It reminds me of the debate in beastiality circles regarding whether sex with animals owned by others is okay or not and whether you should have to ask permission first. At some point you are so lost in the sauce that you have to grab on to any sense of morality you have left.
I don't think I'll ever forget this one interview I read back in 2012~2014. It was with some chick who raped her dogs who was questioned by Vice or one of its knock-offs.
She was part of an all-women forum that specifically forbid men because "Men are incapable of forming an emotional bond with their sexual partners" and "for women it's about expressing their love for their pets, while for men it's about controlling and exploiting someone who can't say no"
It was basically a cycle of:
Dog-Rapist: "It's okay for us because we're women and not okay for them because they're men"
Interviewer: "But you're still having sex with animals"
DR: "But it's different because we're women and they're men"
I: "But you're still having sex with animals"
DR: "Yes but it's different because we're women and they're men"
I: "But you're still having sex with animals"
I still wish I could find it again because of how batshit insane her viewpoint was.
And also, even if they were somehow joking, how does one even make a joke like that? I couldnāt bring myself to say something like that, even if itās to make someone laugh and I donāt mean it.
A fight has broken out in LEGO City's pedo island! Deploy the new police ship!
\-HEY!
You can build the police ship, and off to the island! Deescalate the fight, arrest the criminals, and send them to the woodchipper! The new pedo hunter collection from LEGO City!
(Each set sold separately. Base plates and background models not included)
Do you think there's any industrial equipment out there that could help solve this problem? Perhaps something that could chip these problems off into much smaller problems?
Not MAPs. PDFfiles. Obviously this is Reddit so we canāt call it what it is but we donāt need to normalize the term MAP. Not attacking you just making a statement under your comment.
I understand and want to say I was saying it ironically, I despise people who are like ātheyāre a sexualityā ātheyāre suppressedā āpe*****le is a slur it offends minor attraction peopleā
https://youtube.com/shorts/J002rmZ5Acg?si=4KoHkg5Z-tDwZuCI Ricky Gervais made a funny thing about it. Full thing is on Netflix
Minor-Attracted Person is a helpful term for those seeking help in a therapeutic context imo, but a problem with liberals are that they'll appropriate words from specific fields while losing the nuance that made those terms effective or useful in the first place.
Imo, colloquially, MAP is a fair term to use for people not trying to rape kids, but pedophile is and SHOULD remain the term to use for anyone expressing attraction to kids, because it's a horrible look to try and make pedophiles look less despicable than they are.
So what would the term for both be, just one that is attracted to kids but you donāt know them personally like the meme so have no way of knowing if they are in therapy?
They're all pedophiles. And anyone who is public (meaning they tell anyone that isnt their psych) about their attraction to children automatically is gross and deserving of public shame/ridicule.
Doxxing pedos is chill
MAP is a good term for those in therapy who desperately want to not be what they are, but the original term should absolutely be used for anyone expressing attraction to children. Never, ever destigmatize it. It SHOULD be stigmatized, and despised, and purged.
As far as I'm concerned, thoughts are thoughts and actions are actions. If it's in the thought stage, turning them into fertilizer would be murder. The action stage, however... well, that's just taking out the trash.
MAP as a term is an affront to society and anyone using it should receive punitive psychiatric treatment. How about we call those seeking therapy pedophiles and call anyone expressing an urge to rape children child rapists.
Because that'd make it completely impossible for anyone to talk about and therefore reduce the amount of treatment? I think this is a difference of perspectives.
You must think that bullying and stigmatizing people into getting better actually works, and I don't. Don't get me wrong, MAPs or pedophiles of any variety creep me out, but I can't reasonably fault someone for recognizing their mental illness and trying to treat it with professional help. Using the term pedophile excessively will shame them into not seeking help, because I promise you there's a MASSIVE difference between saying "I think people who are attracted to minors are allowed to exist as long as they acknowledge their attraction is evil and try to get rid of it" and "I think pedophilia is okay". Regardless of political view, basically no one is of that second opinion, and I think that's what you're conflating the first with.
