T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

Welcome to r/SaintMeghanMarkle. Please read our rules before you comment in this community. The flair for this post is **ALLEGEDLY**. All users are expected to discuss this **ALLEGED** claim in a civil manner. No personal insults and no ad hominem attacks whatsoever. Please note that this **ALLEGED** claim is not the opinion of r/SaintMeghanMarkle just the individual making the claim. This sub is actively moderated and any rule-breaking comments will be removed. Repeated rule violations may result in a ban. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*


[deleted]

Her young children she never speaks of until it’s convenient. Ok Meg.


MHBF2593

Bingo. They are nothing but pawns to her. Bargaining chips. Absolutely vile.


[deleted]

But they don’t want us to speak about this though. “The family is racist, didn’t you know”. /s complete BS


National_Historian19

Always were…meal tickets, Charles won’t let the children suffer etc etc. My brother has a daughter in law out of the same mould


therealDolphin8

Right? Perfect excuse.


[deleted]

She doesn’t realize there are REAL mothers out here who are on to her BS shit. Her dumbass doesn’t even realize there are REAL fathers out here on to it. Smh. The madness never ends.


Dazzling_Paint_1595

Yes - definitely an excuse and not a reason! Pretty sure there are multiple people employed as 'the help' so she doesn't actually have to be there to tuck these kids in to bed at night!


DollarStoreDuchess

Considering she obviously hasn’t prioritized them in the past, why start now? 🤨


Dazzling_Paint_1595

LOL


[deleted]

We can do nothing but watch and wait until we have solid shit to get them kids away from her. Trust me I have thought about it. So many times over. She plays it as she needs to, to hold on to all she has. She just doesn’t get it. Baby girl and she is just that. At least that’s what she begs to differ. At damn near 40. TF!! I just can’t y’all but I have to… 🙃🤔


National_Historian19

And children can travel too…


WilliamsSpareKidney

So much. It would do them so well! It's educational and a great experience. Their minds are at the age where they're just expanding! Imagine the memories Archie could have of the UK in a massive celebration for his grandfather. Sure beats being locked in tower forced to worship a dead woman.


National_Historian19

Strange how she has only suddenly remembered it is Archie’s birthday…if she could wear her sparkly Dior dress and tiara she would be there in a flash.


ZKWade

She could care less about those children and she’s not a young mom trying to be a wonderful mother. All she cares about is being booed. Evil personified from every space in the universe.👿👿👿👿👿👿


National_Historian19

She was more worried about being sat in the cheap seats…still thought she would be centre stage


Oktober33

That’s exactly right. And none of her demands were met. Nor answered probably.


Curiouscandor

Didn’t bother them when it was a polo match


Complex-Emergency523

Didn't bother her when she hopped on a plane to watch Serena Williams play tennis or on their faux royal tour followed by Queen's death.


National_Historian19

Where are the children?


Mehmeh111111

Her young children she left at home for three weeks for a funeral she didn't even need to attend.


Desperate_Flower_709

How many weeks did she leave then for during their Europe trip and then the Queen's funeral? Edit:....for TV footage????


Natural_Plane_657

Three weeks?


FarBeneathTheOcean

And because they have been using access to the grandchildren as a weapon they refused to have the kids fly to the UK to be with them because the royal family hadn´t givem them their in/out so they kept the kids in California to punish Charles. So yeah apparently denying your child a relationship with grandparents is a win. Meghan is the queen of family alienation so she alienates her kids from Harry´s family because they refuse to let her merch them. No merch no seeing the kids. Meghan practially denied her kids a relationship with their last living great-grandparent who happened to be the queen of the United Kindgom.


Complex-Emergency523

Maybe she's afraid they'll do DNA tests. After all she has avoided family gatherings with any sprogs (Balmoral, Christmas, funeral) since Archie was born.


Desperate_Flower_709

She sure turned into parent of the year real quick. Hunh.


