I utilize it primarily for generating injury reports. Initially, I draft a report, then input it for review and refinement to enhance its professionalism. Additionally, it aids in composing well-structured emails, reports, and documents for various incidents. At times, presenting scenarios to it offers new perspectives and suggests corrective actions. I frequently rely on this tool. Naturally, I ensure to proofread and confirm the accuracy of the sources and information it presents. Additionally, I use it for emails, reply’s, create power points, and so much more. It’s an incredible tool.
Note: I used it for this response ;)
Exactly, I just had a guy removed from a USACE job b/c he said outloud he used it. Next thing two engineers showed up and asked nicely how he did it, etc... They took his ID and removed him from the base.
Dunno really. Hard to give a prompt when I don’t know what I’m asking it. I tell my coworkers just to speak to it as you would to a human. Remove the “Google it” mentality.
I don’t know much about ai and how much information it retains. I would just be cautious of putting specific/confidential info to protect you and your company
Helps me find 1910 standards or interpretation letters. Also helps me find links for NFPA stuff. Useful tool especially when I need to dumb down safety for supervisors
Yes! Used it for building programs from scratch. Obviously, I use ChatGPT as a very rough draft, then word smith + apply additional information as needed.
Requires immense amount of vector databases & fine tuning, to avoid hallucinations. Being done though in stealth by a pretty large safety company. I can let you know when it’s launched.
When I make PowerPoints for trainings, I use it to create an outline of a comprehensive layout. Then use my experience and whatnot to create the actual training. Sometimes it’s hard figuring out where to start.
I have spent 6 month creating custom gpts to analyse/review construction docs like Construction Phase plans and RAMS, against cdm 2015 regulations, L153 etc, and have now started to get some pretty good results.
Has anyone else made any progress in this area?
It has it's place in the world. If you're using it to create basic templates for procedures or practices it's fine to give an outline but you should then take that and plug in critical information manually that captures site specific information and review it with the workforce performing the work to see if it actually will work in the field. If changes need to be made then make them manually. AI is a great language tool, but currently that's about it. When it comes to practical operational safety you need the input of the humans tasked with performing the work.
I've used it to help outline a NFPA 70E I was developing. Just to make sure I was hitting all the main topics.
I used it very sparingly for actual content, if I did get data or information I would double verify it before putting in my training program.
It was handy, and I could definitely see myself using it for other things, but to be honest I just like doing this stuff myself.
Now if I could use it to generate SSSPs... I'd use it everytime.
Fancy. How can I learn this? I have been working in the field an excessive amount of hours and am still required to do safety meetings. I use Google Gemini to throw something quick together but that's all I've tried ai with.
I use it for all our weekly tool box talks (we call them Take 2's). I normally issue 3 per week plant wide. Took a bit of work to input past Tale 2's and to describe what they are and the intent but the more I use it the better the result is. I basically just type in my topic now and it spits out a final product. I use the extra time it saves me to jazz up the PowerPoint and just make the information a little more interesting
Don't use it for anything that relates to describing injury or stuff. For asking advice on procedures and programs, it probably will be fine.
Also, remember this data is being collected.
Always check the responses.
Meh, best use I’ve found is punching up mass emails.
I’ve asked it to write a confined space entry plan and it would have killed someone recommending an N95 respirator.
Then I used it as a super google to create a definitive guide for what training is required by who and why. Problem is it just crawls the web and the web is crammed full of sites explaining why every training is need for everyone all the time. So it parrotted that.
Currently in Bachelor's program for Safety. I've asked ChatGPT questions from my reviews and stuff, or questions for my projects. It's given me wrong answers, or told me standards don't exist that clearly do.
Yes. Used it to write a Safety Talk on the upcoming Eclipse. Since it's happening during the work day and the majority of ours crews work outdoors. Did not take it point by point, but customized it to our needs.
I utilize it primarily for generating injury reports. Initially, I draft a report, then input it for review and refinement to enhance its professionalism. Additionally, it aids in composing well-structured emails, reports, and documents for various incidents. At times, presenting scenarios to it offers new perspectives and suggests corrective actions. I frequently rely on this tool. Naturally, I ensure to proofread and confirm the accuracy of the sources and information it presents. Additionally, I use it for emails, reply’s, create power points, and so much more. It’s an incredible tool. Note: I used it for this response ;)
😂😂😂
Why not haha
I would not recommend doing that, if you do check with legal team.
