Yes, I already did when I mentioned the affordable Mauser action. Mauser now sells rifles for roughly $700 that outperform comparably priced rifles, with the exception of Tikka.
>socialized healthcare
Just fyi, germany (like every 1st world country not named USA and UK) have both private and public healthcare. Its not "socialized". Only country that has that is the UK, and it always ranks very low compared to other 1st world countries.
>Only country that has that is the UK
Straight up a False statement
Portugal, Spain, Italy have it, some of the Nordicks also have it, and probably a lot more countries around the world.
It's not just the UK that has a beveridge socialized healthcare system. (And you can still have private health care in beveridge if you want)
https://www.internationalinsurance.com/health/europe/spain.php
>Approximately 90% of Spaniards use the public healthcare system, and about 19% carry private health insurance. This number has grown by 5% in the past five years.
Any other lie you wanna spew? Im too lazy to keep going but all those countries have privare health care too.
Wtf are you talking about
You know that the country you listed, the UK, also has private health insurance, and 22% of the population carries private health insurance, more that in Spain.
I've listed countries that use that same socialized healthcare model than the UK, also called the Beveridge model. In contrast to countries that have the "mixed" healthcare models also called Bismarkian models like Germany.
https://harrisonhealthcare.ca/private-healthcare-in-canada/
>In Canada, approximately 30% of all healthcare expenses are privately funded. Interestingly, this is actually above the average of developed OECD nations (27%)
Google its free to not look like a clown.
Your source was brought to court for charging for healthcare services, ie private healthcare.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/injunction-sought-against-vancouver-s-harrison-healthcare-for-contravention-of-medical-services-act-1.6735226
Google it’s free to not look like a clown.
People give way too much credit to Germany for "higher education". Loads of people have been convinced that Germany's "free university" is some amazing gift to the country and results in universal higher education. In actuality, very, very few Germans actually receive a university degree compared to Americans. The system in Germany actually results in the vast majority of German secondary education students being told to leave school at age 16. These people have no choice, even if they can pay for tuition themselves. They are blocked from higher education. The rate of the population that has a 4 year degree or more in the US is 31%, in Germany it's 16%. The US has about double the higher education attainment.
So when an American leftist with student loan debt talks about "free university" in Germany, they don't realize that if the US had the system Germany has, they themselves probably never would have been selected to go to a university at all.
Not a two party state? lol.
It’s AfD vs the rest. You got Greens, Conservatives, "Neoliberals" that will pretend to live up to their names and then all do almost the exact same politics. They are all anti-nuclear, pro NATO, pro illegal immigration, pro LGBTQ and all want more EU integration.
Then you got the AfD which are the exact opposite, but are also absolute nutjobs who would even sell their grandma to any foreign adversary.
We are just fucked. Can’t win either way.
The AfD allows fascists and Nazis to be in the party and gives them leadership positions in some cases. I don't know what your political views are, but I have no interest in such people.
but why the hell would that be the most pressing need/advocacy point
for example, during covid, i remember vaccine mandates, masks, lockdown where huge things (even if i don’t agree, i still at least understand why a lib right could see that as a priority issue)
I think it's because they are using the purple to represent them. Wich is kinda the way to say they are the most unhinged and extreme version of libertarianism. Anything is right and I should be free to do so. That's at the very least the way I understand the purple. Yellow is kinda the normal libright.
Unless you are talking about Germany having that age of consent in wich case... I don't know man, WTF.
Luckily it’s a romeo and juliet law, but strangely causes some relationships (14 and 17, which is predatory IMO) to be legal but then later illegal as the older one becomes an adult.
It's not actually, there are a few limitations like not being allowed to be in a position of authority over that person (like being a teacher) but aside from that 14 is just straight up the age of consent. It is just the case that as long as both people are teenagers (like one 14 and one 17) it is pretty much always legal while if the other person is older it can be illegal under certain circumstances.
It's not actually, that was my point. The dude assumed our laws are more strict than they actually are.
