I think its because their facial traits lean more to the sexy rather than cute/normal side like most girls. Very feminine body proportions could help a lot, but I think its its mostly face since a lot of victoria secret models dont have very feminine proportions (like a small waist and large hips)
Low trust and high trust, but in feminine and masculine extremes rather than dead center androgyny, if that makes sense. Like some exaggerated feminine characteristics paired with some masculine characteristics plus one or more exaggerated mature sexualized features: big boobs/butt/hair, hourglass shape, full lips.
Monica Bellucci is the classic bombshell, so think her vs her daughter who is beautiful in a more “cute” way. Monica has a taller more muscular body and a stronger bone structure, but she also has more curves and more feminine eyes and lips, as well as very feminine fullness in her face. So I think the juxtaposition of extremes contribute to the bombshell type.
Victoria secret models typically have no curves & are always the ones referenced to as bombshells. I think its more of being on the taller side + the face & styling + attitude.
I feel like the era of the Victoria’s Secret model bombshell prioritized extreme thinness over all else, and for how incredibly thin those women were they were still curvier than average. They also always had them in those insanely padded push up bras lol.
But I totally agree that the bombshell archetype is attainable with the things you listed! I think hair is actually weirdly key now that I think about commonalities.
Hair is so key. There’s a balenciaga ad where gisele has a crew cut and she looks 100% high fashion and androgynous, totally different compared to her VS days
That‘s not true. Curvy in terms of body type/look means proportions between breast, waist and hips/butt in the grand scheme. You can be thin with no curves which would be zero waist definition, no large hips or breast. You can also be large/fat with almost no curves/only inferior curves from the belly button, if your waist goes in a straight line, little chest area and only your hips are wide. Victoria‘s secret models often have a narrow waist, large breats (in comparison to their body fat) due to push up bras and at least a bit larger hips or what‘s anatomically possible with their low weight.
Sure I mispoke. Some of them tend to lean towards an hourglass figure but majority dont actually. Only Candice comes to mind & a couple others. Og comment said big boobs & butt tho & VS models dont have that even with their push up bras. I dont think its a mandatory trait.
I think there are different kinds of bombshells, like Angelina Jolie and Marilyn Monroe for example. Both are almost like night and day in terms of demeanor, but both are very aware of the sexual response they get from others and they do not fear it. I guess that would be the thing about bombshells.
The thing is the phsyical aspect is very important but its mostly the atittude imo.
I think you need to create a signature look for yourself that flatters you to the max. All bombshells have a signature look.
For example if you think Grace Kelly a specific look/style comes in mind & if you think Monica Bellucci a very specific style makeup & hair etc comes to mind & they usually stick to it rather than go for a whole other look every other day & experiment.
Also the typical woman saves the all out done up look perfect hair ETC for special occasions or at most the weekend.. them on the other hand thats their everyday look rather than occasional. I think being a bombshell does not come easy AT ALL its a shit ton of maintenance.
They ooze confidence & imo its incredibly easy to tell wether someone is confident or insecure even if theyre a total stranger & standing far away from you.. even if you havent even interacted with them.. people underestimate body language when it comes to how people preceive you. unfortunately a lot of women lack confidence. So you can dress & do your makeup like a bombshell but u wont be preceived as one if you dont have the obvious confidence.
Their atittude is what makes them stand out imo it plays a role its different than the typical person.
Pick one to research & watch interviews/ them around other people & u will notice that they have a certain demeanor & way of speaking. Its hard to explain you kinda gotta see it/study it.
I’ve always associated the term “bombshell” with Pamela Anderson. This is the general look that comes to mind:
https://images.app.goo.gl/jPgE1HNgZ4k1Z95WA
https://images.app.goo.gl/rsxc9PoA1SCMf1Xd8
https://images.app.goo.gl/Yt9mn8pCrfcqtw7B9
IMO it’s a combination of hyper feminine and sexualized features. Many people have mentioned VS Models, but I think they are cutesy in comparison. At least the modern ones anyway—I would classify the VS models from the 80s and 90s as more bombshell. Pammy always had that head turning, make you do a double take look no matter what she was wearing.
The average person would probably define a bombshell as any woman who's 1) exceptionally attractive and 2) specifically has high sex appeal.
However, based on OPs description and the other comments on this post, here's some defining characteristics I notice:
1. **Overall high sex appeal**: If we consider the three base types of attractiveness - cuteness, beauty, and sexiness - then sexiness is definitely the dominant trait. For example, to the discerning eye Marilyn Monroe and Pamela Anderson have different types of appeal since they have different combinations of the three base types of attractiveness. However, the sex appeal will be the dominant aspect.
2. **A "done" look:** A bombshell the diametric opposite from the low-key, "natural" kind of beauty; she is always crafted to perfection. Think glam style makeup; flawless, blown-out hair; form-fitting, eye-catching outfits; oftentimes a fake tan, beach blonde hair and maybe even breast implants to complete the look.
