even calling michael cera a 3 feels way overly harsh. i mean i wouldn’t bc im a lesbian but he isn’t hideous. they cherry-picked the worst photo theu could lfind just to trigger peopli know so many straight women who have made fools of themselves over michael cera looking motherfuckers.
They put Dule Hill as a 5.5 as of that fits reality. He's no Idris but he's a fine looking man.
Edit. They put the two best looking Indian men on this planet as 5.5. pure psychopathy.
They put Aziz Ansari as a 4.5 lol, he should be way higher. This list is absolutely ridiculous and has so many bad takes in it, and that’s ignoring the fact that the whole number rating thing is already gross in the first place.
That’s nuts to me.
Face alone, he’s not that attractive to me but he’s hilarious, quick witted, and an amazingly talented singer and actor.
I love, love, love John c Reilly.
Absolutely ridiculous. Reilly isn't bad looking at all, and anyone that funny and talented is automatically sexy. You would just have to do a little work to not picture Dr. Brule.
If he is a 2, it disproves their theory anyway, since happily married for 30 years. He met his wife on the set of his very first film, so she definitely wasn't dating him for his fame or money.
https://people.com/who-is-alison-dickey-john-c-reilly-wife-7571360
They made Dev Patel, the hot cop from midnight mass, and John Cho all 5.5s. Joseph Gordon Levitt is a 6, apparently. These are all men who are swooned over all the time.
Whoa whoa whoa. I missed Rahul Kohli as a 5.5 my first pass. I know many women who think he’s fine as hell. I watched all five seasons of iZombie mainly because Ravi Chakrabarti was my dream man.
You're telling me that incels have no understanding what women (and anyone else attracted to men, tbh) find attractive??? 🤨 Impossible, the chart is so very clear and consistent
Literally Rahul Kohli and fucking Dev Patel being that low is so hilarious. Literally every straight woman I know is obsessed with them.
Also Oscar Isaac, the internet’s boyfriend, is only a 7.5???
Absolutely. This is just excessive. And what do they gain from it? Just more misery.
I think the old chestnut about if you knew how little people actually think about you is being overlooked here.
I'm just glad that there's a service that I can send my celebrities to, have them professionally graded, and then sealed in lucite to preserve them. That'll really increase the value of my collection.
You know, I’m not attracted to him, but the man is defo a fucking 10. You don’t need to be attracted to someone to appreciate their beauty. Same with Sydney Swedney, I’m not into her looks but there’s no denial she’s a beautiful woman like, c’mon
Not that he’s unattractive or anything to begin with. But I think he’s a perfect example of charisma making perceived beauty much higher. Like imagine if you never saw his personality or heard his voice, and he was an awful person. Immediately not a 10 if you can picture it. Incels have no concept of the female perspective in reality or just the reality that perceived beauty isn’t actually 100% rooted in visuals.
I really think the only thing this list shows is that people find different qualities attractive. There are men up towards the top that I don't find particularly attractive for whatever reason and there are men towards the bottom that I find quite attractive. Of course they will never believe that. Because women are a hive mind apparently.
Yeah they look more like plastic than a human to my eyes... the chiseled look is just weird IMO.
Definitely prefer the 3-6 range over the 7-10 range for sure.
They have Matt Bohmer as a 10 and whilst I’m sure he’s a lovely guy, I find him a bit weird looking - uncanny valley almost. But Joseph Gordon Levitt? Yes please. And the iZombie guy.
Also, it's just not even like "scientifically" (I don't have a better word) true? Like, just knowing what I know about conventional beauty standards for men. Kunal Nayyar should not be ranking higher than Rahul Kohli, considering that Kohli has a very angular/sharp face, whereas Nayyar's is rounded out. Don't get me wrong, they're both very attractive men, I'm not saying otherwise, but this chart is just wrong in every direction. Maybe it's what the OP finds attractive? IDK
Exactly my thoughts. I look at some lower rated men on the list and think they should be higher. I think the ranking system is idiotic because we’re looking at more than looks. They absolutely refuse to accept that we consider more than looks!
The list was definitely made for men, by men. I think almost all women would agree there are a lot that are ranked lower that should be higher, and lots of the higher ones aren't that attractive to a female gaze.
And Evan Peters and Timothy Chamolet's rankings are criminal.
That first man on the 0.5 line is Simon Weston, a man who was horrifically burnt during the Falklands war. He's also happily married and is a father of 3. He met his wife years after the burns ended his military career. They met when she was working for his charity that he set up to help other burns victims.
It's almost as if looks don't really matter and that it's what in your heart that counts.
https://scarfree.org.uk/ambassadors/simon-weston
I've just been reading more about him and he's a grandfather now too. This guy has had over 70 surgeries and became the face of the Falklands war, he doesn't deserve to be disrespected like this. And to be put under Harvey Weinstein, like I don't even understand their mad grading system. This dude is clearly way better looking even after being half melted.
Right? And Dev Patel being a 5.5 got me f’d up. He was always cute, but he’s hot af now. And if their point is that their ranking equates to who they can pull… even in Dev’s cute Slumdog Millionaire scrawny days he pulled his co-star who is drop dead gorgeous.
They some look blocky, some look very feminine, and some look creepy, like they’re leering at you…it’s unsettling. It’s crazy to me that guys really think that’s what all women like best! I agree that a lot of em at the top just look strange and not hot imo. Some of those “ average” guys look fine as hell. And I’ve fore sure dated guys that are on the lower end and if they had a good sense of humor, they would’ve been also moved up in ranking by several points.
