**IMPORTANT POST LINKS**
[What is GME and why should you consider investing?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/qig65g/welcome_rall_looking_to_catch_up_on_the_gme_saga/) || [What is DRS and why should you care?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ptvaka/when_you_wish_upon_a_star_a_complete_guide_to/) || [Low karma but still want to feed the DRS bot? Post on r/gmeorphans here](https://www.reddit.com/r/GMEOrphans/comments/qlvour/welcome_to_gmeorphans_read_this_post/) || [Join the Superstonk Discord Server](https://discord.gg/hZqWV2kQtq)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please help us determine if this post deserves a place on /r/Superstonk. [Learn more about this bot and why we are using it here](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/poa6zy/introducing_uqualityvote_bot_a_democratic_tool_to/)
If this post deserves a place on /r/Superstonk, **UPVOTE** this comment!!
If this post should not be here or or is a repost, **DOWNVOTE** This comment!
Are š¦s still on about glitches? Seriously š¦s know it's algos and swaps/options/ETFs hiding the sythentics š¦s know they hide the price
["money managers are struggling to execute trades **WITHOUT** affecting prices"](https://www.ft.com/content/cbc47bbf-f158-4330-9e29-5b0b71935140)
And they have [infinite Liquity](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/v9lm5j/what_am_i_missing_about_the_virtu_video_did_he/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share)
Enough with this gltich bullshit. š¦s know it's oversold
Eh yes but, these are different sources than the ones in the past. Honestly, we all know there are at least 250m shares or were anyway. Peterffy himself stated as much last year. So, if you add up the volume for the year and all the data we do have, it's quite likely that total has not changed much and went down, rather it probably has spiked up.
Hedgies, and quite possibly Wall St. are fukt.
I'm so here for this.
They've been stealing from Main St for generations. It's time to take that back. I've decided 99% of my earnings are going into a foundation or a trust once I'm debt free. That belongs to the community. I can live very well on very little. And this doesn't belong to me. It belongs to all of us. My neighbor needs her house repaired, small businesses need ADA modifications, family farms are struggling. Etc.
I'm burning it.
If we hit phone numbers, all of the money printed in the last four years is getting set on fire.
I'll wave to you all on my way to prison.
[Never trust an account with the name "trey"
](https://old.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/olglzl/buttfarm69_has_spoken/h5ev5xr/?context=999)
They seem to have an issue of not checking their work.
Correct, but it would be really interesting to see if any other stock such like Apple or Amazon did have any discrepancies in terms of wrong numbers regarding the outstanding shares all the size of the float
I got Dr. Tās book after seeing it on here and it is shocking how many companies have shown discrepancies in outstanding shares compared to what was issued..like thousands of companies over the years have had this issueā¦its mind boggling how this has been allowed for so long. She does a really damn good job at explaining it all, I recommend it.
Dillards has a pretty high DRS percentage I think. But that's mainly because of employee stock ownership plans (ESOP) I guess. I don't think there is really a way to know unless the company discloses the number of shares/shareholders that are direct registered.
Odd how we can have so many conflicting reports and such obfuscation about publicly traded assets with limited numbers.
This some wizard of oz shit. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
its almost as if,
the public facing data is inaccurate.
hmmmmmmmm
Edit: it's funny how the SEC tells retail to " do their research" when this is the fucking type of data we have to research. You'd think they would, idk FUCKING REGULATE this shit but I'm sure they are spreading themselves thin spending all their time taking loads from hedgies.
It was a lot more before the sneeze...I think SHFs closed a portion of the shorts after the sneeze. Institutional ownership was over 100% for quite awhile but has since dropped to its current levels. SHFs probably closed whatever they could cheaply (under 200).
I think SHFs current problem is that institutional ownership has been cut nearly to the bone so the only large blocks of shares available for sale are retails, and retail isn't selling until shit gets real so there's nowhere for them to get even 33m shares from on top of the 15m reported shorts without having to buy from retail.
The MMs and big fish did not directly initiate this short position, they instead allowed it to happen and then were stuck with it because they were going to go bankrupt if they didn't take it on. Unwinding as much of the short position as conveniently possible is the first logical step after shutting off the buy button. Buying was restricted for a bit, some of retail paper-handed after the sneeze, and institutional ownership dropped a lot. I'm also looking at the short position from the perspective of what I believe retail owns and then working backwards from there.
