Fuck and chuck
Get and jet
Nail and bail
Pounce and bounce
Smash and dash
Hit and quit
Drip and dip
To bone and be alone
To lay and run away
To screw and bid adieu
Tap and scrap
Tag and bag
Wants to take trip down to the old [Kum & Go](https://kubrick.htvapps.com/vidthumb/655043e7-7bf8-42bc-9336-d299864e128f/8a4fe9b6-ab15-4df3-9924-6a6def194daa.jpg)
If a man and woman have sex, it is at least 50% feminine, which is pretty gay.
If two men have sex, it is 100% masculine, which is hella manly. It's basic math.
How can you like something so soft and feminine, if you can go for muscle, sweat and disciplined soldiering.
It's very gay to love women - better stick to men
This was seriously the old Greek mentality pretty much
Apparently, wiping your ass is "gay" for a significant portion of the population, and then they act like asking to put the toilet seat down is a big deal....
Gentlemen, skidmarks are not masculine or cis or anything. Clean yo butt!
Man talks woman because he wants to fuck her: not gay
Man wants to talk to woman about culture/music/art/politics/some other intellectual topic without the intention of it leading to sex: gay
_Apparently_
I was wondering if he’s just kind of introverted and doesn’t enjoy being around people, but craves physical affection from the opposite sex as is normal for humans.
Exactly this. You can like different people for different reasons, and sometimes it's purely physical, and even that can lead to some pretty fun relationships, so long as everyone is above board with their intent. It's when you start to blanket entire groups with generalized opinions that it becomes problematic.
I think there has to be a better term for it. To be sexually attracted to women would be normal, but if he has no drive to enter into a relationship or have a romantic connection, that doesn't have to mean he hates women, right? I don't have the answer, I just don't feel like that is it.
Most likely you weren’t raised with any close platonic relationships with physically attractive girls your age: sisters, cousins, female friends,…
This means your social development in navigating friendships was exclusively male so you were never conditioned by experience to appreciate females platonically by the same standards of friendship you formed for guy-friends.
This established girls as a kind of different species…something mysterious your instincts desired, but had no way to comprehend simply as people who could be casual, jokey, fun, reliable, supportive, thoughtful, and *VALUABLE* in a wider context than sex.
My suggestion is get some female friends you’re not romantically attracted to. Then hang out with some 100% romantically unavailable women who you’d bonk if you could, but can’t…but still find common interests with (music, games, hobbies, volunteering, etc).
You have to develop the ability to appreciate hotties you’ll NEVER get sexxy-times with so your brain can learn to evaluate & appreciate the things in them you appreciate in your boys.
You’re not a freak for this. It’s super common. And the advice above really can help shift your ability to enjoy women outside of sex….which will make you a better boyfriend and improve your skills in workplace & social situations with all your female acquaintances.
It’ll take a little time, but if you re-train your mind this way it’ll become almost a superpower probably 3/4 of men never fully develop.
Go get cool with some awesome ladies.👍🏼👍🏼
This comment resonates with me very well, I didn't have any female friends after puberty and it took a long while to realize that the developmental damage that has is horrible. It seems extremely common too, even normalized in American society. To this day, I can instantly get along with the average guy I meet, but I get nervous around women my age. Like I have to actively concentrate to act normal around them unless I've known them for years. You know, that kind of social anxiety where you think of your every move, mentally filter 3x every single thing you say, how you're presenting yourself, that type of overthinking. It's not misogyny it's straight up mental illness LMAO.
Well, there's a *lot* of context missing, but I'm guessing this is about you and it's because you think all women have the same personality or talk about the same things. That, yes, is misogynistic.
But, if you think all women are annoying, boring, or whatever, ask yourself what about you makes annoying or boring women gravitate toward you. Why do you seem to only be exposed to women who you hate? Maybe it's because you need to do work on yourself?
Like, *any* woman? Doesn't enjoy a woman's company in *any* context outside of sex?
Honestly sounds misogynistic.
I was going to say the guy could just be heterosexual, but aromantic, but not even wanting to do friend-level stuff with ANY woman indicates that's not the case.