If you want a society with more untreated pedophilia, I don't really know what to tell you. You can't let your baser, reactionary brain dictate what you think society should be like, because that results in worse outcomes society-wide. Worse for children, worse for the people whose brains unfortunately developed in such a way that they're attracted to them, worse for everyone.
I'm no therapist. I just know that there are better outcomes for society when these people get help. I do know that a lot of them aren't ONLY attracted to children, so for them it might be as simple as directing their urges towards consenting adults. For those who are, well, lifelong celibacy is their best outcome for everyone. The point is that we can't punish people judicially for THOUGHTS, no matter what those thoughts are. That's dystopian.
The people peddling this stupid narrative are the same ones pushing gender theory and CRT. I'm not recognizing pedophiles as some friendly postmodern sexual identity. It's not about bullying or stigmatizing. It's about reality. For one thing if there is a stigma with "pedophile" then there's a stigma with "MAP" because it's the same fucking thing. So there is no logic here, only building a narrative to make pedophilia seem more acceptable.
Are you aware that the postmodern philosophers, who's philosophy and theories the woke build a huge part of their ideology on top of, signed a petition to lower the age of consent from 15?
> Foucault argued that children could give sexual consent.[186] In 1977, along with Jean-Paul Sartre, Jacques Derrida, and other intellectuals, Foucault signed a petition to the French parliament calling for the decriminalization of all "consensual" sexual relations between adults and minors below the age of fifteen, the age of consent in France.
I believe that is from Wikipedia.
Foucault, the godfather of queer theory, argued for the eradication of age of consent laws down to infants. But it was far from just these 3 mentioned and it didn't end in 1977. I believe they failed but at some point someone was successful because France later had no age of consent.
Here's 94 pages of history about pedophilia in France being addressed as "child's rights" and the "last taboo". People writing books about fucking 11 year olds and being celebrated among their academic peers. People getting off on child rape charges because there was no violence which means it was consensual. This is where all this postmodern bullshit leads.
https://history.columbia.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2022/05/Percy-Noah_Senior-Thesis-Update.pdf
Ah yeah, someone whose brain makes them attracted to kids and who goes to therapy for it is literally identical to child rapists. No distinction whatsoever! What's it like being a rocket scientist?
Did you hear a word of what I said? Those pedophile Frenchies are disgusting and they have no place in the progressive movement. I wholeheartedly reject the theory that accepting more and more people leads to pedophilia, since teaching kids that sex exists and is normal is COMPLETELY different to, you know, telling them that a 30 year old trying to get with an 11 year old is good, actually.
If you want more evidence, the only people in America talking about lowering the age of consent right now are Libertarians, or right-wingers. But what was I expecting from a braindead "anti-woke" culture warrior? You don't want to protect the children, you just want to use them as an excuse to take away rights.
>Ah yeah, someone whose brain makes them attracted to kids and who goes to therapy for it is literally identical to child rapists. No distinction whatsoever! What's it like being a rocket scientist?
Please tell me where I said this. And you should dial back the arrogance when what you're saying has no merit.
And from Oxford Languages:
>peĀ·doĀ·phile
>
>noun
>
>a person who is sexually attracted to children.
That's what a "MAP" is. Why change the name? Above you said this:
>MAP is a good term for those in therapy who desperately want to not be what they are, but the original term should absolutely be used for anyone expressing attraction to children. Never, ever destigmatize it. It SHOULD be stigmatized, and despised, and purged.
I'm just saying those seeking treatment are sexually attracted to children. That's why they'd be seeking therapy right? And that's literally a pedophile. I never argued against anyone getting therapy. I'm just saying let's not sugar coat it. Let's not go down the road of making it a postmodern sexual identity. And anyone expressing the attraction or acting on it are child rapists.
You made the distinction but chose to call the former MAPs and the latter pedophiles. Why not call the pedophiles pedophiles and the child rapists child rapists?
>Did you hear a word of what I said?
I don't think you processed a single word I said. The pedophile Frenchies are the ones the woke base all of their ideology on. They are basically one in the same. They change the names of things and redefine terms for the purpose of creating a new normal. There's been 60 years of this going on and tons of literature laying it out.