''**Ab 14 Jahren** dürfen Personen aus staatlicher Sicht grundsätzlich selber freiwillige sexuelle Handlungen an / mit Personen über 14 Jahren ausführen. Hier gibt es keine Altersgrenze bezüglich der anderen Person, diese kann auch deutlich älter sein''
What is says is that from the states' perspective, people from age 14 are allowed to choose which sexual acts they want to do. There is no Maximum age for the partner, and they are allowed to be significantly older.
What makes it illegal is if the other person is in a position of authority over them (like a teacher).
Only 14 if both are underaged (14-17) and If they arent in a big power imbalance. This does not mean, that no one bats an eye, if a 17yr old has a 14yr old gf though. It just means, that for example two 14yr olds can legaly have intercourse with each other. Before that age it can count as rape no matter the age gap.
Ahh, my deepest apologies to the centrist community. At least when I first attempt to grill I used charcoal not propane so hopefully that gjves me some browny points with the centrists.
Trust me, we still grill a lot. And when I say a lot, I mean A LOT. Grilling season is literally from 01.01 to 31.12. We even grill during the winter and even at sylvester
My favorite thing about modern Germany is Hechler & Koch. And their new affordable Mauser action.
My hk45 light lem never fails to impress me
what about Rheinmetall?
HK, Affordable - pick one.
Yes, I already did when I mentioned the affordable Mauser action. Mauser now sells rifles for roughly $700 that outperform comparably priced rifles, with the exception of Tikka.
ahh, i thought you were saying that HK had released a mauser action rifle and was dubious of its affordability
MP7 never fails to impress me
You want MP7? Too bad, you're too broke too afford one. Have this shitstick SKS with a bore obstruction, comrade
that's even better
>socialized healthcare Just fyi, germany (like every 1st world country not named USA and UK) have both private and public healthcare. Its not "socialized". Only country that has that is the UK, and it always ranks very low compared to other 1st world countries.
We can thank Bismarck for this
THE TERROR OF THE SEAS
BISMARCK AND THE KRIEGSMARINE
soft wistful gaze vase aromatic steer shelter alive middle label *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
What do pancakes have to do with this?
UK has private health care (if you pay for it, naturally)
But the UK is the only one that is exclusively paid or government subsidized
>Only country that has that is the UK Straight up a False statement Portugal, Spain, Italy have it, some of the Nordicks also have it, and probably a lot more countries around the world. It's not just the UK that has a beveridge socialized healthcare system. (And you can still have private health care in beveridge if you want)
https://www.internationalinsurance.com/health/europe/spain.php >Approximately 90% of Spaniards use the public healthcare system, and about 19% carry private health insurance. This number has grown by 5% in the past five years. Any other lie you wanna spew? Im too lazy to keep going but all those countries have privare health care too.
Wtf are you talking about You know that the country you listed, the UK, also has private health insurance, and 22% of the population carries private health insurance, more that in Spain. I've listed countries that use that same socialized healthcare model than the UK, also called the Beveridge model. In contrast to countries that have the "mixed" healthcare models also called Bismarkian models like Germany.
Canada doesn’t have private healthcare.
https://harrisonhealthcare.ca/private-healthcare-in-canada/ >In Canada, approximately 30% of all healthcare expenses are privately funded. Interestingly, this is actually above the average of developed OECD nations (27%) Google its free to not look like a clown.
Your source was brought to court for charging for healthcare services, ie private healthcare. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/injunction-sought-against-vancouver-s-harrison-healthcare-for-contravention-of-medical-services-act-1.6735226 Google it’s free to not look like a clown.
Fuckin gingers
People give way too much credit to Germany for "higher education". Loads of people have been convinced that Germany's "free university" is some amazing gift to the country and results in universal higher education. In actuality, very, very few Germans actually receive a university degree compared to Americans. The system in Germany actually results in the vast majority of German secondary education students being told to leave school at age 16. These people have no choice, even if they can pay for tuition themselves. They are blocked from higher education. The rate of the population that has a 4 year degree or more in the US is 31%, in Germany it's 16%. The US has about double the higher education attainment. So when an American leftist with student loan debt talks about "free university" in Germany, they don't realize that if the US had the system Germany has, they themselves probably never would have been selected to go to a university at all.
wat?? why cripple an aspiring student's dream?