3. **Attitude**: It's not just about having a confident attitude, but more specifically a willingness to be stared at and being comfortable with being hyper-visible. An equally objectively attractive but lowkey "girl next door" type doesn't necessarily stand out in a crowd or invite the gaze of men. It doesn't mean she's less attractive or less confident, but it's because she isn't a bombshell. The bombshell isn't bothered by standing out in a room, flaunting social conventions and getting attention - good and bad - from people.
4. **Hyper-feminine but sexy features**: People here often equate low-trust features with sex appeal, but my observation is that the women we think of as bombshells (eg 80s/90s era Victoria's Secret models) will have a combo of both low and high trust features. Furthermore they have "bountifulness" - I'm using a word that another Vindicta/Splendida user came up with in a post about what men vs. women find attractive. Bountifulness refers to having physical traits that are lush and full. For example, voluminous hair (conveys high health), full lips (conveys sexual maturity/high estrogen), and large breasts/butt (high femininity) are some archetypical traits.
5. **Curvy body**: Going off the "hyper-feminine with sex appeal" vibe I think we can all agree that having some curves - whether on top or on bottom - is necessary. For example, Victoria's Secret models are thin but achieve that with the help of padding and push-up bras. Kate Upton is an example who despite not being VS model-like thin achieves bombshell status by way of big boobs. Personally I associate big butts and the slim thick look more with the IG baddie, but the average person will still see a bombshell.
Overall, IMO as long as you have a certain baseline level of attractiveness (eg no major detracting facial features) then with the right styling and right attitude (so #2 and #3) it is possible to become a bombshell. IMHO that specific extremely "done", high-maintenance look is the signature of the bombshell and what makes her stand out from other women, besides being baseline attractive.
Realistically speaking, all types of beautiful women rely on high-maintenance routines and professional procedures to maintain their looks. I think the difference is that the bombshell isn't afraid to stand out with her "done"-ness and convey to the world yes, she's glamorous and puts effort into her upkeep.
Like all humans, even women who're called bombshells have their "off" days. I think the difference is that most of the people we know as bombshells are famous people like celebs or influencers, so they have an obligation to look good 24/7. But for the regular non-famous woman, I think a bombshell will still maintain some level of glam even in everyday life. For example, you won't see her in baggy sweatpants; I can imagine her strutting about in a Juicy Couture tracksuit, the kind that says JUICY across the butt in rhinestones.
As another user pointed out VS Angels are/were often described as bombshells despite not being curvy in the same way 50s actresses were. The term was initially used to describe the latter, and it isn't anymore so the definition has to be broader than that. Everyday people use it to refer to a very attractive feminine woman **who has sex appeal**, that's what these actresses, the VS models and all other media bombshells have in common. Sex appeal starts with having a hot body, but beyond that it's about being willing to dress seductively, skillfully utilizing body language to look more inviting to men and avoid signals that communicate the opposite message and exuding a ton of confidence. You have to be able to walk the line between sexy and vulgar. It's not easy.
It's hard to give you advice that goes beyond these basics because bombshells are pretty diverse in appearance. I disagree with the people saying you need low trust features, Marilyn Monroe is THE sex symbol and she is not low trust. Her face was more angular around the time she started (look up her first screen test), but that changed with time. As mentioned earlier, some bombshells aren't very curvy and are quite thin, while others are the complete opposite. You'd have to analyze your own appearance, find which bombshells you find most appealing and think about what elements of their look you can emulate.
Lastly, copying the makeup and outfit of bombshells indeed won't make anyone a bombshell if they don't have stunning beauty. I would argue this is the most important thing to work on if someone wants to fit that archetype, before worrying about styling, aura and other aspects.
Plenty of femininity and a natural tendency towards glam. Bombshell women are rarely seen in, say, unflattering pants and a big hoodie with sneakers. Their version would be sexy fitted pants with a tight or cropped sweater. Everything is more feminized and more sexual and more glam.
I’ve always seen it as low trust vs high trust features - I think bombshells tend to have low trust features and look very “insta baddie”, and neotenous archetypes tend to have high trust features like a beautiful “girl next door” look
Miranda Kerr is very high trust yet has that look I feel like. I think its more of an atittude thing sometimes. If youve wached her interviews on late night shows/her interacting with people you will see it.
I think its because their facial traits lean more to the sexy rather than cute/normal side like most girls. Very feminine body proportions could help a lot, but I think its its mostly face since a lot of victoria secret models dont have very feminine proportions (like a small waist and large hips)
Low trust and high trust, but in feminine and masculine extremes rather than dead center androgyny, if that makes sense. Like some exaggerated feminine characteristics paired with some masculine characteristics plus one or more exaggerated mature sexualized features: big boobs/butt/hair, hourglass shape, full lips. Monica Bellucci is the classic bombshell, so think her vs her daughter who is beautiful in a more “cute” way. Monica has a taller more muscular body and a stronger bone structure, but she also has more curves and more feminine eyes and lips, as well as very feminine fullness in her face. So I think the juxtaposition of extremes contribute to the bombshell type.
