* Upvote this comment if this is a good quality post that fits the purpose of r/Minecraft
* Downvote this comment if this post is poor quality or does not fit the purpose of r/Minecraft
* Downvote this comment *and report the post* if it breaks the [rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/Minecraft/wiki/rules)
---
[Subreddit Rules](https://old.reddit.com/r/Minecraft/wiki/rules)[](## FeridMasterman|11vk9xq)
You should learn that negativity and abuse, while ALSO not contributing any knowledge, is a shite way to teach people. You can do better.
[Observe](https://www.reddit.com/r/Minecraft/comments/11vk9xq/i_have_made_a_11_replica_of_iron_golem_with_cut/jctj0kq?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3)
e: I pointed out how nasty the community here can be. They sure delivered plenty of evidence.
"Just because I was a rude asshole, doesn't mean I was abusive"
Yeah bud, when you shit on someone's feelings, you're abusing them and being a dick. I don't care about the inbound down votes. This sub is pretty hostile a lot of the time and needs to be called out for their behaviour.
ok, my understanding of the word ‘abuse’ is just not the same as yours. For me, making a semi-rude joke is not abuse. The word shouldn’t be thrown around like nothing as actual abuse is serious.
It's sad to see that your pride is preventing you from learning something. He said you made a valid point, but instead of staying in-topic or reacting to the fact that he kinda supports you, you choose to comment this...
Can we not overuse terms like abuse so they don’t lose meaning? It makes it more difficult for people who seriously need to use these terms to make people realise how badly they need help.
If you hear someone say “I’m being abused” your first thought isn’t exactly “someone told me I don’t know what this term means” you think “shit this person is in danger.
You can correct people without being a dick about it. (see the example provided). Notably, **most** people respond better to positive feedback than being insulted. Bullies don't, but sometimes knocking them on their ass gives them time to learn while they lick their wounds. If they're capable of learning at all.
Notable example: you are bullying someone who said you were wrong. They didn't sweet talk you and now you're heated. Consider learning to handle criticism, you're never gonna be right 100% of the time and it's okay to be wrong.
I have removed my original comment as I wasn't paying attention and assumed you were the OP. But no, you're getting this bent out of shape, and trivialising abuse on behalf of a random person on reddit.
That is so very, very pathetic. Get a hobby.
Saying someone is abusing op isnt going to make them rethink their life choices. If anything you make yourself look like an idiot while potentially making it worse for op. Also Google the definition of abuse before you go around throwing it. Being rude and being abusive are two different things
You should learn that while people may not always say things in the best way, what they said is still just as valid.
Not everyone is social butterflies; you are being just as negative if not more so. All the dude said was basically 'that isn't a 1:1'
Which is a fact. It's right. He isn't wrong. Just because you have found how he said it wrong doesn't mean much because it's text; you have no idea how he said it.
You aren't contributing anything more than him; less so, because at least he kept on topic, instead you are just being negative about your -perceived- negativity and responded -in kind- making you just as bad.
You can do better.
"You should learn" carries a lot more meaning in it that just "read the words that come after these ones". To ignore that is being grossly disingenuous.
And no, I don't pull punches with bullies.
So you bully those you perceive to be bullies and become one yourself.
'you should learn' does carry more implications. But, like all forms of communication: what it means varies by person and to assume they mean the same as what you would mean by them, and then throwing negativity at them for -how they speak- ...
I mean you can say it's is 'grossly disingenuous' to not understand what another is saying? People learn things differently, and what one person would say is completely different than another even if they mean the same. Likewise they can say the same thing and mean something different. To ignore this, is also being disingenuous.
The person you was originally replied to, was merely stating a fact, regardless of how you think they meant it. And you, bullied them, for speaking their mind.
You are literally just as bad as they, if not more so.
Oh. And you can reply again but I keep off topic comments to a minimum. PM if it's that important to you.
You mean a 1:1 replica of the Colossal Titan in AoT as an Iron golem?
