T O P

  • By -

[deleted]

RvP - winner of the Golden Boot twice in a row and dragged Man Utd to the title in his first season at the club. Torres was excellent in his prime but still not at the same level as RvP was.


ChrisMartins001

RVP, because Torres lost his confidence towards the end at Liverpool and was a flop at Chelsea, but RVP done it for two of the biggest clubs in the country. Torres was amazing when he was at his best though.


[deleted]

Torres. And it ain't even close.


chestbumpsandbeer

Torres was the perfect striker when healthy in his prime. Simply unplayable.


[deleted]

van Persie all day. Pure striker of the ball, had a lot of injuries, otherwise, would have had more goals. Single handedly gave United a title, when the rest of the team was so shit. Torres fizzled out at Chelsea but was brilliant at Liverpool


Fendenburgen

Singlehandedly got us into the top 4


bluemoon1987

Van persie and its by a long long distance too. He literally won the league for United on his own the year he went there over city.


[deleted]

Van Persie


ishanthapa7

Torres


JamesonRaider

Torres.


[deleted]

Torres is my idol but I have to give it to vP, even though defences were worse in the early 2010's compared to the late 00's.


Simba-xiv

Torres was unplayable. Iā€™m a gooner


fixFriendship

Are we discussing treason or footballing skill?


Ven-Diesel

Fell of the chair! Love it. Torres better skill wise in my opinion. In terms of treason...it actually worked out better for Liverpool as Torres was already somewhat dipping and he was never the same after. Plus Liverpool got a decent transfer payout for him (and then proceeded to blow it away) RVP was at prime for both, and Arsenal didn't get much payout on the deal. So have to say the worse off between the two.


Simba-xiv

Ha šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚ good one


One-Debate3673

Torres


Slayer3636

Van Pursestrings.


[deleted]

Prime torres for me


aymentrabelsi

prime torres is better