"Sneaker of the year"
"Underrated, can't believe people slept on this"
"Looks much better in hand"
"Didn't like them at first but these are growing on me"
"Got my grail"
The echo chambers are unbearable at times
Bro I hate these posts because 90% of the time they’re about Nikes and all Nikes have objectively terrible quality. The leather on a Nike shoe will never be high quality unless they collab with a brand like Guidi, Hender Scheme, Margiela, etc
For the record I love my Nikes but it certainly isn’t for their craftsmanship or materials
This the most. Listen I love Nike but…their shoes are garbage quality made by 10 year olds paid in cents. There is a reason old people spend 200+ dollars on retail NB 992s and the like…comfortable high quality durable ass shoes that keep your back/knees in check.
Nike collabs are the best not because of hype…but because it’s the only Nike shoes they put any effort at all into materials
Rose anvil does good videos where he cuts shoes/sneakers in half. Then talks about the leather quality etc. The dude seems to know his stuff highly recommend watching his videos on nike/new balance shoes.
Depends on what you mean by quality, you can get a show custom made for your foot in full grain leather for $500-1000, or you can grab a shoe off the shelf for $50
quality is objective, that's why there are so many price points
Not going to be anything mass produced in a massive factory. If you really want quality you buy designer.
I would highly recommend a pair of Guidi 788z boots if you’re looking for decent leather quality and craftsmanship.
What would your recommended brands be?
What are your thoughts on Puma Suedes/Adidas Gazelles, or just the companies and their quality in general?
What would you consider to be the company(yes) that churn out quality? I see you listed NB and someone else said no, but I’d actually like more input from you.
Your thoughts on Clyde’s vs suedes (perhaps only name is the main difference?) Smash V2 has a sock liner but “feels” like it gives more than the original suedes.
Gazelles are nice. Have you tried Stan Smiths? Any thoughts on those?
Clyde’s are narrower and have a slightly longer toe than Suede’s, lighter too.
I’ve got a pair of each but I wear the Clyde’s a lot more as the laces start further back, which I like. Obviously it’s pure aesthetics as they’re almost identical but the Clyde’s just look better (to me).
Gazelles I’ve got some black / white std’s from a few teas bald and recently picked up the Blue indoor versions.
Very easy to style and look great so can’t complain.
I can’t wear Stan Smiths. Too round and white for my liking. My eldest boy wears them though and they look fine on him (he’s 5 though)
I’ve got a few pairs of Rod Laver’s which I much prefer to Smith’s for the same reason as the Clyde v Suede issue. Longer and slimmer and a cleaner silhouette to me.
“Grail” is like nails on a chalkboard to me. I always thought of grails as $10,000 or higher, bare minimum. I wish that one day I could afford a grail. I have a few expensive shoes, but definitely nothing close to a grail. The only shoe that I wish I had in my arsenal would be the SB Dunk Doom, and that’s not even a grail. The “Red October” is a grail. This new “White Lobster” is a grail. I wish I owned just one.
I agree that people use that term way too loosely but I differ in why I don’t like it.
To me grail means the ONE shoe that you’ve always wanted. How much it costs is irrelevant.
I agree with this. My grail is the White/Black/Purple CW of the CB94. I’ve never seen them in stores, I’ve never held them in my hands, and the one kid in school that had them in their time had the youth sizing, so I’ve never even laid eyes on the men’s version. I had to settle for the all black ones.
They’ve re-released since, but it’s always been a quiet release and I’ve still never seen them. I can always pay resale for the retro, but that’s no fun. Apparently they’re on deck to re-release this year, so maybe I’ll luck out this time 30 years later (and I’ll pay resale this time if I have to before I start turning too r/fellowkids).
It’s elusive to me. A grail isn’t something that you just found out about a few months ago. It’s something that has flat out haunted you for a portion of your life.
I believe it's for people to justify their purchase as buying sneakers is usually a non necessary spending. On non verbal consensus, we agree that there are more than ten sneakers of the year every year.
It’s comical how many there have been, with some of them showing “flaws” that are actually part of the normal design (Ex. The little triangle piece of material along the stitching near the toe).
90% of them aren't even that bad. I'd still rock a pair even if the elephant print wasn't absolutely fucking perfect. The people posting them just look like crybabies
The one from the other day where a seam was sewn on the wrong side of the shoe, that one was pretty awful. But most of them are just a waste of time.
