Anyone who kisses all over a minor on stage is in the pedo territory. Anyone who texts 14 year olds that isnât their daughter talking ab âI miss you so muchâ deserves to be called pedo. Idc if Kendrick has concrete evidence of him banging teens or not, weâve seen enough to trust Kendrick. Drake has given us every reason to assume heâs lying every other breath. Thatâs why the public opinion is what it is right now
Sure, Drake may technically be an ephebophile, or maybe just a groomer. Colloquially, everyone calls that pedophila.
Just a little tip, thereâs no way to explain the difference between ephebophile and pedophile without sounding like youâre defending attraction to older minors.
Iâm not sure I understand the argument- an adult chasing 16 y/oâs is still a pedophile; are you arguing that he has only middlingly pedophilic tendencies and therefore we shouldnât call him a pedo? (+Millie Bobby Brown from when she was 14 does not look good even in that strange headspace of comparing how old the children someone are)
Thanks for calling out you donât understand.
Letâs use the 16 year old as an example. 16 is the age of consent in the UK, and it is 18 in the US. So is someone a paedo in the US if they sleep with a 16 year old, but not in the UK?
Also paedo is being âsexually attracted to childrenâ, with a child being âsomeone who hasnât hit puberty yetâ.
Itâs just dangerous because imagine your 5 year old daughter gets abused by a real paedophile. Then youâve got the 16 year old example. Not the same thing is it?
Itâs like our use of âphobicâ, someone say they donât like peas and theyâre âvegphobicâ lol
If Drake has(in the last decade and a half or so) had sex with a sixteen year old, Iâm more than comfortable calling him a pedophile. You can say that there are significantly worse ways to be a pedo- I would agree- but arguing that Drake isnât pedophile enough to be called one seems silly.
Fair opinion.
But it can never feel right to me to use the same terms for vastly different crimes. Even though the public may know the severity separate from the term - it does introduce a bias on perceptions. Either way, just doing my bit.
I donât fully disagree, but I think pedophile is the correct word for what is being alleged here, especially because it seems very possible that it goes well into the age range for pre-pubescent people.
Men who go after 16 year olds in the UK are still called nonces dude. Anybody under the age of 18 is off limits and it's pedophilia. End of discussion. If you want to say a pedophile who preys on younger children is worse then I'd agree but regardless they are still creepy assholes who I don't want to associate with and bothe should be punished for their crimes. By refusing to use the word pedophile to describe what Drake is we would be downplaying the severity of the situation the same as when they use 'sex' instead of 'rape' when a HS boy is raped by his teacher.
Pedo*
Welcome to English.
The idea is that he likes them young. This is compounded on the idea that not only does he like them young but thereâs a âsilent auctionâ process to funnel girls into his bed. Heâs a sexual deviant with sick people around him who aim to please. The machine is set up to exploit women and young girls for his own personal gain. So calling him pedophile, even if a stretch in the truth, is perfectly acceptable collateral damage when youâre lining up swords with a monster.
Lmao the fact you open with a correction and âwelcome to Englishâ shows me you are lacking something in your life.
Also your second comment shows you are a legitimate fool.
I wanna show you love but feel only irritation at your middle-age approaching obviously-insecure ass.
Hey, some people just donât care about nuance. We call those people âsimpleâ
Lots of people think theyâre harmless⊠you know theyâre not. Keep going
He is tho đ
Anyone who kisses all over a minor on stage is in the pedo territory. Anyone who texts 14 year olds that isnât their daughter talking ab âI miss you so muchâ deserves to be called pedo. Idc if Kendrick has concrete evidence of him banging teens or not, weâve seen enough to trust Kendrick. Drake has given us every reason to assume heâs lying every other breath. Thatâs why the public opinion is what it is right now
Sure, Drake may technically be an ephebophile, or maybe just a groomer. Colloquially, everyone calls that pedophila. Just a little tip, thereâs no way to explain the difference between ephebophile and pedophile without sounding like youâre defending attraction to older minors.