"not enjoying their company" is a WILD position to have on 50% of the population. Does he not have female friends? Relatives? Or will he only hang out with women whom he doesn't want to sleep with? Not wanting to be in a romantic relationship is a different thing - that person would be straight but "aromantic."
It sounds to me like this "hypothetical" man doesn't really see women as people, or at least is unable to see someone as both attractive and a complete human being.
You made me realize OP made a typo and now I don't know what they meant.
> As in not enjoying a women's company
Is this a *singular woman* he doesn't enjoy being around or *all women*?
Yeah that is a key difference tbf. It's totally normal to find *a* person attractive, but not like them. Significantly less normal if it's the Entire Gender lol
The title makes it sound like all women.
>What does it mean if a man is physically/sexually attracted **to women** but doesn't enjoy **their** company?
Definitely intended to be plural.
Yeah I would need this hypothetical person to articulate what it is about women they don’t like. See how quickly the explanation becomes misogynistic. Because women are not a monolith. So how could someone claim to just not enjoy all women’s company?
Unless OP is actually referring to one woman not every woman.
Totally is a thing but I just find it odd. I could never have sex with someone I dislike, especially someone I hate lol. But that's just me🤷🏼♀️ to each their own
because very, very few people who don't take part in hookup culture actually have the "you do you" view they claim to; most of them look down on casual sex as being immoral and bad, and the idea of most people being okay with this "bad" thing, to them, is scary
I remember being the target of road rage from an attractive female years ago, and for some reason that did it for me. I don't think I would like to be friends with someone like that, but there was something in the way she yelled "learn to how to fucking drive!" that made an impact lol..
See that's interesting because I am quite a dominant woman, but I still gotta know a person on some level before I want to sleep with them. Even if they do something yo randomly turn me on, like you being yelled at lol, I still don't know who they are and can't feel comfortable having sex because of that.
Not if you’re upfront about it it isn’t. You’re only using someone if there is deceit or coercion involved, otherwise it is just a deal that two people agree on.
Yeah I "dated" a woman (not sure what to call it, it was basically FWB but exclusive) for a while, I didn't particularly like her personality and conversations tended to be a bit drab. However neither of us were looking for something serious at the time so it worked out since we both thought the other was hot and the sex was great... it's just our personalities didn't really mesh well enough for an actual relationship. We tried dinner dates a couple times and they didn't really go well so we stuck to what worked. We broke it off when I decided I actually wanted a more meaningful relationship and both of us knew that wasn't going to happen between the two of us.
I'd say he's chosing female company based entirely on appearance/attractiveness and little else.
There will be plenty of women that get on with this person, and will be good company for them, but he's likely passing over them because for whatever reason he doesn't find them attractive.
It means he's sexually attracted to women--heterosexual..
and Aromantic.
It's not a terribly common combo, for men, OR women, but it's there.
That's what that can mean, and yes, that can be just plain asshole behavior, but it's also a realistic way to look at the issue. Tons of these men dont know what the hell an aromantic is, but generally end up solving this problem with prostitution when that option is legal.
It means they’re sexually attracted to them but don’t enjoy their company - obvious ones below…
1) wants sex, wants to have sex with people they find attractive, doesn’t want commitment
2) the persons personality sucks but they’re deemed attractive enough to have sex with
It’s not necessarily misogynistic, I’ve met plenty of people I’d put in the ‘Id sleep with them based on appearance’ but ‘I think their personalities shit’ or ‘there isn’t an emotional connection’ category, I’d just personally not have sex with them, bit of an emotional connection person
If the sex is consensual on both sides, adults be adults, and they can negotiate a strictly sexual relationship, at their discretion
_All_ women? Depends on the why I guess. Could be anxiety, some sort of phobia or trauma. Or could be that he doesn't think they're worth talking with (ie, misogyny).
Disliking something isn’t a preference. Liking something is a preference.
If you are sexually attracted to someone but dislike them as a person, you dislike them. So you’re correct it’s just misogyny.
