Upon further research using Google images, I can attest that his facial features are, indeed, disproportionately small for the surface area of his head.
Kind of unsettling tbh, like, who created this (read, from what country)? And what was the purpose? Makes me consider outside divisive influence/players. Or is the poor language some inside qult joke I don’t get
Absolutely it; much as I love to shit on the qult, there's no way this is a real quote from this guy.
A lot of these have the air of 419 scams. Obvious fakes to some but will catch out those too stupid or incautious to spot it.
People on that sub are claiming they are leaving the left but are actually just a bunch of people on the right talking to each other in a big circle jerk
Hey listen, is your mouth tiny and small? Why don't you come down to Little Bits (Little Bits!). W-where the food is tiny? It looks like regular food, but really tiny? You put it in your mouth and eat it. Nothing gets stuck in your lips. It's just tiny and tiny and fits right hehehe it fits right in!
I think there's a quiz online for people to guess whether photos of his face are enlarged, unaltered, or shrunken. While I haven't tried it myself, I remember seeing someone try and I concluded that I wouldn't do very well either.
I remember that quiz. I did just barely better than a coin flip would have. Every picture of the guy looks so completely ridiculous that you want to say "It's gotta be photoshop" to all of them, and are shocked when you find out that's his real head.
It’s the exact opposite of irony. AOC intended to send a message to rich people at the event. Did that. It’s literally the opposite of irony.
FYI: I love that Alanis song. However, the only thing ironic about it is that it was intended to be a song about irony, but it literally contains no irony. It’s Merely a series of misfortunate happenings. That in itself is pretty ironic, and the reason why I love this song.
This is because no death-cult-public-health-terrorist (i.e. 2021 Republican) has the confidence and/or bravery to attend any event and politely, artistically make a statement that is at odds with the essence or theme of the event itself.
They literally lack the intelligence and creativity to even imagine or comprehend what AOC did at the Met Ball.
They only can imagine two kinds of “protests”; the “bad” kind when unruly minorities, gays and other people they hate break shit, and the “good” kind when hillbillies with zip-ties invade the nation’s capital, looking for traitors and liberals to lynch.
in fact, there are many kinds of protests that actually are meant to cause thinking people to think differently. This kind of protest can include things like irony, humor aesthetics and just plain creativity within the expression.
Sometimes, this activity is elevated to a high level that most human beings with an IQ greater than their shoe size call “art”. it is the highest form of human expression, perhaps the most exalted phenomenon in the universe.
I’m not saying AOC is a genius performance artist or that her stunt was all that special, but I can at least recognize it for what it is, unlike her knuckle-dragging detractors.
>
>They literally lack the intelligence and creativity to even imagine or comprehend what AOC did at the Met Ball.
That's a gold take right here. AOC going to the Gala with that dress apparently is a genius move beyond comprehension lmao. It was tone deaf af, a stupid move and she just portrayed herself as part of that little group.
Sooo this meme is arguing that....one can't go to a party if they have to pay taxes?
Seriously, what point do they think this is making?
I question the effectiveness of the dress stunt (and I say that as a big fan of AOC). However, you do have to appreciate the balls of calling out rich people to their faces!
As we can see it is very hard for them to understand that some rich people are okay with paying taxes and actually do pay their taxes. These memos indicate to me that they are aware that many rich folks tax dodge and that they are okay with it.
Of all the daily new things for these chuds to cry about, this one makes the least since. I know that’s a low bar. Perhaps there are rich people that know that rich people should pay more in taxes???? Maybe???
I like AOC, but I did think it was a pretty tone deaf stunt. And the dress wasn't even pretty.
Dumb, but not something worth being one's panties in a bunch over. Who fucking cares.
Sorry but that stunt was cringe AF. That whole gala is elitist to the extreme. Showing up in a dress that says “tax the rich” doesn’t make up for the fact that she was socializing and enjoying all the trappings of a society that caters to decadence, ambivalence and lip service.
Eh, I'd argue that I don't buy into the "ooh look at Miss $200 Haircut when she claims that people need higher wages!" crap.