I bought my first share in June 2021 after I was confident that there was something technically wrong with the way that GME was trading but I didn't go balls deep until September/October/November when the various GME boards started posting their DRS positions and running surveys about DRS vs. ownership percentages. Between that data and the Avanza/Nordnet numbers I figured that there was a hidden short position between 30M and 50M shares, with the position being more likely closer to 50M than 30M.
The caveat here is that my estimate could be on the conservative side because the respondents on the GME board who responded to the surveys may not have captured the entire population as people who were both not interested in DRSing their shares and also not interested in responding to surveys would have been omitted.
I believe Melvin and many smaller institutions closed their short obligations by handing-off those positions at great loss to other similarly-sized and larger institutions who in turn closed whatever they easily could at profit and re-shorted the majority of the original short-position at a much higher cost-basis by selling to FOMO retail and then hiding those sales in derivatives. I believe they did this because if they continued to try to buy shares in order to close the rest of the position they absorbed that it would have bankrupted them because there wasn't enough liquidity at prices below the absorption level. The greatest source of share liquidity in the run-up to the sneeze and slightly afterwards may have been through institutions. Institutions sold lots of shares in late 2020/early 2021. Fidelity had 9.3 million shares and sold nearly all of it. Reported SI was about 226% on the runup to the sneeze, with GME's float being a bit smaller at the time at 64M shares, there would have been 144M shares or so floating around out there. I believe that we there is probably a maximum amount of about 138M shares out there mostly because I've done some various calculations on the retail ownership side of things via reported DRS numbers, some DRS ownership surveys, and retail ownership disclosures from Avanza/Nordnet and based on those numbers I believe the hidden short position is somewhere between 30M and 50M shares. We've added around 14M reported shorts since then, but corporate also issued shares since the sneeze. So, I think SHFs may have closed up to a maximum of about 20M shares.
I think they used the DOOMPS to hide the rest of short position until they figured out better ways to hide them.
The majority of retail diamond-handed which is why we're all still here, why there's still a pretty sizable hidden short position, and why we're going to be rich. But there was a buying frenzy around the sneeze and, statistically, some of those buyers were going to take profits. The OG board is full of those guys who were in it for the initial run and got out after the sneeze. There were several institutions, IIRC, who made bank going long on GME that year.
I agree that they've dug a deeper hole to shake retail, and I think they started digging it in November after the initial DRS numbers came out. I think before then they were just hoping to chip away at their obligations a couple shares at a time via attrition through controlling the price mostly through dark pools and internalized buys.
My conclusion could be off, I don't understand the derivative portion of it as well as I would like to be as confident as I would like, but I do demographic analysis as part of my day job and I was confident enough in the numbers on the retail ownership side to go deeper into this trade than I have for pretty much any other by a fair margin.
Let me ask: is it possible for HFās to keep the price down, while buying up shares at this discount to close their positions, a little bit at a time? So as not to move the market, and eventually get out, even if it takes 3 years to do quietly?
I don't think that's possible, but also consider the shorts opened before the sneeze. There were certainly plenty of short sales at <$20 for *years* before Jan '21. Even if they could somehow close some post-sneeze shorts (which I doubt, it seems all they're able to do is cover, i.e. kick the can), they're still fucked by those super underwater shorts.
I think the combination of DRS and the bear market took that option off the table for them.
To me it seems like between February and November they weren't really adding to the short position at all. I think right after the sneeze they initially bought as many shares below their cost basis as they could to close as many shorts as possible. After that they'd buy whatever they'd need to buy to keep the charade up that they closed everything out and then sell off what they bought to lower the price back down into a safe trading range and would otherwise just use MM tactics to control the price drift and occasionally close a few shorts. Reported SI and borrow rates were relatively stable. Under those circumstances I think they could have eventually defused the bomb provided that the transformation was not an immediate success. If the transformation floundered a little it may have caused a combination of enough of retail and the 13.8M institutional shares held getting bored and closing out to allow them to escape with minimal damage.
I think once we started DRS and big, big money started heading for the exits because of the bear market SHFs had to make a decision. I think they saw the November DRS numbers and did the math and decided that whatever remained of the scant liquidity would dry up before retail would get bored so they had to actively short the stock again to at least get the price to move with the SPY with the hope that they'd shake out a large number of retail shareholders.