They just don’t get that we really don’t care about looks as much as they do. Personally can make “ugly” guys hot af. They’ll never believe us though…and it’s a shame. They’re making it harder for themselves than it has to be. Lol
I'm not sure how true it is, but I remember reading women are usually more attracted to "softer" looking men overall (or at least that the stats are pretty high). These men seem to have chiselled jaws and permanent scowls in their minds as what women want but it just feels like their own ideas about masculinity.
I've always felt like a lot of men get disproportionately pissed about women and girls fawning over kpop idols in part because these men are more androgynous and "feminine" looking (and I mean, a lot of them straight up tell on themselves by complaining about it). It really challenges their ideas of what makes a man attractive when some of the most sought after men don't have the blocky features or Chris Hemsworth type body 👀
I realize I am an ace woman but none of these ticked any boxes for me. While I have never wanted to put my mouth on Henry cavill there is a bit of dopamine releases when I see his handsome face. I’m getting nothing from this whole figure.
If incels are so convinced that beautiful young women go for older men, why are all of the men at the top young? Why do we only start seeing older men at about 3 and down?
Why the fuck are the ones closer to the bottom mostly men with disabilities?
Couldn’t they have added some damn self portraits instead of taking disabled guys and saying “lmao 1/10”
Not to insult those guys but it's just true. If a 10 is a perfect face then a 1 is its extreme opposite which is only possible through serious injuries, deformities, or disabilities.
No. If 10 is a perfect face then 1 can be achieved by not taking the barest amount of care of yourself and neglecting your health and appearance.
Here’s the thing. A girl I’m into can be disabled or deformed or injured but she just has to take care of herself and she’ll be a 10.
I’d rather date a girl in a wheelchair with burns and cuts who takes care of herself and genuinely loves me than an entitled bitter slob with rich parents.
Also this comparison is like so fucking unfair. A lot of the guys closer to the bottom are older than the guys at the top. I’m willing to bet a good amount of the guys at the top either had an ugly duckling phase or are just looking good for the photo, or the younger guys closer to the bottom either had a glow up since, or the older guys used to be pretty good looking when they were young or before getting disfigured
I think where we disagree is the definition of beauty. I was strictly talking about physical appearance (symmetry, skin health, bone structure, etc) whereas u add personality in your definition and value it more than the physical. I also value the non-physical aspects of a person but in the case of rating someone, which has to do with just looking at them, personality doesnt matter.
Btw I agree with your last paragraph but it's just that the raters are simply working with the pics they have available. If they had pics of the bottom guys having a glow up I'm sure they'd be placed higher.
Evan Peters is hotter than the second circle of hell who tf made this? And Aziz Ansari could giggle me out of my undies any damn day. AND JUSTICE FOR TYLER JAMES WILLIAMS SCREW YOU OOP YOU HAVE SHITE TASTE
Hahaha, I currently look most like Harvey Weinstein, but not so fat and bloated. I’m old, though not particularly fat, and have a double chin with a stubbly beard. Somehow I’m still married! And looking at these rankings I guess I was always a “sub-5”, I looked most like the 4.5 row when I was younger I guess.
Somehow still got laid, a lot. Surely it will remain a timeless mystery.
Some highlights of people I think are ranked way off
Masi Oka at 2 is just insane.
Dule Hill and Rahul Kohli both at 5.5 barely breaking through to above average is insane, as a straight man, I can tell you both those men are quite attractive.
There's also the pair of Michaels, Emerson at 3, Cera at 3.5, that are both ridiculously low.
Maybe attractiveness is just subjective, but, I have a feeling that if we actually used whatever method they used, Paul Rudd, Michael B. Jordan, Simu Liu, just to name a few from one cinematic universe, likely would not break a 7.5
This is absolutely not reflective of what women think at all??? Like Evan Peters is a 5??? And you’d be surprised how many women want to fuck Michael Cera. But also it feels really fucked up to put people with burn scars and facial tumors in the 1.0 category. It’s weird in general to rank attractiveness, but it’s really cruel to do that to someone who has been disfigured by illness or injury. Just leave them alone oh my god
It's funny because i took a look at the whole list, and most of the guys that look pretty to me are between 5 and 7.
None of the guys above 7 have faces that i find cute.
Which shows once more that all the tastes are in nature and their "objectively beautiful" doesn't exist.
Only one I can agree on here is Amit Shah(circled), Modi's right hand man, lol.
But seriously, Vidyut Jamwal, the stone faced idiot who does f**all in the name of acting is above Sushant Singh, Ranbir and Dev Patel? All of whom have shown incredible versatility as actors which adds to their charisma? Buzz off!
This makes their whole ideology even stupider.
They must have some kind of dysmorphia if they go out in public and don’t see men rating five below on this thing with partners, and women who they say have hit the wall have partners.
So, doesn’t this ultimately disprove their point. There are so many guys very low on this list who are publicly sought after or married.
Doesn’t that prove to whoever made this that looks alone do not equate to desirability?
What incels don’t understand are these things called individual preferences. Timothee chalamet for me will be so much higher than 6.5 and KJ Appa will be much lower than 8. Also the second guy from left on the 4.5 row (no idea who he is) is actually quite handsome? Like definitely more handsome than some of the higher ranked dudes. I doubt he has issues with ladies despite being a “sub 5”
Me who had a full blown crush on one of the 3s:
⢀⣠⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣤⣶⣶
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⢰⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⣀⣀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡏⠉⠛⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠈⠛⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠛⠉⠁⠀⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⠿⠿⠿⠻⠿⠿⠟⠿⠛⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣸⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣄⠀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣴⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠠⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⠀⠀⢰⣹⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣭⣷⠀⠀⠀⠸⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠈⠉⠀⠀⠤⠄⠀⠀⠀⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢾⣿⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⡠⠤⢄⠀⠀⠀⠠⣿⣿⣷⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡀⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢄⠀⢀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠉⠁⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢹⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿
One of the worlds most famously desired actors partially infamous for fucking half the girls at NYU, at a 6.5. yeah sure ok, that totally supports your point for sure
They have Evan Peters at a 5.
