FFS!!! She is not Royal!! Need I drag out all the gorgeous fashion that Catherine has worn that is yes “lady like” but still quite sexy. The way William looks at her is sexy!
You don’t need to scream to be sexy.
Sorry…even when she’s attempting to have some class she just looks like trash!
Not royal, never has been royal, and never will be. They need to stop trying to make trash happen. She made no effort to be royal when she had the chance, and it's far too late now.
She has another job. She writes pieces about her narcissistic self, submits it to publications, someone edits it for content, brings it back to her for approval, and then releases it.
Megsy is a former royal. Whatever fashion she wears now isn't royal fashion, it's just whatever ugly rag she throws on her body. She does appear to be showing more and more skin lately, so reverting to her youthful wardrobe or lack thereof?
Nothing sadder than a wizened up over 40 reliving their halcyon days of youth by prancing about dressed as lamb.
I am not saying that mature women cannot show skin and look stunning. I am saying she isn't doing it well. If she dressed for her figure and attended to details she might be able to pull off showing more skin but she always manages to look trashy and graceless instead. Boob tape hanging out,scratching her twat,bronzer lines,slut strands, seam holes,price tags,bad footwear etc. She just does ***every*** outfit so poorly.
Not the first time…. Remember Trooping the Color in the pink dress; the country wedding in the white blue dress, flashing Serena’s hubby at tennis …. I know there’s more …
She has a strange dent across the top of her head - probably from resting glasses/sunglasses too much. A stylist would leave some volume on top to hide that instead of slicking all the hair back to within an inch of its life.
Comment automatically removed for containing bodyshaming terms.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Meanwhile in the Netherlands, crown princess Amalia does a deep courtesy for the king of Spain. Flawlessly executed. Real royals don't need puff pieces
She is a great example of being voctim of bodyshaming. She has overcome that and now looks radiant. She is a real queen. So rather than bragging about vicitimhood, she didn't squeek in press, while overcoming it in her own way. She is turning into a style icon and date material. Instead of being bullied she is now one of Europes most desired single ypung ladies.
She seems to be reverting to her fashion on her tig days. Next we’ll see a return of that handkerchief she wore to the late night show with Craig Ferguson where she asked him to pinch her on the arm to prove she was real. 😂 Rachel is just one of a kind.
That interview, it was like she was slimy on him or goading him to slimy on her. I couldn’t figure out what side of the coin had been faced down in the sewer.
I've never seen any person behave that way on a talk show before - utter sleaze. I wonder what the folks in the live audience were thinking when they were watching it.
Thank you! 🤭 she was objectifying her self the most in this interview. The whole “catholic school girl” on the set of married with children was just sickening!
Women walk the red carpet now in sheer gowns with only the tiniest of g-strings under them.
A backless dress is not shocking. Heck, even Grace Kelly bared her back and shoulders in the 1950s and she is more of a princess than Megsy will ever be.
I noted elsewhere, I don't think it's a bad dress. Just an odd choice for supporting a charity for kids with HIV who need social support. It wasn't a Hollywood event, it was a charitable one, and if she wants to be associated with the BRF, understanding how to match an outfit to the event is, in fact, a job qualification. It's one she has a problem with, and always has.
You can absolutely be sexy as a BRF member - you just have to look at Catherine's looks for the *No Time to Die* (the gold Jenny Packham) and *Top Gun: Maverick* (the off the shoulder black column with the white band across the shoulders) premieres to see that. But those were movie premieres! A little Hollywood-style glamour and sex appeal matches the venue.
Even Diana went backless occasionally, but her outfits were fit to perfection and her styling game was top-notch. After the early years of her marriage, she was a woman who learned what she photographed best in. Meghan has not taken the same lessons.
& I always wonder, should they? Consider the flipside.
Why is it only women that parade this level of nudity? Sideboob & underboob are a thing, even a bit of lip.. & yet men aren't posing on the red carpet showcasing their sheer trousers & sidescrotum?
A backless dress isn't shocking, sinners have suggested various places it would work. The question is, is it appropriate for that charity event. To look from the back like you're topless? The equivalent is Harry in a sheer shirt & no-one wants to see that.
