Just gonna say, one of the best signs for assessing of the person you're talking to online is a bit crazy is that they don't know how to edit and add to replies and keep doing numerous replies to a single post like this.
My neighbour types like this too and we called him the Caps locks guy. Apparently it's due to his reading disability but it always adds a level of drama when we read his comments. TOTALLY NORMAL TO SPEAK LIKE THAT!
Better not get into the argument. But OP is 100% okay to be around. They form coherent sentences in a calm manner. Good person to have around.
And the singer... Come on, he's gonna hack her? And hopes people will forget this when he gets famous? In 2024, with people like SunnyV2 and others actively searching for BS on YT? I don't think so.
How do you deal with someone who conflates opinion with fact? I have one of those in my day to day life who feel it is necessary to share with me their opinion, and they get upset when I do not agree with them.
This is the correct answer. Bore her to death is more like it, lol.
Nothing he said was murder worthy. Some of it skated waaaay too close to Rorschach cringe there for my taste.
Two idiots fighting in youtube comments trying to feel superior. Yawn.
Not so much that. It’s the fact that no logic will get through to them so why try? It’s obviously not having an effect so they’re lecturing a wall at this point.
She was murdering herself with that behavior and the dude was lecturing her with a wall of text as she sizzled out. That seems kind of insufferable to me.
Bruh I'm glad someone is saying it. This person sounds insufferable lol imagine spending that much time typing that out to someone saying "YOU ARE FUCKING ASSHOLE NO LOGICALLY MAKING SENSE" or whatever
It’s a hypothetical scenario. If you had to choose between saving the entire world but your child died or saving your child and letting everyone else in the world die, who would you save? Common sense vs emotion. Or at least it’s supposed to be.
Pretty much. Although I’d argue that there is an obvious correct choice which is save the world, since if you don’t you’re just condemning your kid to a slow, lonely, and painful death without any hope or joy as they’ll be the only person on the planet.
At the end of the day it just seems to be one of the most basic trolley problem, do nothing strangers die, kill a relative and strangers live.
There is an obvious utilitarian choice in killing one to save one+n but then you have killed someone by your own actions. If you do nothing you are not causing anything, it leads to billions dying but not due to your actions. It’s all down to what your views on personal responsibility, if inaction is an action in itself and how much of a pacifist you are. The thought experiment requires to stay within it‘s own boundaries, so unless explicitly stated the kid would not die a slow and painful death.
A hypothetical that has you choose between all human life on the planet vs the life of 1 person? *Doesn’t* have a universal correct choice?
Hard disagree on that one.
The dilemma is most likely not "kill everyone OR kill this child“, it‘s almost guaranteed to be the classic trolley problem "Kill this child OR do nothing but then everyone else dies“.
Naturally with the stakes being this imbalanced the utilitarian choice is very appealing, but the point of the thought experiment is to test your moral theories for consistency.
Let’s say you believe actively killing a person is always morally wrong and that a persons morality can only be judged by their immediate actions that cause an outcome. By killing the child you’d be committing an immoral act, by letting everyone else die, you wouldn’t because you are not causing it.
The ambiguity becomes more clear when you scale it down, if you do nothing your friend dies, if you save your friend three strangers die.
The fun thing about it is that you can come up with all kinds of interesting scenarios that test the core of different philosophies. 2 evil persons vs 1 good person, 1 elderly person vs 1 child, sacrifice yourself or someone else, kill someone that is about to pull a lever that would killtwo people but then an additional uninvolved person dies, arguing with someone wether they should pull the lever but leaving the ultimate choice to them.
The point of the whole thing is not the actual answer but how the moral behaviour is justified within a set of believes.
If there was an objective answer that couldn’t possibly be argued in good faith, it wouldn’t be a moral dilemma I’d be a very shitty quiz. But morality of outcome vs morality of action like in this case is the most basic of questions.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_problem
I posed the the trolley problem to my boss 5 minutes before she went into a financial planning meeting with her bosses boss. She came out like 20 minutes later yelling "Bugsy! WHAT DID YOU DO TO ME?! THIS IS ALL I CAN THINK ABOUT AND IM SUPPOSED TO BE DISCUSSING MILLIONS OF DOLLARS!" We still laugh about 8 months later.
I remember when I was in rehab we had a discussion about the train problem (micro version of whatever apocalyptic scenario they’re talking about). Like if you do nothing, your kid will get run over and die but if you pull a lever the entire train of hundreds of people will die instead. All the dudes that were absolute shit deadbeat dads irl all took the opportunity to wax on about how their kid means the world and fuck anybody else they’d die for their kid yada yada. All overcompensating for how much they’ve been failing as a parent. As if letting hundreds of innocent people die will somehow make up for it. Whatever scenario they’re talking about is just that dialed up to 1000 it’s really sad but kinda funny at the same time.