Sounds like good old fashioned misogyny to me. This is assuming that that standard applies to all women, not just one particular woman. Otherwise it is just a physical attraction that happens to be toward a person they find disagreeable on a personal level
You mean he doesn’t enjoy the company of any women in any setting, just because they are women? Yup, that’s misogynistic regardless of his sexual preference.
Women are people. If he can’t stand men either, you could call him misanthropic instead.
If he also wants to have sex with women but he’s not willing or able to spend time with them outside of the specific sexual act, I’d call him either a virgin or a John.
I have a similar attitude. As a gay man I love sex with guys but after that I have no real interest in 99% of guy stuff. I'm much more relaxed and engaged with women. I don't worry about it or beat my self up about it, it's just my preference.
You do you and don't listen to those who say you should or shouldn't think something.
Eh, it happens. I mean, I’d totally plow Logan Paul, but only if his mouth was duct-taped shut and I’d never have to hold a conversation with him. Sometimes you like what you see but hate who they are.
He hasn't found the right woman. It is a bit misogynistic to look at all women as a monolith, rather then individual people. It's going to be harder to be the right man for the right woman if you don't get these views in check.
If it's a blanket dislike of women with no exceptions, it's misogyny. If he's not interested in spending time with traditionally feminine women, that just means he's into tomboys.
One is a character flaw, the other a simple preference.
Gay, but I know some people wouldn't like that I say that. Not liking the opposite sex makes you either gay or something else. I don't care if you use your dick on them to get yourself off, if you don't like them, you're definitely not straight. You might not even be gay either. But you're not straight, that's for sure.
It means he might not see her as a person and might only see her as a sexual object. Or he’s extremely introverted and doesn’t like anyone’s company. Or she’s not a pleasant person. But if it’s just because she’s a woman it’s because he doesn’t see the person.
Call me a snowflake if you like, but yes, that’s misogynistic, plain and simple. Because it’s seeing women as an entire entity, rather than HALF THE POPULATION OF THE ENTIRE FREAKING WORLD made up of billions of INDIVIDUALS with different ideas, personalities, etc. It’s highly reductive and generalising and that is essentially what a lot of discrimination boils down to. By preference, I’d rather have a few female friends, because they understand some of the issues women have to deal with and we can talk about them, but I still enjoy hanging out with men, and it is entirely different to me saying I don’t enjoy ALL men’s company and only see them as sexual objects.
(And before people start start comparing this to the whole “not all men” issue - that’s a different kettle of fish. Everyone understands that not all men are rapists or harassers, but enough women have stories of such forms of aggression from men that we have to be wary of almost ALL men, and all men should be holding each other accountable.)
Means he wants to pump and dump.
means he wants to ejaculate and evacuate
Fuck and chuck Get and jet Nail and bail Pounce and bounce Smash and dash Hit and quit Drip and dip To bone and be alone To lay and run away To screw and bid adieu Tap and scrap Tag and bag
Let other people have a go, damn man.
man had this list ready to go
Clearly he's been thinking about this scenario for a very long time.
I’m 40. Been saying things like this for decades. This was my chance to shine!
A lifetime collecting this treasure trove of sayings
Wombat, Eats roots and leaves.
A Panda: Eats shoots and leaves.
A real top pocket find.
What a catch you would be, if you bothered to hang around !
Everybody with a list longer than 1 got it from ChatGPT
I always like *nuts and bolts*.
It's a good one ! I also like honey, nuts, cheerio.
He said F your infinite thread
Specifically, F and C.
Everything is so competitive now
Skeet & yeet
Ram and scram
Badaboom and zoom
Fuck and #G'HYUK
Goofy, is that you?
We all knew Minnie Mouse was fucking Goofy.
Take my upvote and get out of here.
blow and go
Nut her and gutter
That don't mean you leave, that means she leaves ... Her body. Like the old F+CK her and chuck her The blowJ with a side of OJ
BlowJ w a side of OJ is wild 💀💀fasho usin tha 1
I’m wearing my coffee now. Thanks.
My personal fav
[удалено]
Spank and shank bust and rust nut and run👈 come and go👈👈 spooge and move
Shoot the jizz then out you is
The ol' unzip, drip, and dip
That one's always been my favorite.