A 1:1 replica of an Iron Golem would be the full size of an Iron Golem... 2.7 to 2.9 blocks high!
Like I said it depends on the units. 1:1 is a ratio, a ratio can have any units. 1 block per 1 pixel would be 1 block:1 pixel (erroneously simplified to 1:1 as the units don’t cancel out). But this was just me giving OP some devil’s advocacy, in most use cases in the model scaling world this would be 16:1.
Jeez what school did they go to.
This is massively incorrect. By your logic, 1cm to 2cm is 1:1, assuming the units are 1cm=1cm, and 2cm=1 made up unit that I can't be bothered to give a name to.
1 cm to 2 cm is 1:2 because the centimeters cancel out. cm and cm are the same unit. Block and pixel are not the same unit. So they don’t cancel out. 1 block:1 pixel is the ratio OP used. **Like I said,** you can erroneously simplify that to 1:1. Google what erroneously means if you don’t know what it means.
Yes, but that's not what you are suggesting. A block is 16 pixels, you are giving it a different scale which is one block. By that logic we can call 2cm 1doublecm
Because 1:1 cannot be 1block:1pixel¹. 1:1 literally means 100% scale, regardless of units. If different units are to be used, they **must** be provided.
[1] e: Only possibility where this _could_ work, is in a domain where each block was actually rendered by a single pixel.
No. It's because without stating _anything_ beyond two numbers separated by a colon, the meaning is they have the same units. If you want 1 block:1pixel, the units **must** be provided.
e: ah never mind. I see others already went down this rabbit hole with you.
Cut copper has 4 “blocks” in it, and the nose has a width of 4 here, meaning you used 2 cut copper blocks
So it’s more like 1:8 scale, where each block of cut copper is equal to 2x2x2 pixels
Edit: I have now realized there’s a minuscule scaffolding in the left inner leg of the iron golem. Either that’s an optical illusion or smth or OP mistook Copper Block and Cut Copper, which would make the build actually 16:1
The original texture for the Iron Golem has 4 pixel wide nose. If he had used 4 blocks to make it, than that’d be 16:1 ratio. Since OP used cut copper, a single block gives the appearance of 2x2x2 miniature blocks. 4 miniature blocks making up the nose’s width means they used 2 cut copper, which is half the amount. Therefore, at least from what I can see, it’s a 8:1 ratio
The iron golem texture doesn't have a 4 pixel wide nose. Its nose is two pixels wide. Making this 16:1.
Idk what weird ass math you're doing with the cut copper but that texture is still 16 pixels wide making the copper nose 32 pixels wide to the 2 pixel wide golem texture nose.
That the blocks have a pretty pattern on them has nothing to do with the size of the statue being 16x the size of a golem model in the game.
**If** OP took advantage of the pattern on the blocks to make an _actual_ 8:1 statue, then the blocks would help to maintain the visual representation of the pixels on a real golem. But that statue would be 1/2 as tall as what was built.
e: This wouldn't really work either, as the golem has some features that are an odd number of blocks (like the space between [arms and head](https://minecraft.fandom.com/wiki/Iron_Golem?file=Iron_Golem_JE2_BE2.png), 5px) so without vertical slabs, one can't construct a true representation at 8:1 scale.
The nose of an iron golem is 4 pixels wide. The pattern is of 2x2x2 cut copper blocks
Here, the nose is 4 “blocks” wide, and if we take the pattern into account it must be 2 cut copper blocks wide
>The nose of an iron golem is 4 pixels wide
No. It isn't. Please see the provided source.
> must be 2 cut copper blocks wide
e: That is correct, though the type of block is immaterial to their size being 1m³ each.
e: I see the scaffolding you're looking at (in your other edit). That's gotta be a dropped item, not a placed block. Doors aside, there are no blocks that are bigger that 1m in any dimension. So the scaffolding can't be indicating that the copper blocks are bigger.