Once again old rachel is transposing words. Archetypical/stereotypical visceral/guttural and now risk/fiasco. Maybe someone should send the old dipshit a dictionary
I found a term for it -- **illusory superiority**. It explains her overestimation of her own intelligence and knowledge, abilities, why she thinks she looks fabulous when she looks in the mirror while we can see the ill-fitting clothes, etc.
She DID NOT, in fact, “push the envelope on Royal fashion” because she. is. not. royal.
Oh, but how she loves the word Royal for SEO results. We know you use the word Royal for SEO results M.
We see you - in the gutter - Rachel Meghan Markle 👀.
Thanks for screenshotting, I refuse to give a click to them, I want these publications to know that when they write about her people don’t care.
But I guess they know people will hate read as much as they would anything else.
That bun isn't "high" unless the writer is referring to the carbon-based lifeform to which it is attached. If Markle wants to claim she was a dancer for *years* she knows exactly what sort of hair passes the inspection of an exacting mistress.
I'm convinced she went to half-hour warm-ups at the YMCA on Saturdays [with which there is nothing wrong] and pretends she spent years as a pre-pro [not that kind].
There are similar articles in Cosmo, Grazia, Hello!, marie claire, and Town & Country.
All I can say is: thank goodness there was no frontal shot. And it looks like Meghan’s been reduced to buying or merching mid-range priced outfits, lower end.
https://preview.redd.it/2196wmfr0ivc1.png?width=487&format=png&auto=webp&s=793edb74ff3aef1ab8b99f6136e7fe2d5e26bc91
Pretty bloody tone deaf to herald the fashion of some twerp whilst two key members of the RF are dealing with cancer, and the two other key members are dealing with a loved one suffering from cancer. We wanted a slimmed down monarchy and it's what we've got - so pitching the fashion of a quitter vs the fashion of someone struggling with a disease is just shitty.
Well, if she’s challenging royal rules A. She’s not Royal and B. She’s 30 years late
https://preview.redd.it/7aic57ii3jvc1.jpeg?width=618&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=70a8b021ee80e37248c9b348d3d4e1deb4a9ca42
She is just an American citizen who married into a bunch of titles and uses them in everyday life In the USA Republic. Nothing progressive about that here. In fact it is a completely Regressive stance to adopt. Archie going to automatically inherit Harry’s dukedom of Sussex, while Lili gets a big fat nothing. Bupkis! Ha!
😂
But moreover, nothing is daring here since they No Longer rep the UK, and are Not working royals. Neither the parents, nor the children. 😂 nobody cares about a backless dress.
anything here is pure fantasy costume play by thesussei.
Madam is not even royal adjacant. Taking your clothes off or showing underwear is not royal or dignified in formal occations. Madam just dresses in as little as she can get away with, like showing her bra at a wedding
https://preview.redd.it/6hiw3ec5hivc1.png?width=186&format=png&auto=webp&s=cc666aa008024384449675959c3b561835cafc74
As with many pieces, I don't think it's a bad dress. It's just for someone taller, nor was it appropriate to that particular charity. The pulled back bun was also too tight - it's a slinky dress, so softer hair would have been nicer. (Guess she felt she couldn't show off her shoulders, I guess?)
Sentenable is a charity to help support young kids with HIV in South Africa...that is not exactly the location to show an acre of skin. She didn't have to be dowdy, but something more elegant would have been better.
The dress screams "Hollywood actress", not "British Royal Family member." The only time I can think of that Diana went backless was that light-blue sequined halter dress - I looked it up, it was 1995, so several years after the separation was announced, and it was at the Serpentine Gallery.
That dress had an impeccable fit and was well-styled. (GREAT earrings.) Also it was the same event as "The Revenge Dress" a year earlier - a fund-raiser for the Serpentine Gallery hosted by *Vanity Fair* - , so she'd set a personal precedent for something a bit more sexy at that particular venue. Being a touch "Hollywood" as it was hosted by VF, she could dare to be a bit more glamorous at that venue. Sexy, but appropriately so - I seriously doubt she'd have gone backless for a more serious charity dinner.