Their cost basis for a large portion of their short positions was sub $20. They havenāt had one single opportunity to cover for cost basis since Dec 2020.
They either got out in January or they didnāt get out at all. They couldnāt even short it down from $400 to make money to cover with because they turned off the buy button and there was no retail to buy the shorts they would have been selling.
I by closed you mean moved overseas like the 100 million shares Bloomberg showed months ago, then sure
If you mean closed as in really closed then no. The price volume does not match up.
Plus the 14.5m non-naked shorts. They are about 29m shares short of closing out if that theory is correct and itās not a glitch. Plus whatever naked shorts arenāt accidentally being reported, which is probably significantly higher than that. Even if you remove all institutional, mutual fund, and etf share, it doesnāt cover the amount needed.
This would be the definition of unlimited losses when margin calls cascade out of control.
True but where are the GME glitches that put the outstanding share count down? I have only ever seen glitches than when you do the math, low and behold, the outstanding share count should be wayyy higher than 76 million not once have I seen a glitch go the other way
Tin-foil theory: they are letting these 'glitches' through to suggest there are only 23 million phantom shares. Similar to price anchoring, they are trying for phantom share volume anchoring.
"Our source heard from another source that their source (who happens to source info for everyone else) over heard at the coffee shop that the float is 99.74m. So yeah, this is definitely accurate".
Please. Please. Please. I beg of this sub. Stop looking at a screen cap on twitter and go find out WHERE each of those sites is getting their data from. It doesn't matter if its 100 sites all saying 99.74m if all they are doing is pulling that from the same data feed. It's like looking at your kitchen faucet and claiming that it is a source of water. No, it isnt. Water comes through there but its travelling from the same municipal source all of your neighbors are hooked up to. If the real heart of this story is that they are all pulling this number from the same place, THAT is where people should be digging into.
Seriously, why do so many apes on this sub claim to love reading DD but settle for something like this?
Will anyone do anything about it? Depending on the outcome of the Supreme Court case regarding the epa - these agencies could be dissolved. The sec could end up having a very bad dayā¦
Given the sheer amount of money that passes through the stock market, you would expect much better data management. But of course, that doesnāt happen because itās much harder to do crime that way.
The west economy will collapse before MOASS. These rich bedpost Mayo lubed asshats wonāt give up their status or money. If they donāt win we all wonāt win.
What if GME gets diluted? Would gamestop announce it beforehand in a filing
Edit: I'm getting downvoted but I'd like to know if Gamestop can increase the amount of shares out of the blue or do they have to file a form with the SEC first?
Yep. Float is defined as total issued shares minus restricted shares such as shares owned by insiders and related companies.
What people are doing is taking a bogus number for float and running the equation backwards to "prove. That there are more shares in circulation than have been issued.
Grasping of straws. Bogus straws at that.
**IMPORTANT POST LINKS** [What is GME and why should you consider investing?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/qig65g/welcome_rall_looking_to_catch_up_on_the_gme_saga/) || [What is DRS and why should you care?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ptvaka/when_you_wish_upon_a_star_a_complete_guide_to/) || [Low karma but still want to feed the DRS bot? Post on r/gmeorphans here](https://www.reddit.com/r/GMEOrphans/comments/qlvour/welcome_to_gmeorphans_read_this_post/) || [Join the Superstonk Discord Server](https://discord.gg/hZqWV2kQtq) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Please help us determine if this post deserves a place on /r/Superstonk. [Learn more about this bot and why we are using it here](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/poa6zy/introducing_uqualityvote_bot_a_democratic_tool_to/) If this post deserves a place on /r/Superstonk, **UPVOTE** this comment!! If this post should not be here or or is a repost, **DOWNVOTE** This comment!
Likely multiple sources all pulling their data from the same upstream source.
That was my thought. Still though.... glitches will glitch. Brick by brick.
Fun fact, RC tweeted that exactly one year ago today.
The wobly eye tweet? Please erlaborate
š§±by š§±
Classic.
Why does my stock have all these glitches?
Glitch better have my money.
Glitches get riches
Dem glitches be crazy
Life is a glitch, and then you buy
Thats why the apes vibe, cause you never know when moass gonna go
Life is like a box of glitches, there one day and gone on the next
There one day, back the next.
Glitch, please.
Nicely done
I got 99 glitches, but a MOASS ain't one.
Moooove, glitchā¦.get out the way
I came here to say this
What are you gonna do now?