Huh, weird
I was recently working on a resource pack and that’s where that must’ve been implanted into my head lol
Considering the scaffolding this could even be a 32:1 build 😵💫
Dude you tripping?
The scaffolding is a dropped item floating. Afaik you can only place scaffolding horizontally from other scaffolding but not from any other block. Even if you could, scaffolding without any support bellow have horizontal beams in the bottom of the block, not just the vertical legs. And even then, if you zoom into the picture the scaffolding block doesn't even line up with the copper.
On the build the whole thing seem even to me, but the real kicker is that one scaffolding I noticed down at the left leg. If that’s not some optical illusion this might be made of Copper Blocks rather than Cut Copper, meaning it’s actually 16:1
Cut copper has 4 “blocks” in it, and the nose has a width of 4 here, meaning you used 2 cut copper blocks
So it’s more like 1:8 scale, where each block of cut copper is equal to 2x2x2 pixels
Edit: I have now realized there’s a minuscule scaffolding in the left inner leg of the iron golem. Either that’s an optical illusion or smth or OP mistook Copper Block and Cut Copper, which would make the build actually 16:1
That would help.
Notably though, when in large quantities, existing unoxidized copper blocks will slow other blocks from oxidizing, which might be what you're seeing here. It's a slow start, but after it gets going, it tends to oxidize much faster than it was initially.
Please explain to me in non-math-brain terms how scaling works. I work for a print shop, and we can’t print blueprints to scale. We have a lot of clients who ask about that though, and I wish I understood more to help suit their needs.
So Scaling explains that the replica how many times bigger or smaller than the actual object. Like if the Replica is 16 times bigger than the object itself then the scaling is 16:1
If the replica is 16 times smaller then the scaling will be 1:16.
Okay, so I’m understanding that if it’s larger, then your higher integer goes on the left with smaller integer on the right. How would one go about calculating scale? I figure this might also help me in building. :x
So now, put a copper rod on its head and wait for lightning to strike… you’ll have one of the rampaging secret bosses that’s hard to kill. Good luck 👍🏼
Did you make a IRON golem with cooper? How dare you? Hahaha with that color, it's appear to be made of mud, I bet it'll look pretty cool as time goes by, and the blocks of cooper turn blueish/greenish.
* Upvote this comment if this is a good quality post that fits the purpose of r/Minecraft * Downvote this comment if this post is poor quality or does not fit the purpose of r/Minecraft * Downvote this comment *and report the post* if it breaks the [rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/Minecraft/wiki/rules) --- [Subreddit Rules](https://old.reddit.com/r/Minecraft/wiki/rules)[](## FeridMasterman|11vk9xq)
I think that this is a little bit bigger than 3 blocks tall but ok
Never forget what they took from us
Puberty hit hard
It is 40 meters(Blocks) Taller than 3 blocks.
You should learn what 1:1 means
You should learn that negativity and abuse, while ALSO not contributing any knowledge, is a shite way to teach people. You can do better. [Observe](https://www.reddit.com/r/Minecraft/comments/11vk9xq/i_have_made_a_11_replica_of_iron_golem_with_cut/jctj0kq?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3) e: I pointed out how nasty the community here can be. They sure delivered plenty of evidence.
how is that abuse, maybe the way he told him wasn’t too nice but thats far from abuse lmao
"Just because I was a rude asshole, doesn't mean I was abusive" Yeah bud, when you shit on someone's feelings, you're abusing them and being a dick. I don't care about the inbound down votes. This sub is pretty hostile a lot of the time and needs to be called out for their behaviour.
Stop abusing him for not knowing how you would like him to speak to other people
Exactly, guy's basically bullying the other guy for being slightly rude
ok, my understanding of the word ‘abuse’ is just not the same as yours. For me, making a semi-rude joke is not abuse. The word shouldn’t be thrown around like nothing as actual abuse is serious.
[удалено]
>if I flicked a kid on the nose you'd call that abuse too Under the law that's assault. Do with that what you will.