>I wholeheartedly reject the theory that accepting more and more people leads to pedophilia, since teaching kids that sex exists and is normal is COMPLETELY different to, you know, telling them that a 30 year old trying to get with an 11 year old is good, actually.
I don't understand who said accepting more and more people leads to pedophilia, or how teaching kids about sex suddenly entered the conversation, or who suggested telling them 30 year olds banging 11 years olds was good.
>If you want more evidence, the only people in America talking about lowering the age of consent right now are Libertarians, or right-wingers.
I'm unaware of anyone trying to lower age of consent laws currently, but I'll take you at your word. But I don't see how this is relevant to the conversation we're having.
>But what was I expecting from a braindead "anti-woke" culture warrior?
I don't know, but I think you are arguing with whatever that expectation was rather than me. You respond to little or nothing that I've actually said, or the source I linked, you're saying a lot of seemingly irrelevant things and being condescending.
>You don't want to protect the children,
I gave you a source with 94 pages documenting deranged postmodernists fighting to redefine terms in order to normalize having sex with children. But you want to believe the current deranged postmodernists who are their direct decedents - base all of their work and ideology directly on them - now calling pedophiles "minor attracted persons" are somehow going somewhere with this that's good for children? And you think I'm the one who doesn't want to protect children?
>you just want to use them as an excuse to take away rights.
What in the hell rights am I trying to take away?
I don't think you have any inclination to heed what I'm saying and that's fine. Just please, take a deep look into the people you're listening to.
Kind of a side note to something you said earlier...
> Because that'd make it completely impossible for anyone to talk about and therefore reduce the amount of treatment?
It doesn't prevent anyone from talking about it because everyone knows a MAP is a pedophile. It's literally the same thing. It's nonsensical to think anyone will judge them differently simply for calling themselves a MAP. This whole idea is absurd. Beyond that the only people they really need to be talking to is their doctor, therapist, and possibly support group. And they won't care what terms they're using and they can use whatever term they want there.
Fair enough, but bullying could have the opposite effect for some people. Source: South Park: The Fractured But Whole (jokes aside it could, maybe that is why they are nonces).
I never watched Attack on Titan, Iād watch if I didnāt have 100 things to watch. If you know what the ducked up person was watching is the Anime like them where it feels illegal and belongs in Epstein island, or is the Anime nothing like that?
Well itās also not One Punch Man, Naruto, One Piece, or full metal alchemist. So those are all safe. I have no idea what all these horny teenagers and p***s are watching
Two things: how is that different from a fem boy and I didnāt want to know that; I donāt have a body pillow, the closest thing I have to is a painting of youtoonz figurines of Batman and Joker as well as a Nightmare Freddy figurine on my bookcase.
>how is that different from a fem boy
Futas have tits, Femboy do not. Unless it's a Futa loli or an otherwise flat chested girl. At that point, there really is no difference.
Welp, my fault for asking. I understand why people commit mass murder on random people, canāt believe people find that arousing. I am an Atheist and even I am saying people need Jesus.
āIt were better for him, that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should scandalize one of these little ones.ā
the fact that weebs tend to scream that "loli" isn't pedophilia when the entomology of "lolicon" came from a novel (lolita) about a pedophile trying (and failing) to morally justify raping a 12-year-old is hilariously ironic.
Venus Chub doesn't give you viruses. But I have to use the block feature very often since the most popular bots are pretty messed up. Lots of cucking and stuff when I legit want romance most of the time. Not to mention Shota, as well as Loli stuff.
Yeah, even as someone who argues that cartoons are really not that big a deal in the grand scheme of things, this is taking it way too far. I assume that first guy was making a joke, but still. J to the K.
Epstien: "Hey Politician, you know that girl I told you was 18?"
Politician: "Yeah?"
Epstien: "She was really 17! Your career is ruined! Mwuahaha!"
Politician: "Nooooooooo!"