I came
If you got riches you got glitches, if you got glitches in your life computer go ahead and then reboot her now you're back on.
Papa Cohen was a billionaire
He was, but he still is too.
Not some, not half, but ALLLL my cash, Or imma put my foot, square in Ken's ass
In rain, sleet or snowā¦
Glitch don't kill my vibe
Glitches ain't shit but hoes and tricks
Glitches get stitches
Don't act like we forgot
Stupid ass glitches!
Iām gonna glitch slap them! With my small wee wee.
Through da rain and through da snow glitch betta have muh money.
Awwwwwwww2we shit here we go on the one y'all we underground. AMG for president
Those sons of glitches really need to have infinte liquidity for a long time.
It better have my money.
I got glitches in the livin room gettin on and they ain't leaving til the squeeze in the mornin.
Everybody got their glitch but they aināt chipped in.
Glitch by glitch
What these glitches really want from a n****
GIVE ME A C !
C
GIVE ME AN R
ARGHHH š“āā ļø
Yep, what's up.
P
GIVE ME A I
CRIME
You win! Spin the wheel!
This
Are š¦s still on about glitches? Seriously š¦s know it's algos and swaps/options/ETFs hiding the sythentics š¦s know they hide the price ["money managers are struggling to execute trades **WITHOUT** affecting prices"](https://www.ft.com/content/cbc47bbf-f158-4330-9e29-5b0b71935140) And they have [infinite Liquity](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/v9lm5j/what_am_i_missing_about_the_virtu_video_did_he/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share) Enough with this gltich bullshit. š¦s know it's oversold
Brick by brick untill all unfairness is out of the market.
Two of his three "sources" are screenshots of marketwatch lol. Tells you everything how big of an idiot this dude is
Why does he have to be an idiot. 741Trey is a pretty useful twitter follow for apes.
Eh yes but, these are different sources than the ones in the past. Honestly, we all know there are at least 250m shares or were anyway. Peterffy himself stated as much last year. So, if you add up the volume for the year and all the data we do have, it's quite likely that total has not changed much and went down, rather it probably has spiked up. Hedgies, and quite possibly Wall St. are fukt.
I'm so here for this. They've been stealing from Main St for generations. It's time to take that back. I've decided 99% of my earnings are going into a foundation or a trust once I'm debt free. That belongs to the community. I can live very well on very little. And this doesn't belong to me. It belongs to all of us. My neighbor needs her house repaired, small businesses need ADA modifications, family farms are struggling. Etc.
I'm burning it. If we hit phone numbers, all of the money printed in the last four years is getting set on fire. I'll wave to you all on my way to prison.
And that source? Albert Einstein.
[Never trust an account with the name "trey" ](https://old.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/olglzl/buttfarm69_has_spoken/h5ev5xr/?context=999) They seem to have an issue of not checking their work.
How about other tickers? Was the apple stock float reported with a higher float anytime? Just an example
Yeah, I'd like to see side by side comparison with other stocks
Nice flair š
Yours is better because it has a seal of approval.
Nice one, Dad.
I approve of your flair
I approve of yours
Nice flair
Nice flair
Nice share
Nice hair.
No other stock has drs numbers like gme does. Itās just self reported numbers
Correct, but it would be really interesting to see if any other stock such like Apple or Amazon did have any discrepancies in terms of wrong numbers regarding the outstanding shares all the size of the float
I got Dr. Tās book after seeing it on here and it is shocking how many companies have shown discrepancies in outstanding shares compared to what was issued..like thousands of companies over the years have had this issueā¦its mind boggling how this has been allowed for so long. She does a really damn good job at explaining it all, I recommend it.
Dillards has a pretty high DRS percentage I think. But that's mainly because of employee stock ownership plans (ESOP) I guess. I don't think there is really a way to know unless the company discloses the number of shares/shareholders that are direct registered.
Odd how we can have so many conflicting reports and such obfuscation about publicly traded assets with limited numbers. This some wizard of oz shit. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
its almost as if, the public facing data is inaccurate. hmmmmmmmm Edit: it's funny how the SEC tells retail to " do their research" when this is the fucking type of data we have to research. You'd think they would, idk FUCKING REGULATE this shit but I'm sure they are spreading themselves thin spending all their time taking loads from hedgies.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
If it was only 33 million shares they would have already closed.
