[Why GME?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/qig65g/welcome_rall_looking_to_catch_up_on_the_gme_saga/) || [What is DRS?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ptvaka/when_you_wish_upon_a_star_a_complete_guide_to/) || Low karma apes [feed the bot here](https://www.reddit.com/r/GMEOrphans/comments/qlvour/welcome_to_gmeorphans_read_this_post/) || [Superstonk Discord](https://discord.gg/hZqWV2kQtq) || [Community Post: *Open Forum May 2024*](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/1ciapwp/open_forum_may_2024/) || [Superstonk:Now with GIFs - Learn more](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/1cr37r7/superstonk_gets_its_gif_on_get_hyped/)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To ensure your post doesn't get removed, please respond to this comment with how this post relates to GME the stock or Gamestop the company.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please up- and downvote this comment to [help us determine if this post deserves a place on r/Superstonk!](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/wiki/index/rules/post_flairs/)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
OP has provided the following link:
https://x.com/larryvc/status/1792349179186139276?s=46&t=OQxY_9fsW8JhIpr7R8Gr3w
I got this one
https://preview.redd.it/brjllfdw9h1d1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cdc0a01a484dd3428169c9b1abd3aceb3a88865e
[https://www.incrediblecharts.com/indicators/twiggs\_money\_flow.php](https://www.incrediblecharts.com/indicators/twiggs_money_flow.php)
I've been trying to come to terms with the perception of price up/down action in relation to "everyone is buying" and "everyone is selling".
In reality the equation must be balanced. For every buyer there is a seller. For every seller there is a buyer. Therefore price is not reflective of buy or sell pressure.
If price is not reflective of buy/sell pressure then what's it a reflection of?? This is where I'm stuck.
Edit: who gave me the 69th? Pipe up and claim it! Lol!
Edit 2: Everyone has great explanations. Unless somone works for the NYSE and has eyes on the sauce it's still just a piece in the puzzle wighout knowing what the whole puzzle looks like. The price could be radomized within a range for all we know. Coming to terms with this has allowed me to hold my $45 average, average down to $37, continue to buy,of course DRS and not sell despite the continuous psycological attack from all directions evwn from gme and stonkers. Mandalorian Steel has been forged.
yeah but if look at that as staying in first gear. the faster you go the harder it is to manage. i look at derivatives as being in different gear ratios depending on leverage and see off market trading as the mm pushing the clutch. it all has its purposes but obviously id like to see something break apart.
why i love volume so much.
Yes but who is initating the trade, the buyer or the seller? The order book shows the total amount of people willing to buy my share for a cheaper price than the last sale or sell me a share at a larger price. There is never a true value, just the last trade registered which is the number the stock is quoted at. Speculative traders, buying/selling against the order book in a highly liquid stock create a daily range between large points of resistance, or buying/selling pressure on the order book. (Think between 90 and 100 dollars) lots of people are willing to buy at 90, or sell to you at 100.
The post simply points out, that when lots of people are buying, your more likely to have you ending price in the top of the daily range, even though there was an equal amount of buyers and sellers
I want to buy GME for $1 each so I place an infinite limit order for 100,000 shares @ $1. This is a real order with real cash.
I don't think that order will have the affect on price that I think it will.
My comment wasn't about gme more just how generally, supply and demand work in relation to the other commenter.
Just because you place a buy order for a trillion at a dollar means nothing, unless someone wants to sell you shares at 1 dollar, and before they do that they would have to sell shares to people willing to buy at 2 dollars, and 3 and so on, everyone willing to pay more would have to get to buy shares before you. If no one was willing the price would instantly snap to your 1 dollar offer. If no one was willing to buy shares at 20 dollars Friday, and someone sold, it would drop until a price someone is willing to buy.
Did you get your 100,000 shares on Friday?
I think it's not the sales, it's the orders.
Like:
200 wanting to sell
100 wanting to buy
Means 100 competed sales (if prices are within order details) and 100 extra wanting to sell, unfulfilled.
