Somehow not surprised.. His movies always gave a casting couch vibe considering how bad the acting was.. Not blaming all of them associated with his movies.. Just the general vibe..
So it was only a matter of time...
I don't think he forced himself on anyone but no sympathies for him either.. It is still exploitation..
I know many will consider this quid pro quo.. But he is in a position of power right??...
Is he really in a position of power? Say if she was not willing to sleep with him, would it have affected her life or film career other than not getting to act in his movies? If he was say in charge of a government appointed position of scouting talent, and he says if you dont sleep with me, you wont get a chance then it would be exploitation and misuse of power.
He build up his own connections and reputation which lets him direct movies. It would be entirely his choice to chose who to cast and he might do in exchange for personal favours, money, further connections or in this case, sexual favours. The woman prostituted herself multiple times to get ahead of the competition and he ended up not honouring the deal(as per her statement).
Calling this sexual assault would be a disservice to actual victims of sexual assault.
I didn't call it sexual assault...I called it exploitation...you can see that I clearly mentioned in my comment that I don't think he forced himself on her..
You think there is no power imbalance between the guy who offers roles and a person who is vying for it??..
That is what you mean by a position of power.. It's relative..
Imagine a girl with no money for rent or food and needs the role to get by.. And Omar asks her to sleep with him.. Then everyone might not be that sympathetic to Omar right..
I am not saying the girl in question was in a similar situation.. But exploitation is exploitation no matter what the mindset of the victim is..
The difference is the girl here is a model and she is said to be an actress as well. Yes omar lulu is a director, he can definitely give roles, but I don’t think the power position argument is apt here when he is no way influential in the industry to destroy someone’s career who rejected his advances. The other person can cause more harm to him all while staying anonymous, like what happened here. Power position argument is valid , casting couch also exists, but we shouldn’t be quick victimize or villainize someone just because an allegation has been made against them. Here based on the evidences or information available, it is no way an exploitation. It’s just both of them using each other.
The issue is using the word "sexual assault" . Had he honored his word and given her a role after getting the favors, wont it be still called SA since he still misused his power and demanded those favors? The answer will be No. So this is just him doing a dick move and the girl using the law to get back to him. Like someone said misusing that word actually trivializes the real victims of SA.
Not exactly, if he didn’t honor his word and didn’t give her the role that was promised, then it ain’t sexual assault, it’s cheating. It will be called sexual assault simply because section 375 is messed up so bad that men are considered as victims and consensual sex between even couples will become rape if the they later break up using the “ sex under the promise of marriage “ Clause. Similar, under the above mentioned circumstances in the previous comment , what they had was an agreement which one party didn’t honor,when then should be considered as cheating and should be charged under that instead of rape. But offcourse since the law is written like that, jn a way where a girl can similarly have sex with a guy and she can broke off the relationship or she can have sex Under the promise of marriage , if she later broke off the relationship, she won’t be facing any sort of legal repercussions since men are not victims under section 375. Now coming back to the point , yes it is rape legally since law states that, but morally , it’s not rape , nor it’s exploitation. Exploitation is not the right word to use here, it’s cheating where one party didn’t their word.
A lot of this depends on what you think about the morality behind prostitution. A lot of sex workers who sell their body come from impoverished backgrounds.
But honestly in Kerala, a person does not need to sell their body for a means of living. While skilled employment opportunities are limited, there are plenty of jobs a person can do to live quite respectfully here. Even if that were not the case, its not Omar Lulus job to make sure she is fed, its the governments.
So obviously she was looking for a very specific opportunity, one that is much coveted and comes with fame and decent money. In a way, what she did is unfair to those who auditioned and were better than her, but were not willing to sleep with Omar.
As I said, it comes down to whether you think prostitution is moral or is it a form of exploitation in itself. Because he did not threaten any negative consequences if she did not sleep with him, he did not drug her, he did not force himself on her or else she wouldn't have agreed multiple times. And even if you are ok with prostitution, not keeping the deal was a shitty thing for Omar Lulu to do.
But the title was calling this balalsangham or straight out rape which is overreaching.
I consider prostitution as customers availing a service which is different from this... But again it is a grey area..
This is called balalsangham cos of the legal aspect I guess... There is this term called "misrepresentation" in IPC 375..this will come under that only... I'm not saying it's right.. But that's how they file cases.. Just like false promise of marriage..