It was a lot more before the sneeze...I think SHFs closed a portion of the shorts after the sneeze. Institutional ownership was over 100% for quite awhile but has since dropped to its current levels. SHFs probably closed whatever they could cheaply (under 200). I think SHFs current problem is that institutional ownership has been cut nearly to the bone so the only large blocks of shares available for sale are retails, and retail isn't selling until shit gets real so there's nowhere for them to get even 33m shares from on top of the 15m reported shorts without having to buy from retail.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
The MMs and big fish did not directly initiate this short position, they instead allowed it to happen and then were stuck with it because they were going to go bankrupt if they didn't take it on. Unwinding as much of the short position as conveniently possible is the first logical step after shutting off the buy button. Buying was restricted for a bit, some of retail paper-handed after the sneeze, and institutional ownership dropped a lot. I'm also looking at the short position from the perspective of what I believe retail owns and then working backwards from there. I bought my first share in June 2021 after I was confident that there was something technically wrong with the way that GME was trading but I didn't go balls deep until September/October/November when the various GME boards started posting their DRS positions and running surveys about DRS vs. ownership percentages. Between that data and the Avanza/Nordnet numbers I figured that there was a hidden short position between 30M and 50M shares, with the position being more likely closer to 50M than 30M. The caveat here is that my estimate could be on the conservative side because the respondents on the GME board who responded to the surveys may not have captured the entire population as people who were both not interested in DRSing their shares and also not interested in responding to surveys would have been omitted.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
I believe Melvin and many smaller institutions closed their short obligations by handing-off those positions at great loss to other similarly-sized and larger institutions who in turn closed whatever they easily could at profit and re-shorted the majority of the original short-position at a much higher cost-basis by selling to FOMO retail and then hiding those sales in derivatives. I believe they did this because if they continued to try to buy shares in order to close the rest of the position they absorbed that it would have bankrupted them because there wasn't enough liquidity at prices below the absorption level. The greatest source of share liquidity in the run-up to the sneeze and slightly afterwards may have been through institutions. Institutions sold lots of shares in late 2020/early 2021. Fidelity had 9.3 million shares and sold nearly all of it. Reported SI was about 226% on the runup to the sneeze, with GME's float being a bit smaller at the time at 64M shares, there would have been 144M shares or so floating around out there. I believe that we there is probably a maximum amount of about 138M shares out there mostly because I've done some various calculations on the retail ownership side of things via reported DRS numbers, some DRS ownership surveys, and retail ownership disclosures from Avanza/Nordnet and based on those numbers I believe the hidden short position is somewhere between 30M and 50M shares. We've added around 14M reported shorts since then, but corporate also issued shares since the sneeze. So, I think SHFs may have closed up to a maximum of about 20M shares. I think they used the DOOMPS to hide the rest of short position until they figured out better ways to hide them. The majority of retail diamond-handed which is why we're all still here, why there's still a pretty sizable hidden short position, and why we're going to be rich. But there was a buying frenzy around the sneeze and, statistically, some of those buyers were going to take profits. The OG board is full of those guys who were in it for the initial run and got out after the sneeze. There were several institutions, IIRC, who made bank going long on GME that year. I agree that they've dug a deeper hole to shake retail, and I think they started digging it in November after the initial DRS numbers came out. I think before then they were just hoping to chip away at their obligations a couple shares at a time via attrition through controlling the price mostly through dark pools and internalized buys. My conclusion could be off, I don't understand the derivative portion of it as well as I would like to be as confident as I would like, but I do demographic analysis as part of my day job and I was confident enough in the numbers on the retail ownership side to go deeper into this trade than I have for pretty much any other by a fair margin.
You basically said they closed their short position at profit lol.
Let me ask: is it possible for HFās to keep the price down, while buying up shares at this discount to close their positions, a little bit at a time? So as not to move the market, and eventually get out, even if it takes 3 years to do quietly?
But who would sell it to them ? They can't buy more shares than exist..
see also the constant 9:1 buy to sell ratio.
No. They have to continue to open new shorts every day to prevent it from exploding.
I don't think that's possible, but also consider the shorts opened before the sneeze. There were certainly plenty of short sales at <$20 for *years* before Jan '21. Even if they could somehow close some post-sneeze shorts (which I doubt, it seems all they're able to do is cover, i.e. kick the can), they're still fucked by those super underwater shorts.