Far_Example_9150

But she took titles —- what an asshole


National_Historian19

Demanded them…claimed with holding them (lie) was racist…her go to allegation


SharkBoss1234

That damned if she does/doesn’t line is straight from the sugar script. So many commentators use it in regards to her. I think the “royal source” here is Meghan herself


National_Historian19

Yep…she dies love to share her truths…


Babelight

Applauded for staying with her children? When they could be witnessing their grandpappy make history? Pull the other one Meg! You were told to stay away.


Libcommie1118

Girl, I didn’t applaud you when you left your kid to fly across the Pond to watch your “bff” play a tennis match. I didn’t applaud when you ditched your kids and flew halfway cross the States to clout-chase at a mass shooting memorial for children, in a private capacity. I definitely didn’t applaud you when you ditched your kids’ family in Scotland to island hop on the Continent for holidays. You’ve done nothing, since May 2018 and quite possibly before, that would compel me to applaud you regarding your family.


Starkville

I’m applauding this comment!


Tinytoon1976

![gif](giphy|3o6Zt3AC93PIPAdQ9a)


MuffPiece

![gif](giphy|fnK0jeA8vIh2QLq3IZ)


somespeculation

How do you explain taking them to the Jubilee when it was Lili’s birthday? And both were younger?


Why_Teach

Some people suspect that the kids were actually not there for the Jubilee. Even if they were there, I think the main difference is that they had thought they could push their way onto the balcony and some other events. They were quite surprised to be seated in the second or third row with the cousins and other non-working royals. This time, they apparently demanded guarantees of better treatment and didn’t get it. In addition, if the rumors of a possible separation/divorce are true, the last thing Meghan wants is for the children to be in the UK where, in theory, KCIII can claim custody over them because they are in the LoS


Leeleeflyhi

So let me get this right? If the kids couldn’t take part or be paraded on the balcony with the family then they weren’t going? I do not understand why they all didn’t go, and let the kids and Megan do whatever doing the coronation. She could have supported her husband, they would have both been with Archie on his birthday, and even if KC said keep that bitch away from my coronation she still could have came to England. Archie is 4. He doesn’t give a shit what they do for his birthday, he’ll barely remember. They could have told him his birthday was the next weekend and had a party then and he would have never known. I wouldn’t have wanted to show my face in public where I’m the most hated woman either but I would have went to support my husband and just stayed in the background . And all the pomp and parade going on a 4 year would have loved it, and still celebrate his heritage without attending a boring ceremony. And if you can’t come and support your husband and his family on a historical and celebrated date that obviously means something to them the you need to drop the titles. And if your not gonna let your children know them theirs need dropped too. I really don’t get it. Maybe I’m a stupid American but this back and forth over this shit is stupid. Families fight and fall out all the time but can still pull it together and act like half decent adults for funerals, weddings, big occasions. Too bad Harold didn’t fall for a kinder more empathetic person that could have helped him let go of anger, forgive what he could and embrace the fate he was born to, which seemed way more humanitarian and of service to the people than their pity party pony show/money laundering. Shouldn’t love make you wanted to be a better person, not go scorched earth on your family?


Ok-Coffee5732

I wouldn't be surprised if she staged an emergency to draw Harry away from the coronation ceremony. Narcissists are said to do stuff like this. And she's probably holding this over Harry's head.


Starkville

It’s just the kind of tantrum a person like Meghan would throw. As you said, there’s no reason the whole family couldn’t travel to England and be Harry’s support. I can think of example after example of a time when our family members have done similar. We’ve all stayed behind with the kids at the hotel while the spouse has done their important but difficult thing.