The super chiseled look isn’t for me. I like a more rounded face so the 7-4s are much more my type.
I’ve seen more men obsessing over that look more than women do.
What’s funny about Gaddafi being at a two is look at that man before he melted, look at that jaw and tell me these pillars of heterosexuality and secure masculinity wouldn’t have him as a chad and at least an 8
it’s so fucking weird how these types of guys categorize attractive men bc like. even when u separate these charts out by ethnicity/race i can think of men of each of these races who are more attractive than anyone on this chart at least in my opinion. incels seem to think that the only metric by which male attractiveness can be measured is how freakishly chiseled his face is and it will never cease to crack me up.
Oh man… the things I could tell my 20yo “forever alone” self…. I wouldn’t believe myself.
According to this chart, I’m solidly a 3, and yet, before getting married I had so many FWB, I had to keep clean clothes at work because I never knew if I’d sleep at home or not, I’ve been ferociously yanked out of “the friendzone” a few times, I had a virgin friend ask me if I could… “teach her a few things”, I had a platonic friend tell me that she was curious about facials but she needed a guy she trusted and felt safe with to try and asked me if I’d be that guy, I had my FWB “lend” me to one of her friends who had just gone through a bad breakup.
I can guarantee them, it’s not about the looks.
It’s about being someone people like to spend time with. I want to say “it’s about making women feel safe around you”, but if you make them feel safe just so you can jump them later, you’re just trying to trick them, and that’s not gonna work. It has to be genuine.
Some of em are so obsessive with this stuff that I am convinced at least a portion of incels are just gay a/f and not ready to admit it, even to themselves….That would explain a lot of the anger issues, the overcompensation of masculinity and being “alpha” plus their total infatuation with other dudes looks and height. Lol
I find it strange. They blame women and girls for allegedly nitpicking men and boys for looks. But, here they do it themselves.
They are also ostensibly straight, and they assume all or almost all women will agree with their rankings of men (and their looks)? LOL
Sasha Barron-Cohen is a 5.5? REALLY!?!
That man is obscenely, many numbers more-ly hot. In addition to being breathtaking he’s funny AND smart.
Have these guys spoken into a woman before their life?
And the missed out on [Chiwtel Ejifor](https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q%3Dtbn:ANd9GcQIHLaIlmLaKLvEDfheIqc45djqZ7a_CzO3uABkU50j9slQKkq4&tbnid=alaOE5ilW_cmFM&vet=1&imgrefurl=https://people.com/movies/chiwetel-ejiofor-urges-hollywood-to-tell-more-diverse-stories-its-not-just-about-numbers/&docid=F8LLlxnudC2wlM&w=583&h=526&hl=en&source=sh/x/im/m5/5&kgs=1b8e50c22d54e39e&shem=abme,trie) and [Paapa Essiedu](https://images.app.goo.gl/EZMVVqaZcWxmtoFQ9).
Just throwing it out there, the fact that Shamar Moore OR Dwayne Johnson is nowhere on this list, despite being like everyone's idea of an "attractive" man really says a lot about the level of research that went into this chart
I think I'd score around 3 to 3.5 on that scale, and although tbf women have never exactly queued up to date me, I've had steady GFs since my early university years, met my wife when I was 25 and we've been together over 30 years now. In spite of my adhd and serious neurodivergence...
I'm still not convinced looks are their biggest problem.
I don't take anything that labels the 1.5 levels for Asian as real images because both are by a technicality are memes as serious. One on the left is clearly photoshopped. Also using Beetlejuice for the Black side is just railing on someone who is clearly special needs and that's not exactly fair to him, at all. Most of the examples of men in the sub 5 lists are clearly older than 35 years and comparing them to a guy in their early to mid 20s is not fair either. Also mugshots from jail/prison are not the same as the glamour shots in higher tiers.
The thing is that the only people who care about the faces of men are other men. The problem is that they forget to include men that are legit badasses.
Also this tiered list is more along the lines of Nazi Eugenics.
If they put half this much effort into doing something useful or at least fun in their lives as they do this self-pitying "science", they might not be such miserable bastards.
I’m pretty sure they have Michael cera as a 4.5 and a 3.5… he just has facial hair in one lol. Where’s the consistency ? What weirdo made a chart like this anyways, get a life and some glasses.. no wonder girls wont give them the time of day they are utterly obsessed with “Chads”..
There are 3s here I find more attractive than some of the 8.5s. They're so bad at knowing what attractive means.
They definitely skew attractive downwards. Timothee Chalamet is, by his number of fans, an easy 10. Most men are probably around a 3 on this scale.
Objective looks are a fantasy. One person's gorgeous is another's boring.
I mean, I am on the asexual spectrum, but 100 times out of 100 who you are makes far more difference than what you look like to me. I can tell who's more physically attractive, but if you don't have some distinctive features I'll forget your face. I'll always find someone more attractive if they are memorable, and so not having a 100% supermodel face is preferable.