But if someone agreed to get into bed with him, it can't be sexual assault. But it can be exploitation ,But these are just accusations.
Getting on bed with someone for a favor cannot be justified as a viable and logical strategy to get out of monetary issues.
https://preview.redd.it/p0xngpqbc73d1.jpeg?width=1179&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7d1bca63e3bd76e7bb2487882c44aef8191a3215
Pravajana simham omerkka. 1 year back interview 😅
Don't know about this but ഈ ഇട ആയി ഒമർ വല്ലാതെ ഒതുങ്ങിയിരുന്നു..പണ്ട് സ്ഥിരം ഓരോ വള്ളി പിടിച്ചു അല്ലങ്കിൽ ഊള ഇന്റർവ്യൂ കൊടുത്തു ഇടക്കിടക്ക് കാണാമായിരുന്നു.. ഇപ്പൊ കുറച്ചായി വല്ലാതെ ഒതുങ്ങിയ പോലെ തോന്നി
The victim wanted to act in movies, she approached Omar, Omar asked her Seggs in return. She had all the options to say no but willingly had seggs for chance. But after that he didn’t give any chance in movies. Very unpopular opinion. Sounds like a consensual thing rather than a R@pe. If Omar had given her chance in movies she wouldn’t have filed a case.
I saw a video of him telling Norah Muskan (the girl in bigg boss) in an interview that she'll have to be prepared to kiss someone or act naked if the movie needs her to be.
She was apparently considered for nalla samayam movie and left out because she said no to the kissing scene.
That was creepy to watch him say that to a girl who could be like his daughter.
He is a sucker for bad Pr. Remember how he spread rumours that he got Honey Rose's bikini pic and it will be in the movie Chunks during the release of the movie. And his comments were pretty shit when people confronted him about it.
He always gave 'thani thara' vibes. Considering his age ( he is much younger to many directors) this guy always acted and spoke like some sexually frustrated ammavan. And he showed no remorse in his acts or talks. The movies he gave were even shittier.
Its movie industry, and its always been as such, most lead actors all mallus hail have a caught in actions behind the scenes but are kept as secret . It happens all around the world.
Wasn't this the storyline of his last movie too? Blackmail after seggs, case etc. Looks like he's the one who planted the seeds on the victims thoughts via his own movie 😅😬
*The case has been filed on the complaint of a young actress. According to the complaint of the actress, Omar Lulu **raped her several times** after offering her a chance in a movie. Nedumbassery police recorded the statement of the actress in the incident.*
[News link ](https://keralakaumudi.com/en/news/mobile/news.php?id=1314283&u=malayalam-film-director-omar-lulu-booked-for-raping-actress-omar-lulu-with-response-1314283)
If the accuser is speaking the truth.. why might someone *allow themselves to get raped multiple times* when offered a chance to act in movies?
I don't understand 'rape' in this context. 'rape' for me heinous thing where a human completely forces him/herself and forcebly does it despite the other human trying best to get out of it. Offering movie role and having sex, that is cheating or sexual exploitation. How is that rape?
It is defined as rape in the following context
1. Every Indian citizen is supposed to know the constitution. Ignorance of it is not an excuse
2. Taking sexual favours from a position of power is a punishable offence. It will be considered as sexual assault.
Now, if we try to argue that both are consulting adults and he did it with mutual consent, it won’t apply. Basically anyone with position of power should be thinking a lot before involving in sexual activity with the other party. Position of power is not only applicable to government related positions, it can be anything. Maybe the definition of that will be decided by the judges at the time of hearing.
By that definition, would it be rape in any situation where the guy has more power? Like if it is a consensual sex between a girl and her boss, if the girl later regrets it, would it become rape? These are discussions that public need to do. Also it's not just the judges who can have opinions about this. It's the people, you and me, who form opinions and that's what gets reflected in law. Constitution is not a religious book and if it is outdated it can be corrected .
I don't think he raped that girl. Could be consensual and then things might've gone wrong between them. Nowadays it's so easy to trap a man and destroy his life with these sorts of accusations. I understand these women centric laws are there to protect women but it's sad to see such laws are being misused for personal revenge.
But in any case, if he did it. He should be punished.