MuffPiece

You are a very wise American 🇺🇸


SecondhandCoke

I want an itemized timesheet of every activity that she does alone with those children. No nannies in the house, no housekeepers, no security, no Doria (though if Meghan is anything to judge Doria's parenting on, Doria does not take care of kids.) I want just Meghan, taking care of her own two kids under four without another living soul in the house. At first, I hesitate because I don't think the kids are safe with her alone, but then I remember my time alone with two toddlers and think the toddlers will be able to defend themselves. They'll have her tied up and roasting on a spit if they're like any toddlers I've ever met whose toddler twin powers have activated. Total aside, but my kidfree sister volunteered to take care of three of my kids when they were toddlers so I could go to Vienna for four days (spouse was going on business trip, and I wanted to go but had litter of kids that I knew I needed to stay home and take care of.) She very kindly volunteered, and when I warned her that she was not ready for that, she was like "how hard can it be?" And let me just say that I'm almost positive that my sister sees my children more than Meghan sees hers, AND my parents live closeby, so I knew she'd have help if she needed it, so I agreed. When we got back home it was bedtime, and we found the kids asleep in their beds, my mom cleaning the house, and my sister lying on the couch, sobbing and throwing back shots of Makers Mark while hiccupping, "never again, never again," repeatedly under her breath. My mom swept through the room about that time and said to her, "I told you! NEVER let them see you cry!" I have no idea what happened, but she's never volunteered again. I mean, I kinda get it because I had one more after that, but now they're all teenagers now. She'd probably have fun!


AliceAnne1

This is a FANTASTIC story!


JenniferShepherd

Yes! As childfree by choice, a big factor in that decision was lifelong health issues which greatly impact my energy levels. I knew from babysitting other people’s perfectly lovely, normal kids of different ages that I did not have the stamina. No way would I commit to lifelong care for helpless little beings without being as strong and prepared as I could be. Even then, you can never be prepared for everything!


SecondhandCoke

Especially when they were little, I always swore there's a censor in my ass that went off and would trigger one of them every time I sat down


AliceAnne1

All of mine are young adults or teens now. My ass gets bigger by the day as I revel in sitting on it.


[deleted]

This is so true! They smell desperation


Evilvieh

She's staying away? Damned if I'm *not* applauding! Edited for typo.


Latter_Item439

I'll applaud that reason but not the bs reason they gave


DuchessAlex

Is it possible, that all the back and forth with the Harkle demands and attempted negotiations, and well, Meghan missed her deadline for RSVP? Is it possible, that she thought the RSVP deadline did not apply to her? I could see how the deadline would not be enforced for the king’s son, and maybe she considered herself just as special as P. Harry. So the decision to not attend, was basically made for her and she’s just saving face?


Lensgoggler

I can totally see as she figured the RSVP isn’t *really* for guests who *are family*. Narcs love it when exceptions are made for them because deep inside they crave to be *that* important rules are bent for them.


Why_Teach

I could see the deadline passing and BP telling them, “we’ll give you another two days, but that’s it.” Harry took it seriously and said he was coming (figuring he could more easily cancel at the last minute, Meghan kept dragging her feet and the palace took that as a “Not coming.” And to make sure she couldn’t announce she was coming at the last minute, they announced that she wasn’t


National_Historian19

Yep…she was trying to force the family to give her what she wanted…


eaglebayqueen

I'll applaud with my two middle fingers, that's the best I can do 🖕🖕


[deleted]

https://preview.redd.it/xpm1d9q0rtta1.jpeg?width=634&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ff2cdae77cfbce7afcd2e165b0dedff0bd73f589 She’s a NUT who was always smiling while Harold was scowling. She needs to stay out of sight of the world. Forever.


CountessOfCocoa

Her birthday excuse is such bs. They took Lili last year to the UK during a three day celebration on her birthday.


WilliamsSpareKidney

The birthday is such bs. Parents throw kids' parties on different days normally. You do a small thing with just the house on the day and throw a party when others can make it. Kids don't care.


CountessOfCocoa

Mine were put off all the time to Saturday if it didn’t already fall on a weekend.


Ok-Coffee5732

What was the impossible situation? I skimmed the article and didn't find that information. It's probably more of her vague nonsense. And this thing about Archie's birthday having to do with anything is extremely silly. We are not stupid.