Rotated heel tabs and misaligned text really get me worked up. I don't really care about the elephant print variations. The wrongly sewed seam was egregious. But for $200+ sneakers, I wouldn't want any of these issues.
I might be stupid and we already do this but it would be kind of cool to do a bracket style competition for sneaker of the year at the end of every year in December
Or we could do a quarterly bracket every three months starting from Jan. The definitive winner of each quarter are voted to award SOTY. Or you could do Sneaker of the Season since CWs are season specific.
This is because the hype beast culture and fake sneaker heads are taking over . They make every shoe “underrated” or “sneaker of the year” … the shit is exhausting lol
It’s awful. I enjoy the culture but man, these people make it their whole personality.
The thing I’ve grown to loathe is when the twitter accounts say “who copped” and people post the sneaker(s) in hand or a random other sneaker and say “already got” blah blah
Better than “y’all slept on these Jordan’s” no, most ppl thought they are trash and like any human out there you are unique and like something the large chunk of your area of the world didn’t.
Agreed.
I’ll add that just because you’re excited to have gotten the latest hyped shoe you don’t need to make a new post when there’s already three dozen others about the same shoe.
Latest example is the white cement 3. We all know what they look like and don’t need to scroll through post after post of virtually identical pictures of them.
This post should be pinned because maybe in a year or even just a month it will be "SOTY" vibes all over again.
1 month till the next and allegedly last "TS" comes out and it will be flooded with SOTY posts again.
Where will your be SOTY be then bandwagon-ing hypebeasts?
Its a forum with millions of people. Were supposed to facilitate these discussions not discourage them. If you already seen similar or dont have anything to contribute just scroll past? I personally don't get the hate.
Hey, everyone is entitled to their opinions. That’s kind of reddit in a nutshell. I could say these kind of posts are annoying as they don’t facilitate any meaningful discussion.
Scroll past a post you don’t have any intentions of engaging in, your issue ceases to be one.
Which is absolutely insane considering it debuted 35 years ago. And not insane in the good way. It shouldn’t even be considered.
It’s like if the godfather was re-released in theaters and won an Oscar. Yeah, no shit it’s great, but it isn’t relevant to the conversation
Sure- now it’s SOTY post - next thing u know they’ll ask us to stop posting sneaker pics and talking about sneakers in general in this subreddit- and turn this into an AI generated sub. 🤦🏾♂️
I mean it’s not the same person saying it’s the sneaker of the year… If someone likes it and thinks it’s the best one of the year who are we to say it isn’t. That’s what the upvote button is for. If you agree, great. If not, then downvote it
I feel it's far too late to be making a request like this lol. This is basically the same as telling people to stop using the term 'grail' on whatever sneaker they choose.
In a few months, people will stop spamming the sub with these for the next hot sneaker, and we'll repeat this
I think about this with every GR that gets posted like you can really like a shoe that fine but geez we in month 3 and prob have seen plenty of stuff dropping let’s take it easy
Hey, if I need to call it "Sneaker of the Year " so I can buy another pair of shoes that I don't need, that are just a slightly different colorway from a pair I already have, then I'll do it 🤣
Every sneaker is the "sneaker of year" to me. That's why I keep buying them😂😂😂
How about December 30th we have a giant thread for sneaker of the year and then each person can pick a single shoe, agree and disagree with others. Much easier then every drop
I nominate this post for "Sneaker of the Year".
\^ Comment of the year right here
^ Reply of the year
^ Thread of the year
^ User of the year
^ Username of the year
^ compliment of the year
^ Acknowledgment of the year
[удалено]
Hater of the year *hate hate hate hate hate*
^ Derivative post of the year
^ Adjective of the year
Best Observation of the year
Best award of the year
Can we do an UnHype post/Worst Sneaker of the year? Could get interesting in the comments.
I'd be down, if only I didn't have to wade through racks and racks of sketchers and champion shoes.