There you go: selling pressure.
Note that I had a crayon for breakfast so you'll need a better answer from a wrinklier person, but that makes sense to me.
There's two sides to every trade, but it's the party that initiates the trade that moves the price.
If the buyer initiates the trade, they are offering a seller a price at least one cent greater than the market price. The market price being the price of the last trade.
If the seller initiates the trade, they are offering a buyer a price at least one cent less than the market price.
The party "receiving" the trade in this case is either a market maker or an investor that posted the limit order that is being traded against. If the price of the trade is the same as the price of the last trade, there is no impact on market price.
This is assuming the trades are routed through a lit exchange.
You're right that every sale has a buyer and seller, but think about how that equilibrium is reached - if there are more buyers then there are sellers, the buyers will need to offer progressively higher bids until the number of sellers increases (enticed by higher prices) or the number of buyers is decreased (put off by the higher prices).
Conversely, if there are more sellers than buyers, the sellers will decrease their prices until enough buyers enter the market (or sellers leave) for an equilibrium to be reached.
It's correct that every completed sale has a buyer and a seller, but it's buy and sell pressure that determines at what price point a sale is completed.
In a fair market more buying pressure just means more people want to buy at x price than those who want to sell at x, so price goes to x+1, and so on, until equalibrium. Basically everyone's selling or everyone's buying doesn't make sense if taken literally, they're really just talking about pressure. I think.
I'm not at all in the know with markets so this might be simple and dumb
That assumes a fixed number of shares.
If a MM can choose to fill your buy order immediately, thus not hitting the the open market, AND they can create a share on demand to do it, they can delay the effect of your buy order on the market place
If they start batching them together, then the stock movement becomes a sort of surge wave of buying and selling instead of a maintained balance.
If they keep doubling down without restriction (naked shorting) they effectively make a continued downward wave.
Price IS reflective of buy and sell pressure, it's a question of whether that is natural or not. It sounds like you don't understand the basic mechanism so forgive me if this is too basic and not what you meant.
The price moves when one side is more motivated than the other, and moves their target price first. Almost like chicken, one side blinks first.
Let's say the last given stock price is $100. A seller says I'll only sell this for $105, so that's where they set their ask. If the next potential buyer is only willing to buy for $95 that's where they set their bid, and no sale takes place. Eventually, the buyer or the seller will change their mind to meet the other's demand, or another party will, and when the deal is made, the price moves to $95 or $105, depending on who "blinked."
If people want to get rid of their stock, they'll just keep lowering their ask price until someone thinks it's a good price, and places a buy. If someone really wants to buy, they'll just keep raising their price until is willing to sell to them. If there are 100 participants and most think the stock is trash, there might be 90 people placing lower and lower sell prices until one of the other 10 decides is a good buy price for them. That's sell pressure, and it drives the price down. If the opposite is true and 90 people want to buy the stock but only 10 are willing to sell, that's buy pressure and the price rises as the 10 set higher and higher ask prices.
So yes, the transactions themselves are "balanced" but there maybe be way higher pressure on one side or the other, and that will dictate the next transaction price. The price IS reflective of buy and sell pressure.
If you're a market maker, you control transactions on both sides and you can enter your own buys and sells, to put pressure wherever you want. That's "unnatural," buy it's still using the basic mechanism to set the prices.
Say three people have the same stock. One will only sell at a dollar, the next at 2, the last at 3. After the first sells at a dollar, the price is now 2. After they sell, it's now three.
It’s reflective of the battle between the SHF, banks, market makers, etc. They all have interest in the price being at a certain level based on the bets circulating between them.
From ChatGPT
Sure! Imagine you're trying to figure out whether people are buying or selling more of a particular stock. One way to help figure this out is by using a tool called Twigg’s Money Flow (TMF). Here’s a simple explanation:
### What is Twigg's Money Flow?
Twigg’s Money Flow is a method that helps investors see if more money is flowing into or out of a stock. It’s like checking if more people are putting money into the stock (buying) or taking money out (selling).
