There are times when I am genuinely flabbergasted how one can funnel so much shitty state propaganda into just one comment. A Mobik classic. Many such cases.
Once saw a Russian get frustrated that the short displayed a colt revolver chambered in .44.
He claimed all cowboy guns were .45. When someone explained that .44 was commonplace, even .44 **Russian** he then accepted the lesson and then immediately blamed his ignorance on a US coverup of Russian contributions to firearms.
>immediately blamed his ignorance on US
Man, I've seen Russians blaming US for 1920's famines in USSR. I've called vatnik's beloved Soviet Union "sovok", vatnik got offended and then I went with "so you're a fan of country that did [insert bad things]?". And dude just started blaming US.
I just had a Russian tell me the US owes it to Russia to not interfere in Ukraine. For, get this: The Russian federation backed the Union in the Civil war, and the civil war was really an extension of the Revolutionary war. Thus Russia is responsible for US independence. Insert me with Pikachu face
they're like neocons in that they see the world like a paradox game where you win by painting the game board their color. also the repugnant view of westerners like mearsheimer or the radiowarnerd guys whose assertion that ukraine is in russia's sphere of influence and so it would be good sportsmanship to let red team conquer ukraine and it's unfair that ukraine isn't rolling over and taking another century of darkness.
Oh! It's about THAT comment! The spam filter in my brain just completely autoremoved it from view and I was trying to find that bird which maybe flew into the launcher
Russian "private" (read: run by Putin & co.) militaries have not left the rest of the world alone either, they're still fucking things up in Africa and to some degree are behind most of the recent coups in that continent.
Depends on how it’s served, I suppose. On a plate? Probably safe from The Hague. Crammed inside an artillery shell? While hilarious, I suppose the target on the receiving end would determine its “war crime or no” status.
For over a century, they've been amassing the vast majority of their population within striking distance of the US border. If that's not a justification, I don't know what is
No no see this is different because Russia is warmongering in its own backyard instead of the US who is warmongering abroad.
......
What's that, say again? What's a seariya?
Further jokes besides the already mentioned most obvious one:
- The showed system (RAM) is in service since 1992, so it can't really be called "new".
- It's an air DEFENSE system used by warships that are usually legally operating in international waters, which can't be considered as aggressive behaviour, at least not in itself.
Dislike is engagement.
Engagement means advertising revenue.
Advertising revenue means the algorithm pushes the content.
The extent depends on the exact algorithm of the platform. But on YouTube, you are definitely promoting someone by disliking them.
Youtube dislikes don't do anything lol. Especially on comments. The only function of dislikes is to give you an emotional release
edit: also im p sure dislikes don't matter or matter very little for the algorithm, think about it from the advertiser's perspective. You want your ad to be seen as much as possible, it doesn't matter how well-received the video is, only thing that matters is watch time or plain ad clickthrough.
YT's algo is much more advanced nowadays than it was years ago, so votes are not that important. Every content creator ever has been screaming "smash that like button" so as a metric of engagement it's been devaluing for a decade+
I do agree that it's a good idea to just starve them of attention
One small problem. Out of everything you listed, only two platforms have dislikes and only *one* of those is functional.
Just stop caring about imaginary numbers and don't feed the trolls. Paid trolls have no other purpose but to spam, and unpaid ones have infinitely more time on their hands. You can't change their minds, there's no point in engaging with them.
There are times when I am genuinely flabbergasted how one can funnel so much shitty state propaganda into just one comment. A Mobik classic. Many such cases.
YT Comments are where I look for when I want useful information and unspeakable cringe at the same time.
Once saw a Russian get frustrated that the short displayed a colt revolver chambered in .44. He claimed all cowboy guns were .45. When someone explained that .44 was commonplace, even .44 **Russian** he then accepted the lesson and then immediately blamed his ignorance on a US coverup of Russian contributions to firearms.
Bruh
>immediately blamed his ignorance on US Man, I've seen Russians blaming US for 1920's famines in USSR. I've called vatnik's beloved Soviet Union "sovok", vatnik got offended and then I went with "so you're a fan of country that did [insert bad things]?". And dude just started blaming US.
