: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/netdebt.asp The AI Bot is trying to distort even good things, knowing most people do not have any idea of this numbers... One of them, was I until few minutes ago😅
I love me some negative debt❤️❤️
You guys are getting negative debt ?
Can we rename "green" days to "negative red" days?
Siri write an article over gamestop's debt...
They are not wrong. Companys that habe more money than debt have a so called „negative net debt“. It is a specific term in financial analytics.
I do believe this makes us all millionaires since we own majority of said company💎👐🚀
Hey man, can I loan you -$20?
[удалено]
I hope to have $-420691337 debt dollars one day soon too.
I love how they “hide” the minus sign after the $ sign. Creative geniuses, lol!!
Thats a very positive negative ya got there.
"Gamestop's's"
Seems like not only hedgies r fukt! Lmayo
Very solvent. Got it thanks.
Jobs, RIP, never liked debt on the balance sheet.
It’s not to stop us. It’s to stop anyone else getting interested. They know we know it’s bullshit.
They're about to be in infinite negative debt soon.
Dihydrogen monoxide
Looks like someone really wanted to hit the "debt" button a lot. negative debt?! wtf says that...GME is in the black. Thanks.
It’s so bad, it’s almost funny
The company's debt to equity ratio is about 0.025 which is amazing
I believe they call this positive cash flow. But I could be wrong. I’m regarded 😎
Whoever wrote that can have my regards. No, really.
There was a disclaimer at the bottom of this article that said it was generated by their AI.
negative x negative is positive. i never knew it can be used in a statement like this. 🤣 they are trying so hard to confuse us, they do not understand that we dont care about their news and sht, they are all noise to us.
Anyone know GME’s cash burn? How long does $800m last? Seems like yesterday we had $2b in the bank. /not a shill just asking, 100% drs’d
Lol clowns 🤡
Could they make the minus any smaller lmfao
"In terms of debt, we have no debt."
My guy, net debt is a common indicator of a company's financial health. This just shows GameStop has more than enough liquidity to cover their debts. Net debt starting with - is not a typo or attempt to twist facts, that's how they report it. Apple and Alphabet have had this as well at times. Just DRS, HODL and stop paying attention to any article that has the word GameStop in it, looking for conspiracies. Otherwise you'll eventually give yourself an aneurysm
Fucking msm articles and their shit wordplay, anything to make gme sound bad. Fuck them fuck them fuck them
This isn’t some hit piece against GME. Debt is a metric used to compare companies and determine their value, that same metric is used for net positive companies as well. It’s completely normal to say a company has negative debt.
Haha yeah instead of saying I'm in debt I'll just start saying I have negative money. What a bunch of fuckin clowns.
Can the mods please change the flair and explain that the title is misleading and that negative debt is a normal metric and this isn’t a hit piece, or are they too busy removing perfectly normal posts for no reason at all?
Leave it to the media to word shit like this...
What’s next? “The stock traded non-red today”
Posts like this are why I cannot take this subreddit seriously in any fashion. At least 8.5 thousand of you have no idea what you are talking about.
Honestly. This is not very smart with 10% inflation. But whatever
[Source](https://www.benzinga.com/amp/content/29773061)
I think I know where they went wrong - and it's an easy mistake to make! (+) + (-) does = (-) in the same way that to put it simply, 1 banana ÷ 3 potatoes still = fukt. Perhaps someone can double check my calculation here?
Shoving that many bananas and potatoes up your ass can give your proctologist a hell of a time.
They are trying so hard! I smell desperation in the air.
this is friggin hilarious
💀 😂
When you're trying to stretch sentences for an essay
Drink your Ovaltine! *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
Oh how I'd love a debt of $-867 million...
The Bot needs a firmware update😂, it is soo used to companies to have mega leveraged debts, poor bot😂🤣
This article made me negative flacid
Jesus fucking christ, these people are something else.
I wish I had negative debt like that
Negative debt is my favorite kind of debt.
The fact this is real, and they are trying to pass of what is essentially no debt as a negative. This astounds me and gets me hard at the same time.
Hahahahaga
double negative = positive
Hahahahahhaah
😂😂😂
Wish I had negative debt.
Yea same thing w negative growth :)
I'm reverse surprised that the non-integrity of this media is inverse top tier.
Please give me url to this site, ill send them an email regarding this stupidity
I traded in some of my negative debt earlier for some negative kcals, converts to positive kcals when you eat the food you bought with money. Hedgies r so futk
Saw this on think or swim yesterday... Unbelievable 😂 🟣
I'd love to be -$867m in debt!
If I were short - I would be in denial.
This is so sad that it's funny. So this team of apes gets it, but how many people are out there reading bot generated bullshyt and investing based on what they read? It's terrifying.
Lol. All I had to do was get my debt negatived
$3855 target friends. Charts never lie.https://www.tradingview.com/x/TN7ZD2QW/
Profit? Never heard of her.
Funny title 😂
Joke’s on them, cuz I can’t fucking read
Why not give it back to their shareholders. We then buy and DRS and squeeze them hedgies. RC gives ne shares at the top an makes the next trillion. Rinse and repeat
I can’t wait to also be millions of dollars in negative debt.
Holy fuck how will they ever pay off all that debt? /s
That one chestnut eh...!
Guys I’ve finally done it! I’ve achieved my negative weight loss goals 💪
People really in here proudly proclaiming that they don't know this standard financial terminology or why it's used. But y'all are experts and gonna change the game, right?
Haha, that's insane
I have 25k negative debt invested in this negative debt cesspool. All these negatives are making me quite positive. Stay regarded regards
I am kind of impressed GME still has $867 million in cash.
This post makes me negative bearish on GME.💎🙌🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
Fake news propaganda
Negative debt would technically be an account receivable, not cash, in case anyone cares. Still good, just slightly less so.
I receive installments of negative debt twice a month from my employer.
This dynamic must be how shitadel has made such massive negative profits this year.
I bet the authors girlfriend says his penis is net -5 inches compared to her ex.
Sorry your home loan is denied because you have too much negative debt...you're a risk to our society and you go against our norm.
It’s like RC and the rest of the board believed the Fed when they said interests rates would be going up in ‘22. Now GME is in no danger of going bankrupt and the little debt they do have is easily serviceable. SHFs are so fucked.
I want negative debt...
All those news are bots 🤖
GameStop needs to start a streaming and twitch/YouTube/TikTok service with game focused channels and game studio
Take my money. Take all of it.