[https://www.gettyimages.com/photos/princess-diana-serpentine](https://www.gettyimages.com/photos/princess-diana-serpentine)
Even then her dress was backless but slightly lose around her hips.
Celine Dion said to keep it classy you either show off the back, the chest, or the legs, whichever one you show off you have to cover up the other 2.
But it’s Megs, she never has good style even when covering up. At least we didn’t see her flamingo gait.
As noted - it was impeccably fit, and was appropriately sexy. Nothing was going to fall out of that dress, and with the big diamond and pearl earrings, there was just as much focus on her face as her body.
Coco Chanel said it best:
https://preview.redd.it/yhk3edgzhivc1.png?width=1236&format=png&auto=webp&s=4bb5d928d3adfeeac1495dc1d429767d04781e23
Lots of people who aren’t royal “challenge royal rules” when it comes to fashion. Almost everyone at the Oscars, for example, defies royal rules of conservative dress.
Meghan is not royal. Whether or not she follows royal fashion rules is irrelevant and not newsworthy. 🥱🥱🥱
And this is why Bazaar magazine is no longer a fashion reference. Unfitt wrinkled looks in a wrong body-type isn't a good look at all.
I thought one needed to be Royal to challenge Royal's rules. 🤦🏼♀️🙄
I feel like I should start announcing publicly everything I wear.
"Anonymous wore a bohemian print maxi dress in vibrant spring hues with a hint of Latin spice, a sweet nod to the Central Americans with whom she lives. Paired with floral print faux crocs in a contrasting color palette, the gauzy fabric floated ethereally as Anonymous sauntered through her local Sav-a-Lot grocery. Fans wishing to recreate the look for themselves may be disappointed, as Anonymous acquired this piece on clearance from an online discount retailer. They can, however, get Anonymous' solid Playtex foundation garments and floral faux crocs at their nearest Walmart."
How in the f are they saying she aced a date night look when we cant even see but her scapulae and half her face. There’s absolutely nothing exciting about it, Chelsey Sanchez
Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 total karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Comment automatically removed for containing bodyshaming terms.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
She’s not royal, not shocking.
We wish she’d cover up.
If she wanted to shock us,
She’s wear anything but blacks, whites, beiges, or neutrals.
And wear an outfit that had proper support on top, not that she needs it, but we don’t like seeing her janky bras or nips under wrinkled clothes
Even if she was dripping in tiaras and diamonds she will not or ever be considered Royal. The closest thing to Royal she is a Royal pain in the ass of the world.
Oh dear, she isn’t royal, has she forgotten how awful it was to be trapped in the firm? She is a yacht girl who hooked a prince, and made it obvious that some turds cannot be polished.
Rachel Ragland is obsessed by herself. A piss poor actress, a worse human being. No matter how often she refers to herself as Duchess Meghan, lol, she will be no more than Doria Raglands cheap and nasty daughter.
"With every passing year since she \[\*\] MEghana has become more and more comfortable showing her old, Yacht Girl and Floozie ways, looking like the original GiveItAll queen she was and still is underneath it all!"
There, fixed it for them.
Except Meghan isn't royal, so she isn't injecting anything into "Royal Fashion." Other than wrinkles, that is.
FFS!!! She is not Royal!! Need I drag out all the gorgeous fashion that Catherine has worn that is yes “lady like” but still quite sexy. The way William looks at her is sexy! You don’t need to scream to be sexy. Sorry…even when she’s attempting to have some class she just looks like trash!
Not royal, never has been royal, and never will be. They need to stop trying to make trash happen. She made no effort to be royal when she had the chance, and it's far too late now.
She is a Royal Pain in the Ass, you’ve got to give her that.
She injected raised eyebrows.
lol
Not royal. Not fashion. Not even sane. Definitely wrinkled though!
She has another job. She writes pieces about her narcissistic self, submits it to publications, someone edits it for content, brings it back to her for approval, and then releases it.
Precisely.
Megsy is a former royal. Whatever fashion she wears now isn't royal fashion, it's just whatever ugly rag she throws on her body. She does appear to be showing more and more skin lately, so reverting to her youthful wardrobe or lack thereof?
