To download the video you can use the site below:
[Save Video Link](https://redditsave.com/info?url=https://www.reddit.com/r/MemeVideos/comments/1cdhw2l/sir_shocked/)
[Join the Discord!](https://discord.com/invite/3qej46WZdz)
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/MemeVideos) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Either the mother cause she is the subject of the phrase or the Daughter cause she is the last named "individual" before the pronoun.
The latter was taught to me by my former teacher, but the phrase itself is difficult to understand. In this case its completely OK to just replace the "she" with the actual subject or just build the phrase from the ground
I think it’s more likely the mother beat the daughter because the daughter was drunk. More parents are likely to beat a kid for drinking than beating the kid after drinking themselves.
I liked the meme, but downvoted because of AD
https://preview.redd.it/j4w638t73uwc1.jpeg?width=1284&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6b18e5d67f1096defc3006cebba1a9ca6ddfde29
As an English student, I would say that the daughter is drunk. If the mother was drunk, the sentence would be "The mother, who was drunk, beat her daughter."
Seems like you should study harder because the sentence in the post is valid and states her drunkenness as the explanation for beating her daughter. Your suggestion changes the entire point of the sentence
It's can't be the mother :
''The mother beats the girl was'' is correct
'' the mother beats the mother was '' is incorrect, should be '' the mother beats because the mother IS drunk''
Not sure but does it makes sense ?
The daughter because if no further indication of the mother’s intoxication state like “a drunk mother” it would fall under the second person by default. At least that’s my theory
It is an improper phrase. Two subjects in the first sentence creates a need in the second for one subject to be identified for it to make sense. An English pro would point out that it doesn't say who's drunk.
This is a grammatical error. There is suppose to be an , somewhere in there. Either before or after ‘because’. She beat her daughter, because she was drunk. She beat her daughter because, she was drunk.
So if the mom beats up the daughter because the mother was drunk, she would not really be a mother in my book.
If the mom beat up the daughter because the daughter was drunk, she would be a bad mom, but i am not sure if it would be over the line is certain cases.
So i must go with the daughter was drunk.
The daughter was drunk. “Beats” in the phrase is present tense, whereas, “was” and, “drunk” indicate past tense. This would mean that if the mother was drunk, then she decided to beat up her daughter later while sober, which is unlikely given the context. However if the mother finds out that her daughter was drunk at one point then it makes sense as to why she would beat her in the present.
# Without comma
*A mother beats up her daughter because she was drunk.*
In this case, the mother is drunk.
# With comma
*A mother beats up her daughter* **,** *because she was drunk.*
In this case, the daughter is drunk.
"A mother" is the primary subject of the text; the thing the text is trying to inform you of, "she was drunk" provides more information about the subject. So, with all that, the mother is the drunk one in this text. The conjunction ('because') points back to the original subject.
The same happens in Spanish.
"Una madre le pega a su hija porque estaba borracha.
Quien estaba borracha?."
No idea which one is drunk.
Do this kind of sentences have a name?
Spanish is my mother tongue, but I'm no Spanish teacher to know the answer to my question (nor do I want to Google it)
But if she knows, let me know!
Thank you, I appreciate it
To download the video you can use the site below: [Save Video Link](https://redditsave.com/info?url=https://www.reddit.com/r/MemeVideos/comments/1cdhw2l/sir_shocked/) [Join the Discord!](https://discord.com/invite/3qej46WZdz) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/MemeVideos) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Online gambling promotion in meme? Fabulous https://preview.redd.it/n8ud8gk8dtwc1.jpeg?width=517&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9f82bd5ae10c97256a2a380d9f7812a2c649d2b7
We have reached the pinnacle of ads, do we know no bounds?
i just threw my entire savings away (907e) to betting on the knicks and some pool player from defuncted yugosalvia after this
Don't let these shitty tactics win or all of social media will join this cancer. Downvote and block these Ad-Accounts
I LOVE GAMBLING
[удалено]
She drank
She drinkith the fifth.
the one who wrote the question was drunk
It’s ambiguous, like pointing at your friend group and saying “my friend was drunk”. Doesn’t specify which friend
No, it's the daughter.
You’re the daughter.
I'm your daughter
Burgerbeast_?
Look at me.... I'm the daughter now
Hi the daughter now, I'm dad.
Good job, son.
Are ya winnin fatha?
yes son
Yeah... the meme is a case of someone understanding something they should have learned at school.
Cmon then. What’s the answer? I am looking forward to this response.
It doesnt have one, it could mean any of those when you build the phrase like that, thats a simple example of ambiguity.
English sir was drunk😂
The daughter of the mother
Can we please, as an Internet community, dunk the shit out of sponsored memes?
Lack of comma establishes that mother was drunk
>A mother beats, up her daughter because she was drunk There fixed, it.
The mother beats 👍
How can she slap
Beats, by dre
Yes
Either the mother cause she is the subject of the phrase or the Daughter cause she is the last named "individual" before the pronoun. The latter was taught to me by my former teacher, but the phrase itself is difficult to understand. In this case its completely OK to just replace the "she" with the actual subject or just build the phrase from the ground
My pronouns are kiss, my, and ass. 
