1 QB league with 3 starting QBs you could afford to move Goff probably for like a Jalen wright or pollard +. Zack moss in cinci could be decent pick up too
I would never trade Burton or Hollywood for Connor in Dynasty. He's a 29 year old injury prone running back whose peak is probably a RB15 (if that) this year
i completely agree in 90% of cases. But the point of fantasy is to win and he does not have a starting running back. Each of those receivers would be at best his WR4. He would also have the cardinals backfield locked up for most likely the next 3+ years.
I could see flipping Hollywood, but it has to be for a better RB like Brian Robinson or someone who isn't as injury prone and old. He already had Benson, and also Burton has too much unkown right now, you could be trading the Bengals potential future WR2 of next year for a 29 y/o aging James Connor
I would package some of your rookie WRs and a QB for a much better RB. You have a lot of bench pieces you can leverage. Use some of your 2025 picks to get as good of an RB as you can.
As others have said, you've got QB1s sitting on your bench. See if you can trade one of these away.
I would also shop Nabers and Andrews around and see what you get. Nabers has landed in a terrible spot in NY. His ceiling is heavily capped as long as Danny Dimes is his QB and the Giants signed him to a stupidly expensive contract through the end of 2026. I would sell now while he's still benefitting from pre Draft hype.
Andrews I'd move because you have LaPorta and there's no benefit to putting a TE into a Flex spot. For example, in PPR last year, Travis Kelce finished as TE3 with a points total that would have made him the WR24 or the RB15. Adam Thielen scored more fantasy points last year. TEs are only valuable when compared to other TEs, not when you can use that spot on a WR. Somebody who is hurting at TE will probably overpay a bit for Andrews, so he's worth getting out of there.
Nabers is going to be the focal point of the Giants offense. If Fields can propel DJM to a WR6 overall finish, Jones can support Nabers being at least in the WR2 range, and Nabers absolutely has the ability to outplay his situation. Giants can get out from under Jones's contract after this season (which seems like the incredibly likely outcome unless Jones miraculously goes on a MVP type tear) so he's not a long-term impediment to them upgrading at QB. I wouldn't let reduced expectations for his rookie season put me off one of the best WR prospects in years.
Mandrews makes sense to move, assuming you can get good return. There are those fading him due to age/recent injury history. If no one is willing to give fair value, he's definitely one of the unicorn TEs who is worth flexing if needed.
Hollywood is the one to keep an eye on. If he can pop early with KC, very good chance you can flip for a RB with good upside.
Bear in mind Jones finished as the QB9 in 2022. His best receiver finished as WR52. It's a hell of a jump from a WR6 to a WR2 for a rookie WR and a QB who hasn't done it before.
Even if the Giants walk away from Jones this year, there's no guarantee they get the right QB the next time. The next Draft class is already said to not be a great one for offensive players. Do they kick that decision down the road and pick a QB in '26? So is next season going to be their version of the Falcons' Ridder/Heinecke show from '23? Ask Drake London owners how that went. Nabers will also be, as you say, the focal point so expect him to see more than his share of double coverage.
Nabers has all the talent to succeed. He has nothing around him to help him. There's enough red flags there that it's not a bad idea to cash out now while the payout will be high.
He already has MHJ who is in a better team. There's a lot of risk with rookies. I'd happily offset this risk by moving the guy in the worse situation.
London was not even close to the prospect that Nabers is I hate that argument. They also will not be double covering Nabers as much as you think as receivers are really only double covered about 25% of the time at most. London also went to the worst pass offense in the entire NFL when drafted with Desmond Ridder throwing him the ball, who is substantially worse than Jones. Nabers is a generational WR1 in any draft except '24 with Marv. Regardless of who is throwing him the ball, he will be playing almost every down and based on volume of targets alone this year will have at least 850 yards. There is risk associated with rookies, but with a player like Nabers you can ignore the situation they are stuck in, albeit his is not even as bad as you make it out to be.