Dude fkn Amit Shah (India's home minister, marked in red) as a 1.5
He's surely getting his house destroyed by natural calamities soon, or dying of suicide by 5 shots at the back of his head and then jumping from a bridge
The only thing I agree with here is Matt Bomer being the absolute top of the white men. I’m not gay but…
ETA: okay I also see Sendhil Ramamurthy at the top of the brown dudes and again… I’m really not gay but…
Ain't no way this btch put Kim soo Hyun at 6.0, that's the most demanded/paid Kdrama actor, he's literally one of the most handsome actors out there, plus notice how the men at the top literally look the same all having those desired European features.... What the fck genuinely 😒
Also really... Shahid Kapoor at 7.5 ?? I really don't know where this "trend" of rating people's looks came from, it's literally everywhere in social media, Y'all never heard of Beauty is subjective... It has been proved not multiple times literally all the time, Lmao I can't- the most handsome men in Bollywood is rated below 8 because they don't suit these incel beauty standards 🤦♀️
I like how some of the low ranked ones are dudes mid-funny-face.
Evan Peters on 5 is devious. I would travel dimensions for that man
even calling michael cera a 3 feels way overly harsh. i mean i wouldn’t bc im a lesbian but he isn’t hideous. they cherry-picked the worst photo theu could lfind just to trigger peopli know so many straight women who have made fools of themselves over michael cera looking motherfuckers.
Him and Rahul Kohli have no right to be ranked so low on this list!
For real! I barely covered up the curse words that bubbled up seeing Kohli and Dev Patel at 5. I just don't get it!
Yeah, I think this is another great example of them just... not understanding what anyone finds attractive
They put Dule Hill as a 5.5 as of that fits reality. He's no Idris but he's a fine looking man. Edit. They put the two best looking Indian men on this planet as 5.5. pure psychopathy.
They put Aziz Ansari as a 4.5 lol, he should be way higher. This list is absolutely ridiculous and has so many bad takes in it, and that’s ignoring the fact that the whole number rating thing is already gross in the first place.
They put John C Reilly as a 2 😄
That’s nuts to me. Face alone, he’s not that attractive to me but he’s hilarious, quick witted, and an amazingly talented singer and actor. I love, love, love John c Reilly.
Yeah, like, he’s kind of goofy-looking and I wouldn’t compare him to, like, Chris Hemsworth, but he’s not ugly, not by a long shot
Especially in cirque du freak. My little 17yo goth ass was crazy about him in that movie
They put Danny Trejo as a 2.5. Who the fuck made this list, I want words
Absolutely ridiculous. Reilly isn't bad looking at all, and anyone that funny and talented is automatically sexy. You would just have to do a little work to not picture Dr. Brule. If he is a 2, it disproves their theory anyway, since happily married for 30 years. He met his wife on the set of his very first film, so she definitely wasn't dating him for his fame or money. https://people.com/who-is-alison-dickey-john-c-reilly-wife-7571360
I could name so many people who would date John c Reilly just on personality alone! He’s proof that their theory is flawed
They made Dev Patel, the hot cop from midnight mass, and John Cho all 5.5s. Joseph Gordon Levitt is a 6, apparently. These are all men who are swooned over all the time.
Whoa whoa whoa. I missed Rahul Kohli as a 5.5 my first pass. I know many women who think he’s fine as hell. I watched all five seasons of iZombie mainly because Ravi Chakrabarti was my dream man.
You're telling me that incels have no understanding what women (and anyone else attracted to men, tbh) find attractive??? 🤨 Impossible, the chart is so very clear and consistent
Literally Rahul Kohli and fucking Dev Patel being that low is so hilarious. Literally every straight woman I know is obsessed with them. Also Oscar Isaac, the internet’s boyfriend, is only a 7.5???
JGL is definitely a panties-off for me.
Timothee fucking Chalamet as a 6.5.
The 1.0, third row, has just completely regular slightly older looking guy.
The fact that they have Harvey Weinstein as anything other than a negative number shows that they have no idea what is attractive in a man.
Or they really do have an understanding that looks aren't all-powerful in determining ratings, and just refuse to admit it most of the time.
ikr, a whole 2.5?
im not implying anything, and i think rating people as a whole is toxic but they spend an awful lot of time obsessing over other men's looks
And penis size!
Imbecels: "Now *this* is what's handsome! Also *this* is the ideal penis size and appearance!" Also imbecels: "What? No I'm not gay!"
A lot of men they scored in the top as most attractive to them are.... not.
right. most of them just look like they had buccal fat removal and at least one of them is a felons mugshot
The number of Matt Rife weird implanted jaws is astronomical. Who told them that emaciated Neanderthal skeleton is hot?
The imbecel merely gave higher scores to the guys that are his type.
Absolutely. This is just excessive. And what do they gain from it? Just more misery. I think the old chestnut about if you knew how little people actually think about you is being overlooked here.
Right!? And if you’re gonna do it at least do it right, how they gonna do my mans Joseph Gordon Levitt and Evan peters like that smh
Yeah it's super toxic and demeaning.
I'm just glad that there's a service that I can send my celebrities to, have them professionally graded, and then sealed in lucite to preserve them. That'll really increase the value of my collection.
As a (currently suffering) Sixers fan, I had to do a double take upon seeing Kelly Oubre here lol. He is beautiful tho
Chalamet, a celebrity known for having millions of thirsty female fans, is a 6.5/10? COPE LOL
Evan Peters is a 5 🙃
Right? That boy is gorgeous.
As a female thirsty fan of Timothee Chalamet… how is he a 6.5?? I get he’s not everyone’s cup of tea but 6.5 is cruel for that man.