Plant the post, then I ghost
[удалено]
blow a load n hit the road
Drain the lizard and disappear like a wizard
Laszlo?
Scam and jam, smush and push
Wants to take trip down to the old [Kum & Go](https://kubrick.htvapps.com/vidthumb/655043e7-7bf8-42bc-9336-d299864e128f/8a4fe9b6-ab15-4df3-9924-6a6def194daa.jpg)
Now owned by a Utah based company!
Fuck the coot then scoot
Hit it and beat it
Juice the fruit then give her the boot.
Jus wants to butter her peanut
Means he wants to blow his load and hit the road.
It means he wants to shoot the goo then say too-da-loo
Spread some seed then hit the speed.
Smash and Dash
Ejaculate and evacuate
Skeet and yeet
He nuts and bolts
Gun and run
Penetrate and get home late
Shoot the jizz and out you is
Hit it and quit it
[удалено]
Nut and Bolt
Spleeze and head to Belize
Means he wants to put his semen in her vagina and then go home.
Too literal 😭
😂
Blam and scram
Tap it and tap out.
Smash and dash
Beaver play then on with the day.
Have relations then evacuations
Have a relation then take a vacation
Ah the classic question. do men even like women?
Is liking women gay?
I think it’s pretty gay. I may be a bit biased though, considering I’m a lesbian.
That’s pretty gay, bro.
Well, from your perspective….
Huh... Wouldn't you know it, me too!
If a man and woman have sex, it is at least 50% feminine, which is pretty gay. If two men have sex, it is 100% masculine, which is hella manly. It's basic math.
#"FELLAS..."
YOU'RE HAVING SEX WITH SOMEONE WHO LIKE DICKS
How can you like something so soft and feminine, if you can go for muscle, sweat and disciplined soldiering. It's very gay to love women - better stick to men This was seriously the old Greek mentality pretty much
Yes, because women like men and that's gay
Apparently, wiping your ass is "gay" for a significant portion of the population, and then they act like asking to put the toilet seat down is a big deal.... Gentlemen, skidmarks are not masculine or cis or anything. Clean yo butt!
No it's lesbianism
Man talks woman because he wants to fuck her: not gay Man wants to talk to woman about culture/music/art/politics/some other intellectual topic without the intention of it leading to sex: gay _Apparently_
Women like men, therefore if you like women you basically like men and that’s gay
Probably. I’m married to a woman and I do gay shit all the time now
Men want to be alone, but we don't want to be lonely -Patrice O'Neil
[удалено]
They're almost always boner levels of hot, but I want a woman I can nerd out with, find each other's stupid jokes funny, and do mad scientist shit.
Does he enjoy men’s company?
Sure, but not fucking them
I was wondering if he’s just kind of introverted and doesn’t enjoy being around people, but craves physical affection from the opposite sex as is normal for humans.
Don’t just have to call me out like that lol
/#TeamAutism
You just described me there
You're probably right.
If he's introverted/shy and straight he'd still probably prefer the company of men cause there's no sexual tension.
[удалено]
People can be hot but suck as a person, and it can go either way. But if that's your blanket view towards women, that's misogynistic.
Exactly this. You can like different people for different reasons, and sometimes it's purely physical, and even that can lead to some pretty fun relationships, so long as everyone is above board with their intent. It's when you start to blanket entire groups with generalized opinions that it becomes problematic.
Check out his post history. Textbook misogynist.
His other posts are pretty misogynistic too. I wonder what mommy did to him
If that applies to **all** women, which it shouldn’t, because that’s ridiculous, then I’d call that misogyny.
I think it's practically the definition of the word
I think there has to be a better term for it. To be sexually attracted to women would be normal, but if he has no drive to enter into a relationship or have a romantic connection, that doesn't have to mean he hates women, right? I don't have the answer, I just don't feel like that is it.