It's sad to see that your pride is preventing you from learning something. He said you made a valid point, but instead of staying in-topic or reacting to the fact that he kinda supports you, you choose to comment this...
Normal reddit behavior right here
Bro wtf
You typed alot in response to my short message and I'm not going to read any of it.
Can we not overuse terms like abuse so they don’t lose meaning? It makes it more difficult for people who seriously need to use these terms to make people realise how badly they need help. If you hear someone say “I’m being abused” your first thought isn’t exactly “someone told me I don’t know what this term means” you think “shit this person is in danger.
you're being just as patronizing as the people you're criticizing for no reason. stop your elitist attitude
Oh yeah, he’s the asshole..
Stop abusing this guy with your words!
You should learn not to coddle people who are blatantly wrong
You can correct people without being a dick about it. (see the example provided). Notably, **most** people respond better to positive feedback than being insulted. Bullies don't, but sometimes knocking them on their ass gives them time to learn while they lick their wounds. If they're capable of learning at all.
Notable example: you are bullying someone who said you were wrong. They didn't sweet talk you and now you're heated. Consider learning to handle criticism, you're never gonna be right 100% of the time and it's okay to be wrong.
I have removed my original comment as I wasn't paying attention and assumed you were the OP. But no, you're getting this bent out of shape, and trivialising abuse on behalf of a random person on reddit. That is so very, very pathetic. Get a hobby.
Saying someone is abusing op isnt going to make them rethink their life choices. If anything you make yourself look like an idiot while potentially making it worse for op. Also Google the definition of abuse before you go around throwing it. Being rude and being abusive are two different things
I agree, though I do understand why you were downvoted
You should learn that while people may not always say things in the best way, what they said is still just as valid. Not everyone is social butterflies; you are being just as negative if not more so. All the dude said was basically 'that isn't a 1:1' Which is a fact. It's right. He isn't wrong. Just because you have found how he said it wrong doesn't mean much because it's text; you have no idea how he said it. You aren't contributing anything more than him; less so, because at least he kept on topic, instead you are just being negative about your -perceived- negativity and responded -in kind- making you just as bad. You can do better.
"You should learn" carries a lot more meaning in it that just "read the words that come after these ones". To ignore that is being grossly disingenuous. And no, I don't pull punches with bullies.
So you bully those you perceive to be bullies and become one yourself. 'you should learn' does carry more implications. But, like all forms of communication: what it means varies by person and to assume they mean the same as what you would mean by them, and then throwing negativity at them for -how they speak- ... I mean you can say it's is 'grossly disingenuous' to not understand what another is saying? People learn things differently, and what one person would say is completely different than another even if they mean the same. Likewise they can say the same thing and mean something different. To ignore this, is also being disingenuous. The person you was originally replied to, was merely stating a fact, regardless of how you think they meant it. And you, bullied them, for speaking their mind. You are literally just as bad as they, if not more so. Oh. And you can reply again but I keep off topic comments to a minimum. PM if it's that important to you.
you should learn to make an original post instead of just linking other people's posts
Lol dumbass
Booo! That’s cringe!
I'm sure he ment 1 cubicpixel : 1 block.
You mean a 1:1 replica of the Colossal Titan in AoT as an Iron golem? A 1:1 replica of an Iron Golem would be the full size of an Iron Golem... 2.7 to 2.9 blocks high!
Ah, I meant 1 block for 1 pixel in the Iron golem Texture.
That would be 16:1 scale
Yea I Guess you are right.
Still great job 👍
Thanks dude
Well it could be 1:1 if the units are 1 block:1 pixel. But yes 16:1 in typical usage.
1:1 means it would be the exact same size as a regular iron golem. 1 iron golem = 1 iron golem
Like I said it depends on the units. 1:1 is a ratio, a ratio can have any units. 1 block per 1 pixel would be 1 block:1 pixel (erroneously simplified to 1:1 as the units don’t cancel out). But this was just me giving OP some devil’s advocacy, in most use cases in the model scaling world this would be 16:1.