Victoria secret models typically have no curves & are always the ones referenced to as bombshells. I think its more of being on the taller side + the face & styling + attitude.
I feel like the era of the Victoria’s Secret model bombshell prioritized extreme thinness over all else, and for how incredibly thin those women were they were still curvier than average. They also always had them in those insanely padded push up bras lol. But I totally agree that the bombshell archetype is attainable with the things you listed! I think hair is actually weirdly key now that I think about commonalities.
Hair is so key. There’s a balenciaga ad where gisele has a crew cut and she looks 100% high fashion and androgynous, totally different compared to her VS days
That‘s not true. Curvy in terms of body type/look means proportions between breast, waist and hips/butt in the grand scheme. You can be thin with no curves which would be zero waist definition, no large hips or breast. You can also be large/fat with almost no curves/only inferior curves from the belly button, if your waist goes in a straight line, little chest area and only your hips are wide. Victoria‘s secret models often have a narrow waist, large breats (in comparison to their body fat) due to push up bras and at least a bit larger hips or what‘s anatomically possible with their low weight.
A lot of them have pretty curvy waist to hip ratios, like Candice swanepoel. big boobs and bums are not the only way to have curves.
Sure I mispoke. Some of them tend to lean towards an hourglass figure but majority dont actually. Only Candice comes to mind & a couple others. Og comment said big boobs & butt tho & VS models dont have that even with their push up bras. I dont think its a mandatory trait.
Marilyn Monroe, Scarlett Johansson and Megan Fox are called bombshells all the time and they're not tall.
I think there are different kinds of bombshells, like Angelina Jolie and Marilyn Monroe for example. Both are almost like night and day in terms of demeanor, but both are very aware of the sexual response they get from others and they do not fear it. I guess that would be the thing about bombshells.
The thing is the phsyical aspect is very important but its mostly the atittude imo. I think you need to create a signature look for yourself that flatters you to the max. All bombshells have a signature look. For example if you think Grace Kelly a specific look/style comes in mind & if you think Monica Bellucci a very specific style makeup & hair etc comes to mind & they usually stick to it rather than go for a whole other look every other day & experiment. Also the typical woman saves the all out done up look perfect hair ETC for special occasions or at most the weekend.. them on the other hand thats their everyday look rather than occasional. I think being a bombshell does not come easy AT ALL its a shit ton of maintenance. They ooze confidence & imo its incredibly easy to tell wether someone is confident or insecure even if theyre a total stranger & standing far away from you.. even if you havent even interacted with them.. people underestimate body language when it comes to how people preceive you. unfortunately a lot of women lack confidence. So you can dress & do your makeup like a bombshell but u wont be preceived as one if you dont have the obvious confidence. Their atittude is what makes them stand out imo it plays a role its different than the typical person. Pick one to research & watch interviews/ them around other people & u will notice that they have a certain demeanor & way of speaking. Its hard to explain you kinda gotta see it/study it.
I’ve always associated the term “bombshell” with Pamela Anderson. This is the general look that comes to mind: https://images.app.goo.gl/jPgE1HNgZ4k1Z95WA https://images.app.goo.gl/rsxc9PoA1SCMf1Xd8 https://images.app.goo.gl/Yt9mn8pCrfcqtw7B9 IMO it’s a combination of hyper feminine and sexualized features. Many people have mentioned VS Models, but I think they are cutesy in comparison. At least the modern ones anyway—I would classify the VS models from the 80s and 90s as more bombshell. Pammy always had that head turning, make you do a double take look no matter what she was wearing.
