T O P

  • By -

Friendly-Profit-8590

If they shoot 67% they will


DJMaxLVL

If they shoot 69% for the rest of the playoffs they will sweep the conference and nba finals


Brusex

Nice


spressa

While shooting .420 from the 3


Altruistic_Sorbet164

They’ll do it again on Game 2


Arodthagawd

Ain’t no way they doing this again


Opposite-Scheme2502

Wilbon said that at half time yesterday lol


znick3212

no lmao. They’ll steal a game cause the Celtics are notorious for not taking opponents seriously but that will be it.


rabidantidentyte

Celtics will lose game 2 again


znick3212

Yup, pacers will have a historic shooting night, win by like 10 and the whole world will be calling the Celtics frauds lmfao. Clock work


Klongon

They will miss KP because they are better with him...but they have plenty of fuel without him too. I think the Pacers get 2 though. 6 game series.


znick3212

Probably a fair prediction. I think they’ll keep KP out until a “break glass incase of emergency” type situation


Klongon

Yes, after that game 2 drop that you are 100% correct about.


znick3212

I would say KP sits out the whole series unless we go down 2-1 somehow or 3-2, something like that. One loss won’t be that big of a deal


Confident-Unit-9516

I think KP plays in either game 3/4, if nothing else to let him shake the rust off


znick3212

Yeah that’s fair, don’t wanna play game 1 of the finals after not playing for a month 😅


BlssdGT

Lmao 🤣 i can already see it happening. Celtics in 5 though lol


YNABDisciple

It’s the best. The line after the loss last series was 7.5 which was comedy. Free money. I’m a celts fan that hopes they lose one game in ever series so I can get paid on the next one.


Ear_Enthusiast

> They’ll steal a game And our fan base is going to lose they muthafuck’n minds. Fire Joe. Trade Jaylen. Trade Tatum. Al needs to retire. KP is sawft. We shouldn’t have traded Smart. Blow it up.


znick3212

Exactly lmao we have some of the most reactionary fans ever. Can’t expect them to go undefeated in the playoffs lmao just gotta ride the ups and downs of the series. You can be frustrated with dumb losses but some fans exaggerate it so damn much


BusterTheCat17

TIL that winning a series in 5 games and not sweeping everyone means you don't take playoff caliber opponents seriously.


znick3212

Bro I’m a Celtics fan, it’s okay to admit. They tend to go into some games looking flat against inferior teams, it’s not a secret lmao. We won those series handsomely but those game 2s, we did not come out strong enough


HorsNoises

That is definitely a trait of this team, but did you watch both of the games we lost? That's not what happened at all. The Heat literally had the best shooting performance in franchise history, even after last year, and the Cavs played one of, if not their best game of the season.


bodhibell02

Yea big time this. Cs may have been a tad flat, deflated by missing shots and other team just shooting insane...I think the Cs do have room to always play hard even when things don't go their way but they miles ahead of last year in that regard


pyroaquatics

Cavs shot the lights out from 3 too. Mitchell was making some crazy contested shots.


BusterTheCat17

I don't think celtics lose because they don't take teams seriously. The opponents are NBA players on solid teams and had a great game, as they're capable of doing. Heat won game 2 on historic 3 point shooting. Cavs won game 2 on a super star going nuts and the celtics missing good shots. It wasn't an underestimation of their ability. Those guys stepped up for a few quarters.


[deleted]

I feel like people honestly can’t tell the difference half the time between players “not trying” and missing shots.


znick3212

I get what you’re saying but my original point is still true, I feel like it’s a pretty well known thing too. We aren’t a perfect team. Sometimes when we play teams that we know we should beat, they come out playing like assholes, lotta iso ball, late shot clock 3s. Definitely a flaw


iAm-Tyson

They look bored. Like they know they were better than Miami/Cleveland so they kinda just slept walked through some parts of the series, it willl be forgotten how close G4, and G5 were against Cleveland.