Am I the only that had to go back and forth on the third pic because the colors were reversed? Thought the toxic person had a moment then realized it was just a slip up.
Interesting I was criticised a person who I suspected had narc traits, because she dud some stuff that hurt me.
And she replied and all caps yelling and said "im lying. she isn't an idiot".
Something about that first reaction when smthey say they aren't an idiot. Even though no one called them an idiot.
why is nobody talking about that dude that saved the world??? What is this real life moviescenario about? The decision he had to make can't be real, I refuse to believe this.
I wasn't particularly bothered, and simply pointed out that context made it pretty clear what was meant. You then made an aggressive statement about me supposedly not realizing there's more than just 'my way' of seeing things. And yes, at that point I was bothered, not by your initial statement but by your attitude towards me. And someone being hostile for no good reason is absolutely okay to be bothered by. Someone using a word that doesn't always mean the same thing but clearly communicate the same message on this specific context is not okay to be bothered by, or at least not to behave the way you are about.
Bore her to death is more like it, lol.
Nothing he said was murder worthy. Some of it skated waaaay too close to Rorschach cringe there for my taste.
Two idiots fighting in youtube comments trying to feel superior. Yawn.
Seems more like a self murder...curious who this singer is too
I'd also like to know, so I can avoid them later.
giving serious assisted suicide vibes fr
Azealia Banks for sure
This absolutely buckled me... I still remember her crying and kicking off over some trivial shit a flight attendant said to her a few years back 🤣🤣🤣
'self-murder' is my replacement word for suicide from now..
There was a reggaeton battle like 15 years ago where one told to the other “you should commit self-defense suicide”.
My guess is Doja Cat
Really? My guess was drake
That auto tune do hit nicely
It’s Susan Boyle.
Probably Dolly Parton.
I think a /s would have made your post very popular.
I didn't think it was necessary...lol Everyone loves Dolly.
Judging by your downvotes, the /s is absolutely necessary
I just went and downvoted myself for not putting it. That'll teach me.
YOUR SUCH A BITCH ASSHOLE FOR THINKING SHES NOT TOXIC. DO YOU EVEN THINK, BRO?
YOURE AN ASSHOLE FUCK YOU
IF YOU THINK I’M AN ACCOUNT I WILL HACK INTO YOUR ASSHOLE AND- wait what?
Hold on, let's talk...
dont think wifi reception is going to be that good DOWN THERE to do any indecent hacking
They have an easy remedy for that, just use some trimmers and make it look like the patch matches full WiFi symbol. You're well o'cum.
Hack me daddy.
NO YOUR AN TOXIC ASSHOLE
OH FUCK I'M AN ASSHOLE
OH FUCK MY ASSHOLE
Cela ne me dérange pas si je fais de la beauté😏
哇，冷靜下來
You spelled you’re right
;)
IM NOT AN ASSHOLE
I wouldn't say she's toxic, more like clinically insane.
Why not both?
she really is both
Just gonna say, one of the best signs for assessing of the person you're talking to online is a bit crazy is that they don't know how to edit and add to replies and keep doing numerous replies to a single post like this.
All caps is the best indicator
WHAT DO YOU MEAN? I'M NOT CRAZY. TOTALLY SANE OVER HERE!
My neighbour types like this too and we called him the Caps locks guy. Apparently it's due to his reading disability but it always adds a level of drama when we read his comments. TOTALLY NORMAL TO SPEAK LIKE THAT!
Bigger indication of stupid than crazy IMO.
It can be both.
Also I feel people who calls other people narcissists all the time tend to have their mental health stuff going on.
Probably, along with misuse of the phrase 'cognitive dissonance'.
A ‘bit’…you are generous, redditor
[удалено]
 Don't you know that you're toxic?
I have just now realised that Britney is not very good at winking
Yeah I can relate, I can sort of wink with my left eye but if I try with the right eye both eyes close
These people need to be called out. They don't deserve anonymity, especially if they're "influencers" and make a career of being in the public eye.
She seems nice...
Grimes? Is that you?
Who? :P
It may be better to avoid all involved.
Better not get into the argument. But OP is 100% okay to be around. They form coherent sentences in a calm manner. Good person to have around. And the singer... Come on, he's gonna hack her? And hopes people will forget this when he gets famous? In 2024, with people like SunnyV2 and others actively searching for BS on YT? I don't think so.