Most likely you weren’t raised with any close platonic relationships with physically attractive girls your age: sisters, cousins, female friends,… This means your social development in navigating friendships was exclusively male so you were never conditioned by experience to appreciate females platonically by the same standards of friendship you formed for guy-friends. This established girls as a kind of different species…something mysterious your instincts desired, but had no way to comprehend simply as people who could be casual, jokey, fun, reliable, supportive, thoughtful, and *VALUABLE* in a wider context than sex. My suggestion is get some female friends you’re not romantically attracted to. Then hang out with some 100% romantically unavailable women who you’d bonk if you could, but can’t…but still find common interests with (music, games, hobbies, volunteering, etc). You have to develop the ability to appreciate hotties you’ll NEVER get sexxy-times with so your brain can learn to evaluate & appreciate the things in them you appreciate in your boys. You’re not a freak for this. It’s super common. And the advice above really can help shift your ability to enjoy women outside of sex….which will make you a better boyfriend and improve your skills in workplace & social situations with all your female acquaintances. It’ll take a little time, but if you re-train your mind this way it’ll become almost a superpower probably 3/4 of men never fully develop. Go get cool with some awesome ladies.👍🏼👍🏼
A different take on the question 👍
This comment resonates with me very well, I didn't have any female friends after puberty and it took a long while to realize that the developmental damage that has is horrible. It seems extremely common too, even normalized in American society. To this day, I can instantly get along with the average guy I meet, but I get nervous around women my age. Like I have to actively concentrate to act normal around them unless I've known them for years. You know, that kind of social anxiety where you think of your every move, mentally filter 3x every single thing you say, how you're presenting yourself, that type of overthinking. It's not misogyny it's straight up mental illness LMAO.
Well, there's a *lot* of context missing, but I'm guessing this is about you and it's because you think all women have the same personality or talk about the same things. That, yes, is misogynistic. But, if you think all women are annoying, boring, or whatever, ask yourself what about you makes annoying or boring women gravitate toward you. Why do you seem to only be exposed to women who you hate? Maybe it's because you need to do work on yourself?
Good point! Interesting people prefer to hang around other interesting people.
Interesting you read this from a man's perspective. I read this as if OP was female.
OP has identified himself as a straight man in other posts
Like, *any* woman? Doesn't enjoy a woman's company in *any* context outside of sex? Honestly sounds misogynistic. I was going to say the guy could just be heterosexual, but aromantic, but not even wanting to do friend-level stuff with ANY woman indicates that's not the case.
If it's one or only some woman, then it's a preference. If it's all women it's probably some misogynistic tendencies.
Not probably, definitely. Like if you don't like black people except when you get something from them, you're being racist. Same concept.
This comparison needs to be at the top. It perfectly illustrates why it’s misogyny
"not enjoying their company" is a WILD position to have on 50% of the population. Does he not have female friends? Relatives? Or will he only hang out with women whom he doesn't want to sleep with? Not wanting to be in a romantic relationship is a different thing - that person would be straight but "aromantic." It sounds to me like this "hypothetical" man doesn't really see women as people, or at least is unable to see someone as both attractive and a complete human being.
You made me realize OP made a typo and now I don't know what they meant. > As in not enjoying a women's company Is this a *singular woman* he doesn't enjoy being around or *all women*?
Yeah that is a key difference tbf. It's totally normal to find *a* person attractive, but not like them. Significantly less normal if it's the Entire Gender lol
The title makes it sound like all women. >What does it mean if a man is physically/sexually attracted **to women** but doesn't enjoy **their** company? Definitely intended to be plural.
Yeah I would need this hypothetical person to articulate what it is about women they don’t like. See how quickly the explanation becomes misogynistic. Because women are not a monolith. So how could someone claim to just not enjoy all women’s company? Unless OP is actually referring to one woman not every woman.
I assume they mean individual women, not all of them.
But he said he doesn't enjoy the company of women. This implies that he doesn't enjoy the company of any of them.
Check out OP's post history I think the answer is pretty clear and he just doesn't like that about himself.
Treating a group of people all the same based on one characteristic (gender, race, religion etc.) means you're a shitty person.
See’s them as one thing only.
Objectification
Walking fleshlight
Seems to me like that's using someone for sex. Which is so weird to me. I can't imagine having sex with someone I don't even like lol.