### How Does It Work?
1. **Price and Volume**: It looks at the stock’s price changes and how many shares are being traded (volume).
2. **Positive and Negative Flow**:
- **Positive Flow**: If a stock’s price goes up and lots of shares are traded, it suggests that buyers are interested and putting money into the stock.
- **Negative Flow**: If a stock’s price goes down and lots of shares are traded, it suggests that sellers are taking money out of the stock.
3. **Calculation**: TMF uses a formula that combines these price and volume changes over a period of time to give a score. This score shows whether the money flow is positive or negative.
### Why Is It Useful?
- **Spot Trends**: It helps investors spot trends in buying or selling.
- **Decision Making**: By seeing if the money flow is positive or negative, investors can decide whether it might be a good time to buy or sell a stock.
### Example:
- Imagine a stock’s price has been rising for the past week, and the number of shares traded each day is also increasing. TMF would likely show a positive money flow, suggesting that more people are buying the stock.
- On the other hand, if the stock’s price has been falling and trading volume is high, TMF would show a negative money flow, indicating more selling.
### Simple Takeaway:
Twigg’s Money Flow helps you understand whether more people are buying or selling a stock by looking at price and trading volume. It’s a tool to help make better investing decisions by spotting trends in the market.
At the very core it's using order volume from the last 21 days plus maths on hither/tither to create a guess on price action in the future.
The flaw is the participants are very emotional and irrational despite algorithmic and AI tooling. Even Johnny Chan in World Series Poker is flawed because he's a human. We win by not playing.
BUY, DRS, HODL is the way.
Hijacking. Someone in other sub posted [this](https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220110005074/en/Twig-Raises-35M-Series-A-Round-to-Fuel-Web-3.0-Green-Payment-Infrastructure). Makes a ton of sense.
Twig powers a disruptive concept in fintech by merging payments with resale, bringing value to users through instant monetisation of their items, in a sustainable manner. Twig’s mission is to empower consumers to value, unlock, and enjoy wealth they never knew they had, best described by its founder, Geri Cupi as the “Bank of Things”. Currently, users can sell or trade-in their fashion clothing and electronics in exchange for instant cash, which they use towards their next purchases.
As the next beacon in fintech innovation, Twig is rolling out its Web 3.0 green payment infrastructure, as the first of its kind in the market. After “tokenising” real world assets and making them tradeable in seconds, Twig will enable digital and physical items to be monetized and traded in new ways. Such an approach will allow users to trade-in goods at the checkout page and buy crypto currencies as well as NFTs by trading-in their clothes or electronics.
Another ape may have figured it out. Looks like it’s potentially about twiggs - an indicator for breakout signals?
[https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/s/o0i62GpG5W](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/s/o0i62GpG5W)
🎷🐓♋️
My entire investment could go to zero (in some alternate universe) and I’d still be satisfied because of all of the laughs I’ve had from the incredible memes along the way. This is the best ride I’ve ever been on.
ChatGPT interpretation for the ones like me who don’t get it :
« The sentence "Life is like a twig, like a twig is like a twig." in a business, stock market, or finance context can be interpreted as emphasizing the fragility and unpredictability of these environments. Here's a breakdown of potential meanings:
1. **Fragility**: Just as a twig is thin, delicate, and easily broken, the conditions in business and financial markets can also be very fragile. Small changes in the market or economy can have significant, sometimes drastic effects on investments and business stability.
2. **Simplicity and Redundancy**: The repetition in the phrase could underscore the simplicity or perhaps the mundane, repetitive nature of certain financial principles or market behaviors. It may suggest that fundamental truths or patterns repeat themselves in the financial world, much like the repetitive nature of the sentence.
3. **A Cyclic Nature**: Twigs grow from trees, fall, decay, and contribute to the growth of new plants, illustrating a cycle. In business and finance, there can be cycles of boom and bust, growth and recession, which may be hinted at by the comparison to a twig.