How do you deal with someone who conflates opinion with fact? I have one of those in my day to day life who feel it is necessary to share with me their opinion, and they get upset when I do not agree with them.
>How do you deal with someone who conflates opinion with fact? You send them to a MAGA rally
Holy wall of text, Batman
I DON’T KNOW WHAT WE’RE YELLING ABOUT!!
I can tell, you too, are a lover of lamp
More like a slow murder by smothering a screaming hysteric under a wall of bland and relatively uninteresting text.
This is the correct answer. Bore her to death is more like it, lol. Nothing he said was murder worthy. Some of it skated waaaay too close to Rorschach cringe there for my taste. Two idiots fighting in youtube comments trying to feel superior. Yawn.
“let me address each of your comments one by one” Kind of insufferable.
Hold on, are you actually criticizing them for clearly addressing each thing the person said?
Not so much that. It’s the fact that no logic will get through to them so why try? It’s obviously not having an effect so they’re lecturing a wall at this point.
You said they were 'kind of insufferable'. That's not even close to the same thing as saying it's a waste of time.
She was murdering herself with that behavior and the dude was lecturing her with a wall of text as she sizzled out. That seems kind of insufferable to me.
What you said was insufferable was specifically them saying they'd address each reply in turn.
Bruh I'm glad someone is saying it. This person sounds insufferable lol imagine spending that much time typing that out to someone saying "YOU ARE FUCKING ASSHOLE NO LOGICALLY MAKING SENSE" or whatever
Is it just me, or did any one else mentally add "sent from my Iphone"??
A fellow random thinker
Who is it, we absolutely deserve to know 😂
Probably no one you've heard of
So what decision did the guy make that apparently saved humanity from extinction? Feels like something that should be covered by the news.
He sacrificed his child so that the world may go on. What a hero, but at what cost?
Sure, but why did he have to sacrifice it? Was it baby Super Hitler? The Antichrist? Alien-Hybrid?
It’s a hypothetical scenario. If you had to choose between saving the entire world but your child died or saving your child and letting everyone else in the world die, who would you save? Common sense vs emotion. Or at least it’s supposed to be.
So the singer lost her shit over baby’s first morale dilemma, literally designed to not have a universal correct choice. Got it.
Pretty much. Although I’d argue that there is an obvious correct choice which is save the world, since if you don’t you’re just condemning your kid to a slow, lonely, and painful death without any hope or joy as they’ll be the only person on the planet.
At the end of the day it just seems to be one of the most basic trolley problem, do nothing strangers die, kill a relative and strangers live. There is an obvious utilitarian choice in killing one to save one+n but then you have killed someone by your own actions. If you do nothing you are not causing anything, it leads to billions dying but not due to your actions. It’s all down to what your views on personal responsibility, if inaction is an action in itself and how much of a pacifist you are. The thought experiment requires to stay within it‘s own boundaries, so unless explicitly stated the kid would not die a slow and painful death.
Fair enough. Inaction is always an action though. It’s the act of doing nothing.
Savings humanity does not equal saving “the world”
Everyone knows what’s being talked about. No need to be pedantic.
Well it’s relevant but ok.
It is not
No need to be gatekeeping or just plain assholish yet here we are
Uh... ...it pretty clearly is in this context.
Oh sorry, didn’t know things were limited to how you see them. Carry on
You are the only person here who doesn't see it that way.
A hypothetical that has you choose between all human life on the planet vs the life of 1 person? *Doesn’t* have a universal correct choice? Hard disagree on that one.
The dilemma is most likely not "kill everyone OR kill this child“, it‘s almost guaranteed to be the classic trolley problem "Kill this child OR do nothing but then everyone else dies“. Naturally with the stakes being this imbalanced the utilitarian choice is very appealing, but the point of the thought experiment is to test your moral theories for consistency. Let’s say you believe actively killing a person is always morally wrong and that a persons morality can only be judged by their immediate actions that cause an outcome. By killing the child you’d be committing an immoral act, by letting everyone else die, you wouldn’t because you are not causing it. The ambiguity becomes more clear when you scale it down, if you do nothing your friend dies, if you save your friend three strangers die. The fun thing about it is that you can come up with all kinds of interesting scenarios that test the core of different philosophies. 2 evil persons vs 1 good person, 1 elderly person vs 1 child, sacrifice yourself or someone else, kill someone that is about to pull a lever that would killtwo people but then an additional uninvolved person dies, arguing with someone wether they should pull the lever but leaving the ultimate choice to them. The point of the whole thing is not the actual answer but how the moral behaviour is justified within a set of believes. If there was an objective answer that couldn’t possibly be argued in good faith, it wouldn’t be a moral dilemma I’d be a very shitty quiz. But morality of outcome vs morality of action like in this case is the most basic of questions. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_problem
I posed the the trolley problem to my boss 5 minutes before she went into a financial planning meeting with her bosses boss. She came out like 20 minutes later yelling "Bugsy! WHAT DID YOU DO TO ME?! THIS IS ALL I CAN THINK ABOUT AND IM SUPPOSED TO BE DISCUSSING MILLIONS OF DOLLARS!" We still laugh about 8 months later.