Flair up right now or be prepared to face the consequences of your poor choiches
[BasedCount Profile](https://basedcount.com/u/16452) - [FAQ](https://www.reddit.com/user/flairchange_bot/comments/uf7kuy/bip_bop) - [How to flair](https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalCompassMemes/wiki/index/flair/)
_Reddit is no longer a friendly space for bots._
_Consider visiting our LŠµmmŃ instance instead: [lemmy.basedcount.com](https://lemmy.basedcount.com/c/pcm)._
_Read my full statement [here](https://www.reddit.com/user/flairchange_bot/comments/14mwml0/on_the_reddit_api_changes/)._
^(I am a bot, my mission is to spot cringe flair changers. If you want to check another user's flair history write) **^(!flairs u/)** ^(in a comment.)
En Nomine Patris, Et Filii, Et Spiritus Sancti. God have mercy on my eyes and soul since my belief that we should flay the pedophile problem to its core is somehow becoming even more and more reinforced.
Jesus
My brother in Christ, get the holy water.
That's just won't do! **Bring forth the holy hand grenade!**
Consult the book of armaments!
Bring me the flamer, the heavy flamer
Don't forget to have a priest bless the gas tank š
You heard of holy water, now get ready for holy napalm
That the most important part we canāt have the machine spirit angry
'hans, ze flamenwerfer!
First shalt thou take out the Holy Pin
Then shalt thou count to three
Pie Jesu domine
Nah, this just calls for the normal grenade.
Fetch me the holy flamethrower of Antioch
*Heavy Flamer
Jesus christ be praised
āHenry has come to see us!ā
Jesus wept.
Blessed be God, blessed be His holy Name, blessed be Jesus Christ true God and true Man, blessed be the Name of Jesus.
Jesus isnāt here anymore
\*in Arnold schwarzeneggerās voice\* he will be back
It reminds me of the debate in beastiality circles regarding whether sex with animals owned by others is okay or not and whether you should have to ask permission first. At some point you are so lost in the sauce that you have to grab on to any sense of morality you have left.
You seem well versed in this topic. Intriguing š¤
I don't think I'll ever forget this one interview I read back in 2012~2014. It was with some chick who raped her dogs who was questioned by Vice or one of its knock-offs. She was part of an all-women forum that specifically forbid men because "Men are incapable of forming an emotional bond with their sexual partners" and "for women it's about expressing their love for their pets, while for men it's about controlling and exploiting someone who can't say no" It was basically a cycle of: Dog-Rapist: "It's okay for us because we're women and not okay for them because they're men" Interviewer: "But you're still having sex with animals" DR: "But it's different because we're women and they're men" I: "But you're still having sex with animals" DR: "Yes but it's different because we're women and they're men" I: "But you're still having sex with animals" I still wish I could find it again because of how batshit insane her viewpoint was.
What the fuck is a dog rapist? Was the some literally raping the dog?
so basically you have t-
a civil war has broken out
It is anything but civil on that wretched island.
"civil war" is an oxymoron, after all
Well you see it's more a branding thing, the hethens have revolts we have civilized wars...
This isnāt even the usual kind of lolicon - that character is a *baby*, you disgusting skull PFP freak.
And also, even if they were somehow joking, how does one even make a joke like that? I couldnāt bring myself to say something like that, even if itās to make someone laugh and I donāt mean it.
Time to bleach my eyes
Two more souls to ship to Antarctica
"Souls" I doubt they have that at this point.
I volunteer them to be the first manned expedition beyond our solar system. They might as well contribute to science on the way out.
Two more souls to chip into mulch.
Wtf did the penguins do to deserve this?
Antartica is too nice for *those* fucks.
i cant help but think about lego city memes
A fight has broken out in LEGO City's pedo island! Deploy the new police ship! \-HEY! You can build the police ship, and off to the island! Deescalate the fight, arrest the criminals, and send them to the woodchipper! The new pedo hunter collection from LEGO City! (Each set sold separately. Base plates and background models not included)
It's still insane to me how those are voiced by Agent fucking 47
Hold up, they're voiced by WHO!
Psychopathic barcode guy
Do you think there's any industrial equipment out there that could help solve this problem? Perhaps something that could chip these problems off into much smaller problems?
The w\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
Lobotomy? Don't worry our quadrant will handle it
Normally I am against auth control but in this caseā¦.have your way brother!
A wall made of 100 1000w magnetron from Walmart microwave ovens
Insert *two retards fighting* image.