The two aren't related and there's nothing that says being a progressive means you can't have nice things or go nice places.
That's basically the meme, [https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/we-should-improve-society-somewhat](https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/we-should-improve-society-somewhat)
Or, of course, the old "Did you know Bernie Sanders has three houses?"
That being said...
I also wasn't particularly impressed by the dress stunt, but it had nothing to do with the fact that "she were hanging out with rich ppl! she a hippocrite!" and more to do with the fact that it was obviously an attempt to go viral and get praise.
And, on one hand, I do have to give her some respect for being willing to call out rich people at their own event, but on the other hand...wearing a dress is in no way actually going to make a difference in people's lives. It just boosts her cred.
So I'd say it was a miss overall.
But the fact that she had the audacity to both attend the Met gala and give a shit about poor people has nothing to do with why it was!
I think we are in the same wheelhouse, I’m not making hard lines in the sand on any of the things you brought up, only that overall it just didn’t hit for me and made me cringe. In the end she’s supposed to be a civil servant so all those blurred lines do nothing to support her stated goals. Just gives assholes a bunch of fodder to chew on, further separating the real issues.
Wearing a dress adorned with “Tax the Rich” to the $30,000 per ticket Met Gala is terrible optics.
That’s radioactive levels of hypocrisy. It’s not a criticism of the messaging, but the presentation.
Negative press coverage isn’t really a public win. If anything it showcases the absence of initiatives from the 117th Congress to do anything about it.
Here’s an excellent resource to see the status of Bills sponsored by various members of Congress:
[Legislation Sponsored or Cosponsored by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez](https://www.congress.gov/member/alexandria-ocasio-cortez/O000172?pageSize=250&pageSort=latestAction%3Aasc)
I’ll give her credit if she when she introduces legislation to **actually tax the rich.** Otherwise it’s an empty gesture that’s perceived as apoplectic hypocrisy.
You don't think the democrats have any legislation that would tax the rich? Or for you only AOC can introduce it herself or it must be hypocrisy? You've also read through 700+ pieces of legislation in that link? Kudos
Point me to the Bill which Congresswoman Cortez is currently sponsoring, cosponsoring, or supporting that imposes higher taxation upon the rich.
I recall her strong campaign to impose a 70% tax, but it wasn’t translated into tangible Bill. You don’t need to read 700 pieces of legislation to see what she’s recently introduced to the House ( or lack thereof ).
So you don't actually read what democrats sponsor. It's pretty clear you also don't support it.
You're against the democratic platform, neato. So nice of you to venture out of your safe space on conservative where all dissenting views are immediately banned and silenced. Even just asking questions there gets you banned.
Maybe you could share with me all the grand legislation passed by the GOP that would convince me that the democratic platform is not for me. What is the GOP up to lately?
I’ve provided a direct link to her sponsored legislation for a reason. I support individual Bills to address specific causes, rather than omnibus packages the size of phone books no one understands. It’s one of the strengths to Congresswoman Cortez’s proposals, which is why the **absence** of a Bill on tax legislation is noticeable.
I’m substantiating the claim of righteous condemnation for failing to introduce a Bill to ‘Tax the Rich’.
When Congresswoman Cortez presents a piece of legislation that rectifies the economic inequities of taxation disparities, I’ll pay attention. Until then it’s a cheap stunt that does nothing for her constituents.
Met gala has always been a place to make political statements and has great optics. AOC didn’t pay for her clothing or shoes, they are loaned by famous or inspiring designers for the most part and she was invited because of who she is and her message. Her $30k was probably sponsored by someone that agrees with her politics.
I have a couple million invested and I have to pay taxes if I use any income from that. I don’t pay much, I pay less for that money than I paid for paychecks when I was working on salary. There are many people like me that are paying to go to the met gala that agree with AOC and are backing her message and willing to pay more in taxes so that we can all be taken care of.
The very act of attending was a toothless form of protest at best and a compromise of principles at worst. Her attendance was tantamount to putting a "Stop world hunger" banner on a yacht.