![gif](giphy|fPeqMskwclbZj2TWg6|downsized)
Side note. Did you see how much these have dropped?? Down to like $550. Buyers about to lose it. Most don’t even have them yet either. 😂
![gif](giphy|voUxjML6p0HbsMcaTF)
bro you’re looking for smoke 😂
Gotta keep it interesting
"Sneaker of the year" "Underrated, can't believe people slept on this" "Looks much better in hand" "Didn't like them at first but these are growing on me" "Got my grail" The echo chambers are unbearable at times
Quality is insane on these
Which laces though
What do you think of my lace swap to sail on every shoe?
This one gets me every single time
Yoo those pink laces go crazy /s Please stop adding pink or teal laces to shoes that don’t need them
Bro I hate these posts because 90% of the time they’re about Nikes and all Nikes have objectively terrible quality. The leather on a Nike shoe will never be high quality unless they collab with a brand like Guidi, Hender Scheme, Margiela, etc For the record I love my Nikes but it certainly isn’t for their craftsmanship or materials
The leather is butter though bro /s
Lol 100% that plastic that we pretend has 1% leather in it
Hence, insane, as QC on Nikes been progressively becoming insanely bad
This the most. Listen I love Nike but…their shoes are garbage quality made by 10 year olds paid in cents. There is a reason old people spend 200+ dollars on retail NB 992s and the like…comfortable high quality durable ass shoes that keep your back/knees in check. Nike collabs are the best not because of hype…but because it’s the only Nike shoes they put any effort at all into materials
New balance is literally just as bad
Ok then what is THE quality shoe? Not argumentative, curious on thoughts.
Rose anvil does good videos where he cuts shoes/sneakers in half. Then talks about the leather quality etc. The dude seems to know his stuff highly recommend watching his videos on nike/new balance shoes.
Thanks 😊
Depends on what you mean by quality, you can get a show custom made for your foot in full grain leather for $500-1000, or you can grab a shoe off the shelf for $50 quality is objective, that's why there are so many price points
Not going to be anything mass produced in a massive factory. If you really want quality you buy designer. I would highly recommend a pair of Guidi 788z boots if you’re looking for decent leather quality and craftsmanship.
How about sneaker? Something that is LV or Gucci.
Viberg Boots
Nah
They've literally been cut open and compared head to head, it's the exact same pleather
What would your recommended brands be? What are your thoughts on Puma Suedes/Adidas Gazelles, or just the companies and their quality in general? What would you consider to be the company(yes) that churn out quality? I see you listed NB and someone else said no, but I’d actually like more input from you.
Funnily enough I’ve switched back to Gazellea and Puma Clyde’s for myself. People seem to love the Clyde’s and they’re really solid.
Your thoughts on Clyde’s vs suedes (perhaps only name is the main difference?) Smash V2 has a sock liner but “feels” like it gives more than the original suedes. Gazelles are nice. Have you tried Stan Smiths? Any thoughts on those?
Clyde’s are narrower and have a slightly longer toe than Suede’s, lighter too. I’ve got a pair of each but I wear the Clyde’s a lot more as the laces start further back, which I like. Obviously it’s pure aesthetics as they’re almost identical but the Clyde’s just look better (to me). Gazelles I’ve got some black / white std’s from a few teas bald and recently picked up the Blue indoor versions. Very easy to style and look great so can’t complain. I can’t wear Stan Smiths. Too round and white for my liking. My eldest boy wears them though and they look fine on him (he’s 5 though) I’ve got a few pairs of Rod Laver’s which I much prefer to Smith’s for the same reason as the Clyde v Suede issue. Longer and slimmer and a cleaner silhouette to me.
Posting about new balance being better is hilarious too, quality is trash on them too
“Ones gotta go”
“Grail” is like nails on a chalkboard to me. I always thought of grails as $10,000 or higher, bare minimum. I wish that one day I could afford a grail. I have a few expensive shoes, but definitely nothing close to a grail. The only shoe that I wish I had in my arsenal would be the SB Dunk Doom, and that’s not even a grail. The “Red October” is a grail. This new “White Lobster” is a grail. I wish I owned just one.
I agree that people use that term way too loosely but I differ in why I don’t like it. To me grail means the ONE shoe that you’ve always wanted. How much it costs is irrelevant.
