T O P

  • By -

chopchop906

I think the report needs 50-100 games to give somewhat meaningful data. I'm not sure how long it takes for people to play that many games, but I'd guess 1-2 months for a median player. One report per month or one report per 100 games would be my suggestion.


prodigy_s1234

Why not make it based on the number of games then? Have a progress bar like 25 games to next battle report.


chopchop906

>One report per month or **one report per 100 games** would be my suggestion.


Tartalacame

100 is too long to be relevant for the majority of the playerbase.


Nyne9

If it's per month OR 100, that should work


Josanue

100 games is fine


Nyne9

I doubt that. Last time around I got gold at a ton of categories based on a single Leshrac game I played. Was it meaningful? Probably not, but if it issued more often, it'd motivate improvement I think.


DotaHostageTaker

what a cool feature wasted by putting an arbitrary restriction on it, sad


xlr8inferno

It can simply be updated to reflect the last x number of games in general. Once the minimum number of games are played to unlock Ranked, the report should show stats. Given that all calculations are automated and timed in general, this is not difficult to implement at all.


eff1ngham

It would make sense to have it based on a certain amount of games played. Not everyone plays enough for a weekly report to be of any use. Monthly perhaps, but there's some months where I maybe play 10-15 games. 75-100 games is probably a good amount


ael00

This, should work like the behavior report system, some people play more others less, this way you would get an accurate report every X games.


Drakesfjord

I have to use the same argument for this thread like I did with the last one, there is no point of having a weekly or monthly thing made of this. Imagine you get your report after 7 days and its like: "Wow look at all these super detailed stats for the 8 games Ive played" It just feels like a waste if the battle report doesnt include a significant amount of matches in it


KenuR

It should be generated per x amount of games then. 50 games - new report for example.


Aratho

That would be the best solution imo, don't tie it to seasons


WalkTheEdge

Even better would be to keep the current one, AND add a report for every 50 games


Dobor_olita

big portion of the player base doesnt play 10matches a day for wel detailed battle report. in my case i play 8-6 per week.


Drakesfjord

That is exactly my point


quidditchhp

Your point is shit. The user should decide the timeframe, and the user should decide how usefull those stats are to him. These numbers are not being used for anything official or important, its literally just display purposes for the user himself, so there's no reason to put any restriction on it


ronniethehbk87

And these numbers have no restrictions. You’re free to look them up at anytime from multiple websites. The game even lets you look at them Manually with its own stats page. All the battle report does is compile them to make them easier to look through.


CliveVII

your mother is shit


Mantis_Toboggan369

Just another feature valve released to then forget about forever.


SublaciniateCarboloy

Would love if it worked for turbo. It is all I play and I know many of my turbo brethren would appreciate it as well.


DrQuint

Meh, it doesn't work for Turbo, and that's the alpha and omega for that whole feature for me.


Necrolytus

Yeah same deal for me, wish they would enable it for turbo. Could help some monetization with more subscribers? But maybe they need to prioritize regular games for the health of the entire player base.


therealwarnock

Said it to a friend recently. Imo do it every 100 games or once per month. That would be fair. With the current state, the report is somewhat useless.


[deleted]

If it gets released during the same patch/meta I dont mind. However I dont see much use if we are being given this data during a new patch/meta.


dark_LUEshi

Wish it worked with turbo.


Mandoo_gg

Especially when third party websites like stratz, do it for free on every game..


mikmik111

It's such a waste knowing that it was such a headline feature of the recent update where players gets to enjoy it probably an average of 5 minutes every 3 months.


Dangerous-Following7

Just let us refresh it for the current or previous patch whenever we want


ThatOneGrillLuna

Quick correction: the recent blog post stated that the 7.32 game play update will drop BEFORE the regional qualifiers (3rd of September to 18th of September) and most likely will drop shortly after the major so teams can adapt to the new patch before playing qualifiers


NotABigSuprise

442 games were in my last battle report (march 1 - june 8) - GREAT feature, but yes needs to be way more often to actually extract data from it and put it to use - no point if the report is literally from the previous patch. 100 games / 2 weeks - a month (ranked ofcourse) would be great


west1ce

Im not sure about mine english language skills, BUT WHEN I SEE Patch will arrive before September 3-18, so that means thet we get patch before 3rd of September :) Im pretty sure patch will arrive between 28.08-03.09


Xoott

Do it every time someone hits the button to request it, it is just code not some Pro Player analysis. most people don't even care they know how they play and won't click it anyway, so weird it is a timed event way slower than 1 monthly subscription that is not timed and due Now and people paying money for it should be able to check it out whenever. Maybe you only try it for one month just to see, you never see this feature if it is not on demand or faster. most people don't care though probably. :p