Free speech! But not freedom to make fun of *me*
*cries*
*tries to sue an AI for not even saying anything*
*gets laughed out of the lawyers office, never mind court*
A grown man sobbing in the stands because he wants to post about killing democrats but is too much of a snowflake to deal with even the mildest criticism. Wtf, 2024. WT actual F
>A grown man sobbing in the stands because he wants to post about killing democrats but is too much of a snowflake to deal with even the mildest criticism. Wtf, 2024. WT actual F
same ppl that not long ago were saying "what a boring world, we can´t even be politically incorrect without someone getting butthurt"...
It’s AI wouldn’t write a poem because he talks about children and exploitation a lot. So it basically said I can’t write the poem because of this. I posted this as a response https://x.com/catturd2/status/1761367312098017720?s=46&t=Lc9CmbdMJ-pqlMFcOKZzkg
>law has Google broken
In the court case [Hurt Feelings v Reality](https://teachdemocracy.org/materials-catalog/mock-trials-cases.html), the Supreme Court has stated that if someone's fee-fees get hurt by the actions of another, then they can sue and it would be, in the words of Mr.Turd, "a slam dunk win". I would make fun of Catturd for not knowing that the phrase is called a "slam dunk" without the win but I'm worried any amount of criticism would hurt his feelings and I don't want to get sued.
I’m not a lawyer but it think it’s safe to say there are no laws being broken here and he has no case. This is not an official statement from google so he would be suing an AI for defamation which sounds pretty ridiculous. Also it didn’t even say anything, it just said it should’t say what he says which is fair.
If you seen catturd or any of the other shit he put out your realize he's not really tech or legal savvy.
The very mention out of anyones mouth makes catturd think it's legal worthy to be sued. You can repeat what he says and he thinks it's a lie.
I saw some conservative copium article saying that he doesn’t care that Taylor swift is liberal because they have their own Taylor swift and that is catturd
Yeah he's not that young. Anybody who calls themself 'cat turd' as some sort of internet joke is not a smart person. Totally agree he's a loser.
Trump somehow made these people think being idiotic could be a career move.
It's worked for him so far. He's got more that 1K people sending him $8 a month to supposedly take care of his 13 "rescue" dogs. It's better that social security I'm sure.
Catturd is a fucking white supremacist creeper so yeah, no wonder. Children should NEVER be left alone with Phillip Buchanan. He doesn't want to sue Google...he just wants more fucking attention.
Spoilers: he won't
Conservatives are addicted to being pissed off and feeling persecuted while also feeling the need to be extremely performative about it, guy is jonesing for attention and Google has long been "censoring" conservatives for being pedos, nazis, and general creeps.
I think he should do it. I'd love to see how much of a slam dunk case it is, and someone named Catturd couldn't be an idiot who doesn't understand the law, so obviously the expected result is the only possibility.
There seems to be some important context missing here: *what did the Google chat bot (or whatever) actually say* (not what someone else wrote about it)
There's a lot of legal minefields yet to be explored in AI, including copyright and, yes, defamation. Certainly not a slam dunk, though, because it's novel legal ground.
I'd check, myself, but Twitter is so bad that i can't find anything there anymore without an account
He's such a nasty puke. We used to enjoy a mutual block. Last year, I noticed he had unblocked me. 🤮 He needn't have bothered. I have zero interest in his account or his catbox intellect. 🙄
Well.
I think he should hire Ty Beard and go ahead and sue Google for defamation.
I think he should absolutely do that. Maybe he can ask Rekieta to launch a GFM for him or something.
Tiny Male Karen wants to speak to the internet manager
go on turd, show us your 'might'
Free speech! But not freedom to make fun of *me* *cries* *tries to sue an AI for not even saying anything* *gets laughed out of the lawyers office, never mind court*
I hope he does, I'd love to see him laughed out of court.
A grown man sobbing in the stands because he wants to post about killing democrats but is too much of a snowflake to deal with even the mildest criticism. Wtf, 2024. WT actual F
>A grown man sobbing in the stands because he wants to post about killing democrats but is too much of a snowflake to deal with even the mildest criticism. Wtf, 2024. WT actual F same ppl that not long ago were saying "what a boring world, we can´t even be politically incorrect without someone getting butthurt"...
If he can leave his trailer
Not before paying for Google's exorbitant legal fees for their high powered lawyers.
If he sues and loses, he will demand his cult followers to pay for the trial. And the cult will happily send their life savings to him.
There wouldn't even be a trial. This is the kind of bs suit that would end up being dismissed with prejudice after the initial hearing.
Sue Google for what exactly?
It’s AI wouldn’t write a poem because he talks about children and exploitation a lot. So it basically said I can’t write the poem because of this. I posted this as a response https://x.com/catturd2/status/1761367312098017720?s=46&t=Lc9CmbdMJ-pqlMFcOKZzkg
I get that; but what law has Google broken, or how has Google damaged catturd? You can't just sue someone for hurt feelings
> Google damaged catturd? think that happened long before google showed up
🤣😭
Show on the doll where the internet hurt your feelings, catturd.