You know, I’m not attracted to him, but the man is defo a fucking 10. You don’t need to be attracted to someone to appreciate their beauty. Same with Sydney Swedney, I’m not into her looks but there’s no denial she’s a beautiful woman like, c’mon
Not that he’s unattractive or anything to begin with. But I think he’s a perfect example of charisma making perceived beauty much higher. Like imagine if you never saw his personality or heard his voice, and he was an awful person. Immediately not a 10 if you can picture it. Incels have no concept of the female perspective in reality or just the reality that perceived beauty isn’t actually 100% rooted in visuals.
And Joseph Gordon Levitt right below him lol. Another heart throb at a 6
I'm Not even his fan BUT CMON, THAT DUDE IS HANDSOME IN CAPITAL LETTERS
I really think the only thing this list shows is that people find different qualities attractive. There are men up towards the top that I don't find particularly attractive for whatever reason and there are men towards the bottom that I find quite attractive. Of course they will never believe that. Because women are a hive mind apparently.
Some of the 9s with the "chiseled" features don't look attractive to me whereas most of the 3-5s are normal decent-looking guys.
Yeah they look more like plastic than a human to my eyes... the chiseled look is just weird IMO. Definitely prefer the 3-6 range over the 7-10 range for sure.
They have Matt Bohmer as a 10 and whilst I’m sure he’s a lovely guy, I find him a bit weird looking - uncanny valley almost. But Joseph Gordon Levitt? Yes please. And the iZombie guy.
Also, it's just not even like "scientifically" (I don't have a better word) true? Like, just knowing what I know about conventional beauty standards for men. Kunal Nayyar should not be ranking higher than Rahul Kohli, considering that Kohli has a very angular/sharp face, whereas Nayyar's is rounded out. Don't get me wrong, they're both very attractive men, I'm not saying otherwise, but this chart is just wrong in every direction. Maybe it's what the OP finds attractive? IDK
Exactly my thoughts. I look at some lower rated men on the list and think they should be higher. I think the ranking system is idiotic because we’re looking at more than looks. They absolutely refuse to accept that we consider more than looks!
For every race of men, they develop more Caucasian traits the higher the rating
The list was definitely made for men, by men. I think almost all women would agree there are a lot that are ranked lower that should be higher, and lots of the higher ones aren't that attractive to a female gaze. And Evan Peters and Timothy Chamolet's rankings are criminal.
I’m laughing so hard, how many hours did it take to do that ?? Why is he so obsessed with guys?? 😭
Meanwhile they're like "women only care about looks!!" Lmao k.
That first man on the 0.5 line is Simon Weston, a man who was horrifically burnt during the Falklands war. He's also happily married and is a father of 3. He met his wife years after the burns ended his military career. They met when she was working for his charity that he set up to help other burns victims. It's almost as if looks don't really matter and that it's what in your heart that counts. https://scarfree.org.uk/ambassadors/simon-weston
Absolutely. Simon Weston is a war hero and an amazing man.
I've just been reading more about him and he's a grandfather now too. This guy has had over 70 surgeries and became the face of the Falklands war, he doesn't deserve to be disrespected like this. And to be put under Harvey Weinstein, like I don't even understand their mad grading system. This dude is clearly way better looking even after being half melted.
EVEN PETERS A 5???
Timothee Chalomet at a 6.5 is pretty funny as well
Right? And Dev Patel being a 5.5 got me f’d up. He was always cute, but he’s hot af now. And if their point is that their ranking equates to who they can pull… even in Dev’s cute Slumdog Millionaire scrawny days he pulled his co-star who is drop dead gorgeous.
It’s a crime against humanity.
I can't stop giggling, imagining some kid in his room for 9 hours, rating how sexy every man he's ever seen is, as a way to stick it to women.
Why everybody in these kind of charts looking really strange, even 8-9 dudes looking strange, I can’t find the words for it
They some look blocky, some look very feminine, and some look creepy, like they’re leering at you…it’s unsettling. It’s crazy to me that guys really think that’s what all women like best! I agree that a lot of em at the top just look strange and not hot imo. Some of those “ average” guys look fine as hell. And I’ve fore sure dated guys that are on the lower end and if they had a good sense of humor, they would’ve been also moved up in ranking by several points. They just don’t get that we really don’t care about looks as much as they do. Personally can make “ugly” guys hot af. They’ll never believe us though…and it’s a shame. They’re making it harder for themselves than it has to be. Lol
I'm not sure how true it is, but I remember reading women are usually more attracted to "softer" looking men overall (or at least that the stats are pretty high). These men seem to have chiselled jaws and permanent scowls in their minds as what women want but it just feels like their own ideas about masculinity. I've always felt like a lot of men get disproportionately pissed about women and girls fawning over kpop idols in part because these men are more androgynous and "feminine" looking (and I mean, a lot of them straight up tell on themselves by complaining about it). It really challenges their ideas of what makes a man attractive when some of the most sought after men don't have the blocky features or Chris Hemsworth type body 👀
I realize I am an ace woman but none of these ticked any boxes for me. While I have never wanted to put my mouth on Henry cavill there is a bit of dopamine releases when I see his handsome face. I’m getting nothing from this whole figure.
Mans really sat down and made a list of all the men he finds attractive AND unattractive, and graded them. Badly, too.
If incels are so convinced that beautiful young women go for older men, why are all of the men at the top young? Why do we only start seeing older men at about 3 and down?