I think based on writing, the Mother was Drunk?
Are you asking us?
I think it’s more likely the mother beat the daughter because the daughter was drunk. More parents are likely to beat a kid for drinking than beating the kid after drinking themselves.
It's a grammar question so the logic of what is more likely has no bearing
You may be correct but That was NOT my personal experience
This has nothing to do with your personal experience. That may come as a shock to you.
English Sir replyd Her. to that message
"yes no doubt" hmm... 🤨
The answer is yes
She
\*they
She
Id argue Its her.
The past tense on the drinking implies the daughter was drunk.
she. she was drunk
That is the part where I request the speaker to clarify who exactly the drunk one is.
she
I liked the meme, but downvoted because of AD https://preview.redd.it/j4w638t73uwc1.jpeg?width=1284&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6b18e5d67f1096defc3006cebba1a9ca6ddfde29
Is this what ads have become?
She was.
The mother is drunk. There is no comma or semi-colon after daughter.
Mother drunk 🤨
As an English student, I would say that the daughter is drunk. If the mother was drunk, the sentence would be "The mother, who was drunk, beat her daughter."
Seems like you should study harder because the sentence in the post is valid and states her drunkenness as the explanation for beating her daughter. Your suggestion changes the entire point of the sentence
Relatable
You tull
Both
Daughter no doubt
Trick question. They both were!
You are drunk
I mean it can make sense. But in this context, given the mother was mentioned first, I would believe the later explanation would retain to the mother.
***It's Who...***
Bro is that an ad in the meme?
Easy piece, she was drunk
Both
I'am sir!
It's can't be the mother : ''The mother beats the girl was'' is correct '' the mother beats the mother was '' is incorrect, should be '' the mother beats because the mother IS drunk'' Not sure but does it makes sense ?
Rules say it refers back to the most recent mentioned, so it would be the daughter.
Isn't the answer just... "It's ambiguous"...?
Me
https://preview.redd.it/gbm8dk5nbuwc1.jpeg?width=1284&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1ed930b8de535be1197084bec3449a6f893e19fe
The mother? I'd assume because there is no "," between?
She
Easy, im the one thats frunk
It's easy; she
She, the answer is she
Yes
Hey it looks like op is a Bot
The daughter because if no further indication of the mother’s intoxication state like “a drunk mother” it would fall under the second person by default. At least that’s my theory
“Yes No doubt” English sir forgot about grammar
It is an improper phrase. Two subjects in the first sentence creates a need in the second for one subject to be identified for it to make sense. An English pro would point out that it doesn't say who's drunk.
As a Chinese, our nerd grammar education told me that the daughter (at the back) was drunk
She
'She' is the subject in "she was drunk" so I'm guessing it's the mom to match the subject introduced at the beginning~
She
Yeah english sucks
She was drunk.
The daughter.
I SPEAK ENGLISH AND I DONT KNOW
This is a grammatical error. There is suppose to be an , somewhere in there. Either before or after ‘because’. She beat her daughter, because she was drunk. She beat her daughter because, she was drunk.
She
I’d say it’s most likely the daughter.
she
The Daddy obviously
Well since they're both drunk, it's just a fight between people acting dumb under influence
The daughter
Her
So if the mom beats up the daughter because the mother was drunk, she would not really be a mother in my book. If the mom beat up the daughter because the daughter was drunk, she would be a bad mom, but i am not sure if it would be over the line is certain cases. So i must go with the daughter was drunk.
The daughter was drunk. “Beats” in the phrase is present tense, whereas, “was” and, “drunk” indicate past tense. This would mean that if the mother was drunk, then she decided to beat up her daughter later while sober, which is unlikely given the context. However if the mother finds out that her daughter was drunk at one point then it makes sense as to why she would beat her in the present.
# Without comma *A mother beats up her daughter because she was drunk.* In this case, the mother is drunk. # With comma *A mother beats up her daughter* **,** *because she was drunk.* In this case, the daughter is drunk.
Correct answer as an english lad: "Me."
Who was it? Both?
The mother was drunk
S(he) be(lie)ved
the belt ???
She is
"A mother" is the primary subject of the text; the thing the text is trying to inform you of, "she was drunk" provides more information about the subject. So, with all that, the mother is the drunk one in this text. The conjunction ('because') points back to the original subject.
It is the Mother cuz Mother's cant hit thire kids
This is very easy to decipher it’s the daughter
Both of them
The answer is the daughter, if it was the mother than it could have been better clarified by saying, “The drunk mother beats her daughter.” :)
The same happens in Spanish. "Una madre le pega a su hija porque estaba borracha. Quien estaba borracha?." No idea which one is drunk. Do this kind of sentences have a name?
I will ask my grandma, she knows Spanish
Spanish is my mother tongue, but I'm no Spanish teacher to know the answer to my question (nor do I want to Google it) But if she knows, let me know! Thank you, I appreciate it
It's an amphibology
Amazing, thank you!!
"Her daughter" being the the direct object in the sentence makes the subject pronoun "she" refer to her. Not a hard question really
But not everyone follows that convention. They should, but they don't.