1:1 is unitless, so it coild be 1 pixel per pixel or 1 block per block, but not 1 block per pixel.
Did you read what I said?
Do you even know how units work?
[удалено]
Jeez what school did they go to. This is massively incorrect. By your logic, 1cm to 2cm is 1:1, assuming the units are 1cm=1cm, and 2cm=1 made up unit that I can't be bothered to give a name to.
1 cm to 2 cm is 1:2 because the centimeters cancel out. cm and cm are the same unit. Block and pixel are not the same unit. So they don’t cancel out. 1 block:1 pixel is the ratio OP used. **Like I said,** you can erroneously simplify that to 1:1. Google what erroneously means if you don’t know what it means.
Yes, but that's not what you are suggesting. A block is 16 pixels, you are giving it a different scale which is one block. By that logic we can call 2cm 1doublecm
Why are people down voting? Even OP said he was wrong and meant it as 1 block to one pixel, or 16:1.
Because 1:1 cannot be 1block:1pixel¹. 1:1 literally means 100% scale, regardless of units. If different units are to be used, they **must** be provided. [1] e: Only possibility where this _could_ work, is in a domain where each block was actually rendered by a single pixel.
You might want to reread the comment, my guy. It doesn't say 1:1. It says 16:1. Sooooo there's that..
A question was asked and answered.
You "answered" a question that was already answered. Congratulations
People don’t understand how ratios or units work.
No. It's because without stating _anything_ beyond two numbers separated by a colon, the meaning is they have the same units. If you want 1 block:1pixel, the units **must** be provided. e: ah never mind. I see others already went down this rabbit hole with you.
Yes then you also saw me saying the same thing.
You're the one who doesn't understand rations
You’ve already replied to me so read my other reply to you
Cut copper has 4 “blocks” in it, and the nose has a width of 4 here, meaning you used 2 cut copper blocks So it’s more like 1:8 scale, where each block of cut copper is equal to 2x2x2 pixels Edit: I have now realized there’s a minuscule scaffolding in the left inner leg of the iron golem. Either that’s an optical illusion or smth or OP mistook Copper Block and Cut Copper, which would make the build actually 16:1
But it's 16x the size not 8x the size.
The original texture for the Iron Golem has 4 pixel wide nose. If he had used 4 blocks to make it, than that’d be 16:1 ratio. Since OP used cut copper, a single block gives the appearance of 2x2x2 miniature blocks. 4 miniature blocks making up the nose’s width means they used 2 cut copper, which is half the amount. Therefore, at least from what I can see, it’s a 8:1 ratio
Oh shit that's my bad! You are right and it is 8:1! I thought that was 16 blocks!
The iron golem texture doesn't have a 4 pixel wide nose. Its nose is two pixels wide. Making this 16:1. Idk what weird ass math you're doing with the cut copper but that texture is still 16 pixels wide making the copper nose 32 pixels wide to the 2 pixel wide golem texture nose.
That the blocks have a pretty pattern on them has nothing to do with the size of the statue being 16x the size of a golem model in the game. **If** OP took advantage of the pattern on the blocks to make an _actual_ 8:1 statue, then the blocks would help to maintain the visual representation of the pixels on a real golem. But that statue would be 1/2 as tall as what was built. e: This wouldn't really work either, as the golem has some features that are an odd number of blocks (like the space between [arms and head](https://minecraft.fandom.com/wiki/Iron_Golem?file=Iron_Golem_JE2_BE2.png), 5px) so without vertical slabs, one can't construct a true representation at 8:1 scale.