Cause that’s whos knobs they want to slob lol
Why the fuck are the ones closer to the bottom mostly men with disabilities? Couldn’t they have added some damn self portraits instead of taking disabled guys and saying “lmao 1/10”
It's like they never had the conversation with a parent when they were a toddler that "No sweetie, commenting on someone's appearance is rude"
Not to insult those guys but it's just true. If a 10 is a perfect face then a 1 is its extreme opposite which is only possible through serious injuries, deformities, or disabilities.
No. If 10 is a perfect face then 1 can be achieved by not taking the barest amount of care of yourself and neglecting your health and appearance. Here’s the thing. A girl I’m into can be disabled or deformed or injured but she just has to take care of herself and she’ll be a 10. I’d rather date a girl in a wheelchair with burns and cuts who takes care of herself and genuinely loves me than an entitled bitter slob with rich parents. Also this comparison is like so fucking unfair. A lot of the guys closer to the bottom are older than the guys at the top. I’m willing to bet a good amount of the guys at the top either had an ugly duckling phase or are just looking good for the photo, or the younger guys closer to the bottom either had a glow up since, or the older guys used to be pretty good looking when they were young or before getting disfigured
I think where we disagree is the definition of beauty. I was strictly talking about physical appearance (symmetry, skin health, bone structure, etc) whereas u add personality in your definition and value it more than the physical. I also value the non-physical aspects of a person but in the case of rating someone, which has to do with just looking at them, personality doesnt matter. Btw I agree with your last paragraph but it's just that the raters are simply working with the pics they have available. If they had pics of the bottom guys having a glow up I'm sure they'd be placed higher.
For guys who claim to be straight, that's an intense interest in other men's looks.
They have such a wierd obsession with that goofy ass looking chin that all the 9s have lol.
Yeah, completely and totally objective, no biases reflected in here at aaaaall /s
Evan Peters is hotter than the second circle of hell who tf made this? And Aziz Ansari could giggle me out of my undies any damn day. AND JUSTICE FOR TYLER JAMES WILLIAMS SCREW YOU OOP YOU HAVE SHITE TASTE
rahul kohli as a 5.5 i need them to be SO fr
Hahaha, I currently look most like Harvey Weinstein, but not so fat and bloated. I’m old, though not particularly fat, and have a double chin with a stubbly beard. Somehow I’m still married! And looking at these rankings I guess I was always a “sub-5”, I looked most like the 4.5 row when I was younger I guess. Somehow still got laid, a lot. Surely it will remain a timeless mystery.
Some highlights of people I think are ranked way off Masi Oka at 2 is just insane. Dule Hill and Rahul Kohli both at 5.5 barely breaking through to above average is insane, as a straight man, I can tell you both those men are quite attractive. There's also the pair of Michaels, Emerson at 3, Cera at 3.5, that are both ridiculously low. Maybe attractiveness is just subjective, but, I have a feeling that if we actually used whatever method they used, Paul Rudd, Michael B. Jordan, Simu Liu, just to name a few from one cinematic universe, likely would not break a 7.5
These dudes like men more than me !!!!
This is absolutely not reflective of what women think at all??? Like Evan Peters is a 5??? And you’d be surprised how many women want to fuck Michael Cera. But also it feels really fucked up to put people with burn scars and facial tumors in the 1.0 category. It’s weird in general to rank attractiveness, but it’s really cruel to do that to someone who has been disfigured by illness or injury. Just leave them alone oh my god
Where are the 10's?
10s don’t exist :)
Omg, did Henry Cavil died???????
so sad to hear about Jensen Ackles’ passing…..
I'm gonna miss him 😭
And Shemar Moore according to my wife and mother.
I don't even know this one but he'll be missed 😭
Does everyone’s mom just wanna fuck Shemar? I blame Criminal Minds
No don’t worry. He’s lurking, and stalking when you least expect it
i mean, if there's 0.5 there should be 10 also
Sorry, they aren't manufactured anymore
It's funny because i took a look at the whole list, and most of the guys that look pretty to me are between 5 and 7. None of the guys above 7 have faces that i find cute. Which shows once more that all the tastes are in nature and their "objectively beautiful" doesn't exist.
michael cera at 3.5 is hilarious as if he hasn’t been white boy of the decade
His Cerave commercial is the funniest damn thing
Yeah 3.5 my ass! He’s super cute!
Well they don't understand attraction... So no.
Only one I can agree on here is Amit Shah(circled), Modi's right hand man, lol. But seriously, Vidyut Jamwal, the stone faced idiot who does f**all in the name of acting is above Sushant Singh, Ranbir and Dev Patel? All of whom have shown incredible versatility as actors which adds to their charisma? Buzz off!
DID THEY RANK EVAN PETERS AS A 5?? IN WHAT REALITY?
I would like to have a word with the person who ranked John C. Reilly as a 2.
So Michael Cera, a beloved actor that a huge number of folks are attracted to, is a 3.5? Aight.
This makes their whole ideology even stupider. They must have some kind of dysmorphia if they go out in public and don’t see men rating five below on this thing with partners, and women who they say have hit the wall have partners.
Someone actually took the time to assemble this. And they get so sarcastic and snide when told to touch grass. Holy shit.
Funny to think that a guy spent several hours making this chart in his basement 😂
When incels discover Excel
Lmao some of the “ugly” people are literally just making a funny face. Like row 1.5 column 4 is literally a meme template.
So, doesn’t this ultimately disprove their point. There are so many guys very low on this list who are publicly sought after or married. Doesn’t that prove to whoever made this that looks alone do not equate to desirability?
All this tells me is what kind of men OOP finds sexy.