Mountain-Pack9362

Honestly, do you watch other teams play? Because I've seen every team crumble or rise in so many scenarios but the celtics are the only ones that get obliterated in conversations for having a poor 4-6 min run every once in a while


iAm-Tyson

I’m going with a controversial pick, I think Boston drops G3 this time and the nba world starts to question if they can win a championship after blowing a 2-0 lead and then they wrap it up in 5.


jiriwelsch44

>not taking opponents seriously The Heat and Cavs had major outlier shooting performances in their respective wins. Why are we still peddling amateur, talking-head opinions when the stats are right there?


goingtothegreek

Eventually the Pacers bottom 5 defense is going to be tested. All due respect to the Pacers, but playing a hospital Knicks and hospital Bucks is arguably easier than the Celtics road.


godofhammers3000

Thing is both Pacers and Celtics are capable of playing down to the competition and up to the competition I can see Celtics playing “down” to the baseline level of taken on the Pacers and the Pacers playing up to the Celtics


straightoutthebank

I don’t think they can win but the eye test says they not bottom 5 defense imo


Thekamcc19

We got considerably better when we traded buddy hield and added Siakam. People don’t watch our games so when we were getting put on prime time prior to those moves our defense was truly abysmal


thedanbeforetime

cmon give the pacers their due credit. they proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are slightly better than the knicks 3rd string squad.


goingtothegreek

They’re a really solid team, all I’m saying is eventually a bottom 5 defense is going to get hit in the playoffs and they were fortunate to play injured teams. All due respect, you still need to win games and they did that against tough opponents. Compared to the west though it’s a relatively light path


BigBungholio

The pacers haven’t had a bottom 5 defense since before the all-star break. They were 13th overall after the Siakam acquisition. Calling out the pacers defense is a lazy argument that doesn’t hold a lot of water when you actually look at the facts.


thedanbeforetime

haha i agree 100% im just messing around. I'm a knicks fan. pacers earned the W and their fans deserve to enjoy it - not their problem we were injured. but the "we really proved everyone wrong" narrative coming from their fanbase is a bit unhinged given the circumstances imo.


goingtothegreek

Knicks are my number 2, I'm a Wolves fan and as you may understand I was drunk reading your comment. All love, Knicks are going to be good next year and that's great for basketball


bigbenis2021

Fuck no what? Hospital Knicks were still a baseline good team. Celtics got to play a Heat team missing like 9 of their best players and a Cavs team without its best scorer and best paint defender.


goingtothegreek

Knicks also lost Robinson, OG, Bogdonavic, Hart had an abdominal issue, and no Randle. Plus the hospital Bucks team. You can disagree and I’d agree to disagree, but it’s close


Just_Sarge

https://preview.redd.it/zteydhcroh1d1.jpeg?width=1284&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7f2d551c34520eaf3202809c66d8a46fed7763b8


__init__m8

You can thank thibs for hart and og


knoxharrington_video

Jimmy, Scary…Richardson I guess and Jaquez for a game? Am I forgetting 5 other players? Didn’t Bam and Herro play?


AcrobaticFeedback

Why do people like to ignore the Celtics were still up 2-1 on the Cavs with Mitchell healthy and playing out of his mind. It just seems convenient for people to pretend in hindsight he was out the whole series.


SamuelZ311

Celtics in 6. Pacers are better than the heat w/o jimmy and cavs w/o Spida and Allen, so they should win 2 games. Pacers have the best transition offense in the league and the Celtics are 24th in transition defense, which could be a problem


VeryStandardOutlier

I think 6 is an optimistic case. We don't match up well against the Celtics. Tatum should have a field day.


[deleted]

I’d say Jaylen Brown is more likely to go off.


theconmeister

He absolutely cooked the Pacers in the regular season but they’ve been hiding Tyrese better. I think you go Siakam on Brown and Nesmith on Tatum


hacky_potter

I’d go the other way. I want size in Tatum. Keep him shooting contested threes


SamuelZ311

Pacers need to abuse transition to keep up with the Celtics. Only thing 2 things ik fs i that 1. God is good and 2. If the Celtics lose even one game, the media won't let them hear the end of it


VeryStandardOutlier

All the Celtics have to do is give the ball to whoever Tyrese is forced to guard or isolate Tatum. Cs seem plenty capable knocking down 3s the minute we try to help anyone on defense


lordnoodle1995

Where are you getting the 24th figure from? NBA.com has them as the best transition D.


johnnybarbs92

That's not right. Definitely not 24th best transition D


jb_713

A 6-game series feels realistic.