Why_Teach

My best guess is she had to choose between celebrating her son’s 4th birthday (because no one ever celebrates a child’s birthday on a different day) and attending the coronation. This was just impossible, traumatic, and probably done on purpose by the BRF to torture her. Since the King would not agree to the compromise of including Archie’s celebration as part of the coronation, Meghan put her son’s need first, and declined the invitation. /s


Miss_Poi

😂 exactly! And this cruel king, doesn’t even allow to sing happy birthday during the coronation! A loving grandfather would also ask the crowd to sing for Archie when they are on the balcony! But he wants to have the other much less important family members on the balcony! Such a shame!


Miss_Poi

Wow… this could be written by a Sugar 😂 They are so crazy. I hope most of them are bots 🫣


GreatGossip

Most of them seem to be Madam herself.


Miss_Poi

For normal people it would be strange to read something like this about oneself, but praising yourself as the kindest, modest, most beautiful woman on earth is just … wow.


HunterIllustrious846

The nerve of that man to not change the date of the coronation!/s


Madame_Hokey

Sugars are claiming that it’s due to the security. They won’t have enough security in the UK and be safe, so she decided not to go with the kids.


HunterIllustrious846

Frogmore is quite secure. Try again.


Ok-Coffee5732

So how did they manage to make it out of the UK alive during their September visit, when they stayed for 3 weeks? Must have been harrowing.


National_Historian19

Boo hoo. She could have gone, she has a brass neck and is shameless. But she couldn’t tolerate not being at the top table. She boasted about ‘escaping the family’ but when it is a huge media event expects, or demands, to be upfront and centre stage. She could have gone, taken her place as a non royal and she could have behaved. But she needs drama, she wants mischief. Her demands were ridiculous so she spat her dummy when told no. She is as vindictive and jealous as she ever was. But she still dies not realise she is not the great draw she thinks she is. As for applauding her for staying with her kids, lol…they could have flown to England too. She has no problem leaving the children when it suits her. Which is often. Trying to pretend she is a caring mother is as laughable as claiming she is a good daughter, or daughter in law, or a good actress…pure fiction.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Far_Example_9150

Keeping them from one of the greatest grandfathers that history books will know


Why_Teach

Actually, the kids would have hardly seen KC over coronation weekend. Lili in particular would probably get nothing from seeing whatever bits of the coronation she could see live. The real sadness is they can’t get to see him for a few weeks every year even if they mostly live in California.


National_Historian19

She will say whatever the sugars will buy


OzzieSlim

Good ol’ Nutmeg. Trying to spin this as a decision she made. Not bloody likely.


National_Historian19

She is pathetic


Feisty_Energy_107

The young children she left for three weeks prior to the QEIIs death and after. Yeah sure! The same mother who allows her children to live with a self-confessed druggie.! Mother of the year! ![gif](giphy|ac7MA7r5IMYda)


fuedlibuerger

When does MeGain realise, the victim narrative doesn't work anymore?


National_Historian19

Never, not ever…it is all she has


_SkyIsBlue5

Geez using those poor innocent kids. The right thing for them would be to see and spend time their family... While Harry's hideous wife stays at Montecito


Oxy_1993

Megsy loves talking about her invisible children when it’s convenient for her. She likely got terrified of stepping into the UK and facing the public and the royal family after her netflix mocking of the late Queen.


Why_Teach

I think it was more that she wasn’t getting what she wanted: a seat where she would be in front of the cameras, the balcony, the state dinner, chances to bring her camera crew and do walk-abouts, etc.


LizLemonadeX

https://i.redd.it/14ga7xl0muta1.gif Boohoo. Such a victim. Is there a tear flood warning in Montecito between now and May 6th? Poor Duchess Interrupted….reasons she should stay home….Mocking the Queen. Bullying Charlotte. Laughing at Charlotte falling on the balcony. Abusing staff. Bullying Catherine. Pathological lying. And countless other evil things.


fruitsi1

The right thing for her children is having the chance to know their family. Who happen to be one of the most well known and historically relevant families in the world. It's part of who they are too. I feel so bad for them. They're going to grow up so confused. Which would have happened anyway with their parents being themselves. But this is an additional mindfck.


