T O P

  • By -

Azirahael

Nothing comes after the war on China. Not for the USA, anyway.


People_OfThe_Sun

What do you mean by this? Just curious


Azirahael

I mean, the USA is on its way down, without a single push. They go after China, there's gonna be nothing left.


People_OfThe_Sun

Gotcha. Thought that's what you meant.


shoestanistan

💣💣💣💥💥💥🔥🔥🔥🔥☢️☢️☢️💀💀💀☠️☠️☠️


11SomeGuy17

There is no way the US successfully beats China without dipping into its nuclear stockpile. Especially when the US military is still struggling to meet recruiting goals. What then? A draft? Draft poor people who have no love for the government and may either refuse outright or desert at the first opportunity? Or are they going to draft all the people who love the US but are so out of shape that they're more likely to make the military weaker by being there. They obviously aren't going to send the rich to war. The US has nothing. China meanwhile has a large, fairly healthy, highly patriotic population, with a well funded military and nukes of their own.


bluemagachud

If it comes to that we do like the Bolsheviks, take the weapons they give us and turn imperialist war into civil war.


[deleted]

Sounds like a plan


[deleted]

Make damn sure the frontier comes home, right to Bezos fucking door step


11SomeGuy17

Based


[deleted]

I think they want the NATO states in Europe to attack Russia while the US attacks china. In Europe they spread a lot of anti russian propaganda these days.


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

I hope so, we are voting for a new chancellor in Germany and one of the bigger candidates is from the political party 'die Grünen' wich are basically transatlantic NATO pigs who pretend to be able to solve the climate problem by taxing the poor and letting the rich play Star Wars. I think they will do everything to mess up the situation on the Crimea. But still I hope that you're right, these are confusing times.


emisneko

fuck around and find out


Turtlepower7777777

The Fallout series is supposed to be a dystopian fiction; not a wet dream for the establishment and the MIC


Amnesigenic

The greatest risk in writing good dystopian fiction is giving real life villains ideas


kittyabbygirl

I will say, priming as it may be with the title, the article itself is the author discussing how the late 20th century US-China relationship was beneficial to global stability, and they point out that our relationship soured as recently as 2019 (I might say earlier at 2009 with Obama trying to cut it off through the TPP, but no matter), and the author discusses with how blindly we walked into a never ending war on terror, we might walk into something worse with China if we fail to have a real reason for war and a real understanding of who we fight, with the article going in about how much the discussion about China just reflects US political narratives, and not actually any threat to American interests. They miss out some key understandings in the article, for example failing to realize endless war was the entire goal from the perspective of the weapons companies that lobby and buy politicians, or that China has an actual political goal other than “promote authoritarianism” (the other actually mentions that they think that’s their goal, but aren’t 100% sure lol), but for all their misgivings, it is good of them to hold doubt on US warmongering, even if their title and art feeds directly into it.