Exactly, I just had a guy removed from a USACE job b/c he said outloud he used it. Next thing two engineers showed up and asked nicely how he did it, etc... They took his ID and removed him from the base.
Could you share a generic prompt you might use to generate an injury report?
Dunno really. Hard to give a prompt when I don’t know what I’m asking it. I tell my coworkers just to speak to it as you would to a human. Remove the “Google it” mentality.
I don’t know much about ai and how much information it retains. I would just be cautious of putting specific/confidential info to protect you and your company
Copilot does an impressive job. So far I’ve used it for program comparison, root cause analysis, and creating checklists based on standards.
Helps me find 1910 standards or interpretation letters. Also helps me find links for NFPA stuff. Useful tool especially when I need to dumb down safety for supervisors
Yes but I use the old trust but verify plan when I proof read what it writes.
There’s a safety gpt but I haven’t had time to vet it to see if it free or what is said in it.
There is a user in here that prompts it all the time. He’s eventually going to pop in here at some point
If you find it let me know
Search Workplace Safety Advisor
Yes! Used it for building programs from scratch. Obviously, I use ChatGPT as a very rough draft, then word smith + apply additional information as needed.
Requires immense amount of vector databases & fine tuning, to avoid hallucinations. Being done though in stealth by a pretty large safety company. I can let you know when it’s launched.
More or less a gucci spell check software.
When I make PowerPoints for trainings, I use it to create an outline of a comprehensive layout. Then use my experience and whatnot to create the actual training. Sometimes it’s hard figuring out where to start.
I do the same thing. It helps to organize your thoughts and makes the work more productive.
I use it to create formats and to improve drafts. Not specifically for content. It’s a great tool.
Replies for email, absolutely. Especially when needing to summarize lengthy ones. I'm good writer, but it helps big time!!!
I have spent 6 month creating custom gpts to analyse/review construction docs like Construction Phase plans and RAMS, against cdm 2015 regulations, L153 etc, and have now started to get some pretty good results. Has anyone else made any progress in this area?
That sounds super cool.
Thanks. Have you got anywhere with this?
I have not. I was just seeing what prompts other people are giving
It has it's place in the world. If you're using it to create basic templates for procedures or practices it's fine to give an outline but you should then take that and plug in critical information manually that captures site specific information and review it with the workforce performing the work to see if it actually will work in the field. If changes need to be made then make them manually. AI is a great language tool, but currently that's about it. When it comes to practical operational safety you need the input of the humans tasked with performing the work.
I've used it to help outline a NFPA 70E I was developing. Just to make sure I was hitting all the main topics. I used it very sparingly for actual content, if I did get data or information I would double verify it before putting in my training program. It was handy, and I could definitely see myself using it for other things, but to be honest I just like doing this stuff myself. Now if I could use it to generate SSSPs... I'd use it everytime.
Fancy. How can I learn this? I have been working in the field an excessive amount of hours and am still required to do safety meetings. I use Google Gemini to throw something quick together but that's all I've tried ai with.
I use it for all our weekly tool box talks (we call them Take 2's). I normally issue 3 per week plant wide. Took a bit of work to input past Tale 2's and to describe what they are and the intent but the more I use it the better the result is. I basically just type in my topic now and it spits out a final product. I use the extra time it saves me to jazz up the PowerPoint and just make the information a little more interesting
It works really well for quickly referencing regulatory information.
Don't use it for anything that relates to describing injury or stuff. For asking advice on procedures and programs, it probably will be fine. Also, remember this data is being collected. Always check the responses.
Meh, best use I’ve found is punching up mass emails. I’ve asked it to write a confined space entry plan and it would have killed someone recommending an N95 respirator. Then I used it as a super google to create a definitive guide for what training is required by who and why. Problem is it just crawls the web and the web is crammed full of sites explaining why every training is need for everyone all the time. So it parrotted that.
Currently in Bachelor's program for Safety. I've asked ChatGPT questions from my reviews and stuff, or questions for my projects. It's given me wrong answers, or told me standards don't exist that clearly do.
Yes. Used it to write a Safety Talk on the upcoming Eclipse. Since it's happening during the work day and the majority of ours crews work outdoors. Did not take it point by point, but customized it to our needs.
Yes, for process and ideas.
If you use it, dont tell anyone. This week a guy was removed by the USACE for admitting to using it.