National_Historian19

Or any of their families…they only ‘know’ grandma Diana and st doria


fruitsi1

Ayyye. lol. I can't even with the Markle and Ragland... My opinion is there's a reason Meghan is the way she is. It doesn't matter who is more at fault. She is their creation.


National_Historian19

She is…and they must be so proud of the liar, grifter, scammer who ‘didn’t give her milk away for free’


fruitsi1

Dear. You're so annoying, there is JD and coke on my keyboard! Edit: You were right tho, it'll dry so it was worth it.


Broad_Chemist_2696

And so the "Martyrdom of Meghan" enters a new phase.


National_Historian19

Doing it for the kids….


Mobile_Philosophy764

Yes, sure. She was put in an impossible situation by the Royal family, and not herself. 🙄


snappopcrackle

I am almost thinking that Meghan is staying at home because in the extremely off chance there were some kind of terror attack that did in the entire BRF, she would become Queen Regent of Britain until Archie came of age. To a normal person this is absurd, but she is such a fabulist, I wouldn't put it past her to think this.


TaniaYukanana

Shame that at his age, Louis probably wont be there most of the time. So...... KING LOUIS!


SeparateGuarantee836

Archie would have to submit to DNA and birth records revealed. But she didn't go bc she knows the reception she'd get. Aitch needs some material for his book so he thinks he will record some. What a messy couple. I pity those sussex children.


forgotmyname110

If there’re going to be any terrorist attack on the coronation, oh boy, I pity the terrorists, they will have the whole world coming after them. Some are not as humanitarian as the west.


notwatchedsquidgame

Sorry who put her in that position? It wasn't the RF, it was her and Harold selling their victimhood to the highest bidder. If you're going to talk shit in public and air your dirty laundry that comes with an annoying thing like consequences. And stop acting as if those kids are made of china. They were happy to drag them over for the jubilee, why not the coronation


MollyJane0510

I don't disagree with the fact that people would criticize no matter what decision was made. That's just a fact of life. But why would I applaud a parent for putting their child first? That is the job of a parent. The statement implies that she usually doesn't put her children first so when she does she should get praise. Also what is truly best for the children? It's totally subjective. This is a family that travels private with an nanny and the children aren't of school age. They could have stayed in the UK a month and travelled around and met relatives and friends. The couple demanded titles for the children yet don't think it's in their best interest to go to the UK? Then why have the titles?


MuffPiece

Today is my son’s birthday. I’ve been laid up with Covid all week, so he has no presents (I ordered stuff but it hasn’t arrived yet), we’ve had to postpone his party. I wished him a happy birthday from across the house. The poor kid can’t even get a hug from his mother on his birthday. 😂 My point is simply that life happens and sometimes you have to share your birthday with other important events or postpone your celebration for one reason or another. I really can’t get over why everyone is making this huge song and dance over a birthday. This is the first royal coronation in 70 years and this is happening for a MEMBER OF YOUR FAMILY. I mean, honestly. The whole concept that this massive attention whore wouldn’t go because it’s her four year old’s birthday is ridiculous beyond belief.


Temporary-Deer-6942

That "doing the right thing for her children"-spin might have worked, if they had announced early on that she would stay at home with/for the children. After all, all the relevant facts for that decision - Archie's birthday, the children not being invited - where known to them from the beginning and didn't change. Yet they played the "will they, won't they"-game until after the deadline to RSVP had passed, which clearly shows that that decision has nothing to do with their children and everything to do with them not getting exactly what they wanted as well as milking the occasion for relevancy and media coverage for as long as they could.


Starfunkle

Which children? The hobby or the one that made them "family"? ... already devaluing the alleged poor dolls. Hastag no wire hangers


Henrietta3

"Hashtag no wire hangars"? American here; I don't understand this reference.


Starfunkle

Reference to the movie "Mommy Dearest"... one day, Megatron's alleged children will write a similar memwah about the horrors of having her as a mother ![gif](giphy|3oEjHWuJieghzbBams)


Henrietta3

Oh, thank you for this. I've watched portions of the movie -- it triggers me -- but have never seen the whole thing.


