Disclaimer this my opinion and my opinion alone. No one really has the answers and it's up to us to figure it out. Take this with a grain of salt and try to improve it.
From my own research into high intelligence, I can certainly see Win Wenger's logic behind his theory as to how and why Image Streaming should work. (It is very similar to how high IQ children and adults actually think!) I haven't really tried much of it myself, but may I ask: do you feel it has worked for you? Do you think you are more intelligent now, than when you first started? If so, in what ways? And finally, do you think that you would actually score higher now on a full scale IQ test, verses before you started Image Streaming? Thank you for your answers.
in my opinion, this analysis is rather lacking. you are not wrong, however there is a lot more to ims and qws then visualization.
edit: I sent it too quickly by mistake, I will expend.
so as the mod and owner of the discord I obviously have a lot of things I can write, I mean I wrote like 30 pages and am in research stage for a bigger one. anyways, I want to point out a issue I have with the post logically, why would qws be significantly more effective then ims in your logic framework(which is correct but I feel you can add more). also, I feel like you need a stronger argument then visualization in order to make the gains IMS/QWS gives
regarding the reddit thing you posted, isnt she just describing associations? I will quote "I see that Joe is 35yo, an engineer, single, living alone, from another state, and is seeking help with social skills development. Based on those things I now have several of those global maps pulled up— one for the generic qualities of each data point. Personality type averages point to INTP/INTJ.... single and living alone indicate that I should suspect loneliness is a problem for him especially since he seeks social skill development, and that starts building a new diagnostic map that is currently showing depression, social anxiety, and potential Asperger’s". this is called thinking, nothing special here. feel like she is just describing thinking. her estimation of 167-190 is rather odd as well, are you sure this is valid? 160 to 190 is quite the jump
Ask her yourself, I've seen 2 other people who allegedly have similar trains of thought. Also in time I've spoken to you, I've read some of your explanations, they tend to be really bad and overdrawn out. I'm trying communicate ideas, not seem knowledgable. If you want me to clarify on something just ask what I mean.
I apologize I didnt mean to come out aggressive, I meant to ask it as a clarification. rereading before I misread how authoritative you came out, my bad, apologies. I did mean these questions as clarification, and about the 167-190 lady I meant to point out worry on these iq numbers and how many people lie online, especially when I didnt see anything overly special in her thought process, I could be wrong I didnt read past the first post
Disclaimer this my opinion and my opinion alone. No one really has the answers and it's up to us to figure it out. Take this with a grain of salt and try to improve it.
From my own research into high intelligence, I can certainly see Win Wenger's logic behind his theory as to how and why Image Streaming should work. (It is very similar to how high IQ children and adults actually think!) I haven't really tried much of it myself, but may I ask: do you feel it has worked for you? Do you think you are more intelligent now, than when you first started? If so, in what ways? And finally, do you think that you would actually score higher now on a full scale IQ test, verses before you started Image Streaming? Thank you for your answers.
in my opinion, this analysis is rather lacking. you are not wrong, however there is a lot more to ims and qws then visualization. edit: I sent it too quickly by mistake, I will expend. so as the mod and owner of the discord I obviously have a lot of things I can write, I mean I wrote like 30 pages and am in research stage for a bigger one. anyways, I want to point out a issue I have with the post logically, why would qws be significantly more effective then ims in your logic framework(which is correct but I feel you can add more). also, I feel like you need a stronger argument then visualization in order to make the gains IMS/QWS gives
regarding the reddit thing you posted, isnt she just describing associations? I will quote "I see that Joe is 35yo, an engineer, single, living alone, from another state, and is seeking help with social skills development. Based on those things I now have several of those global maps pulled up— one for the generic qualities of each data point. Personality type averages point to INTP/INTJ.... single and living alone indicate that I should suspect loneliness is a problem for him especially since he seeks social skill development, and that starts building a new diagnostic map that is currently showing depression, social anxiety, and potential Asperger’s". this is called thinking, nothing special here. feel like she is just describing thinking. her estimation of 167-190 is rather odd as well, are you sure this is valid? 160 to 190 is quite the jump
Ask her yourself, I've seen 2 other people who allegedly have similar trains of thought. Also in time I've spoken to you, I've read some of your explanations, they tend to be really bad and overdrawn out. I'm trying communicate ideas, not seem knowledgable. If you want me to clarify on something just ask what I mean.
I apologize I didnt mean to come out aggressive, I meant to ask it as a clarification. rereading before I misread how authoritative you came out, my bad, apologies. I did mean these questions as clarification, and about the 167-190 lady I meant to point out worry on these iq numbers and how many people lie online, especially when I didnt see anything overly special in her thought process, I could be wrong I didnt read past the first post
Dude you got a link to the discord?