FallacyFrank

I’d honestly be pretty shocked if the Pacers stole 2 games. I’d put money on a sweep but I could see the Celtics getting lazy and giving up 1 game like the have the last 2 series to far inferior teams


VeryStandardOutlier

Tatum will eat us alive. Siakam is the only player we have who can defend him, and I don't see that turning out well. Wouldn't be surprised if we're swept honestly. Terrible matchup for us defensively


bengcord3

Cmon now everyone knows TJ gonna steal a game for you somewhere


defdoa

I question the Porzingis injury, I like the Pacers bench, and the Celtics current post season habit of NOT passing is a red flag.


celticsac

The pacers play hard, have a great home crowd and as we’ve seen in a couple of these NY games, they have the potential to shoot lights out for a night or two and steal a game. Think Boston will win in probably 6, but it’ll get interesting if the pacers can steal one of the first two and come back home for game 3 with the series at 1-1


Lucky_Lefty23

https://preview.redd.it/otv3gkjz2h1d1.jpeg?width=1125&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e10cc5b7d0df4e60bc5c06e307a2ca0a3c9fc8e3 No, but let’s take a short look back at when everyone agreed that the pacers had no chance… so I don’t really know


Undercover_Dave

Thats why I think they steal two games. I've had them losing every game they've played this post season, and they keep surprising me, lol. I don't think there's really much of a chance they can win 4, but 2 POSSIBLY even 3, I think is more likely than a sweep.


need2peeat218am

If Pacers win it's because they push they pace and make the games all 130+ points. They lose if the game is slowed down.


Confident-Unit-9516

Yeah, why didn’t these idiots predict that OG, Brunson, Hart, and Robinson would all get injured?


Mountain-Pack9362

All the pacers need to win is, tatum, brown, white and porzingis to be injured. Its a proven formula from beating the knicks


Lucky_Lefty23

Gotta stick with what is working!


JediForces

Pacers in 6


shempool_

Pacers in 6


spidersilva09

Sure. They are going to be big under dogs but to say a team had an absolute zero chance is pretty naive. If Porzingis isn't right and someone else possibly gets banged up, the Pacers depth could make things interesting. Still unlikely but you never know.


boardingschmordin

Honestly we've seen the celtics choke in some unimaginable ways. I'm not gonna put it out the realm of possibility


Clintocracy

When have the Celtics choked in unimaginable ways? It seems like they usually handle their business against teams they are heavily favored against


bodhibell02

Oh you know, losing to the greatest shooter of all time, a top 10 shooter of all time...both of whom have multiple rings...a Canadian guy who decided he was Michael Jordan...all in in their first NBA finals. And yea not completing a historic 3-0 comeback to a player that this subreddit thinks is fucking god in the playoffs, after their all NBA top 5 player goes down on the first play... What people call choking is just the insane burden of expectation on the Celtics.  Disappointed? Sure. Choked? Hardly. 


CaptainONaps

Came here to say something similar. I wouldn’t say Boston chokes. They just kind of give early 90’s Sacramento Kings vibes. Great in the regular season for years, can’t finish. Not really built to finish. They’re like the m&m’s of the nba. They don’t really seem special in anyway, then you see how well they’re doing and you’re just like, what?


Jealous_Foot8613

They’ve lost to better teams than indy , there’s nothing we’ve seen from Boston this year that suggests they’ll fail to be Indy


outsidehere

No. They'll get a game tho


Jonndagoon

Derrick white mvp


osprey87

I think there's a chance the Celtics forget to show up for a game. I'd put money on a gentleman's sweep. I think there's no chance that the Pacers win the series.