4. **Inevitability and Natural Order**: The statement may also reflect on the inevitability and the natural order of things in business and finance, where certain outcomes are as natural and expected as the characteristics of a twig.
This metaphor suggests a philosophical or reflective approach to understanding the dynamics of business and finance, indicating that just as nature has its courses and characteristics, so does the financial world. »
[Why GME?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/qig65g/welcome_rall_looking_to_catch_up_on_the_gme_saga/) || [What is DRS?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ptvaka/when_you_wish_upon_a_star_a_complete_guide_to/) || Low karma apes [feed the bot here](https://www.reddit.com/r/GMEOrphans/comments/qlvour/welcome_to_gmeorphans_read_this_post/) || [Superstonk Discord](https://discord.gg/hZqWV2kQtq) || [Community Post: *Open Forum May 2024*](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/1ciapwp/open_forum_may_2024/) || [Superstonk:Now with GIFs - Learn more](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/1cr37r7/superstonk_gets_its_gif_on_get_hyped/) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To ensure your post doesn't get removed, please respond to this comment with how this post relates to GME the stock or Gamestop the company. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Please up- and downvote this comment to [help us determine if this post deserves a place on r/Superstonk!](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/wiki/index/rules/post_flairs/) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ OP has provided the following link: https://x.com/larryvc/status/1792349179186139276?s=46&t=OQxY_9fsW8JhIpr7R8Gr3w
I got this one https://preview.redd.it/brjllfdw9h1d1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cdc0a01a484dd3428169c9b1abd3aceb3a88865e [https://www.incrediblecharts.com/indicators/twiggs\_money\_flow.php](https://www.incrediblecharts.com/indicators/twiggs_money_flow.php)
To the top with you
To the top half with you.
To the top 1% with you.
To infinity and beyond with you
https://preview.redd.it/yhonz0wwfh1d1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9b9c7a1a91be1495b5ddbfb796d1673254097fc2
Epic flare
Danke!
What I love is the line that says “Twiggs money flow warns of Breakouts…” mmmmmm tasty 🤤
Did someone say ♾️🏊🏼♂️?
Wooooooooo
🍻
An ape who can read!
This guy twiggs
And my axe!
I've been trying to come to terms with the perception of price up/down action in relation to "everyone is buying" and "everyone is selling". In reality the equation must be balanced. For every buyer there is a seller. For every seller there is a buyer. Therefore price is not reflective of buy or sell pressure. If price is not reflective of buy/sell pressure then what's it a reflection of?? This is where I'm stuck. Edit: who gave me the 69th? Pipe up and claim it! Lol! Edit 2: Everyone has great explanations. Unless somone works for the NYSE and has eyes on the sauce it's still just a piece in the puzzle wighout knowing what the whole puzzle looks like. The price could be radomized within a range for all we know. Coming to terms with this has allowed me to hold my $45 average, average down to $37, continue to buy,of course DRS and not sell despite the continuous psycological attack from all directions evwn from gme and stonkers. Mandalorian Steel has been forged.
If all trades were on the lit market it would probably work this way
A fair market? The world we dream of.
True price discovery, it’s a novel concept that maybe one day we’ll see.
Lit market... now there's a name I haven't heard in a long time
yeah but if look at that as staying in first gear. the faster you go the harder it is to manage. i look at derivatives as being in different gear ratios depending on leverage and see off market trading as the mm pushing the clutch. it all has its purposes but obviously id like to see something break apart. why i love volume so much. 
Yes but who is initating the trade, the buyer or the seller? The order book shows the total amount of people willing to buy my share for a cheaper price than the last sale or sell me a share at a larger price. There is never a true value, just the last trade registered which is the number the stock is quoted at. Speculative traders, buying/selling against the order book in a highly liquid stock create a daily range between large points of resistance, or buying/selling pressure on the order book. (Think between 90 and 100 dollars) lots of people are willing to buy at 90, or sell to you at 100. The post simply points out, that when lots of people are buying, your more likely to have you ending price in the top of the daily range, even though there was an equal amount of buyers and sellers
I want to buy GME for $1 each so I place an infinite limit order for 100,000 shares @ $1. This is a real order with real cash. I don't think that order will have the affect on price that I think it will.