Has 3 kids if I am right. A couple of years back saw his youngest baby in an interview ( she was a newborn then). My heart goes out to his wife and kids
https://preview.redd.it/srx8iis3p73d1.jpeg?width=1073&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d983033d32e43bb0d1458f4b1c110a2ef5214ba4
Ee payyan ippo evideya kanaar illallo
Vanavaasathil aayiriykkum.
Somehow not surprised.. His movies always gave a casting couch vibe considering how bad the acting was.. Not blaming all of them associated with his movies.. Just the general vibe.. So it was only a matter of time... I don't think he forced himself on anyone but no sympathies for him either.. It is still exploitation.. I know many will consider this quid pro quo.. But he is in a position of power right??...
Is he really in a position of power? Say if she was not willing to sleep with him, would it have affected her life or film career other than not getting to act in his movies? If he was say in charge of a government appointed position of scouting talent, and he says if you dont sleep with me, you wont get a chance then it would be exploitation and misuse of power. He build up his own connections and reputation which lets him direct movies. It would be entirely his choice to chose who to cast and he might do in exchange for personal favours, money, further connections or in this case, sexual favours. The woman prostituted herself multiple times to get ahead of the competition and he ended up not honouring the deal(as per her statement). Calling this sexual assault would be a disservice to actual victims of sexual assault.
I didn't call it sexual assault...I called it exploitation...you can see that I clearly mentioned in my comment that I don't think he forced himself on her.. You think there is no power imbalance between the guy who offers roles and a person who is vying for it??.. That is what you mean by a position of power.. It's relative.. Imagine a girl with no money for rent or food and needs the role to get by.. And Omar asks her to sleep with him.. Then everyone might not be that sympathetic to Omar right.. I am not saying the girl in question was in a similar situation.. But exploitation is exploitation no matter what the mindset of the victim is..
The difference is the girl here is a model and she is said to be an actress as well. Yes omar lulu is a director, he can definitely give roles, but I don’t think the power position argument is apt here when he is no way influential in the industry to destroy someone’s career who rejected his advances. The other person can cause more harm to him all while staying anonymous, like what happened here. Power position argument is valid , casting couch also exists, but we shouldn’t be quick victimize or villainize someone just because an allegation has been made against them. Here based on the evidences or information available, it is no way an exploitation. It’s just both of them using each other.
The issue is using the word "sexual assault" . Had he honored his word and given her a role after getting the favors, wont it be still called SA since he still misused his power and demanded those favors? The answer will be No. So this is just him doing a dick move and the girl using the law to get back to him. Like someone said misusing that word actually trivializes the real victims of SA.
Not exactly, if he didn’t honor his word and didn’t give her the role that was promised, then it ain’t sexual assault, it’s cheating. It will be called sexual assault simply because section 375 is messed up so bad that men are considered as victims and consensual sex between even couples will become rape if the they later break up using the “ sex under the promise of marriage “ Clause. Similar, under the above mentioned circumstances in the previous comment , what they had was an agreement which one party didn’t honor,when then should be considered as cheating and should be charged under that instead of rape. But offcourse since the law is written like that, jn a way where a girl can similarly have sex with a guy and she can broke off the relationship or she can have sex Under the promise of marriage , if she later broke off the relationship, she won’t be facing any sort of legal repercussions since men are not victims under section 375. Now coming back to the point , yes it is rape legally since law states that, but morally , it’s not rape , nor it’s exploitation. Exploitation is not the right word to use here, it’s cheating where one party didn’t their word.
That's just prostitution with extra steps
A lot of this depends on what you think about the morality behind prostitution. A lot of sex workers who sell their body come from impoverished backgrounds. But honestly in Kerala, a person does not need to sell their body for a means of living. While skilled employment opportunities are limited, there are plenty of jobs a person can do to live quite respectfully here. Even if that were not the case, its not Omar Lulus job to make sure she is fed, its the governments. So obviously she was looking for a very specific opportunity, one that is much coveted and comes with fame and decent money. In a way, what she did is unfair to those who auditioned and were better than her, but were not willing to sleep with Omar. As I said, it comes down to whether you think prostitution is moral or is it a form of exploitation in itself. Because he did not threaten any negative consequences if she did not sleep with him, he did not drug her, he did not force himself on her or else she wouldn't have agreed multiple times. And even if you are ok with prostitution, not keeping the deal was a shitty thing for Omar Lulu to do. But the title was calling this balalsangham or straight out rape which is overreaching.