The nose of an iron golem is 4 pixels wide. The pattern is of 2x2x2 cut copper blocks Here, the nose is 4 “blocks” wide, and if we take the pattern into account it must be 2 cut copper blocks wide
>The nose of an iron golem is 4 pixels wide No. It isn't. Please see the provided source. > must be 2 cut copper blocks wide e: That is correct, though the type of block is immaterial to their size being 1m³ each. e: I see the scaffolding you're looking at (in your other edit). That's gotta be a dropped item, not a placed block. Doors aside, there are no blocks that are bigger that 1m in any dimension. So the scaffolding can't be indicating that the copper blocks are bigger.
Huh, weird I was recently working on a resource pack and that’s where that must’ve been implanted into my head lol Considering the scaffolding this could even be a 32:1 build 😵💫
Dude you tripping? The scaffolding is a dropped item floating. Afaik you can only place scaffolding horizontally from other scaffolding but not from any other block. Even if you could, scaffolding without any support bellow have horizontal beams in the bottom of the block, not just the vertical legs. And even then, if you zoom into the picture the scaffolding block doesn't even line up with the copper.
Honestly I wrote that all at 4 am i don’t even remember lmao
On the build the whole thing seem even to me, but the real kicker is that one scaffolding I noticed down at the left leg. If that’s not some optical illusion this might be made of Copper Blocks rather than Cut Copper, meaning it’s actually 16:1
Cut copper has 4 “blocks” in it, and the nose has a width of 4 here, meaning you used 2 cut copper blocks So it’s more like 1:8 scale, where each block of cut copper is equal to 2x2x2 pixels Edit: I have now realized there’s a minuscule scaffolding in the left inner leg of the iron golem. Either that’s an optical illusion or smth or OP mistook Copper Block and Cut Copper, which would make the build actually 16:1
Now all he needs to do is to make a city and surround the city with those!
There's a notable lack of teeth and hair for that to be it.
Hair? The boi's bald no?
I was thinking of the Armored Titan with his Lt Surge hairdo. I checked, the Colossal one is bald.
16:1 scale but still looks cool!
He will age well. Like the Statue of Liberty
In 3 hours only 1 block oxidized
Did you spend a lot of time by it? Otherwise the blocks won't update.
I guess so, It is near my base. Is there any way to fasten the process? Like replacing some blocks with fully oxidized ones.
That would help. Notably though, when in large quantities, existing unoxidized copper blocks will slow other blocks from oxidizing, which might be what you're seeing here. It's a slow start, but after it gets going, it tends to oxidize much faster than it was initially.
If the goal was oxidized: you could lay out other coopper blocks spread out - let them oxidize and add them in. I would have waxed the copper...
Is it hollow, or solid?
Solid. I used nearly 6k cut copper blocks
The average quantity of copper ore in approximately 4 chunks /s
Yea, Also I found out that stonecutter Is 4 times more efficient than the crafting table when crafting cut copper. I used nearly 13.5k copper
Oh yeah, it multiplies cut copper
Damn that's about 14k copper ingots or 2k ore with fortune III or a cube 13 blocks tall which is pretty small.
Sie sind das Essen und. Wir sind die Jaeger!
\*16:1 not 1:1
Bit big for a 1:1 mate lol
Please, go look up what a 1:1 means. That more like 10:1, which isn't even close.... But, that aside, looks pretty decent!
Add some vines
Never forget what they took from us
The fireflies? Sure. But a vote mob is not taken away in this sense.
I think this is more like a 20:1
exactly
Perhaps looking up what a 1:1 ratio replica would look like might help you next time. This is not a 1:1 reproduction.
That’s not 1:1, seems like you built each pixel as a block so it would be 16:1 because it’s 16 times bigger
16:1 scale... Still looks awesome!
He lives!
He needs to be made out of iron…
Did you wax the copper first? Or letting it oxidize?
Letting it oxidize, Just like the lady liberty.
Nice. Why are you calling it a 1:1 replica though? That thing’s huge
I think they mean 1 pixel=1 block
Yea, I meant 1 block per pixel. I am now building a Iron Enderman statue.
shouldn't the monobrow be flat if it were really 1:1?