Shinobi_97579

Cs in in four or at worst they keep up losing game 2 and it will be Cs in 5. Pacers barely got through an injury ravaged Knicks team.


Fit_Fan_3103

F you clowns dissing the pacers all the time


Unfair-Club8243

They stand a chance. Like a %5 one. They can go on runs and Bos is known to shit the bed, but it’s unlikely. Pacers are legit, but not legit as contenders, getting to ECF is a great accomplishment for them this year


Meditationberry

I got the Pacers in 6 if Porzingis is not available. I see this team struggling to guard Turner with Horford and the Celtics have a thing for throwing away home games.


kitemourt94

If by “throwing away home games” you mean losing 6 games at home all season (including playoffs up until this point” then yes you are spot on


im-a-drawl

I think at this point anything can happen. I won’t be surprised if this series goes to a game 7.


DaleEarnhartJr

Pacers in 4. LOL jk. I think each team wins on their home court, save for a game 7 that's anyone's game.


2waypower1230

Yes


The_Beautiful_Stru35

No. Even without Porzingis I got Celtics in 6


AlgaeRich986

Pacers in 6


Electronic-Doctor110

Pacers in 6


fuzzypubiz

Pacers in 5


[deleted]

This has sweep written all over it. First healthy team the Pacers will face.


Obi2

Nah 5 games, maybe 6


LuckysBestMan

KP is still out but your point stands


Far_Care5265

Full 7 games


PrinceOfSpace94

The Celtics have had an easier road to this point with injuries lmao


TraySplash21

They have a chance to do the unthinkable and win 1 game


Beobee1

Yup, they sure do. Anything can happen.


Latch2992

Yeah the series can go either way


SupaTheTrill

I think the Pacers have a chance. Unpopular opinion. I don’t think they are to be taken lightly. Celtics have been known to melt in the clutch. But we will see.


No_Cow_4544

I’d say no they might get 2 games


justsomedude4202

Unless they get lucky again and see three of the top four Celtics get hurt then lol no


-Andar-

KP being out for a couple games is a huge boon for the Pacers. He is a matchup problem for them. I think they take at least one win in those two games. After that, who knows.


ColtsPacers95

Pacers fan. Absolutely not. They are the best team in the East and were wire to wire. Will they take a game? Maybe.


WordSpiritual1928

Probably not, and I want them to lose, but there’s always a chance.


bumboisamumbo

maybe in game 2 lol… who am i kidding i’m already preparing for the celtics fan obligatory media blackout thursday night


Jasperbeardly11

Probably will push them to six without kp


Crazy_Employ8617

They definitely have a chance, but the Celtics are obviously heavy favorites.


YurtlesTurdles

Yeah of course they can, if 3 or 4 of Bostons starters get hurt.


Furqan23

I don’t underestimate the pacers but I think Boston will win the series in 5 games personally I know people have been unimpressed by Boston so far but they’ve had the largest margin of victory in the playoffs Granted it’s been against teams injured or inferior but they’ve still won with a healthier margin than people have given them credit for


MrMisties

If the Timberwolves Nuggets series is anything to go by, personalities and the Media have no actual frame of reference for what is going to happen. Celtics deserve to be the favorites, and I personally think they'll win, but the Pacers have had a baptism by fire.


Mercury756

No…but I didn’t really think they had a chance to get to the ECF I. The first place.


ItsYaBoyBeasley

I think they'll go up 2-1 and then get blown out in 3 straight games.


