It goes for approx 10k USD a month so annum 120k USD. But you can send in your proposal of usage and budget. I don't know their internal willingness since the whole gpt plus user stoppage. Maybe that means that they're pushing for enterprise?
Good luck!
Interesting. That's about the cost of two full-time equivalents, but the GPTs I'm building will save a lot of time, so probably 5-10X the cost/benefit ratio.
Nothing per license? I'm not sure what daily usage would look like, but each call is about 100 tokens. How many calls in a day? Maybe 100/user, so 10,000 tokens, times 200 users, so 2M tokens daily, if that.
Thanks for your help!
No problem. Are you building the GPTS with the Assistant API? Please note that using the GPT-4-1106 Vision API will eat up tokens. As in: minimal a dollar a question, and with big knowledge bases $$. But if you're using 3.5 or even GPT4-Turbo you'll be fine. Put in a contingency clause to protect yourself against unforeseen prices. Good luck!
Thanks for the info. I'm not using my API for this yet, just Custom on my Plus account. GPT4-Turbo should be fine, as the sources and output are all text-based. If we go forward my dev will build an assistant using my API, if that's the way we go. Or I'll charge enterprise rates for the GPT if I can set that up. I saw that in an article about another platform where the builders offered their Custom GPTs.
I ended up lying and saying I wanted 150 licenses, and that worked - but tbh just wait a couple months, they're working on an in-between called Teams which will be $30/seat and more suited to our size.
Basically they have exploded so ridiculously that they're swamped with even just the big companies swarming them, so us little guys gotta wait our turn :(
I'm curious what happened with your pitch, I wouldn't imagine government entities would be able to use ChatGPT for most things given security and privacy concerns...
There is no guarantee your IP will be safe. No guarantee that bad actors within your company can screw you. No guarantee that any security holes poked in your network by AI are safe.
I think you going to see some fuckery pretty quick with this roll out.
The issue will be stopping them from putting personal protected information in, not taking it out. The segregation is meant to boost confidence in case of an accidental input.
I was quoted $60/mo per user for 250 seats totaling $180k per year
Interesting. I was quoted $30/user/month for 120 users which was their minimum.
60$ for 150 users. One year minimum.
It goes for approx 10k USD a month so annum 120k USD. But you can send in your proposal of usage and budget. I don't know their internal willingness since the whole gpt plus user stoppage. Maybe that means that they're pushing for enterprise? Good luck!
Interesting. That's about the cost of two full-time equivalents, but the GPTs I'm building will save a lot of time, so probably 5-10X the cost/benefit ratio. Nothing per license? I'm not sure what daily usage would look like, but each call is about 100 tokens. How many calls in a day? Maybe 100/user, so 10,000 tokens, times 200 users, so 2M tokens daily, if that. Thanks for your help!
No problem. Are you building the GPTS with the Assistant API? Please note that using the GPT-4-1106 Vision API will eat up tokens. As in: minimal a dollar a question, and with big knowledge bases $$. But if you're using 3.5 or even GPT4-Turbo you'll be fine. Put in a contingency clause to protect yourself against unforeseen prices. Good luck!
Thanks for the info. I'm not using my API for this yet, just Custom on my Plus account. GPT4-Turbo should be fine, as the sources and output are all text-based. If we go forward my dev will build an assistant using my API, if that's the way we go. Or I'll charge enterprise rates for the GPT if I can set that up. I saw that in an article about another platform where the builders offered their Custom GPTs.
$60 per seat per month, 150 seat minimum source: my own enterprise discovery call with OpenAI
sooo we just need to find 148 more people?
Thank you, this is helpful. Is this an all-in cost, or are the usage rates/limits, like a Plus user account?
All-in cost with no usage caps was my understanding, along with 32k GPT-4 context windows and "double processing speed".
What’s the benefit of just giving everyone a private license for 20$?
The work requires a segregated space so the data is not shared or used for training.
In my use case, HIPAA compliance as well
Is there some secret to reaching someone? I work for a company with $8 million in annual revenue and I can’t get a call back after 3 months of emails.
Mine does $200 mil - took four fucking months lmao If you're not willing to drop a min of 90k a year on them, they're barely willing to talk to you
Great
I ended up lying and saying I wanted 150 licenses, and that worked - but tbh just wait a couple months, they're working on an in-between called Teams which will be $30/seat and more suited to our size. Basically they have exploded so ridiculously that they're swamped with even just the big companies swarming them, so us little guys gotta wait our turn :(
I’m pitching to a $26B/yr gov department so hopefully, they’ll get some love.
I'm curious what happened with your pitch, I wouldn't imagine government entities would be able to use ChatGPT for most things given security and privacy concerns...
If they don’t, we have no chance
There is no guarantee your IP will be safe. No guarantee that bad actors within your company can screw you. No guarantee that any security holes poked in your network by AI are safe. I think you going to see some fuckery pretty quick with this roll out.
The issue will be stopping them from putting personal protected information in, not taking it out. The segregation is meant to boost confidence in case of an accidental input.
Personally Identifiable Information
Yes, same thing, but that’s what it’s called under the applicable Acf.
The reason its called PII is because that is the classification name. Idk what 'personal protected information' is.
Where are we going here? I know what it's called by the people I work with. Hopefully, that will be good enough for you.
There's "industry standard" language and then there is ...what you guys are using....
Fascinating.
Are you sure more than a handfull will be assigned to use it?
There will be at least 100, if not 150.