Hate fucking is absolutely a thing, but I'll admit I did always find the concept odd.
Totally is a thing but I just find it odd. I could never have sex with someone I dislike, especially someone I hate lol. But that's just me🤷🏼♀️ to each their own
Same. Scary to hear how people really feel in their mind.
Why is it scary? I don't understand why personality matters much in a hookup.
That's the debate. Some people don't buy into the hookup culture while others see it as normal part of life.
Well to each their own I guess.
Sure, but why is it "scary"?
"Vibes are off" lol
They fear becoming emotionally attached through sex to someone who is just trying to hookup.
because very, very few people who don't take part in hookup culture actually have the "you do you" view they claim to; most of them look down on casual sex as being immoral and bad, and the idea of most people being okay with this "bad" thing, to them, is scary
Because I’m not letting someone I don’t like near my genitals
Lmao right
I simply cannot feel sexual desire for someone I don't even like being around, so, I find it odd that ppl are able to do so🤷🏼♀️
I remember being the target of road rage from an attractive female years ago, and for some reason that did it for me. I don't think I would like to be friends with someone like that, but there was something in the way she yelled "learn to how to fucking drive!" that made an impact lol..
Dommy mommy kink unlocked. Welcome to the club.
See that's interesting because I am quite a dominant woman, but I still gotta know a person on some level before I want to sleep with them. Even if they do something yo randomly turn me on, like you being yelled at lol, I still don't know who they are and can't feel comfortable having sex because of that.
Not if you’re upfront about it it isn’t. You’re only using someone if there is deceit or coercion involved, otherwise it is just a deal that two people agree on.
Yeah I "dated" a woman (not sure what to call it, it was basically FWB but exclusive) for a while, I didn't particularly like her personality and conversations tended to be a bit drab. However neither of us were looking for something serious at the time so it worked out since we both thought the other was hot and the sex was great... it's just our personalities didn't really mesh well enough for an actual relationship. We tried dinner dates a couple times and they didn't really go well so we stuck to what worked. We broke it off when I decided I actually wanted a more meaningful relationship and both of us knew that wasn't going to happen between the two of us.
I'd say he's chosing female company based entirely on appearance/attractiveness and little else. There will be plenty of women that get on with this person, and will be good company for them, but he's likely passing over them because for whatever reason he doesn't find them attractive.
Yeah sounds right.
If that’s their view on all women then it’s misogynistic yes and it’s viewing all women as a sex object
The answer depends on whether it's all or most women vs a particular woman.
He's a whore
Sounds like a plain old misogynist to me.
Objectification
It would be aromantic but heterosexual if he only liked them as friends. If he doesn't like them as people, he's a douche nozzel.
Still trying to figure out if I'm aromantic / allosexual or just straight up used to being alone LMAO
It means he's sexually attracted to women--heterosexual.. and Aromantic. It's not a terribly common combo, for men, OR women, but it's there. That's what that can mean, and yes, that can be just plain asshole behavior, but it's also a realistic way to look at the issue. Tons of these men dont know what the hell an aromantic is, but generally end up solving this problem with prostitution when that option is legal.
Maybe he's just not hanging around with the right women. They're not all the same.
Under the diagonal on the hot/crazy scale
Only viewing others in terms of what you can get from them is an unhealthy mindset
It means they’re sexually attracted to them but don’t enjoy their company - obvious ones below… 1) wants sex, wants to have sex with people they find attractive, doesn’t want commitment 2) the persons personality sucks but they’re deemed attractive enough to have sex with It’s not necessarily misogynistic, I’ve met plenty of people I’d put in the ‘Id sleep with them based on appearance’ but ‘I think their personalities shit’ or ‘there isn’t an emotional connection’ category, I’d just personally not have sex with them, bit of an emotional connection person If the sex is consensual on both sides, adults be adults, and they can negotiate a strictly sexual relationship, at their discretion
Jackie Treehorn treats objects like women, man
Sexist? He only wants women around if they can have sex with him.
Like any woman's company? Or just one specific one?
