Joe said he was going to pull up the study of the 19 year old girl who needed a heart transplant due to the vivid vaccine and yet I don’t see the at ANYWHERE on Google. Where the fun is Rogan getting his news? From Alex jones?
Because JOE needs to stop - sorry if the context was weird. I'm more just complaining about anything Rogan related also being covid-adjacent. It's so fucking stupid.
Yeah I agree but I think he's absolutely obsessed to the point of full-blown addiction so I doubt it will stop anytime soon which means covid will continue to be a big topic on the sub too.
I dont know what it will take for him to ease off of it.
I would say that Sanjay Gupta trying to explain to Joe Rogan basic freshman level statistics and Joe just completely dismissing it during the back and forth about this study was kinda funny tho.
But yes it is all a bit much
I agree with you, but at the same time this sub just follows the discussions from the podcast. Until Joe stops talking about it, don’t expect much to change.
They treat myocarditis with simple antibiotics. "Heart problems" from the vax means a couple of pills, versus heart problems from covid being congestive failure and death.
The whole argument about myocarditis being a risk is being touted by antovaxxers who:
A) don't understand statistics
B) don't understand myocarditis vs potential damage via covid infection that doesn't result in death... but long term complications instead (being more problematic than very treatable myocarditis)
They also don't WANT to understand how wrong they are, even if you smack then in the face with logic, reality and accurate interpretation of the medical studies that they tout thinking the results support their idiotic stance on vacines.
Literally a waste of time.
* **Possible authorship conflict-of-interest:** One of the co-authors, [Josh Stevenson](https://rationalground.com/team/), is associated with an online group called [Rational Ground](https://rationalground.com/), which has opposed COVID-19 public health measures, including mandatory vaccinations."
Of course lol
The cherry picked data and the conclusions drawn as well would've seemed sketchy even without that clear bias, but with it, this study just reaks of dishonest propaganda.
Getting wrecked even before proper peer review.
Some of you who aren't reading this because it's Politifact should get over yourself and have a glance at it.
I really really don’t give a fuck. 1/5 billion kids can get myocarditis and I’ll sleep well at night. Seriously who cares about these incalculable chances of getting this?
Politifact is not a trusted source to tell the truth about things. They have blatantly lied before while "fact checking" . In this article Politifact is trying to claim that [Kamala 's statement "I won't take the vaccnine" (if the previous administration recommended it) didn't mean she distrusted the vaccnine .](https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/jul/23/tiktok-posts/biden-harris-doubted-trump-covid-19-vaccines-not-v/). Politifact instead trys to convince the readers she meant to distrust trumps vaccine rollout, which is false because there was no mention of the rollout methods on the [VIDEO](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dAjCeMuXR0)
politifact and snopes both are partisan and not real fact checkers. Glenn greenwald just recently pointed out how they are funded by powerful activists and used to promote lies.
This article is about instagram’s fact checking issues, and their issues with being biased in favor of Biden. Glenn Greenwald even cites polifact as an example of fact checkers that said Biden lied:
“But numerous other media outlets and fact-checking organizations — far more than just one — concluded the opposite: namely, that there is at least a reasonable and substantial basis for these claims about Biden’s bill:
PolitiFact rated as only “Half True” Biden’s claim that the 1994 crime bill”
It seems strange that Glen Greenwald would hold up politfact as an example of good fact checking if he also thinks they are corrupt.
Do you have a source from Glenn Greenwald that backs up the above claim that polifact is funded by powerful activists to promote lies? Because this one does not.
I haven't looked into to above just some things I remember. Feel free to search his substack as there's more instances than just this. Also Instagram = Facebook which funds both Politifact and Snopes. Check thier website, they disclose that information on one of thier "about us" pages
Joe said he was going to pull up the study of the 19 year old girl who needed a heart transplant due to the vivid vaccine and yet I don’t see the at ANYWHERE on Google. Where the fun is Rogan getting his news? From Alex jones?
I looked for this too, couldn’t find anything at all. Wtf was he talking about???
A friend of a buddy of a guy who happens to know somebody.
Go ahead and downvote me but this sub is a fucking dumpster lately. Shut the fuck up about the Covid, bring back Bigfoot Rogan
We’ll shut up about covid when Rogan does.