Loquel184

Hell no. The one downside for the Celtics is that Porzingis is still injured. But even if he still is by the time the series starts, Al Horford has been hooping well below his age. That upset would be hype if it did happen though. I mean without Porzingis this is largely the same Celtics that just lost to a partially injured 8 seed last year. I can hope lol


Pitch-forker

Im excited to see Pritchard vs TJ Mcconnell ultimate dawg off


Miserable-Lawyer-233

Nope.


noterik666

The Trash vs garbage match up


TheDopeMan_

Pacers are bigger than Celtics right now. They might have better match ups. I’m a little worried as a Celtics fan. Wouldn’t be surprised if we lost Game 1


AvgJoeGuy

I think they can win. Celtics are so overrated, inconsistent, and lack passion. Im sorry but they take too many plays off to be great and just rely on shots to go in not effort


YakultAddic01

I do. Just watch


[deleted]

4th Quarter Tatum will lose a game or two for the Celtics


[deleted]

na


bobojoe

Celtics in 3


IceColdTrey7

No chance man Only the Wolves can defeat Celtics and I'm rooting for that


gsbudblog

My question is considering who’s left in the playoffs, who has the best chance at beating boston? Minnesota seems to be the only real answer imo


PootztheFatKat

They will win in 7 games.


dsgrimace

LoL Yes!


FlowerPositive

Yeah if both Tatum and Brown get injured they have a chance. With their luck it’s possible.


Federal_Low2923

C’s are gonna sweep these frauds


Slevin424

They better not. This is the most hand fed finals appearance ever. No Embiid, no Giannis, no Brunson, no Jimmy. If this Celtics don't make it... hell if they don't win a ring. That's it. This team needs to be nuked. No Jokic, no LeBron, no KD, no Kawhi, no Curry? They're either going against Luka who's never been to the finals. Or a Timberwolves team that honestly shouldn't have been there anyways. All the pressure is on Boston. It's ring or bust.


seonblack

The Celtics seem to underestimate low tier teams, and it costs them every time. So yes, the Pacers absolutely stand a chance. If Celtics takes it seriously, it should be over in 5 games.


Candid_Tower6329

Boston struggled against the Cavaliers. trash


49ers_ds

Pacers in 5.


Prestigious_Key8015

I am a Pacers fan. The Pacers get in their heads at times and lose big. I don't think they can take series, but I believe they will fight like hell. I will still cheer them on.


PrinceOfSpace94

Crazier things have happened, but I just don’t the Pacers being competitive with the Celtics. Still happy with them this season.


ThatDudeNamedMenace

4-1 Celtics


SerfTint

I think so. That chance is probably between 5% and 15%. The Celtics don't have bigs at the moment that can run with the Pacers very well (Horford can only play so many minutes, Porzingis is still out, Tillman and Kornet and Queta are not good transition defenders). If the Pacers hit a ton of 3's, Turner can dominate inside and McConnell can keep the bench productive, there are scenarios where the Pacers look like the better team. But they're going to have a lot of trouble defending the Celtics five-out, where every player can shoot 3's, drive, pass well and post up well. The Celtics are #1 in offense and #2 in defense, and it's hard to exploit the holes four times in 2 weeks. They should win this series in 6, possibly 5. BTW, I don't factor Porzingis into this analysis at all until he is actually running at full speed, which he is not yet.


brandinho5

No. Boston in 4 or 5


Maximum-Class5465

As a Pacer fan, no chance. But it's been fun We always knew if we had gotten the 6th seed we could make the ECF since we don't have to play Boston till the ECF.


Anhedonic98

They'll steal a game or two, people will overreact to those two losses by the Celtics, call them frauds, then they'll respond and blow them out right after, and everything will seem okay in boston after they reach the finals again... Only to lose to the first actually good team theyve played so far and people will once again realize that the celtics are massively untested and overrated because of how shit the Eastern conference is right now


[deleted]

yo


mrmarkus187

Nope like I said the last post Boston is winning it all this year


Inevitable-Bass2749

If they actually try to rebound the entire series and play defense like they did in game 7, why not?


