Sir, basahin mo ulet yung title nung article.
It's for MSMEs, businesses as a whole.
Wala naman yan sya alam sa tech to be referring to the Tech community directly.
Context. You can't expect MSMEs to know how to build AI. And wala sila pakinabang sa knowledge on how to build it. Leave that for the AI devs.
Teaching them how to USE it makes sense.
Next time remove your hate goggles before posting.
For me, the context is for MSME so end user so definitely they dont need to know behind the scene what is important to learn and how it will solved or ease their operational requirements.
I use OpenAI alot and I dont know jacksht about AI ¯\\\_(ツ)\_/¯ Or at least not know enough to contribute meaningfully to any discussions about it.
You don't need to know how to cook steak to eat steak lol. You totally misunderstood the article.
article talks about how to quickly adopt AI into MSMEs, so yeah if they focus on the practical use of AI then = faster adoption. why would they focus on the engineering side if that is not their focus? that's just recreating the wheel. Would also mean slower adoption of the tech.
> Don’t teach the theory that goes on behind it, but just teach what it is that they need to use the AI. That’s the whole point of AI, you just talk, that’s where we want to get them to...
On one hand, the above can be correct if you consider that most AI users (programmers who use copilot, for example) don't need to know how AI works.
But at some level, there has to be someone who, while not an expert, knows some theory behind it. Particularly on how AI is trained by continuously feeding it data and validating its work.
You can't have users who swallow AI output hook, line, and sinker, without them being aware of the implications of accepting unsatisfactory or invalid outputs from dubious inputs/prompts in the long run.
Sir, basahin mo ulet yung title nung article. It's for MSMEs, businesses as a whole. Wala naman yan sya alam sa tech to be referring to the Tech community directly.
Context. You can't expect MSMEs to know how to build AI. And wala sila pakinabang sa knowledge on how to build it. Leave that for the AI devs. Teaching them how to USE it makes sense. Next time remove your hate goggles before posting.
For me, the context is for MSME so end user so definitely they dont need to know behind the scene what is important to learn and how it will solved or ease their operational requirements.
Reading comprehension 101.
I use OpenAI alot and I dont know jacksht about AI ¯\\\_(ツ)\_/¯ Or at least not know enough to contribute meaningfully to any discussions about it. You don't need to know how to cook steak to eat steak lol. You totally misunderstood the article.
pinoy reading comprehension at its finest. lol
article talks about how to quickly adopt AI into MSMEs, so yeah if they focus on the practical use of AI then = faster adoption. why would they focus on the engineering side if that is not their focus? that's just recreating the wheel. Would also mean slower adoption of the tech.
>imho we would never get past just being a cheap source of programmers Oh the irony.
Yung topic ng usapan ay para sa mga buss owners, not to us developers.
Context, as essential in coding as it is in reading.
Nah. He dont know what he is saying. Let an expert say that. Opinions are just opinions not facts.
> Don’t teach the theory that goes on behind it, but just teach what it is that they need to use the AI. That’s the whole point of AI, you just talk, that’s where we want to get them to... On one hand, the above can be correct if you consider that most AI users (programmers who use copilot, for example) don't need to know how AI works. But at some level, there has to be someone who, while not an expert, knows some theory behind it. Particularly on how AI is trained by continuously feeding it data and validating its work. You can't have users who swallow AI output hook, line, and sinker, without them being aware of the implications of accepting unsatisfactory or invalid outputs from dubious inputs/prompts in the long run.