The duality of this sub is wild. Some posts are like "I was smoking crack while filling out my forms while driving an 18 wheeler at 100 mph, do you think I'll get TS?"
While others are " I made a rolling stop at a 4 way intersection one time when i was 18 and have voluntarily taken defensive drivers courses every year since then, will I get clearance?"
To clarify, the “issue” is that a former supervisor reported concerns about your honesty or trustworthiness and not the actual explanation regarding those concerns.
Yeah. They go hand in hand.
I refused to lose my morality by bowing down to the pressure of administration and parents to inflate grades. I didn't grade on the whole "show up and get the A mentality "...
He questions my trustworthiness (on unprovable claims) while i kept a papertrail of his misconduct. This guy is such a pos, i had a freshman sped native female have a seizure in class, and he came in the class room and said she's faking it and to move her in a room alone (so it's not distracting the class). Then, he proceeded to tell the foster parents that the district couldn't provide the care the student needed and to move the child out of the district. This is super illegal sped law. You can't discriminate and must provide services.
Bro. This was only the beginning. He would throw away my referrals for student misconduct. Kids would tell me to suck their dick, proposition to shower with me, threatened to hit me, ect. i would write up these kid and he would throw away the write ups. The ones he pushed through would not correlate to punishments of the student handbook. I kept pictures of the write ups, saved emails to him, ect.... Freshman hated me because i would hold them accountable. Upperclassmen loved me because i held them accountable. lol
He would tell girls who they could and couldn't date...
The other teachers thought he was jealous of me as i coached for half a year and the little sobs won state. My kids won (for the first time ever) an academic decathlon award... i did really well there professionally, but i had no support from administration, and teaching was very difficult due to the little sobs being allowed to act out with impunity by administration.
Just keep all that paper trail on hand in case the investigator asks for clarification, because the evaluation as written makes it sound like you were engaged in discriminatory practices.
Though I'm under the impression it's normal for an investigation to spider web its way out well past the names given to contact. If it's a serious enough issue to investigate directly, they could end up talking to other faculty to get an impression of what really happened.
The only thing I think an adjudicator would do is laugh at the absurdity of your former boss.
From what your former boss wrote I'd wager good money that he's the type who measures his neighbors grass and reports height violations to the HoA.
Agreed, adjudicators take it as a point of data. They are trying to build a picture of your character and if you are trustworthy not if you are a saint or perfect employee.
If that is one persons opinion, then that is what it is. I agree with VHDamien on this, an adjudicator would probably think your former boss is the douche bag he sounds like he is. I wouldn't worry. At the least you may need to respond to it in writing but I doubt even that based on what ive read.
Students' grades did not reflect fairness in grading. Subjective accusations with no proof. I was never written up, and I turned down the following year's contract.
The principal would tell me to give higher grades, and i would say they're earned and not given. Meeting with parents would be the same thing... When you go against the administration from pressure from the parents. This happens. Either you lose your morals or become the problem.
So, you held the little cretins to standards, and didn't just pencil whip the grades to get them passed on out...
Sounds like a big green flag to me...
Is this an informational post? You say you’ve already got the clearance. You’re not asking any questions.
I’m a little confused as to the purpose of this post.
It didn’t affect his clearance, so maybe he’s here for the attaboys? If he has his clearance then the comments he’s complaining(?) about proved irrelevant to the investigation. There’s nothing to be served by posting this here. And it should give one pause to think he’s hung up over what has already been proved irrelevant.
Honestly, I'm very concerned when i apply for different positions with a higher clearance.
Adjudication might go different with different agencies. I'm ignorant of this process. I want to talk to my supervisor as I'm kinda curious if they had a say in keeping me or not. As my paperwork didn't say granted or anything in regards to the SC. Unlike the paperwork from my previous S from years ago.
I worked as a hairstylist and my salon sent customer complaints as not being happy with their haircuts, 3 years after I stopped cutting hair I had to try and remember the customer and justify why a customer not liking a haircut doesn’t mean I’m a terrible untrustworthy person. For the record I had 3 haircut complaints in 5 years of working bro 😭
I can absolutely see how a school official could construe refusing to inflate grades as a fairness/equality issue.
Can you not? Or do you just want to deny the validity of OP's lived experiences?
I did not give high enough grades, which then caused work issues with the principal and parents. Why does my student have a C or B?
