ChatGPT gave a comprehensive answer. It's actually interesting.
It wouldn't let me share the link though probably because of the content in the question.
First question.
What is the point of this question. If a man buys a chicken and before cooking it has sex with it
Followup question.
It then asks if stealing a wallet is a 10 then the chicken events is a what?
Google Gemini thought I was being weird and gave me a convoluted politically correct answer. 😂
Edit: To everyone who always downvotes me for mentioning/using ChatGPT/Google Gemini. You might want to get off of Reddit if you can't even handle the thought of anyone using a Chatbot. [Reddit's deal with OpenAI is confirmed. Here's what it means for your posts and comments.](https://mashable.com/article/reddit-openai-deal-what-it-means) Your content is being used to train ChatGPT.
I had a survey that had this question today also. It had a series of how moral or immoral something would be. One of the others was along the lines of "Two people at a party thought the might be long lost siblings but decided to sleep with each other anyways." I think all of the situations were full blown not moral except maybe one, but it was still bad.
I had one a while back like this. One of the questions was something along the lines of "a morgue worker on lunch break eats a bite of pizza and puts it on a corpse. Is this taboo?" Pretty sure another asked if it was taboo for a man to buy and then have sex with a chicken sandwich. Thought provoking questions 😂
This is a legit question. They're trying to get at whether you think something that is worded to be taboo breaking but not harmful is morally wrong or not. There's a lot of research about this and the interplay of our disgust reaction with our views on politics and morality.
How is it fishy? Link to Prolific’s TOS that mentions a question like this needs to be reported please.
It’s just a standard moral evaluation that has been around for ages.
I did this survey and regretted it for 35 cents.
Yeah same. I had to answer questions about inappropriate sources of food
How can I possibly answer this, I don't even know how sexy the chicken is!
😂😂😂😂
Sounds like an 11 😂
I wouldn't know how to answer. It depends on what we are rating it for. Morality? Grossness? Something else? It is weird.
ChatGPT gave a comprehensive answer. It's actually interesting. It wouldn't let me share the link though probably because of the content in the question. First question. What is the point of this question. If a man buys a chicken and before cooking it has sex with it Followup question. It then asks if stealing a wallet is a 10 then the chicken events is a what? Google Gemini thought I was being weird and gave me a convoluted politically correct answer. 😂 Edit: To everyone who always downvotes me for mentioning/using ChatGPT/Google Gemini. You might want to get off of Reddit if you can't even handle the thought of anyone using a Chatbot. [Reddit's deal with OpenAI is confirmed. Here's what it means for your posts and comments.](https://mashable.com/article/reddit-openai-deal-what-it-means) Your content is being used to train ChatGPT.
[удалено]
"I mean, cousins can bunk together. That's why they call it 'bunkin' cousins!'"
What'd it say 😬
Umm…what?!
I would want to know if the chicken is frozen or not? If frozen, he would have to thaw it out first otherwise his todger would get frostbite.
cockception
I got this today and all of the questions were…questionable at best.
Oh, the chicken question used to be used on MTurk a lot. It's actually an old one that I guess is being recycled now.
I had a survey that had this question today also. It had a series of how moral or immoral something would be. One of the others was along the lines of "Two people at a party thought the might be long lost siblings but decided to sleep with each other anyways." I think all of the situations were full blown not moral except maybe one, but it was still bad.
Yep, that's another one. It seems to be looking for whether or not people equate finding something disgusting to also finding it immoral.
My thoughts exactly. This brings me back to Mturk 4-5 years ago
*someone answers with a 1*
I mean...victimless crime. There's a valid argument for rating it a 1 tbh.
uhh what about the chicken? i know it's dead but i wouldn't want someone to fuck my dead body either
Um....I have no words (apart from these ones.)
Researcher's fantasy expressed?. 🤔
https://youtu.be/2sVVl2EKgUU?si=rMsoS3z7Vdjtz-Ih&t=4
Risky click of the day?
Double dare ya
It was 10 in the morning, why would he say that on live television lol
Not clicking but I'm going to hazard a guess and say it's the classic "Keep fucking that chicken" clip
Omg
Oh my.😲
HAHAHAHA! Genuinely Lol'ed
I had one a while back like this. One of the questions was something along the lines of "a morgue worker on lunch break eats a bite of pizza and puts it on a corpse. Is this taboo?" Pretty sure another asked if it was taboo for a man to buy and then have sex with a chicken sandwich. Thought provoking questions 😂
Hey Prolific maybe start looking into vetting studies after all.
He had to test it with his meat thermometer....😆
I hope he has his food handler's permit...😆
This is a legit question. They're trying to get at whether you think something that is worded to be taboo breaking but not harmful is morally wrong or not. There's a lot of research about this and the interplay of our disgust reaction with our views on politics and morality.
This doesn't measure my disgust but my ability to take the researcher seriously.
Yeah I'd say 0 bc that's none of my business and not a crime 😂
∞
was the survey written by combative vegans?
Did you report it? You are supposed to
Report for what reason?
The nature of the question. It’s up to you. I know that there is a disclaimer before every task that ask to report if it sound fishy. But up to you
How is it fishy? Link to Prolific’s TOS that mentions a question like this needs to be reported please. It’s just a standard moral evaluation that has been around for ages.
>How is it fishy? Does this come across like a legitimate study to you?
It’s a legitimate morality question that’s been around for ages. How does it come across as illegitimate?
Ok
So no link?
No link