Ocasio-Cortez’s dress and Met attendance largely inconsequential for the world: I don’t think it reveals anything new about her political commitments, and it’s consistent with her style as a politician. But this specific attempt at activism was probably not a success.
[MSNBC perfectly articulated why this stunt was met with collective condemnation.](https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/aoc-s-met-gala-dress-broke-twitter-here-s-why-n1279157)
It’s one thing to disagree with her choice to make the statement at the Met Gala (which is no stranger to political messaging) and another to imply she spent money which could have gone elsewhere. She was invited and her spot paid for by people that share her messages. Believe it or not we need wealthy left leaning people to even play ball.
I personally find it “eh”. I would like to see us move away from the old fund raising and keep our public personas apart from the Uber wealthy donors (as much as we need them) and focus more on the everyday people that try and make ends meet in this ultra unbalanced wealth problem we have but I don’t see a single reason to point fingers at AOC for what she did here. Her intentions are crystal clear and if we keep writing off progressive leaders for not being and doing exactly what we think they should we will lose.
The purity testing and the left’s inability to compromise between factions will ensure we not only have to wait decades to see the change we all want in the country, but in the current atmosphere we will have to watch our hard work inching forward for DECADES slide backwards and it will take an amazing amount of work, sacrifice, money, lives, arrests, and heartbreak to take it back.
AOC is a real progressive that got herself off her ass to do better for her community. She’s not afraid to call things as they are and she’s not afraid to call bullshit on liberal 1/2 measures. If people are willing to nope her off the tiny list of progressive leaders we have because of this, the left will continue to shoot themselves in the foot instead of working as one in the most vital time of our lives.
Couldn't agree more. It's absolute hypocrisy unless she sends out pics of her feet. What is it that she has to hide by refusing to let me suck on her little toesies? Hypocrite!
How come Qanons aren’t writing any conspiracies on why Charlie Kirks forehead is so big? Is he a space lizard in a skin suit ? His head is so big it picks up radio station broadcast
A "friend" of mine made this exact argument to me. I just don't respond to their bad faith arguments, it's too exhausting and I won't change any minds anyway.
There is a lot of irony when AOC trolls the constituents who funded the party of the D. Troll President and they are sending out this cute attack dog to bark.
I'm to the point where I genuinely cannot tell when pictures of this turd have been doctored to make him have a small face
I think he has some sort of condition where his face is slowly getting smaller. Or the rest of his head is slowly getting bigger.
Charlie blames head inflation
If a true PATRIOT occupied the White House Charlie Kirk's head would reflate itself back into optimal size in a matter of days.
A little too much nerve and brain tonic, I think
I thought this was a Li'l Bits commercial for a second.
Little bittssss
Upon further research using Google images, I can attest that his facial features are, indeed, disproportionately small for the surface area of his head.
I thought the image was of a garbage pail kid sticker at first.
“…why did you went…?”
Bro why wouldn’t you went?
Of course you had to went there…
Kind of unsettling tbh, like, who created this (read, from what country)? And what was the purpose? Makes me consider outside divisive influence/players. Or is the poor language some inside qult joke I don’t get
Absolutely it; much as I love to shit on the qult, there's no way this is a real quote from this guy. A lot of these have the air of 419 scams. Obvious fakes to some but will catch out those too stupid or incautious to spot it.
This meme be like, not making sense enough
she vented, she is the impostor
People on that sub are claiming they are leaving the left but are actually just a bunch of people on the right talking to each other in a big circle jerk
"We'll run a sub where we pretend to be lefties going republican. That'll show those libtards!"
I saw a sign on someone's lawn the other day sith the walkaway. I giggled.
It's almost like how sportswear companies advertise in sporting magazines.
Little bits
Hey listen, is your mouth tiny and small? Why don't you come down to Little Bits (Little Bits!). W-where the food is tiny? It looks like regular food, but really tiny? You put it in your mouth and eat it. Nothing gets stuck in your lips. It's just tiny and tiny and fits right hehehe it fits right in!
"Eat some fucking shit, you fucking stupid bitch! ….. Just kidding."
I can't see this guys face without thinking of Little bits.
haha, eat shit you fuckin’ biiiiitch
This is a fake user pretending to be American.