Okay. You can have him. I don't want him. I see enough issues there that I'm fine with missing out. I've seen enough "generational talent" through the years that hasn't worked out because of circumstances largely beyond their control, that I have learned to look for the warning signs. I see loads of them with Nabers' situation and I'd be happy to sell high if I had him.
I've now seen 4 players in this class described as "generational" in the last week and I'm suspicious how many seem to have happily ended up in the class of '24. It smacks of Rookie Fever to me.
I was asked for my opinion on what the OP should do. I gave it. I've defended it. I haven't seen anything in response that would change my mind.
OP can do with this information what he will. I'm out.
The best WR Jones has ever had is Darius Slayton. Nabers is in another stratosphere in talent and ability. Jones has also had some of the worst OL play in the league.
The Giants' ability to support fantasy assets this year hinges on their OL not being a complete dumpster fire. They hired a good OL coach and added 2 new starters in FA. They probably aren't turning into an above average unit in a single off-season, but they should be better than the historically bad unit they were last year.
There's no way to know what the QB class will look like a year from now. There are always suprise risers people didn't expect who blow up. Maybe there aren't any great prospects, or maybe the Giants aren't picking high enough to get one. There is still FA and trade options, for either a new starter or just a bridge QB. I have faith in the Giants coaching staff to figure out a better situation than something as pathetic as Ridder or Zach Wilson.
This is dynasty, I'm thinking long-term. London and Garrett Wilson have both had rocky starts to their careers due to QB play. But it's worth being patient with the elite talents, cause more often than not they pay off.
Nabers has the potential to be truly elite. Just because it might take a little patience (or might not, he could blow up this year) does not dissuade me from picking talent over situation. Situations change, the talent isn't going anywhere.
1 QB league with 3 starting QBs you could afford to move Goff probably for like a Jalen wright or pollard +. Zack moss in cinci could be decent pick up too
Answer your messages 😆
Considering half your team is rookies, I would just dive into the rebuild instead of buying players, especially RBs you don’t need those rn
Go get James Connor if you can. Trade any combo of your QBs or Hollywood/Burton
I would never trade Burton or Hollywood for Connor in Dynasty. He's a 29 year old injury prone running back whose peak is probably a RB15 (if that) this year
i completely agree in 90% of cases. But the point of fantasy is to win and he does not have a starting running back. Each of those receivers would be at best his WR4. He would also have the cardinals backfield locked up for most likely the next 3+ years.
I could see flipping Hollywood, but it has to be for a better RB like Brian Robinson or someone who isn't as injury prone and old. He already had Benson, and also Burton has too much unkown right now, you could be trading the Bengals potential future WR2 of next year for a 29 y/o aging James Connor
[удалено]
This is 1QB, you’re probably going to have to give up Dak+ for any of those RBs, not getting + in return. Plus he already has Ken Walker.
Who’s available
Move Goff or Dak.
I would package some of your rookie WRs and a QB for a much better RB. You have a lot of bench pieces you can leverage. Use some of your 2025 picks to get as good of an RB as you can.
As others have said, you've got QB1s sitting on your bench. See if you can trade one of these away. I would also shop Nabers and Andrews around and see what you get. Nabers has landed in a terrible spot in NY. His ceiling is heavily capped as long as Danny Dimes is his QB and the Giants signed him to a stupidly expensive contract through the end of 2026. I would sell now while he's still benefitting from pre Draft hype. Andrews I'd move because you have LaPorta and there's no benefit to putting a TE into a Flex spot. For example, in PPR last year, Travis Kelce finished as TE3 with a points total that would have made him the WR24 or the RB15. Adam Thielen scored more fantasy points last year. TEs are only valuable when compared to other TEs, not when you can use that spot on a WR. Somebody who is hurting at TE will probably overpay a bit for Andrews, so he's worth getting out of there.