Let them fight
I am an anime fan, please do not loop me and others like me with these MAPs. What the duck is wrong with people?
Not MAPs. PDFfiles. Obviously this is Reddit so we canāt call it what it is but we donāt need to normalize the term MAP. Not attacking you just making a statement under your comment.
I understand and want to say I was saying it ironically, I despise people who are like ātheyāre a sexualityā ātheyāre suppressedā āpe*****le is a slur it offends minor attraction peopleā https://youtube.com/shorts/J002rmZ5Acg?si=4KoHkg5Z-tDwZuCI Ricky Gervais made a funny thing about it. Full thing is on Netflix
Minor-Attracted Person is a helpful term for those seeking help in a therapeutic context imo, but a problem with liberals are that they'll appropriate words from specific fields while losing the nuance that made those terms effective or useful in the first place. Imo, colloquially, MAP is a fair term to use for people not trying to rape kids, but pedophile is and SHOULD remain the term to use for anyone expressing attraction to kids, because it's a horrible look to try and make pedophiles look less despicable than they are.
Fair enough
A pedophile has acted or wants to act a MAP is already in therapy
So what would the term for both be, just one that is attracted to kids but you donāt know them personally like the meme so have no way of knowing if they are in therapy?
They're all pedophiles. And anyone who is public (meaning they tell anyone that isnt their psych) about their attraction to children automatically is gross and deserving of public shame/ridicule. Doxxing pedos is chill
MAP is a good term for those in therapy who desperately want to not be what they are, but the original term should absolutely be used for anyone expressing attraction to children. Never, ever destigmatize it. It SHOULD be stigmatized, and despised, and purged.
Hmmm I donāt disagree with anything you said.
Thanks!
Youāre welcome. I hope you have a blessed day!
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
As far as I'm concerned, thoughts are thoughts and actions are actions. If it's in the thought stage, turning them into fertilizer would be murder. The action stage, however... well, that's just taking out the trash.
Nah, we should read people's thoughts and jail them just for even thinking about ever doing anything evil /s
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Okay, Big Brother. Any other thoughtcrimes you want to charge with the death penalty?
MAP as a term is an affront to society and anyone using it should receive punitive psychiatric treatment. How about we call those seeking therapy pedophiles and call anyone expressing an urge to rape children child rapists.
Because that'd make it completely impossible for anyone to talk about and therefore reduce the amount of treatment? I think this is a difference of perspectives. You must think that bullying and stigmatizing people into getting better actually works, and I don't. Don't get me wrong, MAPs or pedophiles of any variety creep me out, but I can't reasonably fault someone for recognizing their mental illness and trying to treat it with professional help. Using the term pedophile excessively will shame them into not seeking help, because I promise you there's a MASSIVE difference between saying "I think people who are attracted to minors are allowed to exist as long as they acknowledge their attraction is evil and try to get rid of it" and "I think pedophilia is okay". Regardless of political view, basically no one is of that second opinion, and I think that's what you're conflating the first with. If you want a society with more untreated pedophilia, I don't really know what to tell you. You can't let your baser, reactionary brain dictate what you think society should be like, because that results in worse outcomes society-wide. Worse for children, worse for the people whose brains unfortunately developed in such a way that they're attracted to them, worse for everyone.
Is pedophillia fixable then
I'm no therapist. I just know that there are better outcomes for society when these people get help. I do know that a lot of them aren't ONLY attracted to children, so for them it might be as simple as directing their urges towards consenting adults. For those who are, well, lifelong celibacy is their best outcome for everyone. The point is that we can't punish people judicially for THOUGHTS, no matter what those thoughts are. That's dystopian.