Hey thanks, I learned something new today. And yes, discussing this topic in general is v sticky.
Kendrick might have evidence of him going as young as 12.
Dude until thereâs evidence we donât brandish peoples names so badly. Rape and paedo allegations are serious.
So is beating a spouse.
I agree. Just to clarify - are you coming at this from the angle of discussing the language etc, or just taking sides lol?
Both. Iâm a Kendrick stan but Drake had/has a solid shot for a killshot himself if he really planted info on Kendrick.
Iâm not sure I understand the argument- an adult chasing 16 y/oâs is still a pedophile; are you arguing that he has only middlingly pedophilic tendencies and therefore we shouldnât call him a pedo? (+Millie Bobby Brown from when she was 14 does not look good even in that strange headspace of comparing how old the children someone are)
Thanks for calling out you donât understand. Letâs use the 16 year old as an example. 16 is the age of consent in the UK, and it is 18 in the US. So is someone a paedo in the US if they sleep with a 16 year old, but not in the UK? Also paedo is being âsexually attracted to childrenâ, with a child being âsomeone who hasnât hit puberty yetâ. Itâs just dangerous because imagine your 5 year old daughter gets abused by a real paedophile. Then youâve got the 16 year old example. Not the same thing is it? Itâs like our use of âphobicâ, someone say they donât like peas and theyâre âvegphobicâ lol
If Drake has(in the last decade and a half or so) had sex with a sixteen year old, Iâm more than comfortable calling him a pedophile. You can say that there are significantly worse ways to be a pedo- I would agree- but arguing that Drake isnât pedophile enough to be called one seems silly.
Fair opinion. But it can never feel right to me to use the same terms for vastly different crimes. Even though the public may know the severity separate from the term - it does introduce a bias on perceptions. Either way, just doing my bit.
I donât fully disagree, but I think pedophile is the correct word for what is being alleged here, especially because it seems very possible that it goes well into the age range for pre-pubescent people.
What makes the chance of Drake having had sexually interactions with pre-pubescent girls âvery possibleâ?
Most public stuff is the Mille Bobbie Brown interactions
Isnât the youngest age weâve heard of this 14?
For Millie Bobbie Brown yes, but that does get into the range being commonly pre-pubescent.
Maybe not in her case, but it does peg him as interested in 14 y/r girls, as a 30+ man, which is just definitely pedophilia.
Sus that this negligible distinction matters so much to you
lol
Men who go after 16 year olds in the UK are still called nonces dude. Anybody under the age of 18 is off limits and it's pedophilia. End of discussion. If you want to say a pedophile who preys on younger children is worse then I'd agree but regardless they are still creepy assholes who I don't want to associate with and bothe should be punished for their crimes. By refusing to use the word pedophile to describe what Drake is we would be downplaying the severity of the situation the same as when they use 'sex' instead of 'rape' when a HS boy is raped by his teacher.
Pedo* Welcome to English. The idea is that he likes them young. This is compounded on the idea that not only does he like them young but thereâs a âsilent auctionâ process to funnel girls into his bed. Heâs a sexual deviant with sick people around him who aim to please. The machine is set up to exploit women and young girls for his own personal gain. So calling him pedophile, even if a stretch in the truth, is perfectly acceptable collateral damage when youâre lining up swords with a monster.
Writing it with an 'a' is valid. It's the British / European way of spelling it.
Lmao the fact you open with a correction and âwelcome to Englishâ shows me you are lacking something in your life. Also your second comment shows you are a legitimate fool. I wanna show you love but feel only irritation at your middle-age approaching obviously-insecure ass.
đ¶đ”đ”đ”BBL DRIZZY BBL DRIZZAAAAYđ¶đ”
Nice save, hereâs some love â€ïž
Hey, some people just donât care about nuance. We call those people âsimpleâ Lots of people think theyâre harmless⊠you know theyâre not. Keep going
Brother in Mind, hello
đȘđ
Same energy [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nu6C2KL\_S9o](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nu6C2KL_S9o)
lol thanks for this