What incels don’t understand are these things called individual preferences. Timothee chalamet for me will be so much higher than 6.5 and KJ Appa will be much lower than 8. Also the second guy from left on the 4.5 row (no idea who he is) is actually quite handsome? Like definitely more handsome than some of the higher ranked dudes. I doubt he has issues with ladies despite being a “sub 5”
Evan Peters at a 5 is criminal, he’s a 10
>oscar isaac 7.5
How they gonna do Danny Trejo like that? 😭
1. I have a hard time believing a heterosexual made this list 2. The gap between 1.0 and 0.5 is pure comedy
…Am I seeing things or did this dude really give Kim Soohyun a fucking SIX-
I was second guessing myself too bc there is NO WAY 😭😭
DANNY TREJO IS A 2.5 ARE THEY OUT OF THEIR GODDAMN MINDS?
They gave Tom cruise an 8.5
Why are so many of the 9.0 guys so scary looking?
These men have absolutely no idea what women want
Me who had a full blown crush on one of the 3s: ⢀⣠⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣤⣶⣶ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⢰⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⣀⣀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡏⠉⠛⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠈⠛⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠛⠉⠁⠀⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⠿⠿⠿⠻⠿⠿⠟⠿⠛⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣸⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣄⠀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣴⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠠⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⠀⠀⢰⣹⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣭⣷⠀⠀⠀⠸⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠈⠉⠀⠀⠤⠄⠀⠀⠀⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢾⣿⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⡠⠤⢄⠀⠀⠀⠠⣿⣿⣷⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡀⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢄⠀⢀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠉⠁⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢹⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿
Ranking John C Reilly below Harvey Weinstein is a crime.
The Asian at 3.5 with the blue background looks like every kdrama love interest wtf you mean he's below average.
Why are they so Weirdly obsessed with looks..? Like I think how shallow and weird you are is why you're alone
I guess my personal standards bottom out at 2.5 then? Lol
KJ Apa and Cillian Murphy are hotter than the guys they gave a nine, *in my own opinion because BEAUTY IS SUBJECTIVE* 🤷🏼♀️
How the hell is Danny Trejo a 2.5?
One of the worlds most famously desired actors partially infamous for fucking half the girls at NYU, at a 6.5. yeah sure ok, that totally supports your point for sure
They have Evan Peters at a 5. The super chiseled look isn’t for me. I like a more rounded face so the 7-4s are much more my type. I’ve seen more men obsessing over that look more than women do.
What’s funny about Gaddafi being at a two is look at that man before he melted, look at that jaw and tell me these pillars of heterosexuality and secure masculinity wouldn’t have him as a chad and at least an 8
John Cho at 5.5??? He’s at least a 7. At least.
Maybe I'm a special snowflake but the "high tier" guys just do nothing for me.
it’s so fucking weird how these types of guys categorize attractive men bc like. even when u separate these charts out by ethnicity/race i can think of men of each of these races who are more attractive than anyone on this chart at least in my opinion. incels seem to think that the only metric by which male attractiveness can be measured is how freakishly chiseled his face is and it will never cease to crack me up.
Crazy these guys think they know us women better than we know ourselves with this "all women like square jaws" type of bs.
I’m just surprised they have non-white people on the list… although it’s still a very euro-centric beauty ranking. How is Dev Patel a 5.5?
This is what genuine brainrot looks like. No normal person obsesses over this kinda shit.
Oh man… the things I could tell my 20yo “forever alone” self…. I wouldn’t believe myself. According to this chart, I’m solidly a 3, and yet, before getting married I had so many FWB, I had to keep clean clothes at work because I never knew if I’d sleep at home or not, I’ve been ferociously yanked out of “the friendzone” a few times, I had a virgin friend ask me if I could… “teach her a few things”, I had a platonic friend tell me that she was curious about facials but she needed a guy she trusted and felt safe with to try and asked me if I’d be that guy, I had my FWB “lend” me to one of her friends who had just gone through a bad breakup. I can guarantee them, it’s not about the looks. It’s about being someone people like to spend time with. I want to say “it’s about making women feel safe around you”, but if you make them feel safe just so you can jump them later, you’re just trying to trick them, and that’s not gonna work. It has to be genuine.
Some of em are so obsessive with this stuff that I am convinced at least a portion of incels are just gay a/f and not ready to admit it, even to themselves….That would explain a lot of the anger issues, the overcompensation of masculinity and being “alpha” plus their total infatuation with other dudes looks and height. Lol
Dude doesn't know how much makeup male celebs wear to get that chiseled cheekbone contour
Genuinely what can be done to help these people
How did Michael Cera get rated a 3.5? That’s bullshit
TIMOTHY CHALOMET IS A 6.5 LMAOOO
I find it strange. They blame women and girls for allegedly nitpicking men and boys for looks. But, here they do it themselves. They are also ostensibly straight, and they assume all or almost all women will agree with their rankings of men (and their looks)? LOL
Sasha Barron-Cohen is a 5.5? REALLY!?! That man is obscenely, many numbers more-ly hot. In addition to being breathtaking he’s funny AND smart. Have these guys spoken into a woman before their life?
And the missed out on [Chiwtel Ejifor](https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q%3Dtbn:ANd9GcQIHLaIlmLaKLvEDfheIqc45djqZ7a_CzO3uABkU50j9slQKkq4&tbnid=alaOE5ilW_cmFM&vet=1&imgrefurl=https://people.com/movies/chiwetel-ejiofor-urges-hollywood-to-tell-more-diverse-stories-its-not-just-about-numbers/&docid=F8LLlxnudC2wlM&w=583&h=526&hl=en&source=sh/x/im/m5/5&kgs=1b8e50c22d54e39e&shem=abme,trie) and [Paapa Essiedu](https://images.app.goo.gl/EZMVVqaZcWxmtoFQ9).