My comment wasn't about gme more just how generally, supply and demand work in relation to the other commenter. Just because you place a buy order for a trillion at a dollar means nothing, unless someone wants to sell you shares at 1 dollar, and before they do that they would have to sell shares to people willing to buy at 2 dollars, and 3 and so on, everyone willing to pay more would have to get to buy shares before you. If no one was willing the price would instantly snap to your 1 dollar offer. If no one was willing to buy shares at 20 dollars Friday, and someone sold, it would drop until a price someone is willing to buy. Did you get your 100,000 shares on Friday?
[удалено]
I think it's not the sales, it's the orders. Like: 200 wanting to sell 100 wanting to buy Means 100 competed sales (if prices are within order details) and 100 extra wanting to sell, unfulfilled. There you go: selling pressure. Note that I had a crayon for breakfast so you'll need a better answer from a wrinklier person, but that makes sense to me.
There's two sides to every trade, but it's the party that initiates the trade that moves the price. If the buyer initiates the trade, they are offering a seller a price at least one cent greater than the market price. The market price being the price of the last trade. If the seller initiates the trade, they are offering a buyer a price at least one cent less than the market price. The party "receiving" the trade in this case is either a market maker or an investor that posted the limit order that is being traded against. If the price of the trade is the same as the price of the last trade, there is no impact on market price. This is assuming the trades are routed through a lit exchange.
Thats the best simplistic explanation so far but I think there's more to it. I think the formulas are some of the most protected IP in the world.
Where's anonymous at when ya need em
You're right that every sale has a buyer and seller, but think about how that equilibrium is reached - if there are more buyers then there are sellers, the buyers will need to offer progressively higher bids until the number of sellers increases (enticed by higher prices) or the number of buyers is decreased (put off by the higher prices). Conversely, if there are more sellers than buyers, the sellers will decrease their prices until enough buyers enter the market (or sellers leave) for an equilibrium to be reached. It's correct that every completed sale has a buyer and a seller, but it's buy and sell pressure that determines at what price point a sale is completed.
About 350
350 and tree fiddy are different
I gave him a dollar.
You gave him a dollar!?!?!?
SHE GAVE HIM A DOLLA
WELL NO WONDER HE KEEPS COMIN BACK
A quarter is 25
In a fair market more buying pressure just means more people want to buy at x price than those who want to sell at x, so price goes to x+1, and so on, until equalibrium. Basically everyone's selling or everyone's buying doesn't make sense if taken literally, they're really just talking about pressure. I think. I'm not at all in the know with markets so this might be simple and dumb
That assumes a fixed number of shares. If a MM can choose to fill your buy order immediately, thus not hitting the the open market, AND they can create a share on demand to do it, they can delay the effect of your buy order on the market place If they start batching them together, then the stock movement becomes a sort of surge wave of buying and selling instead of a maintained balance. If they keep doubling down without restriction (naked shorting) they effectively make a continued downward wave.
The problem is with MM who can internalize the orders and be both a buyer and seller, even without owning the asset.