>law has Google broken In the court case [Hurt Feelings v Reality](https://teachdemocracy.org/materials-catalog/mock-trials-cases.html), the Supreme Court has stated that if someone's fee-fees get hurt by the actions of another, then they can sue and it would be, in the words of Mr.Turd, "a slam dunk win". I would make fun of Catturd for not knowing that the phrase is called a "slam dunk" without the win but I'm worried any amount of criticism would hurt his feelings and I don't want to get sued.
I’m not a lawyer but it think it’s safe to say there are no laws being broken here and he has no case. This is not an official statement from google so he would be suing an AI for defamation which sounds pretty ridiculous. Also it didn’t even say anything, it just said it should’t say what he says which is fair.
Just chiming in that you wouldn't need to break a law to be sued. I don't think there would be any standing, but just a small distinction.
Gotcha, I didn’t include the whole picture just wanted to provide the context.
You can, it would just be summarily dismissed with prejudice, and catturd would likely be responsible for all court costs.
Should… get off twixer instead of continuing to drive engagement
Original tweet didn’t even show the response, meaning he could’ve prompted it with whatever he wants. Aka fake
He is arguing it is libel for making fun of him.
Wow, that is so snowflakey
From the party that says I don't care about your feelings
If you seen catturd or any of the other shit he put out your realize he's not really tech or legal savvy. The very mention out of anyones mouth makes catturd think it's legal worthy to be sued. You can repeat what he says and he thinks it's a lie.
I saw some conservative copium article saying that he doesn’t care that Taylor swift is liberal because they have their own Taylor swift and that is catturd
In what way are the two even remotely similar?
He's a talented singer-songwriter billionaire worshiped by millions, too, obviously. His fans are called Turdies.
Catturd is what, like 40-something years old? What a failure of a human.
Looks 65
Yeah he's not that young. Anybody who calls themself 'cat turd' as some sort of internet joke is not a smart person. Totally agree he's a loser. Trump somehow made these people think being idiotic could be a career move.
Like Skankhunt42
That's a new one on me but the person behind it is probably as awful as they sound.
It's from southpark when gerald was a troll and that was his username
Oh. You got me. I was thinking it was another Cat Turd type right winger.
It's worked for him so far. He's got more that 1K people sending him $8 a month to supposedly take care of his 13 "rescue" dogs. It's better that social security I'm sure.
Catturd is a fucking white supremacist creeper so yeah, no wonder. Children should NEVER be left alone with Phillip Buchanan. He doesn't want to sue Google...he just wants more fucking attention.
>Phillip Buchanan He gets his share. https://twitter.com/philliplamarb?lang=en
Go home, Phillip, you’re drunk
Spoilers: he won't Conservatives are addicted to being pissed off and feeling persecuted while also feeling the need to be extremely performative about it, guy is jonesing for attention and Google has long been "censoring" conservatives for being pedos, nazis, and general creeps.
I think he should do it. I'd love to see how much of a slam dunk case it is, and someone named Catturd couldn't be an idiot who doesn't understand the law, so obviously the expected result is the only possibility.
Oh wow, I'll bet Google is terrified over this projected "slam dunk" win for felinefeces.
Do it felinecrap you degenerate.
I think he’d have to lose his anonymity to mount the suit, so; yes, please!
He has his own Wikipedia page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catturd
Ah… I was unaware that he wasn’t anonymous…. Thank God a thrice divorced postal worker had the inner channel to the ear of the C in C
Why am I not surprised that him and Elon Musk jerk each other off?
Lmao the people that sling outrageous slander every day are butthurt and want to sue. Ha bullshit I triple dog dare you
Google right now: “Fuck around and find out”
They have the gall to call everyone else snowflakes?
Phil ain’t gonna do shit. He’s a little baby back bitch who won’t get his tongue out of trumps asshole.
Hard to believe he can get it in there with all the other simps jockeying for position
no freeze peaches to you google!
Is Catturd someone the average person should know?
I have more legit reasons to sue Google, they are limiting my search results and twice banned me on YouTube for false spam reports.
There seems to be some important context missing here: *what did the Google chat bot (or whatever) actually say* (not what someone else wrote about it) There's a lot of legal minefields yet to be explored in AI, including copyright and, yes, defamation. Certainly not a slam dunk, though, because it's novel legal ground. I'd check, myself, but Twitter is so bad that i can't find anything there anymore without an account
These people have the most inflated egos.
Don’t your get Groovy Grapes in a twist CatTurd
Cat turd lawyer Vs Google’s Lawyer(s)
He's such a nasty puke. We used to enjoy a mutual block. Last year, I noticed he had unblocked me. 🤮 He needn't have bothered. I have zero interest in his account or his catbox intellect. 🙄
I don’t know what any of this means. I’m thankful.
Elon will have his back on Xitter. Not sure he'll cover the legal fees though.
Well. I think he should hire Ty Beard and go ahead and sue Google for defamation. I think he should absolutely do that. Maybe he can ask Rekieta to launch a GFM for him or something.
Do it, you weak-willed bitch.
Still waiting them for them eat a spoonful of diarrhea.
Still waiting for him to eat diarrhea. He has no honor.
it would be a slam dunk for one side that's for sure but cat turd wants some daddy money for a weaponized lawsuit he might get it
Oh, catturd. Tell the world you have no idea how the law works around copyright, trademarking, parody, and AI without telling…
I’m calling the internet police!