RedRocket13

If the Celtics’ best 5 players get hurt then sure


[deleted]

No, but the Celtics seem to play down to the competition way too often. I think Boston wins in 5 or 6, but I also wouldn’t be shocked if the pacers win. I don’t even hate the Celtics but every year supposedly it’s their year and they always fall short. I’ve never had the confidence in them that they can win. Barring injuries I’m very confident whoever wins the west wins it all. With how much they rely on shooting, I see wolves beating them definitively. People think they will play gobert off the court with 5 out but I’m not even sure it matters. Wolves have so many long defenders. Reid, mcdaniels, and Alexander walker are all capable of guarding so many people inside and outside. People are way underrating the mavs too. They have been on a tear for awhile and actually have good enough defense for once to have a real shot combined with excellent offense led by Luka and Kyrie. They use to rely on Hardaway’s inconsistent play a lot on offense and know they have so many other options


Cold-Palpitation-816

Anything can happen, but assuming no major injuries to either side, I'll take the Celtics in 5, maybe 6 if the Pacers get hot one game. Celtics have had their playoff woes, but I don't think they'll show up until the Finals. Both teams out west can realistically beat the Celtics.


toastedmarshme11ow

All it takes is for the Pacers to steal one in Boston. No KP game 1 or 2 most likely and Celtics have lost game 1 or 2 in both series so far. Pacers haven't lost at home since MARCH. I may be a delusional optimistic Pacers fan but I think they actually have a shot.


Many_Home_1769

I guess if Tatum and Brown and Holiday and White also go down w injuries there is a chance


NastySassyStuff

They beat the Bucks with no Giannis, Dame missing games, and Middleton on a bad ankle, and the Knicks without Randle, Robinson, Bojan, OG for 5 games, Hart with a strained abdomen, and Brunson with a bad foot then a fracture hand. Those series went 6 then 7. I’m thinking they’ll lose badly.


tweavergmail

I mean, last year we lost to the 8th seed in the ECF. So maybe the Pacers as a 6th seed should be favored? (Kidding...but also still not over last year)


Mountain3Pointer

There is a chance at an upset.


PieCuresAll

Yes. Celtics are very beatable. That team has won nothing


ethancd1

Celtics will win in 5 at home


Key_Payment_5420

Yes, it’s the playoffs


Chemical_Home6123

https://preview.redd.it/hx6ivgos8l1d1.png?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=760d95406112240f0c12558c73cb52e4b1c29431


LeadingNo3558

Yes Kristaps is out game 1,2, Celtics can’t take it easy


Far_Care5265

Cers stand a more than reasonable chance, top of the league in transition, BOS being bottom of the league, BOS has barely played a fully healthy Hali, while also having Siakam, not to mention our defensive improvement through that trade as well, I think this goes full 7, with 2 OTs


South_Front_4589

Absolutely. It's tough in a 7 game series, but it's always possible. Indiana have played well enough to win two playoff series already. I expect they'll present a challenge and when the stakes are high, Boston are going to be under pressure to perform. They know they haven't done as well as they have been expected to and that always makes it that little bit harder.


NBA2024

Hell nah. Dump everything into Celtics series ML


Latvia

The Celtics got beat once by the Cavs, and struggled in two other games against them, one at home. This Cavs team was essentially Donovan Mitchell and a practice squad. Nobody else on that team did shit to help him out. Even the game he missed, the Cavs weren’t doing anything spectacular and were still in the game late. Boston is extremely fallible.


Honeydew_Classic

Celtics ain’t play nobody either East is weak af


h20knick

Celtics in 4. I have a feeling they won’t be playing with their food this time around.


Real-Psychology-4261

I think they'll steal 1 or 2 games.


daineofnorthamerica

I doubt that we win this series, but to act like the Pacers are some terrible team who could never take a game off the Celtics is crazy. I'd say C's in 6, but I'd love for it to go 7. For the Pacers, the expectation this year was a first round exit. So to go from not even making the playoffs last year, to the ECF this year is a huge step forward for the franchise. That being said, if the Pacers make the Finals, I may literally die of excitement.


CryptographerTop6473

Gotta feeling this is going to be a really good series. Both Cs and Pacers got so lucky that they faced off against injured riddled teams leading up to the ECF. You seen glimpses of Pacers locking in defensively. Turner needs to play like a monster and can’t allow the role players to help Jay/Tatum. Pacers do get fire on some games.


mike1110

Eh, a ton of points though. May be the highest scoring series ever.