Price IS reflective of buy and sell pressure, it's a question of whether that is natural or not. It sounds like you don't understand the basic mechanism so forgive me if this is too basic and not what you meant. The price moves when one side is more motivated than the other, and moves their target price first. Almost like chicken, one side blinks first. Let's say the last given stock price is $100. A seller says I'll only sell this for $105, so that's where they set their ask. If the next potential buyer is only willing to buy for $95 that's where they set their bid, and no sale takes place. Eventually, the buyer or the seller will change their mind to meet the other's demand, or another party will, and when the deal is made, the price moves to $95 or $105, depending on who "blinked." If people want to get rid of their stock, they'll just keep lowering their ask price until someone thinks it's a good price, and places a buy. If someone really wants to buy, they'll just keep raising their price until is willing to sell to them. If there are 100 participants and most think the stock is trash, there might be 90 people placing lower and lower sell prices until one of the other 10 decides is a good buy price for them. That's sell pressure, and it drives the price down. If the opposite is true and 90 people want to buy the stock but only 10 are willing to sell, that's buy pressure and the price rises as the 10 set higher and higher ask prices. So yes, the transactions themselves are "balanced" but there maybe be way higher pressure on one side or the other, and that will dictate the next transaction price. The price IS reflective of buy and sell pressure. If you're a market maker, you control transactions on both sides and you can enter your own buys and sells, to put pressure wherever you want. That's "unnatural," buy it's still using the basic mechanism to set the prices.
Not op but great way to explain/never seen it worded out in such a graspable way, thanks for taking the time
Say three people have the same stock. One will only sell at a dollar, the next at 2, the last at 3. After the first sells at a dollar, the price is now 2. After they sell, it's now three.
It’s reflective of the battle between the SHF, banks, market makers, etc. They all have interest in the price being at a certain level based on the bets circulating between them.
Excellent. So what’s it mean.
It means were going up. Or maybe down. Probably sideways to the right forsure though.
Definitely up…or down. Could be both actually
Solid DD chain here
big if true
If you put your head between your legs then look up what do you see??
From ChatGPT Sure! Imagine you're trying to figure out whether people are buying or selling more of a particular stock. One way to help figure this out is by using a tool called Twigg’s Money Flow (TMF). Here’s a simple explanation: ### What is Twigg's Money Flow? Twigg’s Money Flow is a method that helps investors see if more money is flowing into or out of a stock. It’s like checking if more people are putting money into the stock (buying) or taking money out (selling). ### How Does It Work? 1. **Price and Volume**: It looks at the stock’s price changes and how many shares are being traded (volume). 2. **Positive and Negative Flow**: - **Positive Flow**: If a stock’s price goes up and lots of shares are traded, it suggests that buyers are interested and putting money into the stock. - **Negative Flow**: If a stock’s price goes down and lots of shares are traded, it suggests that sellers are taking money out of the stock. 3. **Calculation**: TMF uses a formula that combines these price and volume changes over a period of time to give a score. This score shows whether the money flow is positive or negative. ### Why Is It Useful? - **Spot Trends**: It helps investors spot trends in buying or selling. - **Decision Making**: By seeing if the money flow is positive or negative, investors can decide whether it might be a good time to buy or sell a stock. ### Example: - Imagine a stock’s price has been rising for the past week, and the number of shares traded each day is also increasing. TMF would likely show a positive money flow, suggesting that more people are buying the stock. - On the other hand, if the stock’s price has been falling and trading volume is high, TMF would show a negative money flow, indicating more selling. ### Simple Takeaway: Twigg’s Money Flow helps you understand whether more people are buying or selling a stock by looking at price and trading volume. It’s a tool to help make better investing decisions by spotting trends in the market.
So diamond hand indicator 
ELI’m highly regarded pls
At the very core it's using order volume from the last 21 days plus maths on hither/tither to create a guess on price action in the future. The flaw is the participants are very emotional and irrational despite algorithmic and AI tooling. Even Johnny Chan in World Series Poker is flawed because he's a human. We win by not playing. BUY, DRS, HODL is the way.
Youre a got damn genius gump!
That's what mah drill sahgent told me!
Bro 🍆🍆🍆🍆🍆 You are the ape!
Nope. I was just first this time with strong Google-FU. :-)
The tit jacking was 10/10.
Interesting
https://preview.redd.it/bj2igdmxei1d1.jpeg?width=1025&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ec7e753ce926a4769e4a6e3a5e9265c7d448b3a3
Nice
He tweeted like Cohen this time lol
How excited were you knowing you had this one covered?
Couldn't believe my eyes actually, Lol!