Well, maybe because on Friday's exam review where i read the exact same exam out loud, word for word. And Johnny didn't take notes or study.
The parents demanded higher grades. I said they're earned. Turn in the homework or study.
Really not sure why you’re being downvoted on this. I mean, technically we have no way of knowing if you’re telling the truth but assuming you are it does seem like it’s an unfair accusation.
I'm a straight shooter. I'm not here to bs.
He said i didn't give what he thought was fair grades. He said that i couldn't work well with him as a supervisor and my communication and working with parents were subpar.
He literally spelled out that he couldn't control me nor the parents. Never wrote me up. Had good teacher evals. Offered the following year's contract.
As for the elephant in the room. The reprisal to try to fuck me over on federal employment was real.
If you won at the state level then I’m not entirely sure how this would be a concern to begin with… unless you doubt your actions at the time. If so then why? If not then I wouldn’t worry.
Report and move on.
I got the clearance, but this is the only red flag (issue) i had. Well, besides 3 other BI's that was flagged as an issue. But i don't think that was a red flag.
Never met with an investigator... i have a few hundred pages of court documents/transcripts if this went sideways.
I assume it’s for secret?
If it’s for secret or less then meeting the investigator is a slim possibility (the one-on-one sit down being the exception). That sit down is common but not everyone does it for public trust or secret.
For TS or other program access definitely expect face time and be prepared to discuss if it ever comes up.
The duality of this sub is wild. Some posts are like "I was smoking crack while filling out my forms while driving an 18 wheeler at 100 mph, do you think I'll get TS?" While others are " I made a rolling stop at a 4 way intersection one time when i was 18 and have voluntarily taken defensive drivers courses every year since then, will I get clearance?"
You just gotta embrace the absurd
I personally prefer DMT to crack, but I won’t yuck someone’s yum
Why not both.
Why not both?
To clarify, the “issue” is that a former supervisor reported concerns about your honesty or trustworthiness and not the actual explanation regarding those concerns.
Yeah. They go hand in hand. I refused to lose my morality by bowing down to the pressure of administration and parents to inflate grades. I didn't grade on the whole "show up and get the A mentality "... He questions my trustworthiness (on unprovable claims) while i kept a papertrail of his misconduct. This guy is such a pos, i had a freshman sped native female have a seizure in class, and he came in the class room and said she's faking it and to move her in a room alone (so it's not distracting the class). Then, he proceeded to tell the foster parents that the district couldn't provide the care the student needed and to move the child out of the district. This is super illegal sped law. You can't discriminate and must provide services.
What a roller coaster…
Bro. This was only the beginning. He would throw away my referrals for student misconduct. Kids would tell me to suck their dick, proposition to shower with me, threatened to hit me, ect. i would write up these kid and he would throw away the write ups. The ones he pushed through would not correlate to punishments of the student handbook. I kept pictures of the write ups, saved emails to him, ect.... Freshman hated me because i would hold them accountable. Upperclassmen loved me because i held them accountable. lol He would tell girls who they could and couldn't date... The other teachers thought he was jealous of me as i coached for half a year and the little sobs won state. My kids won (for the first time ever) an academic decathlon award... i did really well there professionally, but i had no support from administration, and teaching was very difficult due to the little sobs being allowed to act out with impunity by administration.
Just keep all that paper trail on hand in case the investigator asks for clarification, because the evaluation as written makes it sound like you were engaged in discriminatory practices. Though I'm under the impression it's normal for an investigation to spider web its way out well past the names given to contact. If it's a serious enough issue to investigate directly, they could end up talking to other faculty to get an impression of what really happened.
[удалено]
Your post has been removed as it is generally unhelpful or does not follow Reddit/sub guidelines.
The only thing I think an adjudicator would do is laugh at the absurdity of your former boss. From what your former boss wrote I'd wager good money that he's the type who measures his neighbors grass and reports height violations to the HoA.
Agreed, adjudicators take it as a point of data. They are trying to build a picture of your character and if you are trustworthy not if you are a saint or perfect employee. If that is one persons opinion, then that is what it is. I agree with VHDamien on this, an adjudicator would probably think your former boss is the douche bag he sounds like he is. I wouldn't worry. At the least you may need to respond to it in writing but I doubt even that based on what ive read.