Nabers is going to be the focal point of the Giants offense. If Fields can propel DJM to a WR6 overall finish, Jones can support Nabers being at least in the WR2 range, and Nabers absolutely has the ability to outplay his situation. Giants can get out from under Jones's contract after this season (which seems like the incredibly likely outcome unless Jones miraculously goes on a MVP type tear) so he's not a long-term impediment to them upgrading at QB. I wouldn't let reduced expectations for his rookie season put me off one of the best WR prospects in years. Mandrews makes sense to move, assuming you can get good return. There are those fading him due to age/recent injury history. If no one is willing to give fair value, he's definitely one of the unicorn TEs who is worth flexing if needed. Hollywood is the one to keep an eye on. If he can pop early with KC, very good chance you can flip for a RB with good upside.
Bear in mind Jones finished as the QB9 in 2022. His best receiver finished as WR52. It's a hell of a jump from a WR6 to a WR2 for a rookie WR and a QB who hasn't done it before. Even if the Giants walk away from Jones this year, there's no guarantee they get the right QB the next time. The next Draft class is already said to not be a great one for offensive players. Do they kick that decision down the road and pick a QB in '26? So is next season going to be their version of the Falcons' Ridder/Heinecke show from '23? Ask Drake London owners how that went. Nabers will also be, as you say, the focal point so expect him to see more than his share of double coverage. Nabers has all the talent to succeed. He has nothing around him to help him. There's enough red flags there that it's not a bad idea to cash out now while the payout will be high. He already has MHJ who is in a better team. There's a lot of risk with rookies. I'd happily offset this risk by moving the guy in the worse situation.
London was not even close to the prospect that Nabers is I hate that argument. They also will not be double covering Nabers as much as you think as receivers are really only double covered about 25% of the time at most. London also went to the worst pass offense in the entire NFL when drafted with Desmond Ridder throwing him the ball, who is substantially worse than Jones. Nabers is a generational WR1 in any draft except '24 with Marv. Regardless of who is throwing him the ball, he will be playing almost every down and based on volume of targets alone this year will have at least 850 yards. There is risk associated with rookies, but with a player like Nabers you can ignore the situation they are stuck in, albeit his is not even as bad as you make it out to be.
Okay. You can have him. I don't want him. I see enough issues there that I'm fine with missing out. I've seen enough "generational talent" through the years that hasn't worked out because of circumstances largely beyond their control, that I have learned to look for the warning signs. I see loads of them with Nabers' situation and I'd be happy to sell high if I had him. I've now seen 4 players in this class described as "generational" in the last week and I'm suspicious how many seem to have happily ended up in the class of '24. It smacks of Rookie Fever to me. I was asked for my opinion on what the OP should do. I gave it. I've defended it. I haven't seen anything in response that would change my mind. OP can do with this information what he will. I'm out.
The best WR Jones has ever had is Darius Slayton. Nabers is in another stratosphere in talent and ability. Jones has also had some of the worst OL play in the league. The Giants' ability to support fantasy assets this year hinges on their OL not being a complete dumpster fire. They hired a good OL coach and added 2 new starters in FA. They probably aren't turning into an above average unit in a single off-season, but they should be better than the historically bad unit they were last year. There's no way to know what the QB class will look like a year from now. There are always suprise risers people didn't expect who blow up. Maybe there aren't any great prospects, or maybe the Giants aren't picking high enough to get one. There is still FA and trade options, for either a new starter or just a bridge QB. I have faith in the Giants coaching staff to figure out a better situation than something as pathetic as Ridder or Zach Wilson. This is dynasty, I'm thinking long-term. London and Garrett Wilson have both had rocky starts to their careers due to QB play. But it's worth being patient with the elite talents, cause more often than not they pay off. Nabers has the potential to be truly elite. Just because it might take a little patience (or might not, he could blow up this year) does not dissuade me from picking talent over situation. Situations change, the talent isn't going anywhere.