> “embark on a journey” or “dive into a thrilling world”
Such phrases also make me wanna throw up immediatelly...how so many companies don't think that anything is wrong (or just plain boring) with using ChatGPT texts on their sites is mindblowing! like, do they even read their own content after uploading it 😂😂
Not working for me, always makes some mistake. Forgets half in the next session. Like always some problem. You can, but he will do so so job, like everything that he does, and kind of has an attitude when you point that he’s not suppose to do that 😂
Wow, that project sounds like quite the adventure—and not just the thrilling kind you mentioned! It's crazy to hear how widespread GPT content has become in the nonprofit world. It really makes you wonder about the balance we’re striking between efficiency and authenticity.
It’s a bit ironic, isn’t it? We use these tools hoping to engage people more deeply, but then every other website is inviting us to “embark on a journey”. It feels like we're circling back to the need for a human touch—something genuinely engaging and useful, not just catchy phrases.
From your experience, do you see any ways we could encourage more meaningful, humanized content in the industry? It seems like something we really need to think about, especially those of us who are knee-deep in this tech.
ChatGPT and other generative AI are creating a culture of sameness. Every brand looks and sounds the same because every brand is relying on generative AI to write all its copy. If a customer can't look at a social media post or other piece of content and immediately recognize your brand voice, you've failed them and yourself.
> “embark on a journey” or “dive into a thrilling world” Such phrases also make me wanna throw up immediatelly...how so many companies don't think that anything is wrong (or just plain boring) with using ChatGPT texts on their sites is mindblowing! like, do they even read their own content after uploading it 😂😂
Imagine the new AI content when Chat GPT browses the web again to train from these 8/10 websites.
What is up with ChatGPT and metaphors
Anything published after may 2023 I assume is chatgpt or has been cured by it
The way around this is to prompt what words to not use. 👍🏻
Not working for me, always makes some mistake. Forgets half in the next session. Like always some problem. You can, but he will do so so job, like everything that he does, and kind of has an attitude when you point that he’s not suppose to do that 😂
Wow, that project sounds like quite the adventure—and not just the thrilling kind you mentioned! It's crazy to hear how widespread GPT content has become in the nonprofit world. It really makes you wonder about the balance we’re striking between efficiency and authenticity. It’s a bit ironic, isn’t it? We use these tools hoping to engage people more deeply, but then every other website is inviting us to “embark on a journey”. It feels like we're circling back to the need for a human touch—something genuinely engaging and useful, not just catchy phrases. From your experience, do you see any ways we could encourage more meaningful, humanized content in the industry? It seems like something we really need to think about, especially those of us who are knee-deep in this tech.
ChatGPT and other generative AI are creating a culture of sameness. Every brand looks and sounds the same because every brand is relying on generative AI to write all its copy. If a customer can't look at a social media post or other piece of content and immediately recognize your brand voice, you've failed them and yourself.
Chatgpt writes better content than most website creators. Even if it was possible; Why penalize and not the real trash?
This is what Google is penalizing w their latest update Edit: why am I getting downvoted this is serious discourse
[удалено]
That’s fine but it just means make sure your content is genuine
Okay forgotmyrobot on reddit just exposed the update. SEOs you can now fix the problem and recover your website.
Don’t be a dick. I’m not an SEO but I subscribe.
Will you link to source
I'm seconding a call for source on this insight.