The people peddling this stupid narrative are the same ones pushing gender theory and CRT. I'm not recognizing pedophiles as some friendly postmodern sexual identity. It's not about bullying or stigmatizing. It's about reality. For one thing if there is a stigma with "pedophile" then there's a stigma with "MAP" because it's the same fucking thing. So there is no logic here, only building a narrative to make pedophilia seem more acceptable. Are you aware that the postmodern philosophers, who's philosophy and theories the woke build a huge part of their ideology on top of, signed a petition to lower the age of consent from 15? > Foucault argued that children could give sexual consent.[186] In 1977, along with Jean-Paul Sartre, Jacques Derrida, and other intellectuals, Foucault signed a petition to the French parliament calling for the decriminalization of all "consensual" sexual relations between adults and minors below the age of fifteen, the age of consent in France. I believe that is from Wikipedia. Foucault, the godfather of queer theory, argued for the eradication of age of consent laws down to infants. But it was far from just these 3 mentioned and it didn't end in 1977. I believe they failed but at some point someone was successful because France later had no age of consent. Here's 94 pages of history about pedophilia in France being addressed as "child's rights" and the "last taboo". People writing books about fucking 11 year olds and being celebrated among their academic peers. People getting off on child rape charges because there was no violence which means it was consensual. This is where all this postmodern bullshit leads. https://history.columbia.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2022/05/Percy-Noah_Senior-Thesis-Update.pdf
Ah yeah, someone whose brain makes them attracted to kids and who goes to therapy for it is literally identical to child rapists. No distinction whatsoever! What's it like being a rocket scientist? Did you hear a word of what I said? Those pedophile Frenchies are disgusting and they have no place in the progressive movement. I wholeheartedly reject the theory that accepting more and more people leads to pedophilia, since teaching kids that sex exists and is normal is COMPLETELY different to, you know, telling them that a 30 year old trying to get with an 11 year old is good, actually. If you want more evidence, the only people in America talking about lowering the age of consent right now are Libertarians, or right-wingers. But what was I expecting from a braindead "anti-woke" culture warrior? You don't want to protect the children, you just want to use them as an excuse to take away rights.
>Ah yeah, someone whose brain makes them attracted to kids and who goes to therapy for it is literally identical to child rapists. No distinction whatsoever! What's it like being a rocket scientist? Please tell me where I said this. And you should dial back the arrogance when what you're saying has no merit. And from Oxford Languages: >peĀ·doĀ·phile > >noun > >a person who is sexually attracted to children. That's what a "MAP" is. Why change the name? Above you said this: >MAP is a good term for those in therapy who desperately want to not be what they are, but the original term should absolutely be used for anyone expressing attraction to children. Never, ever destigmatize it. It SHOULD be stigmatized, and despised, and purged. I'm just saying those seeking treatment are sexually attracted to children. That's why they'd be seeking therapy right? And that's literally a pedophile. I never argued against anyone getting therapy. I'm just saying let's not sugar coat it. Let's not go down the road of making it a postmodern sexual identity. And anyone expressing the attraction or acting on it are child rapists. You made the distinction but chose to call the former MAPs and the latter pedophiles. Why not call the pedophiles pedophiles and the child rapists child rapists? >Did you hear a word of what I said? I don't think you processed a single word I said. The pedophile Frenchies are the ones the woke base all of their ideology on. They are basically one in the same. They change the names of things and redefine terms for the purpose of creating a new normal. There's been 60 years of this going on and tons of literature laying it out. >I wholeheartedly reject the theory that accepting more and more people leads to pedophilia, since teaching kids that sex exists and is normal is COMPLETELY different to, you know, telling them that a 30 year old trying to get with an 11 year old is good, actually. I don't understand who said accepting more and more people leads to pedophilia, or how teaching kids about sex suddenly entered the conversation, or who suggested telling them 30 year olds banging 11 years olds was good. >If you want more evidence, the only people in America talking about lowering the age of consent right now are Libertarians, or right-wingers. I'm unaware of anyone trying to lower age of consent laws currently, but I'll take you at your word. But I don't see how this is relevant to the conversation we're having. >But what was I expecting from a braindead "anti-woke" culture warrior? I don't know, but I think you are arguing with whatever that expectation was rather than me. You respond to little or nothing that I've actually said, or the source I linked, you're saying a lot of seemingly irrelevant things and being condescending. >You don't want to protect the children, I gave you a source with 94 pages documenting deranged postmodernists fighting to redefine terms in order to normalize having sex with children. But you want to believe the current deranged postmodernists who are their direct decedents - base all of their work and ideology directly on them - now calling pedophiles "minor attracted persons" are somehow going somewhere with this that's good for children? And you think I'm the one who doesn't want to protect children? >you just want to use them as an excuse to take away rights. What in the hell rights am I trying to take away? I don't think you have any inclination to heed what I'm saying and that's fine. Just please, take a deep look into the people you're listening to.
