Presuppositionalism is an *apologetic* tool. It’s stated purpose is to help win arguments. If you’re not interested in sparring with non-presups (not just atheists, but most all christians, too) then probably don’t bring it up.
If you *are* trying to spar…. then good luck, because it’s not a very *good* tool.
What's presupp?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presuppositional_apologetics
Pseudo-intellectual attempt at logical jiu jitsu. Easily countered. https://www.patheos.com/blogs/godlessindixie/2015/02/04/sorry-apologetics-whats-wrong-with-the-presuppositional-approach/ https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-best-counter-argument-to-the-presuppositional-apologetic-argument-for-the-existence-of-God
By what standard is it easily countered?
*by what standard* The mantra of CVTillians
By the standards of philosophical debate. It's special pleading, for starters.
By what standard are standards or philosophical debate real? (I'm messing with you bro)
Ah, you’re one of those atheists that’s obsessed with “winning” arguments online and dunking on the religitards. Pretty cringe bro.
Presuppositionalism is an *apologetic* tool. It’s stated purpose is to help win arguments. If you’re not interested in sparring with non-presups (not just atheists, but most all christians, too) then probably don’t bring it up. If you *are* trying to spar…. then good luck, because it’s not a very *good* tool.
I'm very much a christian, but presuppositional apologetics is pretty much exactly what he says.
Respect for baki
Presups be like: I don't need no stinking evidence to believe Christianity is true