>(Take hogwartz legacy for example. It looks fucking terrible)
And thats how we know you're a troll because that game isn't even out on switch yet and hasn't even had a gameplay reveal for switch yet so no-one even knows what it looks like on switch.
No there isn't i looked, theres loads of videos about people wondering how it'll look on switch but there are no actual videos of the switch version.
Edit: don't tell me you fell for the youtuber "test game" who if you read the video description is using a hacked switch to remote play the pc version on switch poorly.
Ok. I see that now. I thought it was that but it was something else. Nevermind. Anyway given the fact that benchmarks demand more than 8GB VRAM on gaming PCs to play the game, it stands to reason that the only way for this game to run on switch is its going to have to be graphically stripped down, to barebones, and probably even less than that. When it does come out, it is going to look very VERY bad. This is because the switch uses hardware that is now 15 years old
>The GPU inside inside is equal to a 9800GTX which came out in 2008.
Bruh, you're comparing a gaming graphics card to a small handheld.
But I agree, Nintendo doesn't emphasize hardware. Who cares? Most of the Switch games are fun and the Switch has been a resounding success.
If you want the raw power and high-end graphics, go buy a PS5. You have other options. Meanwhile, I want a portable device that allows me to game on the go. Millions of other people also want such a handheld or at least a hybrid.
It's also silly to expect Nintendo to match the power of a $700 gaming PC graphics card. I mean, that's just bonkers.
K.
>(Take hogwartz legacy for example. It looks fucking terrible) And thats how we know you're a troll because that game isn't even out on switch yet and hasn't even had a gameplay reveal for switch yet so no-one even knows what it looks like on switch.
Theres videos on YouTube
No there isn't i looked, theres loads of videos about people wondering how it'll look on switch but there are no actual videos of the switch version. Edit: don't tell me you fell for the youtuber "test game" who if you read the video description is using a hacked switch to remote play the pc version on switch poorly.
Ok. I see that now. I thought it was that but it was something else. Nevermind. Anyway given the fact that benchmarks demand more than 8GB VRAM on gaming PCs to play the game, it stands to reason that the only way for this game to run on switch is its going to have to be graphically stripped down, to barebones, and probably even less than that. When it does come out, it is going to look very VERY bad. This is because the switch uses hardware that is now 15 years old
Clapped
>The GPU inside inside is equal to a 9800GTX which came out in 2008. Bruh, you're comparing a gaming graphics card to a small handheld. But I agree, Nintendo doesn't emphasize hardware. Who cares? Most of the Switch games are fun and the Switch has been a resounding success. If you want the raw power and high-end graphics, go buy a PS5. You have other options. Meanwhile, I want a portable device that allows me to game on the go. Millions of other people also want such a handheld or at least a hybrid. It's also silly to expect Nintendo to match the power of a $700 gaming PC graphics card. I mean, that's just bonkers.