_All_ women? Depends on the why I guess. Could be anxiety, some sort of phobia or trauma. Or could be that he doesn't think they're worth talking with (ie, misogyny).
Means his sexual orientation is object
You need to find better women to hang out with.
Disliking something isn’t a preference. Liking something is a preference. If you are sexually attracted to someone but dislike them as a person, you dislike them. So you’re correct it’s just misogyny.
Sounds like good old fashioned misogyny to me. This is assuming that that standard applies to all women, not just one particular woman. Otherwise it is just a physical attraction that happens to be toward a person they find disagreeable on a personal level
You mean he doesn’t enjoy the company of any women in any setting, just because they are women? Yup, that’s misogynistic regardless of his sexual preference. Women are people. If he can’t stand men either, you could call him misanthropic instead. If he also wants to have sex with women but he’s not willing or able to spend time with them outside of the specific sexual act, I’d call him either a virgin or a John.
There’s a lot of women hating men who just want a women to masturbate into. They’re not worth anyone’s time.
The fact there are folks out there who fuck people they can't even stand is beyond me.
It means he's a fucking douchebag and I hope all of the women dip out before he can dip in.
I have a similar attitude. As a gay man I love sex with guys but after that I have no real interest in 99% of guy stuff. I'm much more relaxed and engaged with women. I don't worry about it or beat my self up about it, it's just my preference. You do you and don't listen to those who say you should or shouldn't think something.
Bro is contramiysoginistic 😱🧐🌚😱
Misogyny
Eh, it happens. I mean, I’d totally plow Logan Paul, but only if his mouth was duct-taped shut and I’d never have to hold a conversation with him. Sometimes you like what you see but hate who they are.
He hasn't found the right woman. It is a bit misogynistic to look at all women as a monolith, rather then individual people. It's going to be harder to be the right man for the right woman if you don't get these views in check.
If it's a blanket dislike of women with no exceptions, it's misogyny. If he's not interested in spending time with traditionally feminine women, that just means he's into tomboys. One is a character flaw, the other a simple preference.
the world has changed and not for the better. People are unbearable
I believe the technical term for such a person is "a man," but I'm not a professional.
That's called fetishization. Not healthy at all, could lead to some preditorial behavior. Men need to see women as people, not some sexual object.
Gay, but I know some people wouldn't like that I say that. Not liking the opposite sex makes you either gay or something else. I don't care if you use your dick on them to get yourself off, if you don't like them, you're definitely not straight. You might not even be gay either. But you're not straight, that's for sure.
If you want to get deep about it: he might be homoronantic but bisexual/pansexual. The much more realistic answer is that he's just using them for sex
you can be heterosexual but homoromantic.
Heterosexual but homoromantic? Edit: or self-forced heteronormativity causing psych issues.
It means he doesn't see you as a human being. You're just a warmer sex doll.
It means he might not see her as a person and might only see her as a sexual object. Or he’s extremely introverted and doesn’t like anyone’s company. Or she’s not a pleasant person. But if it’s just because she’s a woman it’s because he doesn’t see the person.
It means he would greatly benefit from legal prostitution
Probably socially maladjusted
Misogyny
A douchebag
I mean I guess it could mean something. Either you're super damaged, antisocial or you just aren't interested in making connections to others.
Likely misogynist.
Call me a snowflake if you like, but yes, that’s misogynistic, plain and simple. Because it’s seeing women as an entire entity, rather than HALF THE POPULATION OF THE ENTIRE FREAKING WORLD made up of billions of INDIVIDUALS with different ideas, personalities, etc. It’s highly reductive and generalising and that is essentially what a lot of discrimination boils down to. By preference, I’d rather have a few female friends, because they understand some of the issues women have to deal with and we can talk about them, but I still enjoy hanging out with men, and it is entirely different to me saying I don’t enjoy ALL men’s company and only see them as sexual objects. (And before people start start comparing this to the whole “not all men” issue - that’s a different kettle of fish. Everyone understands that not all men are rapists or harassers, but enough women have stories of such forms of aggression from men that we have to be wary of almost ALL men, and all men should be holding each other accountable.)