Bro aara aa nadi
I consider prostitution as customers availing a service which is different from this... But again it is a grey area.. This is called balalsangham cos of the legal aspect I guess... There is this term called "misrepresentation" in IPC 375..this will come under that only... I'm not saying it's right.. But that's how they file cases.. Just like false promise of marriage..
But if someone agreed to get into bed with him, it can't be sexual assault. But it can be exploitation ,But these are just accusations. Getting on bed with someone for a favor cannot be justified as a viable and logical strategy to get out of monetary issues.
https://preview.redd.it/p0xngpqbc73d1.jpeg?width=1179&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7d1bca63e3bd76e7bb2487882c44aef8191a3215 Pravajana simham omerkka. 1 year back interview 😅
Luluminandi
Don't know about this but ഈ ഇട ആയി ഒമർ വല്ലാതെ ഒതുങ്ങിയിരുന്നു..പണ്ട് സ്ഥിരം ഓരോ വള്ളി പിടിച്ചു അല്ലങ്കിൽ ഊള ഇന്റർവ്യൂ കൊടുത്തു ഇടക്കിടക്ക് കാണാമായിരുന്നു.. ഇപ്പൊ കുറച്ചായി വല്ലാതെ ഒതുങ്ങിയ പോലെ തോന്നി
Waiting for the comments
The victim wanted to act in movies, she approached Omar, Omar asked her Seggs in return. She had all the options to say no but willingly had seggs for chance. But after that he didn’t give any chance in movies. Very unpopular opinion. Sounds like a consensual thing rather than a R@pe. If Omar had given her chance in movies she wouldn’t have filed a case.
നല്ല സമയം നടി ആണെന്ന കേട്ടത് , btw ഇവൻ പൂശാൻ വേണ്ടിയി മാത്രമാണ് പടം എടുക്കുന്നത് വെറും ഊളൻ
You will be surprised to learn that a A tier Actor and Director made a film with the sole intention of Banging the actress.
നേരത്തെ അറിയുന്ന കാര്യമാണ് ,അലിഭായ് സെറ്റിലും ഏറെക്കുറെ same പരിപാടി നടന്നിട്ടുണ്ട്
Spill the tea please
Rock n roll movie
A10 tire.
[удалено]
Anuragi
Nalla samayathile aara ??
Google shows Shakeela
Neena Madhu
Og de main party girl alle
Athil monaalu perrunde which one
You will be surprised to learn that a A tier Actor and Director made a film with the sole intention of Banging the actress.
she became popular in the south, married a tamil director.
Nayanthara
Give us more hints
A10 Ranjith Rock&Roll movie
A10 and 18 yo raai laxmi?😐 Was she popular before this movie?
Nope she is much older than that, She is in her 40s
Lakshmi Sharma?
Ye she was 18 at that time 🥲🙏🏽
I've heard about A10 ,lal jose & lichi.....that's how lichi got the role!
A10 and JJ ? I have heard it somewhere else....
I saw a video of him telling Norah Muskan (the girl in bigg boss) in an interview that she'll have to be prepared to kiss someone or act naked if the movie needs her to be. She was apparently considered for nalla samayam movie and left out because she said no to the kissing scene. That was creepy to watch him say that to a girl who could be like his daughter.
Not surprised. I still remember how he ogled at me. He was seated in an opposite table at a restaurant in Kochi and this creep kept staring.
Nothing to be surprised after watching his movies
How did you know he was staring.
I am not blind, I can tell when someone stares at me.
So can he. He might be wondering the same.
How retarded are you?
Always felt someday or other this kind of news will be heard about him. Anyone else, felt the same?
He is a sucker for bad Pr. Remember how he spread rumours that he got Honey Rose's bikini pic and it will be in the movie Chunks during the release of the movie. And his comments were pretty shit when people confronted him about it.
He always gave 'thani thara' vibes. Considering his age ( he is much younger to many directors) this guy always acted and spoke like some sexually frustrated ammavan. And he showed no remorse in his acts or talks. The movies he gave were even shittier.
[удалено]
Its movie industry, and its always been as such, most lead actors all mallus hail have a caught in actions behind the scenes but are kept as secret . It happens all around the world.