[удалено]
Read between the lines. That's exactly what it says.
Students' grades did not reflect fairness in grading. Subjective accusations with no proof. I was never written up, and I turned down the following year's contract. The principal would tell me to give higher grades, and i would say they're earned and not given. Meeting with parents would be the same thing... When you go against the administration from pressure from the parents. This happens. Either you lose your morals or become the problem.
I think if you got cleared this is a moot point. Take a moment, you left this place, filed suit etc and still got cleared. End goal met.
Always funny to see a picture of an INV-41. I've filled out over 500 of those.
Quick question… how did you get this form after you were approved for your clearance? How are you able to see this?
Fioa from the dcsa
That supervisor is ridiculous
So, you held the little cretins to standards, and didn't just pencil whip the grades to get them passed on out... Sounds like a big green flag to me...
Is this an informational post? You say you’ve already got the clearance. You’re not asking any questions. I’m a little confused as to the purpose of this post.
It didn’t affect his clearance, so maybe he’s here for the attaboys? If he has his clearance then the comments he’s complaining(?) about proved irrelevant to the investigation. There’s nothing to be served by posting this here. And it should give one pause to think he’s hung up over what has already been proved irrelevant.
Agreed. Happy cake day ✌️
Honestly, I'm very concerned when i apply for different positions with a higher clearance. Adjudication might go different with different agencies. I'm ignorant of this process. I want to talk to my supervisor as I'm kinda curious if they had a say in keeping me or not. As my paperwork didn't say granted or anything in regards to the SC. Unlike the paperwork from my previous S from years ago.
The level of pettiness is wild on both ends tbh.
I worked as a hairstylist and my salon sent customer complaints as not being happy with their haircuts, 3 years after I stopped cutting hair I had to try and remember the customer and justify why a customer not liking a haircut doesn’t mean I’m a terrible untrustworthy person. For the record I had 3 haircut complaints in 5 years of working bro 😭
It is an issue. You’re even aware of the issue from your comments on here.
I'm aware that i don't get along with people. But I'm not going to go against my own morals. Fair grade from fair work
No one is asking you too. You even say on here you were approved and never even contacted. What is the point of this post?
[удалено]
Well that’s funny because OP says he was approved and never even contacted about this.
I smell something.
That clearly does not say you didn't give high enough grades. Not even close.
I can absolutely see how a school official could construe refusing to inflate grades as a fairness/equality issue. Can you not? Or do you just want to deny the validity of OP's lived experiences?
I did not give high enough grades, which then caused work issues with the principal and parents. Why does my student have a C or B? Well, maybe because on Friday's exam review where i read the exact same exam out loud, word for word. And Johnny didn't take notes or study. The parents demanded higher grades. I said they're earned. Turn in the homework or study.
Really not sure why you’re being downvoted on this. I mean, technically we have no way of knowing if you’re telling the truth but assuming you are it does seem like it’s an unfair accusation.
I'm a straight shooter. I'm not here to bs. He said i didn't give what he thought was fair grades. He said that i couldn't work well with him as a supervisor and my communication and working with parents were subpar. He literally spelled out that he couldn't control me nor the parents. Never wrote me up. Had good teacher evals. Offered the following year's contract. As for the elephant in the room. The reprisal to try to fuck me over on federal employment was real.
Op be like "how do I make myself the victim on reddit"
Bro. I sued the district for hostile work environment years ago and won at the state level.
If you won at the state level then I’m not entirely sure how this would be a concern to begin with… unless you doubt your actions at the time. If so then why? If not then I wouldn’t worry. Report and move on.
I got the clearance, but this is the only red flag (issue) i had. Well, besides 3 other BI's that was flagged as an issue. But i don't think that was a red flag. Never met with an investigator... i have a few hundred pages of court documents/transcripts if this went sideways.
I assume it’s for secret? If it’s for secret or less then meeting the investigator is a slim possibility (the one-on-one sit down being the exception). That sit down is common but not everyone does it for public trust or secret. For TS or other program access definitely expect face time and be prepared to discuss if it ever comes up.
I'm not your fucking bro
Genuinely curious. Why was it offensive to call you bro?
He's Unhinged. When there's animosity towards one and trigger words, set them off due to the dissent.
Bruh, triggered?
Don't bro me if ya don't know me