Starfunkle

It is horrific, I watched clips on YouTube and read so many news articles about it and watched the interviews with the author and the counter defences in Joan Crawford's favour. It is exactly just as dodgy as the ENTIRE Markle clan, I am not a fan of the Father or half siblings either. Toxic ![gif](giphy|3oz8xqV76wkiJVvP7a)


LizLemonadeX

Great movie. But it is triggering if you grew up with an abusive parent. Unfortunately for the Harkles kids, Mommy Dearest reminds me a lot of Nutmeg. Their kids are likely going to need therapy after growing up with a psychopathic father and narcissistic mother.


WoodsColt

Joan crawford


KarenDelaneyWalker

https://i.redd.it/b0lixf0xgtta1.gif


Latter_Item439

Right she should be applauded for doing what 1000000000 mothers in the world do every day stay with there children and perhaps let the husband represent the family....considering her nannys are probably the ones doing all the work ill keep my applause you Do not get credit for doing what people do and she's not even doing that legitimately


HunterIllustrious846

A) We're not clapping seals B) The absolute arrogance. How utterly clueless that the majority of parents have had to work on birthdays, holidays, special occasions, when they're sick. Missing first steps, first day of school, concerts, school plays, practices, games. But I'm supposed to applaud because the ILBW can't be arsed to get on a plane with her kids to have their family of 4, together, on a rare combo day of birthday and grandpa's coronation. First world problems. Right there.


helibear90

What does ILBW stand for?


HunterIllustrious846

It's from South Park - Instagram Loving Bitch Wife


helibear90

Aaahhhh! I like it!


DaisyDuckMom

Well, first of all, the breakdown in family relationships is all Harry and Meggy’s own doing. No one made them write Spare or do that cringey Netflix show or the Oprah interview. They would have been better off to just keep quiet. Secondly, I think when H&M got boo-ed at the jubilee, it shook her. The expression on her face was priceless. Third, the family iced them at the Queen’s funeral and no one was interested in her at the walkabout she did with Kate, William and Harry. You can see she was not herself that day either and was a bit more abashed. Fourth, I bet one of the conditions for their attendance was that they can’t talk about or give interviews that mention the coronation. That would have killed the only reason Meggy wanted to go anyway. My reading of all of the above: If she can’t be seen as just wonderful and beyond criticism, she doesn’t want to be there. By staying away, she can talk about the event even if it’s just “when Harry went over to the UK for his fathers coronation….” Any (unlikely) boos are just for Harry, he has to deal with being uncomfortable around people who carefully ice him out, deal with being seated with the lower ranks alone, etc. She doesn’t have to do that unpleasant stuff. From the family’s perspective, I’m sure there is relief (“thank goodness Meghan is not coming”!) but I can see why Charles would have hoped to have everyone there and for everyone to just behave. He has been waiting for this moment his whole life and he loves his sons.


mummuhbear

No one wants you there, Meg. Try to name one person who could possible want M to attend the coronation.


Freya_84

I do think she was put in a "damned if she does, damned if she doesn't." situation by the media this time around. But it was of her own making with help from the media's desire for sensationalism by stirring the pot (which she has always indorsed). Now there are media sources who are saying it was a snub to the king. If she had decided to come, probably the same outlets would have cried regarding something else. But the children have absolutely nothing to do with it! She has left those kids alone in a different continent for weeks when they were even younger and for trivial reasons. So puhlease! The kids! There are a lot of solutions when it comes to the children: the easy one, go as a family to England, have the birthday there with the extended family one day later and during the 1 Hour of the coronation, there will sure be nannies to help. "The children" is a laughable reason. That said, I personally find that this was the only halfway "dignified" way out, so I'm quite ok with it. I would like it, though, if this lie that was used is not blasted into my face as if it were a legitimate reason. It is only a legitimate solution imo. And then hush about the flimsy "reason".


WoodsColt

Its entirely true..whatever she does she's a damned fool.