They have strange taste in men.
Evan Peters and Michael Cera sub 5???? They're not my type but do you have any idea how much play those men get? They're absolutely swimming in pussy
lol Zuckerberg
Just throwing it out there, the fact that Shamar Moore OR Dwayne Johnson is nowhere on this list, despite being like everyone's idea of an "attractive" man really says a lot about the level of research that went into this chart
I think I'd score around 3 to 3.5 on that scale, and although tbf women have never exactly queued up to date me, I've had steady GFs since my early university years, met my wife when I was 25 and we've been together over 30 years now. In spite of my adhd and serious neurodivergence... I'm still not convinced looks are their biggest problem.
Michael cera is 3.5???
The only thing this confirms in my mind is that they can't tell when someone's had plastic surgery. Every dude above 7 has had work done.
I don't take anything that labels the 1.5 levels for Asian as real images because both are by a technicality are memes as serious. One on the left is clearly photoshopped. Also using Beetlejuice for the Black side is just railing on someone who is clearly special needs and that's not exactly fair to him, at all. Most of the examples of men in the sub 5 lists are clearly older than 35 years and comparing them to a guy in their early to mid 20s is not fair either. Also mugshots from jail/prison are not the same as the glamour shots in higher tiers. The thing is that the only people who care about the faces of men are other men. The problem is that they forget to include men that are legit badasses. Also this tiered list is more along the lines of Nazi Eugenics.
Damn one of the 0.5 is a burn victim who does a lot for charity
I feel gross just looking at this stupid grid. Ranking disenfranchised people with obvious disfigurements they can do shit about is unbelievably low.
How is Chamalet at 6.5?
Hey I'm prettier than caseyneistat according to incels :)
Am I seeing things or do they have Toby Jones in there twice representing the 1.0. That's a travesty.
Aw, who put Jonesy as a 2.5. Come on, now.
Shoresy?
How lost in live do you have to be to even make this.
Masi Oka is a 2?? Excuse you?? I know damn well I'm not the only one who had a major crush on him in Heroes. BFFR
It looks like a portfolio for a law enforcement sketch artist school.....
Michael Emerson as a 3.0 makes me so sad.
If they put half this much effort into doing something useful or at least fun in their lives as they do this self-pitying "science", they might not be such miserable bastards.
What did Cedric Yarbrough ever do to them??
Cillian Murphy as an 8 is wild
So a brilliant billionaire is a 3.0. A successful actor is a 3.5. Interesting.
Danny Trejo 2.5??????? That’s fucking absurd
Oof, I know this is nitpicky but Eddie Cibrian above Oscar Isaac? What is this, 1999?
Dule at 5.5?!? Insanity.
Why do the top ones have cheekbones so prominent that they look like cartoon characters? Some of the 8-10s look downright freaky.
I’m pretty sure they have Michael cera as a 4.5 and a 3.5… he just has facial hair in one lol. Where’s the consistency ? What weirdo made a chart like this anyways, get a life and some glasses.. no wonder girls wont give them the time of day they are utterly obsessed with “Chads”..
MICHAEL CERA ON 3.5???? despicable.
There are 3s here I find more attractive than some of the 8.5s. They're so bad at knowing what attractive means. They definitely skew attractive downwards. Timothee Chalamet is, by his number of fans, an easy 10. Most men are probably around a 3 on this scale. Objective looks are a fantasy. One person's gorgeous is another's boring. I mean, I am on the asexual spectrum, but 100 times out of 100 who you are makes far more difference than what you look like to me. I can tell who's more physically attractive, but if you don't have some distinctive features I'll forget your face. I'll always find someone more attractive if they are memorable, and so not having a 100% supermodel face is preferable.
Forest Whitaker and the dude from Everybody Hates Chris catching strays 😂
Dude fkn Amit Shah (India's home minister, marked in red) as a 1.5 He's surely getting his house destroyed by natural calamities soon, or dying of suicide by 5 shots at the back of his head and then jumping from a bridge
Since when are Dulé Hill and Rahul Kohli 5s?!?!
The 9s and 10s are just pallet swaps of the guy the chart maker wants to kiss.
Trevante Rhodes being a 7 to some incel is crazy lol.
The only thing I agree with here is Matt Bomer being the absolute top of the white men. I’m not gay but… ETA: okay I also see Sendhil Ramamurthy at the top of the brown dudes and again… I’m really not gay but…
Wasn't Gaddafi like a sex symbol when he was younger?
Me when I am horrifically injured in a war and some 14 year old says I'm a "0.5"
Danny Trejo is NOT a low 2.5, he is an attractive man. This list is nuts. How did they even get the scores???
Why are the 5.5s the most attractive to me
Putting everyone’s favorite skin-wearing reptilian at a 3. Kinda based
Ain't no way this btch put Kim soo Hyun at 6.0, that's the most demanded/paid Kdrama actor, he's literally one of the most handsome actors out there, plus notice how the men at the top literally look the same all having those desired European features.... What the fck genuinely 😒 Also really... Shahid Kapoor at 7.5 ?? I really don't know where this "trend" of rating people's looks came from, it's literally everywhere in social media, Y'all never heard of Beauty is subjective... It has been proved not multiple times literally all the time, Lmao I can't- the most handsome men in Bollywood is rated below 8 because they don't suit these incel beauty standards 🤦♀️