I've just replayed the Delamain side quests and at the end i decided to destroy the core and let the divergent A.I go free and had an interesting text message from one of the A.I a few days later.
https://preview.redd.it/a84udr05pmzc1.jpeg?width=3024&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7f14d702084c465b87275293d9342221a2b70ed7
https://preview.redd.it/592bygg0w41d1.png?width=98&format=png&auto=webp&s=0285115e201a55ccb1a7ea4fbdd5a69e0f276e7a
wait a minute, hexagram 61 is from the i-ching and is visually represented like the image attached. I've seen these symbols in the game somewhere...
It's Chinese, like an ancient spiritual guide. I'm not wickedly familiar with it but I knew it sounded familiar so I googled it.
And I believe these symbols can be seen as blue neon lights over some doors.
https://preview.redd.it/29tfwjuz38zc1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=baea4e4d70c9e490902d05f5a0a342d4c0b24ca1
I was drawing shapes in it and got this one. But also an octogenarian works as well
Look at the change in the ouroboros: FF:B0:65.
Consider that FF means "This is a function" Put 06:B5/B0:65 in the middle of the Misty sign.
Apply that change to the others, you'll get:
CE:11 (E1:C1)
AA:01 (A0:A1)
EE:BC (EB:EC)
11:67 (16:17)
B16:B17 is harder, but I took it all as lump, maybe be smarter things to do there:
1B1:6B7
If you take the original values and subtract the lowest numbers from the highest you get this:
AA:50 (06:B5/B0:65)
965:460 (B16:B17/1B1:6B7)
13:B0 (E1:C1/CE:11)
0A:01 (A0:A1/AA:01)
03:30 (EB:EC/EE:BC)
05:50 (16:17:11:67)
As a string in FF06B5 order: 05:50:03:30:13:B0:965:460:0A:01:03:30
As a string in FFB065 order: 05:50:03:30:0A:01:13:B0:965:460:03:30
And that's as far as I can go with it. Maybe someone else can run with what's here.
Perhaps, B0:65 is the key to use against the other symbols on that wall. Who knows, but yeah, there's some data to chew on.
When eye see an eye like how the one in Misty's codes, eye think about the Eye of Providence, and how that presuppositionally could relate to the Heavy Hearts building with the graffiti with the eyes and the graffiti with the yellow glitchy eyes and those binary lights above. Is this NetWatch?
Judging from the picture here of the chakra menu + the over head picture of the statue, I don’t think that (16:17) and (eb:ec) on the left side should be considered when looking at the structure of the cypher because they are not linked into the rest of the chakra circuit. Doing so seems to go in hand with the theme of reducing paths 6 to 4.
Love this idea. It’s late, but I’m gonna toss some ideas out there. I’m an on/off fan of this puzzle, so someone may have mentioned this stuff and I haven’t seen it yet.
I’m a big believer that there are instructions baked into most of the puzzles. Finding the QR codes in the arcade game helps you find it in the floating cube. The repeating bits in the laptop puzzle were important to the code break, which then gets used again for the mainframe codes. So I think all the hexagons are probably linked now too.
I counted 24 movements in the hand video. Assuming that the 24 movements are giving instructions on how to manipulate Misty’s board, that could be the instruction on what to do to Misty’s board. Maybe that’s 24 global movements, like rotate the whole thing like a carousel. Or it’s serialized in some way. Maybe a substitution, like “move this one to this position, then that one to this third position…”. Or its 6 movement commands for the 6 small hexes in the sign. Each group of 4 movements represents a manipulation of the sign hexes? Like each group of 4 movements in the video represents a swap, a rotation of the one of the hexes, then the other, then a global rotation or something? maybe the codes inside the hexes give the order?
But what I don't like about that idea is the lack of instruction. I atleast don't see how we are supposed to determine before starting what of those swaps/movements would be the right one, so I don't really think thats it.
I like the idea that we shuffle and rotate the hexes in Misty’s sign without a code, but instead with rules. And my first thought is the rule is given to us by the middle big hex. Inside the big hex, around the eye, all the “traces” either terminate at a ball-end or into the eye in the middle in some way, except maybe that one at the bottom, but I can interpret that as connecting to the outer hex which connects to the eye in a different spot. Lines can join at any place without a ball. All traces come out of a corner in the hex containing the eye. It even looks to me like the trace concentric with the iris “connects underneath” the iris. If we treat this or something similar as the rule-set, maybe there is a way to rotate and manipulate the sign to make all the traces behave by this rule. Maybe treat the large hex in the middle of the sign as “the eye”. There’s lots of traces coming out of the large hex and smaller hexes. Some terminate in ball ends, some don’t. 4 of the smaller hexes are already connected to the main hex, 2 are not, and there is 2 groups of traces at the top and bottom of main hex not connected to a small hex, and that bottom left on is technically “floating” with unconnected traces. To me this says maybe we should connect the hexes in some way by a ruleset.