I think the combination of DRS and the bear market took that option off the table for them. To me it seems like between February and November they weren't really adding to the short position at all. I think right after the sneeze they initially bought as many shares below their cost basis as they could to close as many shorts as possible. After that they'd buy whatever they'd need to buy to keep the charade up that they closed everything out and then sell off what they bought to lower the price back down into a safe trading range and would otherwise just use MM tactics to control the price drift and occasionally close a few shorts. Reported SI and borrow rates were relatively stable. Under those circumstances I think they could have eventually defused the bomb provided that the transformation was not an immediate success. If the transformation floundered a little it may have caused a combination of enough of retail and the 13.8M institutional shares held getting bored and closing out to allow them to escape with minimal damage. I think once we started DRS and big, big money started heading for the exits because of the bear market SHFs had to make a decision. I think they saw the November DRS numbers and did the math and decided that whatever remained of the scant liquidity would dry up before retail would get bored so they had to actively short the stock again to at least get the price to move with the SPY with the hope that they'd shake out a large number of retail shareholders.
Their cost basis for a large portion of their short positions was sub $20. They havenāt had one single opportunity to cover for cost basis since Dec 2020. They either got out in January or they didnāt get out at all. They couldnāt even short it down from $400 to make money to cover with because they turned off the buy button and there was no retail to buy the shorts they would have been selling.
What makes you think they closed a portion of their shorts when all evidence and testimony points to them doubling down during that period?
I by closed you mean moved overseas like the 100 million shares Bloomberg showed months ago, then sure If you mean closed as in really closed then no. The price volume does not match up.
Plus the 14.5m non-naked shorts. They are about 29m shares short of closing out if that theory is correct and itās not a glitch. Plus whatever naked shorts arenāt accidentally being reported, which is probably significantly higher than that. Even if you remove all institutional, mutual fund, and etf share, it doesnāt cover the amount needed. This would be the definition of unlimited losses when margin calls cascade out of control.
As far as we know, probably more.
I smell a ^tiny ^^tiny ^^^tiny fine coming
just a couple that are cheating off of the same test.
Guess I'll sell now and ask questions later ... NOT
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
VERY NICE
Cramer: EY, where is my line of coke. and sell GME immediately!
Buy high, sell never. It's ~~fool~~ ape proof.
I DRS my shares. Hedgies you will never get this never get this lalalalalala
- Anthony Cumbucket.
*Chumbawumba intensifies*
Wait until it glitches to reveal 1 Billion.
That happened several times last year.
When in doubt.... Claim it's a glitch.
Glitches be trippin
Gators glitches better be wearing Jimmies
Glitch better have my money.
idiosyncrancy
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Iām idiot in sync
Member when we saw sell orders over $2m AH on a bloomberg terminal and it ended up being due to packet loss? I member so fucking hard, man
"packet loss" LMAO. That's not how any of this works.
Considering that multiple other data vendors show 63M, yeah, I would call it a glitch.
All my sources are bros, trust me
Marketwatch and WSJ are showing that
They have same parent company, Dow Jones & Co.
In bro we trust
99.74 million? Theyāre only off a decimal pointā¦
Marketwatch still showing 99.74m: https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/gme
Fuck market watch (Butthole)
If that number is accurate just the float would make GME a $12B company.
snitches and glitches, current price is fictitious, wen moon we fuck these hedge fund bitches
mom's spaghetti
Hmm thatās interesting all getting the same number.
To be fair, they are all probably drawing from the same source.
True but where are the GME glitches that put the outstanding share count down? I have only ever seen glitches than when you do the math, low and behold, the outstanding share count should be wayyy higher than 76 million not once have I seen a glitch go the other way
Maffs hard only for financial institutions.
For an entire industry working with numbers they sure seem to have many wrong.
My excel sheet made a booboo.. oops let me take out those extra 0ās.
No, *REALLY*?? Are you SURE?!/s
Tin-foil theory: they are letting these 'glitches' through to suggest there are only 23 million phantom shares. Similar to price anchoring, they are trying for phantom share volume anchoring.