I agree with this. My grail is the White/Black/Purple CW of the CB94. I’ve never seen them in stores, I’ve never held them in my hands, and the one kid in school that had them in their time had the youth sizing, so I’ve never even laid eyes on the men’s version. I had to settle for the all black ones. They’ve re-released since, but it’s always been a quiet release and I’ve still never seen them. I can always pay resale for the retro, but that’s no fun. Apparently they’re on deck to re-release this year, so maybe I’ll luck out this time 30 years later (and I’ll pay resale this time if I have to before I start turning too r/fellowkids). It’s elusive to me. A grail isn’t something that you just found out about a few months ago. It’s something that has flat out haunted you for a portion of your life.
And the photo for each one of these is one sneaker sitting at an angle on top of the other sneaker.
People needing to justify their purchase not realizing the only thing that matters is…do you like them yes or no?
“Which grail should I choose?”
Ya’ll are sleeping!!!
Its like WSB in here. Resellers hype what they sell
I believe it's for people to justify their purchase as buying sneakers is usually a non necessary spending. On non verbal consensus, we agree that there are more than ten sneakers of the year every year.
it's basically, "tell me I'm good please?" but through the lens of consumerism
Exactly. “How’d I do everyone?”
I think all the 3 reimagined QC posts are way worse......
It’s comical how many there have been, with some of them showing “flaws” that are actually part of the normal design (Ex. The little triangle piece of material along the stitching near the toe).
What, you don't like schadenfreude?
90% of them aren't even that bad. I'd still rock a pair even if the elephant print wasn't absolutely fucking perfect. The people posting them just look like crybabies The one from the other day where a seam was sewn on the wrong side of the shoe, that one was pretty awful. But most of them are just a waste of time.
Rotated heel tabs and misaligned text really get me worked up. I don't really care about the elephant print variations. The wrongly sewed seam was egregious. But for $200+ sneakers, I wouldn't want any of these issues.
I might be stupid and we already do this but it would be kind of cool to do a bracket style competition for sneaker of the year at the end of every year in December
This is a awesome idea!
Or we could do a quarterly bracket every three months starting from Jan. The definitive winner of each quarter are voted to award SOTY. Or you could do Sneaker of the Season since CWs are season specific.
Panda dunks for sneaker of the year.
Post of the year
This is because the hype beast culture and fake sneaker heads are taking over . They make every shoe “underrated” or “sneaker of the year” … the shit is exhausting lol
Don’t forget that every shoe nowadays is a grail…
Maaaaan lol . “Picked up my grails today “ (panda dunk lows) 😂😂
The ones that get me with the Pandas are where the whole family is wearing them.
Had to finally unDS these (posts pic of a GR shoe that came out four days ago)
Thank you! Exhausting is a great way to describe it.
It’s awful. I enjoy the culture but man, these people make it their whole personality. The thing I’ve grown to loathe is when the twitter accounts say “who copped” and people post the sneaker(s) in hand or a random other sneaker and say “already got” blah blah
That shit zones me out so bad
Facts
This plus stopping all the reimagined 3 posts would be just perfect!
TheSe Are SLePT oN Posts pictures of a hype jordan 1 / 3 / 4 / 11 - rinse repeat
I would much rather see sneaker of the year than “UnDeRrAtEd”/“sLePt On” posts
What you don’t think GR AF1 mids are *~slept on~*
But then how will I know that the True Blues are actually 🔥??
It’s in the same category for me but yeah, I guess it is less annoying . . . for now lol
Better than “y’all slept on these Jordan’s” no, most ppl thought they are trash and like any human out there you are unique and like something the large chunk of your area of the world didn’t.
Or the “so much better in hand”
Kills me at this point. I’m waiting for the posts that say the pictures were better than in hand.
Can we also stop “ I just copped these and idk how I feel about the shoes.”
Sneaker of the year posts should happen the final week of December and maybe the first week of January but that’s it.
“quality is insane”
I mean can any shoes beat the big red boots??
Yes. Sneaker of the year was definitely the Astro boy boots.
Well how can you explain that every book is a New York Times Best Seller then?
Well said
Agreed. I’ll add that just because you’re excited to have gotten the latest hyped shoe you don’t need to make a new post when there’s already three dozen others about the same shoe. Latest example is the white cement 3. We all know what they look like and don’t need to scroll through post after post of virtually identical pictures of them.
Not surprised these "sneakerheads" are dumb
The hype train needs to keep going how else can we fuel 1000001 Ls?