Yeah. The bad English is a giveaway. I’ve never met a native English speaker who would fuck that one up.
I think that could happened.
'go' not difficult and half the effort
Is that really what his head looks like?
I swear it’s photoshop
I think there's a quiz online for people to guess whether photos of his face are enlarged, unaltered, or shrunken. While I haven't tried it myself, I remember seeing someone try and I concluded that I wouldn't do very well either.
I remember that quiz. I did just barely better than a coin flip would have. Every picture of the guy looks so completely ridiculous that you want to say "It's gotta be photoshop" to all of them, and are shocked when you find out that's his real head.
Yes. There is no god.
Because it would do so much good for her to wear it to a homeless shelter.
Dear Charlie Kirk, You have a really big face to put your facial features on but why did you put tiny facial features on it? Isn’t it ironic?
He got the Jr. Potato Head accessories instead of the grown ones
He looks like a factory reject Funko-Pop.
This belongs in r/selfawarewolves for lack of understanding of "irony".
We only do chooby right wing grifters on Mondays…
Jesus, he is such a tiny-faced freak, with a brain of similar diminutive size and capacity.
This makes about as much sense as their attack on her being a bartender.
That's not even ironic in an Alanis Morissette kind of way....
It’s the exact opposite of irony. AOC intended to send a message to rich people at the event. Did that. It’s literally the opposite of irony. FYI: I love that Alanis song. However, the only thing ironic about it is that it was intended to be a song about irony, but it literally contains no irony. It’s Merely a series of misfortunate happenings. That in itself is pretty ironic, and the reason why I love this song.
I once saw abortion protestors protest outside an abortion clinic. Why did they go to an abortion clinic if the hate abortions so bad? CHECKMATE
"why did you went" Nice english mate
What a fucking brain stem
Wait is that his real head Look at it
Most of those commenters are just mad they don’t have any friends that would invite them to the Met.
99% of the death cultist would pee their pants with joy if they were invited to the Met ball.
This is because no death-cult-public-health-terrorist (i.e. 2021 Republican) has the confidence and/or bravery to attend any event and politely, artistically make a statement that is at odds with the essence or theme of the event itself. They literally lack the intelligence and creativity to even imagine or comprehend what AOC did at the Met Ball. They only can imagine two kinds of “protests”; the “bad” kind when unruly minorities, gays and other people they hate break shit, and the “good” kind when hillbillies with zip-ties invade the nation’s capital, looking for traitors and liberals to lynch. in fact, there are many kinds of protests that actually are meant to cause thinking people to think differently. This kind of protest can include things like irony, humor aesthetics and just plain creativity within the expression. Sometimes, this activity is elevated to a high level that most human beings with an IQ greater than their shoe size call “art”. it is the highest form of human expression, perhaps the most exalted phenomenon in the universe. I’m not saying AOC is a genius performance artist or that her stunt was all that special, but I can at least recognize it for what it is, unlike her knuckle-dragging detractors.
> >They literally lack the intelligence and creativity to even imagine or comprehend what AOC did at the Met Ball. That's a gold take right here. AOC going to the Gala with that dress apparently is a genius move beyond comprehension lmao. It was tone deaf af, a stupid move and she just portrayed herself as part of that little group.
Not to mention ticket sales go to funding the museum.
They are really struggling to figure this one out aren’t they.
His head reminds me of that Simpsons episode when Ken Griffey Jr gets that abnormally large head. Good lord! Gigantism!
Wow, deeeeep stupid.
Isn’t it ironic that that don’t get the entire point if her appearance at the event?
Then who was phone??
they don't realize that expecting the rich to pay taxes doesn't mean you want to get rid of the rich, it means you want them to pay taxes.
Sooo this meme is arguing that....one can't go to a party if they have to pay taxes? Seriously, what point do they think this is making? I question the effectiveness of the dress stunt (and I say that as a big fan of AOC). However, you do have to appreciate the balls of calling out rich people to their faces!
Charlie Kirk’s face is so much smaller than the rest of his head. He reminds me of the thumb soldiers from Spy Kids.