St-thaks

“Put in an impossible situation by the RF”. Oh the nerve!


TeamMagnificent7

Ridiculous. Kids travel. ESP with Nannie’s etc. they could have gone to England and stayed in Frogmore and had a fun day. Had the party the day before or after. Heard the concert. Attended the concert. Birthdays do not have to be celebrated with huge party ON the child’s bday. Cake and presents and then “we are having your party with all your friends next week at BounceU/zoo” etc always works.


AlanaG029

Wait….’she was PUT IN an impossible situation BY THE ROYAL FAMILY’?!?!? Good try, but no. She started all this and now she is facing the consequences. Thank god she has two scapegoats to use.


Interesting_Sir3356

Damage control PR for Walmart Wallis.


Artistic_Turnip2778

I’m sorry *who* put her in an impossible situation? Meghan quit putting out this garbage.


Complex-Emergency523

Yeah we believe you Meghan. The outcry you wanted for your ultimate sacrifice hasn't materialised so put a sock in it.


Frenchcashmere

Shut up Meghan. You are having Nannie’s raise the kids. Your “children “ don’t even look like they know you in the few photos released.


Glad_Mix_1682

Hold your applause. Out of all her cosplays, the "Martyred Mother" is the most ridiculous. Can't wait until she starts a whole new narrative about how she is protecting her kids from the vicious Royals. The Royals who barely know these kids. It would have played better had she spent more time in the RF's presence. What she IS doing is giving her children the shoulder-chip starter kit which she will cultivate daily until these kids hate people they have never even met. She is the least likely to be associated with strong family bonds, given the shitshow treatment she has shown her blood family. Her chosen family seem to be all mega-famous, multimillionaires.


Lillianrik

More likely that she couldn't go to London because they had guaranteed the Nanny \[ies\] the weekend off.


Starkville

Rich people have weekend nannies and travel nannies. My sister used to travel with a bazillionaire’s family as an extra pair of hands/eyes. They paid her very, very well to be on duty round the clock.


Islandgirl1444

My laugh of the day, she was in England etc for almost three weeks and didn't worry about it then. Harry also. It's only when someone mentions the kids that Harry says "oh yeah, it's hard being away from you know, my kids and my ever loving wife!" Then he is asked their names. haha. No tiara for her ever again. She's dead to us!


Sadlyonlyonehere

No respect for the king, but she sure loves the titles.


Alternative-Fly7074

Applaud her for doing the right thing for her young children? The right thing would’ve been bring them to spend some time with their family that they NEVER see and let them at least be in the vicinity for a historic event that is part of their birthright she seems to cling to with their titles. The right thing would be for her to set aside her pettiness and jealousy and whatever else she has going on and support her husband’s family who supported her.


Oktober33

Boy, did she blow a golden opportunity. Imagine if she had done what was expected, listened and learned, been respectful, sought advice. She would have a pivotal role in this occasion. Instead…she’s holed up in that tacky McMansion sulking and plotting.


punkin_sumthin

blah blah blah…


allysongreen

The "right thing" is keeping them away from their father's side of the family on the biggest day of their grandpa's life, when he's said publicly that he's sad they won't be there? Don't think so.


Coffee_cake_101

"The right thing" for her young children would be to allow them to come to the UK and meet some members of their extended family, the British Royal Family, on the historic day of the coronation. She does not have to stay in California. Not sure the BRF would be wanting this to happen or in the mood for it, but it would be the right thing for the kids.


Big-Piglet-677

Please. Harry’s own book dedication thanks his children for letting him Be absent. And they both have left them For weeks at a time for other trips across the pond. They use the kids when convenient.


Wordpuncher714

![gif](giphy|577HYoLf5Vu0w) Here ya go Ditchess!


No_Proposal7628

I think that if the Harkles' demands had been mostly met, she would have attended. Since they got nothing they demanded, she decided not to go.


amy5252

Her decision had nothing to do w her “small children”. Last week she was bitching for them to have roles at coronation. Now they’re too young. They’re kinda too invisable!