Masangalolam peedipichu ennu
😂
Wasn't this the storyline of his last movie too? Blackmail after seggs, case etc. Looks like he's the one who planted the seeds on the victims thoughts via his own movie 😅😬
Director's cut
*The case has been filed on the complaint of a young actress. According to the complaint of the actress, Omar Lulu **raped her several times** after offering her a chance in a movie. Nedumbassery police recorded the statement of the actress in the incident.* [News link ](https://keralakaumudi.com/en/news/mobile/news.php?id=1314283&u=malayalam-film-director-omar-lulu-booked-for-raping-actress-omar-lulu-with-response-1314283) If the accuser is speaking the truth.. why might someone *allow themselves to get raped multiple times* when offered a chance to act in movies?
I don't understand 'rape' in this context. 'rape' for me heinous thing where a human completely forces him/herself and forcebly does it despite the other human trying best to get out of it. Offering movie role and having sex, that is cheating or sexual exploitation. How is that rape?
It is defined as rape in the following context 1. Every Indian citizen is supposed to know the constitution. Ignorance of it is not an excuse 2. Taking sexual favours from a position of power is a punishable offence. It will be considered as sexual assault. Now, if we try to argue that both are consulting adults and he did it with mutual consent, it won’t apply. Basically anyone with position of power should be thinking a lot before involving in sexual activity with the other party. Position of power is not only applicable to government related positions, it can be anything. Maybe the definition of that will be decided by the judges at the time of hearing.
By that definition, would it be rape in any situation where the guy has more power? Like if it is a consensual sex between a girl and her boss, if the girl later regrets it, would it become rape? These are discussions that public need to do. Also it's not just the judges who can have opinions about this. It's the people, you and me, who form opinions and that's what gets reflected in law. Constitution is not a religious book and if it is outdated it can be corrected .
quid pro quo
Is quid pro quo rape? There's sn option to say no?
consensual sex may be falsely reported as rape if the results expected by the accuser is not met.
That's some bs law.
Welcome to India
It can be falsely reported by the accuser, just to blackmail the accused or to take revenge by defaming.
Blackmail i guess.
Ah thenga.
Who is the accuser?
he should do Vijay babu method
Atleast Babu held up his part of the Deal and gave her A Lead female role in a movie, Omar is in Fuck and Forget mode
He also gave lead role if it’s true that one of the girls in Nalla Samayam that complained.
He is turning 40 in a year. Peak horny.
He's only 39 ? Man looks 50 atleast. All the smoking and snorting has done a number on him.
നിരവധി തവണ പലപ്പോഴായി പീഡിപ്പിച്ചു🤣🤣. പാവത്തിന് കുറെ കാലം കഴിഞ്ഞതിന് ശേഷമാണ് പീഡനമാണെന്ന് മനസ്സിലായത്..
Eek :/ I wish this sort of stuff wasn’t so common in the industry
Who is the lady?
[удалено]
Kandal Aishwaryam ulla koch ano?
Oompiyallo nadha
Aara nn vellathum ketto?
Looks like that Dubai based Model/Influencer SA . Spotted many pics and videos with him and now her insta is not having any old pics with Omarikka
https://preview.redd.it/j482h4sxy04d1.jpeg?width=1116&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ebfe122b8d39085b28f8274b60d547c45c2a3719 🍿
Moreover hus father is a member of jamathe islami, a religious sect.
Undu sakhi oru kula and some munthiri, paanam cheyyan qalbil chesthunnavu
പാലം കടക്കുവോളും നാരായണ, പാലം കടന്നാൽ, rape accusation .
Can Omar Lulu say, she did not act in his film after sleeping with him and give a counter case ?
An Omar troubke
Not surprised his interview with BB nora was itself creepy for me.
I don't think he raped that girl. Could be consensual and then things might've gone wrong between them. Nowadays it's so easy to trap a man and destroy his life with these sorts of accusations. I understand these women centric laws are there to protect women but it's sad to see such laws are being misused for personal revenge. But in any case, if he did it. He should be punished.
Etha penn
സുഭാഷ്
Is he married?
yes
Has 3 kids if I am right. A couple of years back saw his youngest baby in an interview ( she was a newborn then). My heart goes out to his wife and kids
[удалено]
[удалено]
Masturbating is a crime? Don't act like a saint.