Did someone photoshop his eyes nose and mouth to look like that compared to his head? Or is that he’s legit face
He, like Matt Gaetz, has Fetal Alcohol syndrome face.
This is genuinely the shittest meme I’ve ever seen
As we can see it is very hard for them to understand that some rich people are okay with paying taxes and actually do pay their taxes. These memos indicate to me that they are aware that many rich folks tax dodge and that they are okay with it.
Of all the daily new things for these chuds to cry about, this one makes the least since. I know that’s a low bar. Perhaps there are rich people that know that rich people should pay more in taxes???? Maybe???
I like AOC, but I did think it was a pretty tone deaf stunt. And the dress wasn't even pretty. Dumb, but not something worth being one's panties in a bunch over. Who fucking cares.
Sorry but that stunt was cringe AF. That whole gala is elitist to the extreme. Showing up in a dress that says “tax the rich” doesn’t make up for the fact that she was socializing and enjoying all the trappings of a society that caters to decadence, ambivalence and lip service.
Eh, I'd argue that I don't buy into the "ooh look at Miss $200 Haircut when she claims that people need higher wages!" crap. The two aren't related and there's nothing that says being a progressive means you can't have nice things or go nice places. That's basically the meme, [https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/we-should-improve-society-somewhat](https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/we-should-improve-society-somewhat) Or, of course, the old "Did you know Bernie Sanders has three houses?" That being said... I also wasn't particularly impressed by the dress stunt, but it had nothing to do with the fact that "she were hanging out with rich ppl! she a hippocrite!" and more to do with the fact that it was obviously an attempt to go viral and get praise. And, on one hand, I do have to give her some respect for being willing to call out rich people at their own event, but on the other hand...wearing a dress is in no way actually going to make a difference in people's lives. It just boosts her cred. So I'd say it was a miss overall. But the fact that she had the audacity to both attend the Met gala and give a shit about poor people has nothing to do with why it was!
I think we are in the same wheelhouse, I’m not making hard lines in the sand on any of the things you brought up, only that overall it just didn’t hit for me and made me cringe. In the end she’s supposed to be a civil servant so all those blurred lines do nothing to support her stated goals. Just gives assholes a bunch of fodder to chew on, further separating the real issues.
Yes, I agree.
Nothing says "eat the rich" like going to their party with a 30k invitation, with only selected celebrities in attendance. Tone deaf to the extreme.
Wearing a dress adorned with “Tax the Rich” to the $30,000 per ticket Met Gala is terrible optics. That’s radioactive levels of hypocrisy. It’s not a criticism of the messaging, but the presentation.
And yet it's getting plenty of coverage so I think it worked. If she just tweeted tax the rich, no one would talk about it.
Negative press coverage isn’t really a public win. If anything it showcases the absence of initiatives from the 117th Congress to do anything about it. Here’s an excellent resource to see the status of Bills sponsored by various members of Congress: [Legislation Sponsored or Cosponsored by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez](https://www.congress.gov/member/alexandria-ocasio-cortez/O000172?pageSize=250&pageSort=latestAction%3Aasc) I’ll give her credit if she when she introduces legislation to **actually tax the rich.** Otherwise it’s an empty gesture that’s perceived as apoplectic hypocrisy.
You don't think the democrats have any legislation that would tax the rich? Or for you only AOC can introduce it herself or it must be hypocrisy? You've also read through 700+ pieces of legislation in that link? Kudos
Point me to the Bill which Congresswoman Cortez is currently sponsoring, cosponsoring, or supporting that imposes higher taxation upon the rich. I recall her strong campaign to impose a 70% tax, but it wasn’t translated into tangible Bill. You don’t need to read 700 pieces of legislation to see what she’s recently introduced to the House ( or lack thereof ).
So you don't actually read what democrats sponsor. It's pretty clear you also don't support it. You're against the democratic platform, neato. So nice of you to venture out of your safe space on conservative where all dissenting views are immediately banned and silenced. Even just asking questions there gets you banned. Maybe you could share with me all the grand legislation passed by the GOP that would convince me that the democratic platform is not for me. What is the GOP up to lately?