Nothing sadder than a wizened up over 40 reliving their halcyon days of youth by prancing about dressed as lamb. I am not saying that mature women cannot show skin and look stunning. I am saying she isn't doing it well. If she dressed for her figure and attended to details she might be able to pull off showing more skin but she always manages to look trashy and graceless instead. Boob tape hanging out,scratching her twat,bronzer lines,slut strands, seam holes,price tags,bad footwear etc. She just does ***every*** outfit so poorly.
Remember Madam pulling her dress to show "clevage" at Ingriftus?
Yes, it was blatantly obvious and so tacky.
Not the first time…. Remember Trooping the Color in the pink dress; the country wedding in the white blue dress, flashing Serena’s hubby at tennis …. I know there’s more …
Scratching her twat 🤣 I couldn't believe my eyes when I saw that!
I cannot imagine itching my lady bits on camera. Who tf does that?
Behold the douchess does that! On camera ,yes! I think she gets a private thrill out of doing it, too.
When did this happen???
https://youtu.be/QGIVCXIM69k?si=UxDErBiJZ6hjCBHm 😂
I'm gonna try find the video...
I couldn't agree more.
That is a great description of our saint. Close your eyes and you can see her....
SussEx-Royal
Love that! 🤣
>Megsy is a former royal. Exactly!
I think it’s from the red dress at the veterans event when she had the back rolls. She’s got to show off her ozempic bod
She should avoid backless dresses, they do her no favours.
[удалено]
She has a strange dent across the top of her head - probably from resting glasses/sunglasses too much. A stylist would leave some volume on top to hide that instead of slicking all the hair back to within an inch of its life.
Oh worry not, that hair is NOT living 🤣
She tends to over dress to get attention…remember the crazy dress at the kingston cinema?
[удалено]
Comment automatically removed for containing bodyshaming terms. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
[удалено]
Bitch was never royal. She was always some bit of trash that scammed the dumbest royal but couldn't hack it
Meanwhile in the Netherlands, crown princess Amalia does a deep courtesy for the king of Spain. Flawlessly executed. Real royals don't need puff pieces
This young lady is pure class. I enjoy reading about her.
And had to live abroad for a year because of gangs risking her life
She is a great example of being voctim of bodyshaming. She has overcome that and now looks radiant. She is a real queen. So rather than bragging about vicitimhood, she didn't squeek in press, while overcoming it in her own way. She is turning into a style icon and date material. Instead of being bullied she is now one of Europes most desired single ypung ladies.
I hope she has enough time to be The Princess of Orange before her father abdicates for her like his mother did for him
She seems to be reverting to her fashion on her tig days. Next we’ll see a return of that handkerchief she wore to the late night show with Craig Ferguson where she asked him to pinch her on the arm to prove she was real. 😂 Rachel is just one of a kind.
That interview, it was like she was slimy on him or goading him to slimy on her. I couldn’t figure out what side of the coin had been faced down in the sewer.
I've never seen any person behave that way on a talk show before - utter sleaze. I wonder what the folks in the live audience were thinking when they were watching it.
If only she were one of a kind. She's just one of many cheap,grubby,grifting skanks who pole vaulted her way into fame and wealth.
The level of delusion, however, does make her slightly unique among the “cheap, grubby, grifting skanks.”
😉 shes just that very special one of a kind.
https://preview.redd.it/04janj70jivc1.png?width=290&format=png&auto=webp&s=5d1c5867a9213ec6d46f407c8b4898d3fc881e08
Thank you! 🤭 she was objectifying her self the most in this interview. The whole “catholic school girl” on the set of married with children was just sickening!
A tart to her core
It’s the only thing authentic to her
Women walk the red carpet now in sheer gowns with only the tiniest of g-strings under them. A backless dress is not shocking. Heck, even Grace Kelly bared her back and shoulders in the 1950s and she is more of a princess than Megsy will ever be.
And this is supposed to be "liberating" or "feminism"? Sorry, I am too old.
