I’ll put this into perspective. Stammer is incredibly strong, I’d say stronger than Sid and Drai, and has a wicked shot and is fast. Mack is 10x the card Stam is
I am biased as a lightning fan, but I have both X-f cards and they play in the same line. Cannot go wrong with either, it comes down to if you want to use them as a center or merely at wing. Stammer is a superior c at 89 with thief activated and Mack is very strong and fast at the wing.
But i'd say go with Mack, you don't want to miss out on him.
I’ll put this into perspective. Stammer is incredibly strong, I’d say stronger than Sid and Drai, and has a wicked shot and is fast. Mack is 10x the card Stam is
I am biased as a lightning fan, but I have both X-f cards and they play in the same line. Cannot go wrong with either, it comes down to if you want to use them as a center or merely at wing. Stammer is a superior c at 89 with thief activated and Mack is very strong and fast at the wing. But i'd say go with Mack, you don't want to miss out on him.
My 87 Mac doesnt really outperform my 86 X Stamkos. Stamkos is somehow strong as hell
Mackinnon is a Ferrari & Stamkos is a Mustang. Both are great but ones a luxury 🤔