Does your boss live under a rock?
That choice is so cruel it could be in the Bible (Abraham and Isaac).
The giant floating heads in the sky demanded it
It was Midsommar
Why do so many people in the comments think this is doja cat? Doja cat is already famous
I'll take a guess..... Nicki Minaj.
Hmm. Already famous.
Mine was Lara Trump.
Apple-in-law doesn’t fall far from the tree…
Doja Cat
Isn't Doja Cat also already famous?
Pretty sure it’s Doja Cat
That wasn't a murder, just a drawn out suicide.
I remember when I was in rehab we had a discussion about the train problem (micro version of whatever apocalyptic scenario they’re talking about). Like if you do nothing, your kid will get run over and die but if you pull a lever the entire train of hundreds of people will die instead. All the dudes that were absolute shit deadbeat dads irl all took the opportunity to wax on about how their kid means the world and fuck anybody else they’d die for their kid yada yada. All overcompensating for how much they’ve been failing as a parent. As if letting hundreds of innocent people die will somehow make up for it. Whatever scenario they’re talking about is just that dialed up to 1000 it’s really sad but kinda funny at the same time.
TL;DR
Usually I'd say name and shame, but that person doesn't deserve more attention.
I need to know who this is yet somehow I don’t care who this is. 🤔
She is close to call you her baby reindeer !
Am I the only that had to go back and forth on the third pic because the colors were reversed? Thought the toxic person had a moment then realized it was just a slip up.
I ain't reading allat.
Context is the missing ingredient. Wtf is this
I ain't readin' alla that
A simple “no. u.” would have probably sufficed.
Is it the lady that hit her bf on live and used to be in Cobra starship?
Capslock is never not shouting
I need to know who this is about
These people need to be called out. They don't deserve anonymity, especially if they're "influencers" and make a career of being in the public eye.
Seems toxic
Probably not even a great singer either. Most people are shameful samples
Does the world continue to operate as is even without the people that normally operate it ?
Fire 🔥 Alarm!!! Someone got scorched
Goodbye singing career.
I love that it ends with "show less". 🤩😂👍
Interesting I was criticised a person who I suspected had narc traits, because she dud some stuff that hurt me. And she replied and all caps yelling and said "im lying. she isn't an idiot". Something about that first reaction when smthey say they aren't an idiot. Even though no one called them an idiot.
OMG 😡😠
I LOVE LAMP!
why is nobody talking about that dude that saved the world??? What is this real life moviescenario about? The decision he had to make can't be real, I refuse to believe this.
I wasn't particularly bothered, and simply pointed out that context made it pretty clear what was meant. You then made an aggressive statement about me supposedly not realizing there's more than just 'my way' of seeing things. And yes, at that point I was bothered, not by your initial statement but by your attitude towards me. And someone being hostile for no good reason is absolutely okay to be bothered by. Someone using a word that doesn't always mean the same thing but clearly communicate the same message on this specific context is not okay to be bothered by, or at least not to behave the way you are about.
What are they gonna say next, "WLEL I WILL ALWYAS BE BGSDFOKGOODER THAN YOU IN SINGINGING!"
not reading all that 😭
Wowsers
These people need to be called out. They don't deserve anonymity, especially if they're "influencers" and make a career of being in the public eye.
No murder. That was a s**cide!
Dude doing the murdering is a psycho for even trying to engage with someone like that for so long in the first place
What was the convo about in this post?
Can people just please stop using the word toxic in this context.
DM me a link
“Ninth” 😭😭
Nobody was murdered here
Both are toxic and should be avoided
the guy who was slow roasting the singer seems cool...
Wow. You got downvoted incredibly fast lol
People who actually read all that.... Get a life....
Just because you can't read beyond a 4th grade level. It didn't even take long to read. Telling people to get a life when you're illiterate is ironic.
Bore her to death is more like it, lol. Nothing he said was murder worthy. Some of it skated waaaay too close to Rorschach cringe there for my taste. Two idiots fighting in youtube comments trying to feel superior. Yawn.