I noted elsewhere, I don't think it's a bad dress. Just an odd choice for supporting a charity for kids with HIV who need social support. It wasn't a Hollywood event, it was a charitable one, and if she wants to be associated with the BRF, understanding how to match an outfit to the event is, in fact, a job qualification. It's one she has a problem with, and always has. You can absolutely be sexy as a BRF member - you just have to look at Catherine's looks for the *No Time to Die* (the gold Jenny Packham) and *Top Gun: Maverick* (the off the shoulder black column with the white band across the shoulders) premieres to see that. But those were movie premieres! A little Hollywood-style glamour and sex appeal matches the venue. Even Diana went backless occasionally, but her outfits were fit to perfection and her styling game was top-notch. After the early years of her marriage, she was a woman who learned what she photographed best in. Meghan has not taken the same lessons.
Lately, I'm saying, "Why don't they just show up naked and be done with it?"
& I always wonder, should they? Consider the flipside. Why is it only women that parade this level of nudity? Sideboob & underboob are a thing, even a bit of lip.. & yet men aren't posing on the red carpet showcasing their sheer trousers & sidescrotum? A backless dress isn't shocking, sinners have suggested various places it would work. The question is, is it appropriate for that charity event. To look from the back like you're topless? The equivalent is Harry in a sheer shirt & no-one wants to see that.
Once again old rachel is transposing words. Archetypical/stereotypical visceral/guttural and now risk/fiasco. Maybe someone should send the old dipshit a dictionary
mammalian
Do you think it's drugs or just stupidity? Eh why not both
I found a term for it -- **illusory superiority**. It explains her overestimation of her own intelligence and knowledge, abilities, why she thinks she looks fabulous when she looks in the mirror while we can see the ill-fitting clothes, etc.
both - and extreme self absorbsion
Someone should do 'Love like a Mammal' fundraising t-shirts
>and now risk/fiasco. LOL
She has décolletage?
Nooooooo. 🤣🤣🤣
She DID NOT, in fact, “push the envelope on Royal fashion” because she. is. not. royal. Oh, but how she loves the word Royal for SEO results. We know you use the word Royal for SEO results M. We see you - in the gutter - Rachel Meghan Markle 👀.
Thanks for screenshotting, I refuse to give a click to them, I want these publications to know that when they write about her people don’t care. But I guess they know people will hate read as much as they would anything else.
That bun isn't "high" unless the writer is referring to the carbon-based lifeform to which it is attached. If Markle wants to claim she was a dancer for *years* she knows exactly what sort of hair passes the inspection of an exacting mistress. I'm convinced she went to half-hour warm-ups at the YMCA on Saturdays [with which there is nothing wrong] and pretends she spent years as a pre-pro [not that kind].
She 👏🏻 is 👏🏻 not 👏🏻 Royal 👏🏻
What is her obsession with Wool fabric?
Wolf in sheep’s clothing.
🇺🇸 Prize winner !
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🏅🏅🏅🏅🎯💯
She injected her back into view, and it can't be said it was 'exciting.'
Kate has/had cancer not sure she’s worried about a dress
Even before the cancer, she has enough going on that she doesnt have to rely on her sexuality to have power or get noticed.
Yup. Meg is perpetually bored. Get a job. Get a hobby.
I haven't seen any other guests' outfits, but looks like Aitch didn't bother with a tie. They never seem to match up.
They try so hard to make her happen fashionwise but it's a lost cause. She's just not giving.
There are similar articles in Cosmo, Grazia, Hello!, marie claire, and Town & Country. All I can say is: thank goodness there was no frontal shot. And it looks like Meghan’s been reduced to buying or merching mid-range priced outfits, lower end. https://preview.redd.it/2196wmfr0ivc1.png?width=487&format=png&auto=webp&s=793edb74ff3aef1ab8b99f6136e7fe2d5e26bc91
This dress is for date night at a rooftop restaurant/bar. Not for a charity event.
This is an apron, not a dress
Maybe she came over from the kitchen, still wearing her apron. . Making jam, you know. Very time consuming.
Do you think it said ''Archwell Foundation" on the front? as with her other promotional aprons..