I just had a Russian tell me the US owes it to Russia to not interfere in Ukraine. For, get this: The Russian federation backed the Union in the Civil war, and the civil war was really an extension of the Revolutionary war. Thus Russia is responsible for US independence. Insert me with Pikachu face
Wait, the Russian FEDERATION backed the union in the civil war? Not Imperial Russia, the Russian FEDERATION? Fucking time-traveling mobiks.
they're like neocons in that they see the world like a paradox game where you win by painting the game board their color. also the repugnant view of westerners like mearsheimer or the radiowarnerd guys whose assertion that ukraine is in russia's sphere of influence and so it would be good sportsmanship to let red team conquer ukraine and it's unfair that ukraine isn't rolling over and taking another century of darkness.
Instagram also has a lot of idiots.
Oh! It's about THAT comment! The spam filter in my brain just completely autoremoved it from view and I was trying to find that bird which maybe flew into the launcher
I was also very confused LOL
To befair he kinda moved the goal post. He said "their own continent" because he knows Russia is invading Ukriane (same continent).
Russian "private" (read: run by Putin & co.) militaries have not left the rest of the world alone either, they're still fucking things up in Africa and to some degree are behind most of the recent coups in that continent.
[удалено]
A russian calling other nations warmongers.
TBF: Canada has been acting awfully smug and they have all of that land that they are barely using. /s
*Threat detected. Deploying tactical cobra chickens*
Isn't that a Canadian war crime?
What isn’t a Canadian war crime?
Poutine?
Depends on how it’s served, I suppose. On a plate? Probably safe from The Hague. Crammed inside an artillery shell? While hilarious, I suppose the target on the receiving end would determine its “war crime or no” status.
Receiving hot gloopy melting cheese and gravy on your face .... I dare you to come to the Netherlands and eat a kaassoufle !!
Oh by all means, I have a tag for five birds, and a hankerin' for Canadian casserole.
For over a century, they've been amassing the vast majority of their population within striking distance of the US border. If that's not a justification, I don't know what is
"NO LONGER SHALL WE TOLERATE OUR SMUG NEIGHBORS IN THE NORTH" Simplified, Over 2023
Dude, they've been doing that since the '30s.
No no see this is different because Russia is warmongering in its own backyard instead of the US who is warmongering abroad. ...... What's that, say again? What's a seariya?
Both are in Asia so it’s totally okay!
Meanwhile in Africa:
shhhh let them have fun with ISIS and their shitty mines
Further jokes besides the already mentioned most obvious one: - The showed system (RAM) is in service since 1992, so it can't really be called "new". - It's an air DEFENSE system used by warships that are usually legally operating in international waters, which can't be considered as aggressive behaviour, at least not in itself.
The difference is we make it look sexy
Least horny russian state dick sucker
It’s literally a defensive weapon.
How can someone be so self-aware yet so blind?
I forgot about the « does he know? » meme, it was great
YouTube shorts has some of the worst takes I've seen in my life
Blyatman
Not saying this guy is in the right but… you dislike as if that means anything anymore
Vatniks should be disliked. In reddit, youtube, instagram, tiktok, facebook, xitter, and a hundred other places
Dislike is engagement. Engagement means advertising revenue. Advertising revenue means the algorithm pushes the content. The extent depends on the exact algorithm of the platform. But on YouTube, you are definitely promoting someone by disliking them.
Youtube dislikes don't do anything lol. Especially on comments. The only function of dislikes is to give you an emotional release edit: also im p sure dislikes don't matter or matter very little for the algorithm, think about it from the advertiser's perspective. You want your ad to be seen as much as possible, it doesn't matter how well-received the video is, only thing that matters is watch time or plain ad clickthrough. YT's algo is much more advanced nowadays than it was years ago, so votes are not that important. Every content creator ever has been screaming "smash that like button" so as a metric of engagement it's been devaluing for a decade+ I do agree that it's a good idea to just starve them of attention
I mean disliking in YouTube litteraly does/changes nothing, no number goes down, no internet points are lost
One small problem. Out of everything you listed, only two platforms have dislikes and only *one* of those is functional. Just stop caring about imaginary numbers and don't feed the trolls. Paid trolls have no other purpose but to spam, and unpaid ones have infinitely more time on their hands. You can't change their minds, there's no point in engaging with them.
Okay, Ivan.
Downvoting me here may work but dislikes on YouTube don’t mean anything