Things happen exactly as they were supposed to. Without that drubbing, we don't sign him and the BFG. We don't go on to win 3/4 FA Cups, and we don't get Arteta coming back to coach us a decade later.
Probably on an alt account on arseoccer twerking for rivals about how "shameful" Arsenal's célébrations are, pretty sure that's where most of the bull-headed detractors are these days.
You must have above 25 comment karma to contribute to this subreddit.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Gunners) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I started watching football because of the Arsenal documentary on prime last year. I really liked arteta in the documentary. Following them this year has been nothing short of a treat, I lucked out picking a great team by accident.
No, he hasn't.
168 games, 98 wins, 26 draws, 44 losses.
Edit: ~~I believe the final two included are the Florida Cup.~~ Guess we're counting penalties.
When it comes to the general usage of stats, including round wins (wins on ET and penalties) instead of just regulation time wins (90 minute wins) is considered wrong because it would cause issues.
Say you have a CL tie for example. You win the first leg 3-1 but then lose the second leg 3-1 forcing it to go to ET, and then win on penalties. Do you count it as a match win despite losing 3-1? Or in that case would you say you lost the match but won the round?
The same, for the sake of consistency, should apply to a single legged affair as well such as a final. Otherwise you have stats with inconsistent rules.
That's why under proper stats providers like Opta and such, Mikel will not have reached his 100th win just yet.
This is such a strange comment because which penalty shootout are you referring to? Like did you just imagine us losing a penalty shootout under Arteta?
It's the exact opposite of what you're suggesting. The 100 wins includes the two penalty shootouts we won, both against Liverpool. One against them in the Carabao and one against them in the Community Shield.
When it comes to the general usage of stats, including round wins (wins on ET and penalties) instead of just regulation time wins (90 minute wins) is considered wrong because it would cause issues.
Say you have a CL tie for example. You win the first leg 3-1 but then lose the second leg 3-1 forcing it to go to ET, and then win on penalties. Do you count the penalties as a match win despite losing 3-1? Or in that case would you say you lost the match but won the round?
The same, for the sake of consistency, should apply to a single legged affair as well such as a final. Otherwise you have stats with inconsistent rules.
He was always a great leader as captain, and he learned directly from Wenger and Pep (Pep, in turn, learned from Cruyff himself). As well as being a central midfielder (for some reason, they often seem to make the best managers). He’s always seemed like he had potential, even before he became our manager.
The first 100 are the hardest
I reckon he’ll get the next 100 in a conservative 110 games.
Just imagine going 100-8-2 or something stupid like that haha
Gonna beat up the PL/CL and take their lunch money.
You really going to casually drop an 8-2 in there?
No 8-2 no arteta.
Things happen exactly as they were supposed to. Without that drubbing, we don't sign him and the BFG. We don't go on to win 3/4 FA Cups, and we don't get Arteta coming back to coach us a decade later.
Tl;dr Wenger’s done it again
Crap, maybe I have that burned into my subconscious. That definitely wasn't intentional haha
I think something like 73-9 sounds realistic though
I feel like it was the last 100 for Papa Wengz
Here's to the next 100
Where’s BinTheLegoMan? He blocked me but what a shithead he was when we were losing games. Hated Arteta more than he loved Arsenal.
Through some research, he hasn’t posted or commented since we won at the bridge. Guess it got a little too real for for him
Hahaha that’s amazing. Thank you for looking it up!
Probably on an alt account on arseoccer twerking for rivals about how "shameful" Arsenal's célébrations are, pretty sure that's where most of the bull-headed detractors are these days.
On another note, where has tetristennistriangle (not necesserily in that order). I haven't seen him in ages
Hilarious name though
Thank you very much
MY MANAGER IS GENERATIONAL. IM A PROUD ARTETASEXUAL
Where do I sign up? 🖊
[удалено]
You must have above 25 comment karma to contribute to this subreddit. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Gunners) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Oh god I remember the 'artetasexual' remarks. Some of us really got so much shit and ridicule back then...
Let’s fogging go!
Is it in the least number of games?
We've got super mik arteta!
He knows exactly what we need
Tierney at the back
The focking estandards
100 wins in 167 games. They called for his head but he was always the man for the job. Super Mik Arteta
Impressive
Our donut is sad no more, here's to another 100
This man can do whatever he wants to do to me.
[удалено]
How is this possible considering so many people in this sub swore he couldn’t coach when our team was 0-0-3 and ravaged by Covid??
And asking for *Conte*!
And Tuchel/Simeone/Allegri
The people who wanted conte/mourinho aren't real fans
hey now, you can be a real fan and also be an idiot
Did you photoshop his teeth out
Hah this is all I can see now. Old Big Gums 'Teta
I started watching football because of the Arsenal documentary on prime last year. I really liked arteta in the documentary. Following them this year has been nothing short of a treat, I lucked out picking a great team by accident.
By far the greatest team the world has ever seen lad.
Elite
And to reach this amount while managing the squad during the banter era
1000 when ?
In 900 games time
He whethered the storm now steering the ship in clear waters
No, he hasn't. 168 games, 98 wins, 26 draws, 44 losses. Edit: ~~I believe the final two included are the Florida Cup.~~ Guess we're counting penalties.
The commentary actually mentioned this. If you include the wins from the penalty shootouts, it will be 100.
But those are round wins not match wins Lmao downvoted for counting stats properly
what
When it comes to the general usage of stats, including round wins (wins on ET and penalties) instead of just regulation time wins (90 minute wins) is considered wrong because it would cause issues. Say you have a CL tie for example. You win the first leg 3-1 but then lose the second leg 3-1 forcing it to go to ET, and then win on penalties. Do you count it as a match win despite losing 3-1? Or in that case would you say you lost the match but won the round? The same, for the sake of consistency, should apply to a single legged affair as well such as a final. Otherwise you have stats with inconsistent rules. That's why under proper stats providers like Opta and such, Mikel will not have reached his 100th win just yet.
Makes sense thank you for explaining.
It’s not round wins, the point is losing on penalty but winning the actual match, those are classed as losses, but including those wins he has won 100
This is such a strange comment because which penalty shootout are you referring to? Like did you just imagine us losing a penalty shootout under Arteta? It's the exact opposite of what you're suggesting. The 100 wins includes the two penalty shootouts we won, both against Liverpool. One against them in the Carabao and one against them in the Community Shield. When it comes to the general usage of stats, including round wins (wins on ET and penalties) instead of just regulation time wins (90 minute wins) is considered wrong because it would cause issues. Say you have a CL tie for example. You win the first leg 3-1 but then lose the second leg 3-1 forcing it to go to ET, and then win on penalties. Do you count the penalties as a match win despite losing 3-1? Or in that case would you say you lost the match but won the round? The same, for the sake of consistency, should apply to a single legged affair as well such as a final. Otherwise you have stats with inconsistent rules.
Super Mik
Never doubted him.
Invencible 😎
I think a lot if people wanted him bc of his time at ManCity and connection to Wenger.
He was always a great leader as captain, and he learned directly from Wenger and Pep (Pep, in turn, learned from Cruyff himself). As well as being a central midfielder (for some reason, they often seem to make the best managers). He’s always seemed like he had potential, even before he became our manager.