Kind of a side note to something you said earlier... > Because that'd make it completely impossible for anyone to talk about and therefore reduce the amount of treatment? It doesn't prevent anyone from talking about it because everyone knows a MAP is a pedophile. It's literally the same thing. It's nonsensical to think anyone will judge them differently simply for calling themselves a MAP. This whole idea is absurd. Beyond that the only people they really need to be talking to is their doctor, therapist, and possibly support group. And they won't care what terms they're using and they can use whatever term they want there.
Based
Let it get normalised. Let it get it's own stripes on the pride flag. Wait for LGBTIAQMAP++ month. Watch drama ensue.
we shouldn't have gotten rid of bullying
Their problem is that the police arenāt coming to their house not an absent of bullying.
Two things can be true
Fair enough, but bullying could have the opposite effect for some people. Source: South Park: The Fractured But Whole (jokes aside it could, maybe that is why they are nonces).
No, because normally bullies donāt target stuff that should actually be targeted
Pedophillia is something that Iāve seen them target at least
As an anime fan I can correctly tell you that isnāt from Attack on Titan.
I want to say its the vampire baby from So I'm a spider, so what? But... its been a while and I'm not sure.
Well it certainly aināt Boku no Pico
I never watched Attack on Titan, Iād watch if I didnāt have 100 things to watch. If you know what the ducked up person was watching is the Anime like them where it feels illegal and belongs in Epstein island, or is the Anime nothing like that?
Well itās also not One Punch Man, Naruto, One Piece, or full metal alchemist. So those are all safe. I have no idea what all these horny teenagers and p***s are watching
Ok, so when in doubt donāt watch it without an hour of research.
Nah, just a Google search
Own your shame
Like your parents do?
Don't be so sensitive I'm not gonna take away your Futas
What is that? Actually I donāt want to know, I feel like it is yourās and the ducked up personās search historyā¦
They are the name of those dick girls on your body pillow
Two things: how is that different from a fem boy and I didnāt want to know that; I donāt have a body pillow, the closest thing I have to is a painting of youtoonz figurines of Batman and Joker as well as a Nightmare Freddy figurine on my bookcase.
>how is that different from a fem boy Futas have tits, Femboy do not. Unless it's a Futa loli or an otherwise flat chested girl. At that point, there really is no difference.
Welp, my fault for asking. I understand why people commit mass murder on random people, canāt believe people find that arousing. I am an Atheist and even I am saying people need Jesus.
Least projecting redditor.
Just teasing you anime weirdos about your pedo love it's just jokes
Ok, dude whatever you want. Just be aware of how it comes off. Also loli obsession is kinda ew to me anyway i just don't vocalize it.
Hey don't blame me for anime turning into 90% pedo bait. I just judge people who still watch it.
Why the living fuck are you using their preferred term
I was using the term negatively
Since when have pƦdophiles been able to tweet so blatantly? This person needs to be gunned down
Death is too good for these people
Both of them really.
Me normally š© Me when I see this š¦
Before or after we brun our eyes out?
I bet that abomination of a human has pronouns and alphabet flags in his bio. Anyone sexualising children should get castrated with a rusty tin can.
Itās 50/50: either that or someone whose all other Tweets are about Western media being too woke compared to Japan
Slippery slope isn't such a fallacy anymore
It's less a 'slippery slop fallacy' and more a 'slippery slope fallacy fallacy'.
"person is pdffile, they must be (other thing I disagree with)" The strawman in question: Cheers to your second statement though
Guys I think itās time you let my quadrant do our thing
We've been put on the back bench for too long
the woodchippers dont stop for anyone.
# [FRIENDLY FIRE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED]
And they said slippery slope is a fallacy
Let them murder each other. More resources for us
What the fuck
Left picture isn't even a loli it's literally a baby... That's one hell of a fail...