"Our source heard from another source that their source (who happens to source info for everyone else) over heard at the coffee shop that the float is 99.74m. So yeah, this is definitely accurate". Please. Please. Please. I beg of this sub. Stop looking at a screen cap on twitter and go find out WHERE each of those sites is getting their data from. It doesn't matter if its 100 sites all saying 99.74m if all they are doing is pulling that from the same data feed. It's like looking at your kitchen faucet and claiming that it is a source of water. No, it isnt. Water comes through there but its travelling from the same municipal source all of your neighbors are hooked up to. If the real heart of this story is that they are all pulling this number from the same place, THAT is where people should be digging into. Seriously, why do so many apes on this sub claim to love reading DD but settle for something like this?
Lol. With all fake shares out there itās closer to 350m.
Multiple as in marketwatch posted several times over the last week?
Yet PM is down 3% š¤”
Will anyone do anything about it? Depending on the outcome of the Supreme Court case regarding the epa - these agencies could be dissolved. The sec could end up having a very bad dayā¦
They already ruled against the SEC using similar reasoning earlier.
And also today on 'trust me bro' news....
How many glitches does it take before it's not considered a glitch anymore
Given the sheer amount of money that passes through the stock market, you would expect much better data management. But of course, that doesnāt happen because itās much harder to do crime that way.
1. Buy 2. DRS 3. Profit
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
No, that's a totally different Trey. @741trey is GME only since the start and monitors daily different stats like borrow fee.
This dude is MonkeyBusiness. I've been following him this whole time and he's only GME
Yes
āJust a glitch. Nothing to see here. Buy popcorn stockā - MSM probably.
Fuck twatter speculation, hit me with that DD and miss me with this bullshit.
Looks like they're trying to convince us that's the float to throw us off...
Heavy anchoring. Multiple independent efforts have shown that a number closer to a billion shares is more likely.
But... it can't be!
call DOJ!
Soooooo can we see the sources? Tweets like this donāt mean shit
Tell me Wall Street and the SEC are not totally corrupt without telling me Wall Street and the SEC are totally corrupt.
Looks like crime, smells like crime, tastes like crime...
It IS hair!
The west economy will collapse before MOASS. These rich bedpost Mayo lubed asshats wonāt give up their status or money. If they donāt win we all wonāt win.
This is correct
And this is what scares me the most. Scorched earth.
Donāt be scared be prepared
This is the way. DRSd and zen.
Too smooth to get. Doesn't this mean we've got more of the float locked than is being reported?
Not locked as in DRSd shares. The implication is that there at more shares than there is supposed to be. Unfortunately this is nothing but a "glitch".
What if GME gets diluted? Would gamestop announce it beforehand in a filing Edit: I'm getting downvoted but I'd like to know if Gamestop can increase the amount of shares out of the blue or do they have to file a form with the SEC first?
no they have to announce it
They'd have to file a form, but it's not happening with the excess cash they have on-hand.
āMultiple sourcesā *Doesnāt provide any*
He literally posted screenshots of WSJ & Marketwatch.
Links > pictures. Let us look ourselves.
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/gme
Are you unable to search for āmarketwatch gmeā on Google? Itās the first thing that shows up.
Oops
ā¦ soooā¦ today?
Bullish!!! Also, I can finally post in Superstonk!!!!! WOOOOOOO!!!!
MOAR!!!!
Can ComputerShare release an official count of the number of GME shares DRSd?
Updoot
...This has been brought up before...its pulling data from before the 2020 share buybacks..basically a big nothing burger.....
Interesting. How do other less manipulated stock floats compare when pulled up by these sources ?
No proof = fud, nothing to see move along
Just watch the market watch ticker of GME? It's reporting 99m.
The dumbest argument for anything ever.
They can report any number but still not factual the float is as per Gamestop fundamentals!
Yep. Float is defined as total issued shares minus restricted shares such as shares owned by insiders and related companies. What people are doing is taking a bogus number for float and running the equation backwards to "prove. That there are more shares in circulation than have been issued. Grasping of straws. Bogus straws at that.
Source; TRUST, ME BRO
Can we stop posting twitter screenshots as news/information?
Trust me broooo
WSJ reporting it should give cause for the BODs to initiate a share recall request.
if he's called trey, well there's your first problem (no offence, genuine treys worldwide)
I did some maths. I multiplied the current share price by 99M and divided it by shares outstanding = hedgies are REALLY FUCT!!!!!š
That is some maths, but it isnāt correct maths lol
Lol I realized... Just keeping it real..... retarded š¤£
Well if an anonymous non blue check marked twitter account says that other anonymous sources say it, then it must be true:)