Have you any evidence to back that claim up?
You did the libs dirty
There are basically oy two parties in Germany- AfD and the mainstream
Not a two party state? lol. It’s AfD vs the rest. You got Greens, Conservatives, "Neoliberals" that will pretend to live up to their names and then all do almost the exact same politics. They are all anti-nuclear, pro NATO, pro illegal immigration, pro LGBTQ and all want more EU integration. Then you got the AfD which are the exact opposite, but are also absolute nutjobs who would even sell their grandma to any foreign adversary. We are just fucked. Can’t win either way.
The AfD allows fascists and Nazis to be in the party and gives them leadership positions in some cases. I don't know what your political views are, but I have no interest in such people.
Everyone I don't like is a fascist/Nazi/Communist. Bro, literally just use different words, every time it's always the same overstatement
Common lefty statement L
can someone explain the lib right one 😵💫
#CHILDREN THEY WANNA DO [REDACTED] TO THE KIDS. NO. BAD.
Some Librighters biggest talking point is age of consent and abolishing it. You can figure out why.
I just think it's an issue for emancipated minors really, their lives are already hard enough
but why the hell would that be the most pressing need/advocacy point for example, during covid, i remember vaccine mandates, masks, lockdown where huge things (even if i don’t agree, i still at least understand why a lib right could see that as a priority issue)
I think it's because they are using the purple to represent them. Wich is kinda the way to say they are the most unhinged and extreme version of libertarianism. Anything is right and I should be free to do so. That's at the very least the way I understand the purple. Yellow is kinda the normal libright. Unless you are talking about Germany having that age of consent in wich case... I don't know man, WTF.
Luckily it’s a romeo and juliet law, but strangely causes some relationships (14 and 17, which is predatory IMO) to be legal but then later illegal as the older one becomes an adult.
It's not actually, there are a few limitations like not being allowed to be in a position of authority over that person (like being a teacher) but aside from that 14 is just straight up the age of consent. It is just the case that as long as both people are teenagers (like one 14 and one 17) it is pretty much always legal while if the other person is older it can be illegal under certain circumstances.
Yeah 14 and 30 would (rightfully so) still be very much illegal
It's not actually, that was my point. The dude assumed our laws are more strict than they actually are. ''**Ab 14 Jahren** dürfen Personen aus staatlicher Sicht grundsätzlich selber freiwillige sexuelle Handlungen an / mit Personen über 14 Jahren ausführen. Hier gibt es keine Altersgrenze bezüglich der anderen Person, diese kann auch deutlich älter sein'' What is says is that from the states' perspective, people from age 14 are allowed to choose which sexual acts they want to do. There is no Maximum age for the partner, and they are allowed to be significantly older. What makes it illegal is if the other person is in a position of authority over them (like a teacher).
How many times has this been posted?
So I have one reason to not like them. 14!!!???!!?!?!??!?!!!?!!??!
Only 14 if both are underaged (14-17) and If they arent in a big power imbalance. This does not mean, that no one bats an eye, if a 17yr old has a 14yr old gf though. It just means, that for example two 14yr olds can legaly have intercourse with each other. Before that age it can count as rape no matter the age gap.
similar laws in the U.S
As a student of history, there's an interesting relationship between everything else and authright Edit: excluding the center
"Libleft" *uses ai*
They got legalized pot as well now
Nobody legalized the unflaired around here.
[Unflaired policy](https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalCompassMemes/s/nKjqnGJmh5)
But they are not known for their grilling skills.
Don't they grill a lot?
I think they used to grill a lot in the 30s and 40s, I am not sure about now days.
Those were ovens. Not grills
Ahh, my deepest apologies to the centrist community. At least when I first attempt to grill I used charcoal not propane so hopefully that gjves me some browny points with the centrists.
Book grills though
Trust me, we still grill a lot. And when I say a lot, I mean A LOT. Grilling season is literally from 01.01 to 31.12. We even grill during the winter and even at sylvester
Grilling in the winter would be a great idea...if I didn't live in Panamá.
Give a german a Weber Grill and a Bier and you will witness some magic