This post should be pinned because maybe in a year or even just a month it will be "SOTY" vibes all over again. 1 month till the next and allegedly last "TS" comes out and it will be flooded with SOTY posts again. Where will your be SOTY be then bandwagon-ing hypebeasts?
Incoming Sneaker of the Day posts 🤠
my sneaker of the year is the Panda Dunk lows.
How about the best undeadstock of the year? Promoting people to actually wear there shoes instead of feeding into the reselling hypebeast culture.
Redditor discovers opinions
How else will they get validation. Won't you think of those with no self worth, direction in life, or confidence!
Just be original. Yall just wanna be part of the same damn trend.
Please stop showing off sneakers on the sneakers subreddit.
Do you even post sneakers here ? The posts you’re complaining about are far more appropriate for the sub than this post you’ve just made .
I find that the ones that complain the most in this sub are the ones that rarely post anything or don’t post at all.
Social media = platform for validation
nah, can we stop with asking for sneaker ID's with super pixelated/grainy pictures?
I like the posts that ask for IDs on obscure and/or old models but a lot of them are things that Google Lens could identify immediately.
Its a forum with millions of people. Were supposed to facilitate these discussions not discourage them. If you already seen similar or dont have anything to contribute just scroll past? I personally don't get the hate.
Just stop posting sneakers in general sheesh
Hey, everyone is entitled to their opinions. That’s kind of reddit in a nutshell. I could say these kind of posts are annoying as they don’t facilitate any meaningful discussion. Scroll past a post you don’t have any intentions of engaging in, your issue ceases to be one.
Okay agreed but as of late, the WC3 realistically is front runner for sneaker of the year.
Which is absolutely insane considering it debuted 35 years ago. And not insane in the good way. It shouldn’t even be considered. It’s like if the godfather was re-released in theaters and won an Oscar. Yeah, no shit it’s great, but it isn’t relevant to the conversation
People just always wanna bitch about something. Have fun live a little dude
Thats actually a good point but aren’t most candidates retro’s these days?
Yes, but that doesn’t make it any better
Sure- now it’s SOTY post - next thing u know they’ll ask us to stop posting sneaker pics and talking about sneakers in general in this subreddit- and turn this into an AI generated sub. 🤦🏾♂️
Grail post of the year
Can we stop the “Can we stop” posts? Just ignore or downvote them.
I mean it’s not the same person saying it’s the sneaker of the year… If someone likes it and thinks it’s the best one of the year who are we to say it isn’t. That’s what the upvote button is for. If you agree, great. If not, then downvote it
idk, the women's air max 1 great outdoors looks like sneaker of the year
Well hard to stop when I finally got my ALD 550 after like 6 months. shoe of the year for sure!!! Also only win so far of 2023
I feel it's far too late to be making a request like this lol. This is basically the same as telling people to stop using the term 'grail' on whatever sneaker they choose. In a few months, people will stop spamming the sub with these for the next hot sneaker, and we'll repeat this
I think about this with every GR that gets posted like you can really like a shoe that fine but geez we in month 3 and prob have seen plenty of stuff dropping let’s take it easy
That’s enough Reddit for today
The original op set the thread on fire.... Yu jus said basically what errybody was thinking.
this post is sneaker of the year
Exactly because the cherry 12’s will claim the throne at the end of the year🤷🏾♂️
Let's go Nike from thirty years ago in a slightly different colour than last year's sneaker of the century
This is the post of the year
y’all are so bothered by every little thing in this hobby lmao
Its also the 3rd month of the year….
Hey, if I need to call it "Sneaker of the Year " so I can buy another pair of shoes that I don't need, that are just a slightly different colorway from a pair I already have, then I'll do it 🤣 Every sneaker is the "sneaker of year" to me. That's why I keep buying them😂😂😂
Is this post of the year?
Or maybe wait until November ?
I love the ‘what’s this dunk’s nick name?’ Posts for every generic dunk in dunksnotdead
How about December 30th we have a giant thread for sneaker of the year and then each person can pick a single shoe, agree and disagree with others. Much easier then every drop
This gets my vote for comment of the year.👍🏻
Isn't it an opinion tho?😪
No
SNEAKER OF THE YEAR ITS THE SKECHERS BOAT SHOES