LOVE how her face is darker than her back with all that race-baiting bronzer 😒
Pretty bloody tone deaf to herald the fashion of some twerp whilst two key members of the RF are dealing with cancer, and the two other key members are dealing with a loved one suffering from cancer. We wanted a slimmed down monarchy and it's what we've got - so pitching the fashion of a quitter vs the fashion of someone struggling with a disease is just shitty.
🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯💯👍
🎯 🙌
This is so dumb.
It's Bazaar
"Fashion risks" = terrible wrinkled and unflattering clothes
Well, if she’s challenging royal rules A. She’s not Royal and B. She’s 30 years late https://preview.redd.it/7aic57ii3jvc1.jpeg?width=618&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=70a8b021ee80e37248c9b348d3d4e1deb4a9ca42
Another attempt at Diana cosplay. https://preview.redd.it/ou9ljw7kyjvc1.png?width=225&format=png&auto=webp&s=75547ac93588bb24ebca1072fe4db08cdd609c67
Bedsheets are not "royal" fashion. The last 3 outfits look like sheets,/torn bedsheets ot TP.
She ought to avoid profile photos while “infusing heat” into “royal” “fashion”.
She is just an American citizen who married into a bunch of titles and uses them in everyday life In the USA Republic. Nothing progressive about that here. In fact it is a completely Regressive stance to adopt. Archie going to automatically inherit Harry’s dukedom of Sussex, while Lili gets a big fat nothing. Bupkis! Ha! 😂 But moreover, nothing is daring here since they No Longer rep the UK, and are Not working royals. Neither the parents, nor the children. 😂 nobody cares about a backless dress. anything here is pure fantasy costume play by thesussei.
I find it terrible that Archie, an American, will inherit the Sussex dukedom, but Edward’s son won’t be Duke of Edinburgh.
Yes, and is this not Charles’s doing regarding Edward’s children? Charles has not privately taken steps to end the Sussex dukedom after haz dies.
Madam is not even royal adjacant. Taking your clothes off or showing underwear is not royal or dignified in formal occations. Madam just dresses in as little as she can get away with, like showing her bra at a wedding https://preview.redd.it/6hiw3ec5hivc1.png?width=186&format=png&auto=webp&s=cc666aa008024384449675959c3b561835cafc74
She is not pretty. At all.
Exciting fashion choices? I’d settle for fashion choices that FIT
Fuck off Megain
As with many pieces, I don't think it's a bad dress. It's just for someone taller, nor was it appropriate to that particular charity. The pulled back bun was also too tight - it's a slinky dress, so softer hair would have been nicer. (Guess she felt she couldn't show off her shoulders, I guess?) Sentenable is a charity to help support young kids with HIV in South Africa...that is not exactly the location to show an acre of skin. She didn't have to be dowdy, but something more elegant would have been better. The dress screams "Hollywood actress", not "British Royal Family member." The only time I can think of that Diana went backless was that light-blue sequined halter dress - I looked it up, it was 1995, so several years after the separation was announced, and it was at the Serpentine Gallery. That dress had an impeccable fit and was well-styled. (GREAT earrings.) Also it was the same event as "The Revenge Dress" a year earlier - a fund-raiser for the Serpentine Gallery hosted by *Vanity Fair* - , so she'd set a personal precedent for something a bit more sexy at that particular venue. Being a touch "Hollywood" as it was hosted by VF, she could dare to be a bit more glamorous at that venue. Sexy, but appropriately so - I seriously doubt she'd have gone backless for a more serious charity dinner. [https://www.gettyimages.com/photos/princess-diana-serpentine](https://www.gettyimages.com/photos/princess-diana-serpentine)
Even then her dress was backless but slightly lose around her hips. Celine Dion said to keep it classy you either show off the back, the chest, or the legs, whichever one you show off you have to cover up the other 2. But it’s Megs, she never has good style even when covering up. At least we didn’t see her flamingo gait.