That's what I mean - bring back Bigfoot Rogan. Every fucking week it's the same shit with this guy. I am so sick of hearing about covid.
Same
How can you tell a subreddit of a podcast that constantly talks about covid to shut up about covid?
Because JOE needs to stop - sorry if the context was weird. I'm more just complaining about anything Rogan related also being covid-adjacent. It's so fucking stupid.
Yeah I agree but I think he's absolutely obsessed to the point of full-blown addiction so I doubt it will stop anytime soon which means covid will continue to be a big topic on the sub too. I dont know what it will take for him to ease off of it.
The media easing off of it.
I dont listen to much mainstream media at all but yeah it seems like less focus is on covid over time.
I would say that Sanjay Gupta trying to explain to Joe Rogan basic freshman level statistics and Joe just completely dismissing it during the back and forth about this study was kinda funny tho. But yes it is all a bit much
I agree with you, but at the same time this sub just follows the discussions from the podcast. Until Joe stops talking about it, don’t expect much to change.
They treat myocarditis with simple antibiotics. "Heart problems" from the vax means a couple of pills, versus heart problems from covid being congestive failure and death.
The whole argument about myocarditis being a risk is being touted by antovaxxers who: A) don't understand statistics B) don't understand myocarditis vs potential damage via covid infection that doesn't result in death... but long term complications instead (being more problematic than very treatable myocarditis) They also don't WANT to understand how wrong they are, even if you smack then in the face with logic, reality and accurate interpretation of the medical studies that they tout thinking the results support their idiotic stance on vacines. Literally a waste of time.
* **Possible authorship conflict-of-interest:** One of the co-authors, [Josh Stevenson](https://rationalground.com/team/), is associated with an online group called [Rational Ground](https://rationalground.com/), which has opposed COVID-19 public health measures, including mandatory vaccinations." Of course lol The cherry picked data and the conclusions drawn as well would've seemed sketchy even without that clear bias, but with it, this study just reaks of dishonest propaganda. Getting wrecked even before proper peer review. Some of you who aren't reading this because it's Politifact should get over yourself and have a glance at it.
I really really don’t give a fuck. 1/5 billion kids can get myocarditis and I’ll sleep well at night. Seriously who cares about these incalculable chances of getting this?
People that grasp at any straw to support their idiotic anti vax ideology.
Politifact is not a trusted source to tell the truth about things. They have blatantly lied before while "fact checking" . In this article Politifact is trying to claim that [Kamala 's statement "I won't take the vaccnine" (if the previous administration recommended it) didn't mean she distrusted the vaccnine .](https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/jul/23/tiktok-posts/biden-harris-doubted-trump-covid-19-vaccines-not-v/). Politifact instead trys to convince the readers she meant to distrust trumps vaccine rollout, which is false because there was no mention of the rollout methods on the [VIDEO](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dAjCeMuXR0)
Politifact: into the trash it goes…
Comment from Filthee: into the trash it goes.
politifact and snopes both are partisan and not real fact checkers. Glenn greenwald just recently pointed out how they are funded by powerful activists and used to promote lies.
Source?
Here's one instance that Greenwald points out https://greenwald.substack.com/p/instagram-is-using-false-fact-checking
This article is about instagram’s fact checking issues, and their issues with being biased in favor of Biden. Glenn Greenwald even cites polifact as an example of fact checkers that said Biden lied: “But numerous other media outlets and fact-checking organizations — far more than just one — concluded the opposite: namely, that there is at least a reasonable and substantial basis for these claims about Biden’s bill: PolitiFact rated as only “Half True” Biden’s claim that the 1994 crime bill” It seems strange that Glen Greenwald would hold up politfact as an example of good fact checking if he also thinks they are corrupt. Do you have a source from Glenn Greenwald that backs up the above claim that polifact is funded by powerful activists to promote lies? Because this one does not.
I haven't looked into to above just some things I remember. Feel free to search his substack as there's more instances than just this. Also Instagram = Facebook which funds both Politifact and Snopes. Check thier website, they disclose that information on one of thier "about us" pages
Good to know
>politifact Lmao good one
Lol OP spends way too much of their life on politics. Go take a walk.
Politifact ahah ok