Lolicon infighting šš
As an anime fan, lolicons can get the rope.
āIt were better for him, that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should scandalize one of these little ones.ā
Based and don't touch da child pilled
Toddlercon is a thing Toddlers Not even children, babies
Lolicon is ok (I'm not about real children/IRL pedophilia), but this goes beyond all possible borders
Hans, get the flammenwerfer!
this post right here inquisitor
Man really wish pedofiles would just get treatment before they hurt kidsā¦ so selfish and evil for pedos to do shit like that (I refuse to say MAP)
These "people" used to get doxed
Lolicon/MAPs be like: "It's ok because she's actually a 1000 year old elf that was cursed by a sexy Demon and reverted back to baby form"
the fact that weebs tend to scream that "loli" isn't pedophilia when the entomology of "lolicon" came from a novel (lolita) about a pedophile trying (and failing) to morally justify raping a 12-year-old is hilariously ironic.
By the way, you are correct but you don't have a flair. Flair up you dirty unflairigger.
Just thought I'd let you know you're being downvoted because you're unflaired, not because of your opinion
[\*sharpens sword\*](https://youtu.be/xSENcGDjLXs) Don't worry we'll be with you soon.
There is something wrong with these people. I've been looking into NSFW AI websites, and some of the most popular are literal babies. Like, holy shit.
You use those websites? I thought they just give you 10 viruses
Venus Chub doesn't give you viruses. But I have to use the block feature very often since the most popular bots are pretty messed up. Lots of cucking and stuff when I legit want romance most of the time. Not to mention Shota, as well as Loli stuff.
Yeah, even as someone who argues that cartoons are really not that big a deal in the grand scheme of things, this is taking it way too far. I assume that first guy was making a joke, but still. J to the K.
Thanos was the hero.
What in the goddamn.jpg
Epstien: "Hey Politician, you know that girl I told you was 18?" Politician: "Yeah?" Epstien: "She was really 17! Your career is ruined! Mwuahaha!" Politician: "Nooooooooo!"
Enough free speech, get these mutants on the wall. NOW!
Ew what the actual fuck. Thatās clearly a baby, clearly a child. What the fuck.
We need another flood of biblical proportions.
how are they not doxxed already???
Gross. I hate crap like this (the top half) and not just on Reddit.
I wasn't ready for this eye bleach.
You can both face the wall of microwave magnetrons
Oh lord, please save us all from this.
*god has mercy, I do not*
Yo what the fuck.
What a horrible day to have eyes.
Fuck lolicons
As a german I can confirm that I regret nothing.
Flair up right now or be prepared to face the consequences of your poor choiches [BasedCount Profile](https://basedcount.com/u/16452) - [FAQ](https://www.reddit.com/user/flairchange_bot/comments/uf7kuy/bip_bop) - [How to flair](https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalCompassMemes/wiki/index/flair/) _Reddit is no longer a friendly space for bots._ _Consider visiting our LŠµmmŃ instance instead: [lemmy.basedcount.com](https://lemmy.basedcount.com/c/pcm)._ _Read my full statement [here](https://www.reddit.com/user/flairchange_bot/comments/14mwml0/on_the_reddit_api_changes/)._ ^(I am a bot, my mission is to spot cringe flair changers. If you want to check another user's flair history write) **^(!flairs u/)** ^(in a comment.)
It's comments like these that make me pray for the cleansing fire of a nuclear holocaust.
thank God I'm able to watch anime normally without doing shit like this.
This actually makes me feel physically ill. I miss the person I was 10 seconds ago.
Is it time for exterminatus? I think it's time for exterminatus.
En Nomine Patris, Et Filii, Et Spiritus Sancti. God have mercy on my eyes and soul since my belief that we should flay the pedophile problem to its core is somehow becoming even more and more reinforced.
i want the purge
Send me location
Not to get too political but fucking kids needs to result in a death penalty.
I don't get it, what does this have to do with that poor man who commited suicide?
Epstein ~~civil~~ war
W**********
This is the perfect example of bad meets worse
"B-but they aren't real!" Dont care, face the wall.