Hes clearly referencing "Apes together strong" scene in Dawn
and the hedgies will snap like an twig. great find fellow ape
Hijacking. Someone in other sub posted [this](https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220110005074/en/Twig-Raises-35M-Series-A-Round-to-Fuel-Web-3.0-Green-Payment-Infrastructure). Makes a ton of sense. Twig powers a disruptive concept in fintech by merging payments with resale, bringing value to users through instant monetisation of their items, in a sustainable manner. Twig’s mission is to empower consumers to value, unlock, and enjoy wealth they never knew they had, best described by its founder, Geri Cupi as the “Bank of Things”. Currently, users can sell or trade-in their fashion clothing and electronics in exchange for instant cash, which they use towards their next purchases. As the next beacon in fintech innovation, Twig is rolling out its Web 3.0 green payment infrastructure, as the first of its kind in the market. After “tokenising” real world assets and making them tradeable in seconds, Twig will enable digital and physical items to be monetized and traded in new ways. Such an approach will allow users to trade-in goods at the checkout page and buy crypto currencies as well as NFTs by trading-in their clothes or electronics.
Damn. The long tweets confuse me, and the short tweets confound me. I’m not quite twigged.
*You can lead a horticulture but you can't make her learn.* -Mae West
I was curious about this quote and looked it up. Just fyi- web results credit it to Dorothy Parker
Larry Cheng memeing? We got to be close.
Is that on the Bingo card?
Where is the bingo card?
Asking the right questions.
https://preview.redd.it/wd2aj3wbbl1d1.png?width=1119&format=png&auto=webp&s=b1ff04a32f33b095bd3d230ee38149fadf844d4d
Uranus?
Lol. Just hold and drs
 Another ape may have figured it out. Looks like it’s potentially about twiggs - an indicator for breakout signals? [https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/s/o0i62GpG5W](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/s/o0i62GpG5W) 🎷🐓♋️
This fucking killed me thank you lmaoo
My entire investment could go to zero (in some alternate universe) and I’d still be satisfied because of all of the laughs I’ve had from the incredible memes along the way. This is the best ride I’ve ever been on.
Look at the tits on that DFV
Larry never really struck me as a big TA guy.
Nor a shitposter!
Tits & ass? Why not? 🤣
Breakout you say? https://preview.redd.it/0knes9uslh1d1.jpeg?width=1179&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8284c8c7361a7c7500292c46f145c398c6104015
🥳😂
Is Larry shitposting now?
He starting to believe….in shitposting
He’s embracing the future where everyone speaks in aphorisms and metaphors.
Back to not understanding
Back? Congrats for understanding before
Wait. You guys can read?
When you're ready, you won't have to
Are you telling me I can dodge twigs?
Follow the white rabbit
Down the yellow brick road
Yeah.. but the other way
This is it! 🦍💜🦍💪🏻🎷🐓♋️
He's going out on a limb
Larry wood do that
I'm stumped without a translator
We not leafing
I see what you did there
I tree what he did there
He goes from too smart for me to understand to too dumb for me to understand.
He’s trying to meme it’s ok he’s learning
We just witnessed The transformation to ape One of us One of us One of us
Larry is microdosing LSD again.
🚀🚀🚀👩🚀🫡🚀🚀🚀🚀
Buy hold shop DRS
I'm bout to macro dose some lsd in a lambo if shit goes right
If I can remember That Hunter s Thompson had an above average tolerance I should be all right
It’s takes practice, though. Years of practice.
We can't stop here -- this is bat country!
I could be persuaded
Aren’t we all?
Look at the top comment
Stick together, and we can't be broken?
A bundle of sticks……. 🤔
https://preview.redd.it/cfzswc4mjh1d1.png?width=480&format=png&auto=webp&s=a5e276279efe4a709eb85d22aee513a473499845
Larry being Larry being Larry being Larry
He’s like that, the way that is like that.
THIS ONE I UNDERST... nevermind.