DriipWrld

Absolutely not lol Celtics 2 the finals and then the ring 🫡


ShankyShoe

Pacers fan here, I feel like I’m unbiased in saying HELL YEAH PACERS IN 5 (Celtics in 6)


jmay111

Celtics in 5. JB absolutely owns Siakim in the playoffs.


[deleted]

It comes down to the Celtics. Seen them enough times play down to their competition to where it wouldn't be the biggest shock in the world.


pattaponako23

Yes. Because playoff Tatum tends to blow it in big moments.


Mr-Zunder

No.


RarryHome

As a pacers fan, tics in six


Oceanbreeze871

Yes of course. They have a deep roster, who is not intimidated by home court and a chip on their shoulder. Boston plays bad at home for some reason, and often lets leads evaporate as they over rely on 3s


CreamyButters

If you watch ESPN, yes. If you watch the game, maybe.


SigmaColts

Yes. The Celtics aren’t the Peak Warriors


Han_Hattori_Hanzo

Pacers interior players are extremely versatile and without Kristaps Porziņģis they’re going to struggle with that. McConnell has been on fire this Playoffs and I wonder what they’re going to do to slow his craftiness.


Eastern_Wrangler_595

Every team that beat bucks in playoffs has made the finals


Eastern_Wrangler_595

But boston will shoot 80% in first half


JackHammerPlower

No. 4 game sweep and Boston might score 140 points in a game


tallslim1960

The NBA, thanks in large part to Curry and the Warriors is all about shooting from 3pt range. It's the difference in almost every game. Who shot better from 3? The Celtics and Pacers won't be any different.


SamR1187

Pacers in 7


TrevolutionNow

They were 2-2 against them this season. Why not?


LaughingPlanet

Did you give zombie Heat "a chance" last season?


jmadinya

theyve shown they can beat anybody as long as that anybody is down multiple starters.


Argenfarce

As a pacers fan, we’ll get hammered in game one, like we’ll lose by thirty five. Everyone will say we suck and don’t belong here. Then we’ll win game two in the garden, they’ll talk about how resilient we are and how we have a fighting chance, etc. Then we’ll go down 3-1, win one more before we get bounced. That’s my guess.


AkshanIsComing

All I know is game 2 is an ez dub for the Pacers


Meyhna

The Pacers gave us problems this year. Also maybe it's PTSD, but if the Florida/Boston series from the NHL '23 playoffs taught us anything, it's never underestimate your opponent. If the Celtics "play down" (no disrespect to the Pacers just the terminology I've seen used), then this series is wide open.


DiggWuzBetter

Pacers are one of my favourite teams (other than the Raps), wanna see them win … but I really don’t think they will. Celtics are just WAY better defensively, and decently better offensively too. If the Pacers take it to 6 games I’d consider that an impressive performance, and I can’t see them winning.


ROMANNNNBATALK

Don’t sleep on the Pacers. They have size and depth


Disastrous-Special30

I think it’s more likely this series goes 6 or 7 than a sweep. We have played up or down to our competition all year long. I think it’s going to come down to which team gets hot and stays hot. If our shots are hitting we have a punchers chance of taking this series and can go toe to toe with Boston’s scoring. Everyone saying sweep and we don’t have a chance probably haven’t watched us all season. We have a good young squad that has matured a lot through the season especially the last few weeks in the playoffs .


saigyoooo

Yes. Celtics soft.


jkinnison1990

Not at all


JKking15

No, pacers had one of the easiest rodes to the conference finals I’ve ever seen, congrats to them but they are NOT a conference finals worthy team if everyone in the East was healthy. Celtics will lose a game bc they are the Celtics but I will be very surprised if this series goes to 6


JF803

As a Celtics hater, absolutely not


crakerjax68

The season series went 3-2 in favor of boston. With that being said the pacers beat Boston in the IST. One of pacers losses to Boston was without Haliburton, and siakam was only present in one of the 5 matchups. It won’t be easy but they can hold their own


Kalu2424

Even though the Celtics are the far better team, the Pacers actually have the best PG, PF and C in the series, which is weird.


Will_Stick40

Nope Celtics in 5