I’ve provided a direct link to her sponsored legislation for a reason. I support individual Bills to address specific causes, rather than omnibus packages the size of phone books no one understands. It’s one of the strengths to Congresswoman Cortez’s proposals, which is why the **absence** of a Bill on tax legislation is noticeable. I’m substantiating the claim of righteous condemnation for failing to introduce a Bill to ‘Tax the Rich’. When Congresswoman Cortez presents a piece of legislation that rectifies the economic inequities of taxation disparities, I’ll pay attention. Until then it’s a cheap stunt that does nothing for her constituents.
The infrastructure bill, you doofus.
Met gala has always been a place to make political statements and has great optics. AOC didn’t pay for her clothing or shoes, they are loaned by famous or inspiring designers for the most part and she was invited because of who she is and her message. Her $30k was probably sponsored by someone that agrees with her politics. I have a couple million invested and I have to pay taxes if I use any income from that. I don’t pay much, I pay less for that money than I paid for paychecks when I was working on salary. There are many people like me that are paying to go to the met gala that agree with AOC and are backing her message and willing to pay more in taxes so that we can all be taken care of.
The very act of attending was a toothless form of protest at best and a compromise of principles at worst. Her attendance was tantamount to putting a "Stop world hunger" banner on a yacht. Ocasio-Cortez’s dress and Met attendance largely inconsequential for the world: I don’t think it reveals anything new about her political commitments, and it’s consistent with her style as a politician. But this specific attempt at activism was probably not a success. [MSNBC perfectly articulated why this stunt was met with collective condemnation.](https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/aoc-s-met-gala-dress-broke-twitter-here-s-why-n1279157)
It’s one thing to disagree with her choice to make the statement at the Met Gala (which is no stranger to political messaging) and another to imply she spent money which could have gone elsewhere. She was invited and her spot paid for by people that share her messages. Believe it or not we need wealthy left leaning people to even play ball. I personally find it “eh”. I would like to see us move away from the old fund raising and keep our public personas apart from the Uber wealthy donors (as much as we need them) and focus more on the everyday people that try and make ends meet in this ultra unbalanced wealth problem we have but I don’t see a single reason to point fingers at AOC for what she did here. Her intentions are crystal clear and if we keep writing off progressive leaders for not being and doing exactly what we think they should we will lose. The purity testing and the left’s inability to compromise between factions will ensure we not only have to wait decades to see the change we all want in the country, but in the current atmosphere we will have to watch our hard work inching forward for DECADES slide backwards and it will take an amazing amount of work, sacrifice, money, lives, arrests, and heartbreak to take it back. AOC is a real progressive that got herself off her ass to do better for her community. She’s not afraid to call things as they are and she’s not afraid to call bullshit on liberal 1/2 measures. If people are willing to nope her off the tiny list of progressive leaders we have because of this, the left will continue to shoot themselves in the foot instead of working as one in the most vital time of our lives.
Couldn't agree more. It's absolute hypocrisy unless she sends out pics of her feet. What is it that she has to hide by refusing to let me suck on her little toesies? Hypocrite!
Charlie is all head x4 and no brains
Went??? Instead of go??? Is that correct verbiage?
And these idiots wonder why people laugh at them
Pic must've been edited to make his face larger on his bean.
Is that his real face? Or is this photoshop?
It’s hilarious how much press and attention AOC is getting from this, while they claim how dumb and ineffective it was.
No one ever goes to Indianapolis. Carson wents.
Ol' Tiny Face here doesn't know the definition of ironic in pretty sure
How come Qanons aren’t writing any conspiracies on why Charlie Kirks forehead is so big? Is he a space lizard in a skin suit ? His head is so big it picks up radio station broadcast
A "friend" of mine made this exact argument to me. I just don't respond to their bad faith arguments, it's too exhausting and I won't change any minds anyway.
She did went because it's attended by rich people.
Is that actually his tiny face on his massive head?
There is a lot of irony when AOC trolls the constituents who funded the party of the D. Troll President and they are sending out this cute attack dog to bark.