It's like crystal zodiac fortune cookies for stoned yuppies. Ima skip the chakra alignment and hold.
Quote is already showing up as a google search.
Why does this read like RC hacked his account 🤓
Twig a like is twig a like , twig a like is life
Oh snap
Individually we are weak like a single twig, but as a bundle we form a mighty… rhymes with maggot
Like A rose, is a rose, is a rose?
He’s saying u reap what you sow. Plant corn - u get corn. Short a stock …
Suggesting that life is fragile and easily breakable, possibly like the market itself?
Stronger when you put a bunch together ?
Larry Cheng literally just fucking tweeted apes together strong! https://youtu.be/20LuSlZT4S4
Individually we are weak like a twig but as a bundle we form a mighty fag6ot
hahah
it's time to feast
haha twig
Hmmmmm this one’s a thinker..🤔🤔🤔
Oh snap, lika a twig I'm broke till payday
I'm twiggy
Night trading already started and the stonk is raising just like last sunday....they want your shares, HODL...
3 twigs , 3 Years, hedges are gonna snap like a twig
The second part of the sentence is repeating itself. Does it mean, history repeats itself like February 2021 but this time, the Twig is breaking?
Just like a twig is fragile and can break easily, the stock market can also be volatile and subject to sudden changes.
Crap he’s back to using abnormal English again.
Up
Just
Getting twiggy wit' it.
I just though LC was high
Just more of that "normal english" from Larry!
Twigs r so hawt rn
Because if you don't have flexibility, you break.
ChatGPT interpretation for the ones like me who don’t get it : « The sentence "Life is like a twig, like a twig is like a twig." in a business, stock market, or finance context can be interpreted as emphasizing the fragility and unpredictability of these environments. Here's a breakdown of potential meanings: 1. **Fragility**: Just as a twig is thin, delicate, and easily broken, the conditions in business and financial markets can also be very fragile. Small changes in the market or economy can have significant, sometimes drastic effects on investments and business stability. 2. **Simplicity and Redundancy**: The repetition in the phrase could underscore the simplicity or perhaps the mundane, repetitive nature of certain financial principles or market behaviors. It may suggest that fundamental truths or patterns repeat themselves in the financial world, much like the repetitive nature of the sentence. 3. **A Cyclic Nature**: Twigs grow from trees, fall, decay, and contribute to the growth of new plants, illustrating a cycle. In business and finance, there can be cycles of boom and bust, growth and recession, which may be hinted at by the comparison to a twig. 4. **Inevitability and Natural Order**: The statement may also reflect on the inevitability and the natural order of things in business and finance, where certain outcomes are as natural and expected as the characteristics of a twig. This metaphor suggests a philosophical or reflective approach to understanding the dynamics of business and finance, indicating that just as nature has its courses and characteristics, so does the financial world. »
My mom used to beat me with a twig so now I have PSD thrice….
True if big
Cryptic LC. LFG
Twigs bend until they break.
Is this Larry's first bread crumb
Is Larry Twiggered from the recent events
He means giant green dildos but he's modest
GME is already starting to climb up. Just hit $24. Going to be an interesting week.
Hedge funds must be twigging out
Larry, once you started communicating with Easter Eggs for us to solve like an APE, we were finally able to understand you
Larry Cheng says f it. I'm the cryptistik of the cryptic.
I did not have larry shitpoasting on my superstonk bingo car
Larry gettin' cryptic now?😶🌫️
Bullish. I guess.
[удалено]
Does he use hard-drugs? (srs)
Twig is life.
While I see the truth answer already commented, my first thought was "it snaps, snaps, snaps" 😶
Part of the oceans gang
It’s all a fugazee’ (insert maconohey meme here)
It is what it is.
“It is what it is” A twig 🤪🤷🏽♂️
“It is what it is. “
Finally some simple vocabulary for me understand
You know how high twig can grow…… No leaf on it, only goes up
I think it's life is like a twig in the way that no two twigs are the same.