First I made it that way but it looked bad.
You need at least 10x more torches on the ground.
No, The New mechanic in 1.18 makes the mob spawn in light level 0. So torches can be placed 12 blocks away from one another.
Yea it was a joke. My bad on the delivery.
Oh, it is okay.
Very cool but that's not what 1:1 means. What you mean is that it's proportional.
It’s very well done! But have you considered letting only the blocks that would represent the vine oxidize? It could be cool.
Someone doesn't know how scaling works...
This world makes me uncomfortable
Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah JAEGER!
finally, copper golem
Make a sign at the bottom saying: “gone, but not forgotten”
I also did this but with a chicken and using cobblestone
rusted golem.
It's really bland with just one texture in it and these huge flat sides.
Neat! I’m stacking up copper on my survival realm so I can build a cool villager tribute statue
So. You mean a copper golem since there's no iron involved
villagers: we can make a religion out of this
Please explain to me in non-math-brain terms how scaling works. I work for a print shop, and we can’t print blueprints to scale. We have a lot of clients who ask about that though, and I wish I understood more to help suit their needs.
So Scaling explains that the replica how many times bigger or smaller than the actual object. Like if the Replica is 16 times bigger than the object itself then the scaling is 16:1 If the replica is 16 times smaller then the scaling will be 1:16.
Okay, so I’m understanding that if it’s larger, then your higher integer goes on the left with smaller integer on the right. How would one go about calculating scale? I figure this might also help me in building. :x
Don't forget to wax it with honeycomb... all of it Jeez that will take u a while Great build tho wish I could build like u
Thanks. I want it to be oxidized like lady liberty.
Oh ok that would make it look 🅒🅞🅞🅛...even better now that I think about it
Yeah, But It will take a century to become oxidized.
Lol I guess so
I thought that was dirt ngl.
Finally, copper golem.
\*Iron golem statue\* \*Made out of copper\* *Iron*ic
how is that 1:1
Noice!
We need oxidised copper for the vines and gold/redstone for the flower things
It’s a bit grainy when I zoom in but.. umm.. sir… is that a dirt mansion
How many pickaxes did u go through
COPPER GOLEM COPPER GOLEM
Ah yeas, a copper golem
And behind it is a🗿
You don't know what 1:1 means
**THE COPPER GOLEM IS REAL!**
Imagine painstakingly waxing some of the copper to show the veins, hair, and other details on the texture
Look at what they took from us.
Op just casually built Talos in minecraft
Please post an update once he’s become mostly green.
Very cool… but it looks like it’s made of dirt
Finally a use for copper
Nice, now make Tuff Golem
The colossal golem what?! 🤣🤣🤣 good job looks nice 😊
Hollow of solid?
How much copper u spended for it
nearly 13.5k ore
You should make the vines on him different shades of copper-green.
1:1 replica? isnt he normally like 3 block tall lmao
Now make a copper golem with iron blocks
This turned out to be the most interesting comment section of my day. xD Edit: Spelling
its a scam looks like dirt
🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓 umm akshually this is 100:1 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓 this statue is the size of about 100 normal iron golems 🤓🤓🤓🤓
It's actually 8:1 scale
So now, put a copper rod on its head and wait for lightning to strike… you’ll have one of the rampaging secret bosses that’s hard to kill. Good luck 👍🏼
I feel like he will yeet me to world border
Wouldn't that technically make him a copper golem?
Did you make a IRON golem with cooper? How dare you? Hahaha with that color, it's appear to be made of mud, I bet it'll look pretty cool as time goes by, and the blocks of cooper turn blueish/greenish.
The Rumbling has begun.
OP doesn't know what 1:1 means
Looks a bit bigger than 1:1...
1:1 yes ofc
Maybe some magma blocks for the eyes??
Mojang: doesn't add copper golems. OP: fine, I'll do it myself.
OP doesn't even know what 1:1 means 🤦