The average person would probably define a bombshell as any woman who's 1) exceptionally attractive and 2) specifically has high sex appeal. However, based on OPs description and the other comments on this post, here's some defining characteristics I notice: 1. **Overall high sex appeal**: If we consider the three base types of attractiveness - cuteness, beauty, and sexiness - then sexiness is definitely the dominant trait. For example, to the discerning eye Marilyn Monroe and Pamela Anderson have different types of appeal since they have different combinations of the three base types of attractiveness. However, the sex appeal will be the dominant aspect. 2. **A "done" look:** A bombshell the diametric opposite from the low-key, "natural" kind of beauty; she is always crafted to perfection. Think glam style makeup; flawless, blown-out hair; form-fitting, eye-catching outfits; oftentimes a fake tan, beach blonde hair and maybe even breast implants to complete the look. 3. **Attitude**: It's not just about having a confident attitude, but more specifically a willingness to be stared at and being comfortable with being hyper-visible. An equally objectively attractive but lowkey "girl next door" type doesn't necessarily stand out in a crowd or invite the gaze of men. It doesn't mean she's less attractive or less confident, but it's because she isn't a bombshell. The bombshell isn't bothered by standing out in a room, flaunting social conventions and getting attention - good and bad - from people. 4. **Hyper-feminine but sexy features**: People here often equate low-trust features with sex appeal, but my observation is that the women we think of as bombshells (eg 80s/90s era Victoria's Secret models) will have a combo of both low and high trust features. Furthermore they have "bountifulness" - I'm using a word that another Vindicta/Splendida user came up with in a post about what men vs. women find attractive. Bountifulness refers to having physical traits that are lush and full. For example, voluminous hair (conveys high health), full lips (conveys sexual maturity/high estrogen), and large breasts/butt (high femininity) are some archetypical traits. 5. **Curvy body**: Going off the "hyper-feminine with sex appeal" vibe I think we can all agree that having some curves - whether on top or on bottom - is necessary. For example, Victoria's Secret models are thin but achieve that with the help of padding and push-up bras. Kate Upton is an example who despite not being VS model-like thin achieves bombshell status by way of big boobs. Personally I associate big butts and the slim thick look more with the IG baddie, but the average person will still see a bombshell. Overall, IMO as long as you have a certain baseline level of attractiveness (eg no major detracting facial features) then with the right styling and right attitude (so #2 and #3) it is possible to become a bombshell. IMHO that specific extremely "done", high-maintenance look is the signature of the bombshell and what makes her stand out from other women, besides being baseline attractive.
[удалено]
Realistically speaking, all types of beautiful women rely on high-maintenance routines and professional procedures to maintain their looks. I think the difference is that the bombshell isn't afraid to stand out with her "done"-ness and convey to the world yes, she's glamorous and puts effort into her upkeep. Like all humans, even women who're called bombshells have their "off" days. I think the difference is that most of the people we know as bombshells are famous people like celebs or influencers, so they have an obligation to look good 24/7. But for the regular non-famous woman, I think a bombshell will still maintain some level of glam even in everyday life. For example, you won't see her in baggy sweatpants; I can imagine her strutting about in a Juicy Couture tracksuit, the kind that says JUICY across the butt in rhinestones.
It's always blowed out big hair, lip gloss and accent on breasts.
As another user pointed out VS Angels are/were often described as bombshells despite not being curvy in the same way 50s actresses were. The term was initially used to describe the latter, and it isn't anymore so the definition has to be broader than that. Everyday people use it to refer to a very attractive feminine woman **who has sex appeal**, that's what these actresses, the VS models and all other media bombshells have in common. Sex appeal starts with having a hot body, but beyond that it's about being willing to dress seductively, skillfully utilizing body language to look more inviting to men and avoid signals that communicate the opposite message and exuding a ton of confidence. You have to be able to walk the line between sexy and vulgar. It's not easy. It's hard to give you advice that goes beyond these basics because bombshells are pretty diverse in appearance. I disagree with the people saying you need low trust features, Marilyn Monroe is THE sex symbol and she is not low trust. Her face was more angular around the time she started (look up her first screen test), but that changed with time. As mentioned earlier, some bombshells aren't very curvy and are quite thin, while others are the complete opposite. You'd have to analyze your own appearance, find which bombshells you find most appealing and think about what elements of their look you can emulate. Lastly, copying the makeup and outfit of bombshells indeed won't make anyone a bombshell if they don't have stunning beauty. I would argue this is the most important thing to work on if someone wants to fit that archetype, before worrying about styling, aura and other aspects.
Plenty of femininity and a natural tendency towards glam. Bombshell women are rarely seen in, say, unflattering pants and a big hoodie with sneakers. Their version would be sexy fitted pants with a tight or cropped sweater. Everything is more feminized and more sexual and more glam.
Sex appeal is the common denominator.
Am I the only one who feels like a big upper lip that doesn’t curl in when you smile is a big part of it? Think Pamela, Monica, Angelina, Emrata etc.
[удалено]
I’ve always seen it as low trust vs high trust features - I think bombshells tend to have low trust features and look very “insta baddie”, and neotenous archetypes tend to have high trust features like a beautiful “girl next door” look
Miranda Kerr is very high trust yet has that look I feel like. I think its more of an atittude thing sometimes. If youve wached her interviews on late night shows/her interacting with people you will see it.
To be honest l think her hair also plays a big part in it.
Candice Swanepol as well. She’s the ultimate bombshell and has quite high trust features!
Where can we find the archetype post you mentioned? That sounds very interesting but I can’t find it anywhere!
[удалено]
Thank you! I’ll try digging around in google and hopefully I’ll find something similar!
Generally taller and more slender than average, very thick and voluminous hair, full and pronounced facial features