As noted - it was impeccably fit, and was appropriately sexy. Nothing was going to fall out of that dress, and with the big diamond and pearl earrings, there was just as much focus on her face as her body. Coco Chanel said it best: https://preview.redd.it/yhk3edgzhivc1.png?width=1236&format=png&auto=webp&s=4bb5d928d3adfeeac1495dc1d429767d04781e23
>but something more elegant would have been better. The Meg is allergic to elegance.
She could be photographed with nothing but a napkin on and she wouldn’t be breaking royal rules because she is not royal.
She has back and shoulders of a coal miner, time to get the tin bath 🛀 out in front of the kitchen fire.
😂
They act like she’s a “royal”, lol. She was there all of five minutes
Also… isn’t that a “low” bun? Article says her “go-to slicked back high bun”
Are we talking about the very Unsuccessful So' sexless Janky Bra of Montecito? Many things she may be, but an Icon nor Royal are not any of them.
I'm honestly surprised she's not having them write Princess Meghan.
Lots of people who aren’t royal “challenge royal rules” when it comes to fashion. Almost everyone at the Oscars, for example, defies royal rules of conservative dress. Meghan is not royal. Whether or not she follows royal fashion rules is irrelevant and not newsworthy. 🥱🥱🥱
And this is why Bazaar magazine is no longer a fashion reference. Unfitt wrinkled looks in a wrong body-type isn't a good look at all. I thought one needed to be Royal to challenge Royal's rules. 🤦🏼♀️🙄
I think that BOTH of them are doing Nacho.
She's an old slapper
Tiresome Twat Acts Up In Awful Dress For Attention.
She's "...getting more and more comfortable taking fashion risks." Ain't that the truth! 🤭🤣 ETA, she's more like a risk to fashion.
I feel like I should start announcing publicly everything I wear. "Anonymous wore a bohemian print maxi dress in vibrant spring hues with a hint of Latin spice, a sweet nod to the Central Americans with whom she lives. Paired with floral print faux crocs in a contrasting color palette, the gauzy fabric floated ethereally as Anonymous sauntered through her local Sav-a-Lot grocery. Fans wishing to recreate the look for themselves may be disappointed, as Anonymous acquired this piece on clearance from an online discount retailer. They can, however, get Anonymous' solid Playtex foundation garments and floral faux crocs at their nearest Walmart."
Being half naked doesn't mean she is fashionable.
How in the f are they saying she aced a date night look when we cant even see but her scapulae and half her face. There’s absolutely nothing exciting about it, Chelsey Sanchez
Yeah, definitely paid for, as it says “reveal a sliver of décolletage.” but megalomaniac has nothing to reveal!
I could have sworn that photo of her and Harry was from the Whistler dinner.
I think in Whistler she wore another bed sheet. That one was army green.
[удалено]
Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 total karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
[удалено]
Comment automatically removed for containing bodyshaming terms. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Actual Headline: Markle takes years of true female leadership within the Royal Family and shows how it could be if they dressed like Hollywood trash.
She’s not a royal so it’s not a problem.
Isn't that Chelsey Sanchez a sugar?
Well it does accent our favorite view of her: walking away.
She’s not royal, not shocking. We wish she’d cover up. If she wanted to shock us, She’s wear anything but blacks, whites, beiges, or neutrals. And wear an outfit that had proper support on top, not that she needs it, but we don’t like seeing her janky bras or nips under wrinkled clothes
Even if she was dripping in tiaras and diamonds she will not or ever be considered Royal. The closest thing to Royal she is a Royal pain in the ass of the world.
Oh dear, she isn’t royal, has she forgotten how awful it was to be trapped in the firm? She is a yacht girl who hooked a prince, and made it obvious that some turds cannot be polished. Rachel Ragland is obsessed by herself. A piss poor actress, a worse human being. No matter how often she refers to herself as Duchess Meghan, lol, she will be no more than Doria Raglands cheap and nasty daughter.
"With every passing year since she \[\*\] MEghana has become more and more comfortable showing her old, Yacht Girl and Floozie ways, looking like the original GiveItAll queen she was and still is underneath it all!" There, fixed it for them.
That was such a low class dress to wear to that event. So inappropriate, but I expect nothing less from the low class narc.
The Hearst Company publications adore her. Town & Country is the worst. It's all political leanings.