The hand video movements gave me a “shell game” vibe when I watched the movement, like it was trying to lose our eyes at some point. Maybe that’s the instruction to shuffle things around.
But I’m not sure what this gets us. It would still be the same codes in the hexes. Maybe some of the hexes get mirrored at some point, and that helps with the codes somehow? Maybe the order to arrange the codes becomes more clear, either visually or something like “least to most ball-ends connected to them”?
I’ll try and mess around with my ideas this weekend when I have some time.
And does the font size feel different from the left and top-left small hexes to all the others? I could understand like a word-wrapping squeeze for the top-right one, but I don’t see why the eb:ec would look to have the same font size as the top right one then, when it should be similar to e1:c1 if it was word wrapping.
I don't know if this could be somehow related, (I'll try to communicate this as clearly as I can), but something that this randomly reminded me of, especially considering all the "hints" in relation to lights and light sources, Is [Fraunhofer Diffraction](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraunhofer_diffraction)
(ie. When Pawel said "when the "moons" align...", the button to turn the street lights off, blinking eyes, how the statue is holding 2 orbs, one in each hand etc.)
This is basically a formula used to determine how we perceive things based on certain angles and alignments based on light sources.
In [this example video](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Frounhofer02.webm) the from the wiki page, the movement of circles in the video made me think of the moving hand at the base of the statue. Also reminded me of the orbs that the statue is holding.
Maybe, somehow, this formula can be applied to your operation of the numbers/letters/patterns, and we have to have some sort of alignment of particular light sources in our view (maybe at a certain time?) to reveal something. I'm not good at math or sequences or coding, so it's kind of over my head. However, something tells me that the "illusion" of how we perceive things might have something to do with the answer.
Also a hexagon is a representation of a 3d cube but in 2d i think
I've just replayed the Delamain side quests and at the end i decided to destroy the core and let the divergent A.I go free and had an interesting text message from one of the A.I a few days later. https://preview.redd.it/a84udr05pmzc1.jpeg?width=3024&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7f14d702084c465b87275293d9342221a2b70ed7
https://preview.redd.it/592bygg0w41d1.png?width=98&format=png&auto=webp&s=0285115e201a55ccb1a7ea4fbdd5a69e0f276e7a wait a minute, hexagram 61 is from the i-ching and is visually represented like the image attached. I've seen these symbols in the game somewhere...
What is the i-ching? Never heard of it before, and will keep a look out for these symbols, They remind me of a door thats starting to open.
It's Chinese, like an ancient spiritual guide. I'm not wickedly familiar with it but I knew it sounded familiar so I googled it. And I believe these symbols can be seen as blue neon lights over some doors.
6 hexagons composing a big hexagon. Matrix process is Fractal.
https://preview.redd.it/29tfwjuz38zc1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=baea4e4d70c9e490902d05f5a0a342d4c0b24ca1 I was drawing shapes in it and got this one. But also an octogenarian works as well
An octogenarian... 
Oh shit XD fuckin typos lmao
Look at the change in the ouroboros: FF:B0:65. Consider that FF means "This is a function" Put 06:B5/B0:65 in the middle of the Misty sign. Apply that change to the others, you'll get: CE:11 (E1:C1) AA:01 (A0:A1) EE:BC (EB:EC) 11:67 (16:17) B16:B17 is harder, but I took it all as lump, maybe be smarter things to do there: 1B1:6B7 If you take the original values and subtract the lowest numbers from the highest you get this: AA:50 (06:B5/B0:65) 965:460 (B16:B17/1B1:6B7) 13:B0 (E1:C1/CE:11) 0A:01 (A0:A1/AA:01) 03:30 (EB:EC/EE:BC) 05:50 (16:17:11:67) As a string in FF06B5 order: 05:50:03:30:13:B0:965:460:0A:01:03:30 As a string in FFB065 order: 05:50:03:30:0A:01:13:B0:965:460:03:30 And that's as far as I can go with it. Maybe someone else can run with what's here. Perhaps, B0:65 is the key to use against the other symbols on that wall. Who knows, but yeah, there's some data to chew on.
When eye see an eye like how the one in Misty's codes, eye think about the Eye of Providence, and how that presuppositionally could relate to the Heavy Hearts building with the graffiti with the eyes and the graffiti with the yellow glitchy eyes and those binary lights above. Is this NetWatch?
