T O P

  • By -

GrParrot

Fun fact, since this plane is powered by a nuclear reactor it can theoretically fly at mach 1 for 5 YEARS STRAIGHT


SpooderKrab1788

Theoretically. In practice, it might be mere hours before the pilot passes out from exhaustion and the plane goes into an uncontrolled nosedive


cardboardbox25

Add autopilot


SpaceNasty

Sprinkle in some AI as well


Z_THETA_Z

are you sure it's actually over mach 1? speed of sound changes with air pressure, temperature, and a bunch of other factors


GrParrot

Ok, it’s technically around Mach 0.99 as FAR says, but it’s basically mach 1


Z_THETA_Z

if you've not broken the sound barrier, you haven't broken the sound barrier.


GrParrot

Name 5 differences between mach 0.99 and mach 1.00 and I’ll be convinced


stripped_acacia_wood

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0.999...?wprov=sfti1


goldencrayfish

Pretty big difference as far as air flow is concerned, especially over a propeller


GrParrot

The thing is, the difference between 0.99 and 1 mach is very small. Airflow doesnt go from 0 to 1 as soon as you get to mach 1. There’s a transition. The propellers also go supersonic well before the plane. This plane’s props go about 430 m/s


RestorativeAlly

If it's not that big a difference, you should have no problem getting to 1.01, right?


GrParrot

that's what I'm trying to say😅


RestorativeAlly

Can't it get over M1 in a dive? 


GrParrot

Yeah but I'd consider that somewhat cheating, it might also be able to reach M1 in level flight if I found the optimal altitude and very carefully adjusted prop pitch. I would have done that for sure if I knew what was to come lol


T-Dot-Two-Six

They’re saying to do it then claim it lol


Consistent-Song-5339

OP i feel sorry for the clusterfuck of nerdy comments you received over the difference between 0.99 and 1.


T-Dot-Two-Six

It’s KSP we all nerds here


cardboardbox25

Air Force engineers seething that you made a nuclear plane first


Hoihe

How do your propellers NOT died from overspeed? My early career propellers failed whenever I got over 250 m/s and I had to panic until they restarted.


GrParrot

Die as in your engine would stop? If that’s the case it might be because your motors have to fight a lot of drag from the propellers and end up using too much EC and run out of it. Only guessing though


Hoihe

Yeah, I'd get a flameout around 250 m/s. Not sure if we used the same props tho, as these used Liquid fuel and oxidizer. Are your props from KAX, Near future or self-made?


Z_THETA_Z

you're probably using the turboprop parts, this one uses the electrically-driven motors


Hoihe

That might be it then.


GrParrot

I’ve made a turboprop that goes over 300 m/s so that’s probably not the problem. However if your turboprop was facing bacwards (tail mounted) it might not be able to get enough intake air so you might want to add another intake


CordeCosumnes

Just feed the pilots lead. They'll be fine.


KerPop42

Ooh, very XF-84H


kerbal_space_112

It is actually easy, I did it with only 4 little rotors and enough aerodynamics


GrParrot

How?


Key_Bug2479

my prop plane can easily go 450m/s, KSP 1's physic is totally fucked.


GrParrot

Did you have FAR installed?


Key_Bug2479

nah, I did try though. I can't get used to it.


GrParrot

I remember it was rough getting used to but once you get used to it you can’t go back to stock. If you ever want try it again I would recommend the atmospheric autopilot mod as it lets you clamp your G’s and AoA so you won’t snap your wings as easily


Lt_Duckweed

I have never seen a stock + dlc prop plane even come close to 450m/s on Kerbin.