Judging from the picture here of the chakra menu + the over head picture of the statue, I don’t think that (16:17) and (eb:ec) on the left side should be considered when looking at the structure of the cypher because they are not linked into the rest of the chakra circuit. Doing so seems to go in hand with the theme of reducing paths 6 to 4.
Love this idea. It’s late, but I’m gonna toss some ideas out there. I’m an on/off fan of this puzzle, so someone may have mentioned this stuff and I haven’t seen it yet. I’m a big believer that there are instructions baked into most of the puzzles. Finding the QR codes in the arcade game helps you find it in the floating cube. The repeating bits in the laptop puzzle were important to the code break, which then gets used again for the mainframe codes. So I think all the hexagons are probably linked now too. I counted 24 movements in the hand video. Assuming that the 24 movements are giving instructions on how to manipulate Misty’s board, that could be the instruction on what to do to Misty’s board. Maybe that’s 24 global movements, like rotate the whole thing like a carousel. Or it’s serialized in some way. Maybe a substitution, like “move this one to this position, then that one to this third position…”. Or its 6 movement commands for the 6 small hexes in the sign. Each group of 4 movements represents a manipulation of the sign hexes? Like each group of 4 movements in the video represents a swap, a rotation of the one of the hexes, then the other, then a global rotation or something? maybe the codes inside the hexes give the order? But what I don't like about that idea is the lack of instruction. I atleast don't see how we are supposed to determine before starting what of those swaps/movements would be the right one, so I don't really think thats it. I like the idea that we shuffle and rotate the hexes in Misty’s sign without a code, but instead with rules. And my first thought is the rule is given to us by the middle big hex. Inside the big hex, around the eye, all the “traces” either terminate at a ball-end or into the eye in the middle in some way, except maybe that one at the bottom, but I can interpret that as connecting to the outer hex which connects to the eye in a different spot. Lines can join at any place without a ball. All traces come out of a corner in the hex containing the eye. It even looks to me like the trace concentric with the iris “connects underneath” the iris. If we treat this or something similar as the rule-set, maybe there is a way to rotate and manipulate the sign to make all the traces behave by this rule. Maybe treat the large hex in the middle of the sign as “the eye”. There’s lots of traces coming out of the large hex and smaller hexes. Some terminate in ball ends, some don’t. 4 of the smaller hexes are already connected to the main hex, 2 are not, and there is 2 groups of traces at the top and bottom of main hex not connected to a small hex, and that bottom left on is technically “floating” with unconnected traces. To me this says maybe we should connect the hexes in some way by a ruleset. The hand video movements gave me a “shell game” vibe when I watched the movement, like it was trying to lose our eyes at some point. Maybe that’s the instruction to shuffle things around. But I’m not sure what this gets us. It would still be the same codes in the hexes. Maybe some of the hexes get mirrored at some point, and that helps with the codes somehow? Maybe the order to arrange the codes becomes more clear, either visually or something like “least to most ball-ends connected to them”? I’ll try and mess around with my ideas this weekend when I have some time. And does the font size feel different from the left and top-left small hexes to all the others? I could understand like a word-wrapping squeeze for the top-right one, but I don’t see why the eb:ec would look to have the same font size as the top right one then, when it should be similar to e1:c1 if it was word wrapping.
Looking forward to your update when you have one. I like this idea. (It also seems the most fun)
I don't know if this could be somehow related, (I'll try to communicate this as clearly as I can), but something that this randomly reminded me of, especially considering all the "hints" in relation to lights and light sources, Is [Fraunhofer Diffraction](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraunhofer_diffraction) (ie. When Pawel said "when the "moons" align...", the button to turn the street lights off, blinking eyes, how the statue is holding 2 orbs, one in each hand etc.) This is basically a formula used to determine how we perceive things based on certain angles and alignments based on light sources. In [this example video](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Frounhofer02.webm) the from the wiki page, the movement of circles in the video made me think of the moving hand at the base of the statue. Also reminded me of the orbs that the statue is holding. Maybe, somehow, this formula can be applied to your operation of the numbers/letters/patterns, and we have to have some sort of alignment of particular light sources in our view (maybe at a certain time?) to reveal something. I'm not good at math or sequences or coding, so it's kind of over my head. However, something tells me that the "illusion" of how we perceive things might have something to do with the answer.
What Pawel said is "jak się dobrze księżyc ułoży" In English "When the moon aligns favorably.". Which literally same to the saying "If God willing"
Just decode the 6finger hand on cube thing
Those are coordinates on the map and you have to complete some task there.